Bonum Certa Men Certa

List of FSFE Resignations and Expulsions

Reprinted with permission from the Free Software Fellowship

Despite constant rumours and gossip, nobody has actually been expelled from FSFE e.V. in recent times.



At least seven significant figures and over 100 Fellows have resigned from various posts:





The last two FSFE e.V. members resigned immediately after the 2019 annual meeting decided to pursue a vendetta against the former fellowship representative.



These resignations don't reflect any wrongdoing on the part of the members who have departed, they reflect the fact FSFE e.V. itself is being consumed by foolish vendettas.



President Kirschner, like the current occupant of the White House, finds himself surrounded by people who won't question his immature antics. Is that the foundation of a strong and credible organization?



Resignation of Hugo Roy



From: Hugo Roy <hugo@fsfe.org <mailto:hugo@fsfe.org>>
To: mk@fsfe.org <mailto:mk@fsfe.org>
Cc: ga@lists.fsfe.org <mailto:ga@lists.fsfe.org>
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 21:41:57 +0200
Subject: [GA] Withdrawal from the association


Dear Matthias,

I write to you, in your role as President of the Free Software Foundation e.V., to declare my withdrawal from the association, effective today.

Dear members,

I have reached a point in my involvement, where I have decided it is time to move on. This decision reflects the reality that both people and organizations change in their priorities.

In terms of free software, I will continue to apply myself, but I have to find new partners.

Kind regards,

Hugo Roy


Resignation of Shaun Coughlan



From: Shane Martin Coughlan <shane@opendawn.com <mailto:shane@opendawn.com>>
To: Matthias Kirschner <mk@fsfe.org <mailto:mk@fsfe.org>>
Cc: FSFE Legal Team <legal@lists.fsfe.org <mailto:legal@lists.fsfe.org>>,
FSFE General Assembly <ga@lists.fsfe.org <mailto:ga@lists.fsfe.org>>,
FSFE Team <team@fsfeurope.org <mailto:team@fsfeurope.org>>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 19:59:37 +0900
Subject: [GA] Withdrawal from the association


Dear Matthias

I am writing to you, in your role as President of the Free Software Foundation e.V., to declare my withdrawal from the association, FSFE team and FSFE legal team, effective today.

Dear GA Members, Members of FSFE Team, FSFE Legal Team

After 12 years in the General Assembly of FSFE, and 13 in FSFE team and the FSFE legal team, I have decided it is time to move on. This decision reflects the reality that both people and organizations change in their priorities and their application of scarce resources such as time.

In terms of open access and open technology, I will continue to apply myself activities such as the OpenChain Project and spaces of shared knowledge such as the Legal Network and the Asian Legal Network.

I can be contacted, as always, at shane@opendawn.com <mailto:shane@opendawn.com>

Regards

Shane


Resignation of Armijn Hemel



Subject: [Legal Team] leaving FSFE's legal team
From: Armijn Hemel - Tjaldur Software Governance Solutions <armijn@tjaldur.nl>
To: legal@lists.fsfe.org <legal@lists.fsfe.org>
CC: ga@lists.fsfe.org
hello all,

I have decided to leave FSFE's legal team after almost 12 years. This was not an easy decision to make and it has actually been on my mind for many many months.

My frustration with FSFE has been growing for the last number of years. When the new leadership team came on board it was to be expected that some things would change but unfortunately it was not the change I had hoped for. While there are many things that have contributed to my decision there are a few core issues that are central. I am going to explain these and hope that FSFE's leadership will (finally) listen and take action.

* Decreased engagement of the legal team

Where before the legal team would be consulted for its opinion prior to decisions regarding the legal strategy of FSFE or other issues affecting the legal team it now seems that the legal team is merely informed of the decisions made by FSFE's management. This has had profound effects on the motivation of the legal team. While before there used to be a flurry of activity this is no longer the case, and there are very few conversations about real legal issues or discussions about legal questions, and so on.

* Decreased visibility in the outside world regarding legal issues and policy, no vision and forgetting about core goals

In the years prior to current management there was quite a bit of work being done to collaborate with Brussels and international business communities. This seems to have completely fallen to the side. Instead FSFE seems to focus much more on short term goals like campaigns, which will create a bit of press for a short time before moving on to the next campaign. While campaigns are good they are short term and have limited value without long term follow up. This part is missing.

There is no long term vision ("what do we want to achieve with FSFE in the next 5 years?"), there are no ties being forged in the political arena (apart from fringe parties like the Pirate Party or the Green Party, which contributes to being ignored by others), and core goals seem to be forgotten. Instead of working towards strengthening free software's position in Europe and shaping how free software is perceived (both I would consider core goals) the focus has shifted to goals like gender diversity. While these goals are worthy they seem to have replaced (instead of augmented) FSFE's original objective and I don't think this is the right way forward.

* No knowledge being institutionalized

Knowledge about people, events, and political sensitivities, etc. is not institutionalized. Several times when talking to the president and legal coordinator about topics I became aware that we had already discussed these matters before. However the information was treated as new to the other party. Looking through my notes and e-mail archives later, and talking to other people on the legal team, I confirmed that these topics had indeed been covered already (one example was NIPA from Korea).

Additionally, the executive team and staff seem to be unwilling to learn about the people and organizations active in the field (who is who, what are their goals and motivations, where is their place in the hierarchy and so on), despite being nudged repeatedly to be aware and engaged by several people including me. Without this information it is very difficult to operate effectively.

* Bad organizational management

FSFE feels like it is reverting back to being run like a student union, whereas in the past people tried to make it more professional. FSFE's management makes very basic and unnecessary mistakes unworthy of an organization trying to have global influence. This is hurting FSFE. Even though this has been addressed a few times (by some, including myself) nothing seems to be done to rectify these mistakes. A few cases that I am aware of:

- everyone taking leave at the same time (post-FOSDEM), meaning the office grinds to a halt

- stakeholders not being alerted to key people being absent

- e-mails from potential sponsors getting stuck in mailinglist queues for a long time because everyone is on leave at the same time

- e-mails about legal cases (France) getting stuck in a mailinglist queue for a long time because there is no monitoring

- virtual machines not up and running because of lack of monitoring

and so on. I do not want to discuss these cases individually, but what is clear is that there is a pattern: the organizational infrastructure is fragile, there are no fall backs in place and where they are in place they are not working.

* No improvements/personal attacks

None of the issues mentioned above are new (and if they are, then QED) and have been mentioned before. What I have noticed when issues are mentioned is that either one of these three things happens:

- they fall on deaf ears

- they are acknowledged and then ignored

- FSFE gets very defensive, or launches personal attacks. The most glaring case was when the vice-president recently came barging in and arrogantly threw insults left and right without understanding any of the background of the situation, and launched a vicious personal attack on two of the previous legal coordinators.

All these things combined have tipped the scales and now the negative far outweighs the positive (because there is very little positive left in my opinion). I no longer feel that FSFE is the right place for me, or that it is advancing free software in Europe (especially the legal field) and it is better to focus my energy somewhere else where I can have a more positive impact.

Have I been perfect myself? Of course I haven't and I am very aware of where and when I screwed up. But the difference is that I try to learn from it and prevent the mistakes from happening again.

As the next step I will unsubscribe from the mailing list (I will stay on the legal network).

Good luck FSFE, as you will need it.

armijn

-- Armijn Hemel, MSc Tjaldur Software Governance Solutions

Recent Techrights' Posts

Nat Friedman Had Left Microsoft GitHub Exactly One Week Before Matthew Garrett Sent His First SLAPP (Which Was an Empty Threat, He Was Abusing the Legal System of Another Continent to Terrorise Critics Who Had Just Unearthed Major Microsoft Scandals)
And it was likely talked about by his lawyers around the exact same time Nat Friedman was packing up
 
Links 05/06/2025: First US Spacewalk 60 Years Ago, GNU Octave 10.2.0 is Out
Links for the day
Scandinavia Saying Goodbye to Microsoft
The Danes have had enough of Microsoft
GNU/Linux Measured at 6% in Bangladesh, According to statCounter
Windows isn't growing, it's going away
Gemini Links 05/06/2025: Loop Earplugs Review and ANS Forth
Links for the day
Armenian Adoption of GNU/Linux
Russian influence in Armenian must be worrying to Microsoft
Abuse Inside the Polish Patent Office (UPRP) - Part II: Turning a Once-Respected Patent Office Into a Circus and Laughing Stock
It's not legal, but administrators who don't care about the law and don't fear the law would just go ahead and turn things to junk
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, June 04, 2025
IRC logs for Wednesday, June 04, 2025
Slopwatch: Mindless Slop Pieces, Fake Images and Text, Linux FUD on the Cheap
spewed out by Microsoft-controlled LLMs
Links 04/06/2025: Workers' Strikes, Sudan Exodus
Links for the day
Links 04/06/2025: Linux Foundation PR Spam and Lee Jae-myung Wins Election
Links for the day
Gemini Links 04/06/2025: Future Leaders of the World and Platforming Jordan Peterson
Links for the day
Links 04/06/2025: WSL Backfiring on Microsoft and "Disney, Microsoft Announce Massive Layoffs"
Links for the day
Our Case is a Very Easy Win, the SLAPPs From Microsofters Were a Grave Error, and Censoring Information Won't Work (It'll Only Ever Backfire)
Censoring is what people do when they lose the argument
Say the Truth, the Rest Will Follow
There's no guarantee that writing the truth will result in an audience (or readership), but over time - in the long run - people generally gravitate towards what they know or feel to be crude truth, not just what's comforting (albeit false or self-deluding, usually groupthink dictated from above)
How to Expose High-Level Corruption Without Getting in (Too Much) Trouble
Democracy depends on free press and freedom of the press depends on being able to safely publish (and keep available) material that bad people don't want to be known to anybody
In-Depth EPO Coverage at Techrights Turns Eleven
11 years is a very long time
Windows Measured Below 10% in Afghanistan, GNU/Linux Gaining a Lot
about 80% are Android (Linux) users, compared to only about 10% for Windows
Poland's Political Predicament and Social Control Media
Democracy and fake "tech" don't mix well; the latter tends to interfere with the former and that's why we get more "Putins" out there
EPO: Taking Away From the Staff to Give More to the Rich
The Central Staff Committee (CSC) wrote to EPO staff earlier this week
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, June 03, 2025
IRC logs for Tuesday, June 03, 2025
Abuse Inside the Polish Patent Office (UPRP) - Part I: It's a Lot Like the EPO
we can commence a series soon
Gemini Links 04/06/2025: Inescapable Questions and Quitting All "Oligarch Tech"
Links for the day
Slopwatch: Linux FUD From Slopfarms, Blaming Linux for Microsoft Issues; Even WebProNews Has Become a Slopfarm (Googlebombing "Linux" With Slop Images and Fake/Plagiarised Text)
The Web is really getting bad; it's also overwhelmed by fake material or plagiarised material, wherein the plagiarism gets disguised/hidden by LLM sausage factories
Links 03/06/2025: Tiananmen Square Massacre Censorship and Growing Military Activities Around Taiwan
Links for the day
Linux is Already Dominant (Android), Let's Make GNU/Linux Dominant in Desktops/Laptops as Well
"Dr. Stallman recently warned everybody about Microsoft."
The Loyalty to Microsoft and the Salaries From Microsoft (Funding SLAPPs Against Techrights and Tux Machines)
Garrett always knows better. He knows everything best.
Windows Falls in Italy as GNU/Linux Jumps to 5%
Italy knows a thing or two about digital autonomy
Nigeria is All Android and Google
Windows down to almost nothing in Africa's largest population
Mass Layoffs at Microsoft (Second Wave) Not Limited to Redmond
"More layoffs at Microsoft as axe falls in Washington and California"
Gemini Links 03/06/2025: Forth System and "Common Lisp is a Dumpster"
Links for the day
The Leaks Were Right: Mass Layoffs at Microsoft in May, Then Another Wave in June
Just as we've been saying for over a month
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Monday, June 02, 2025
IRC logs for Monday, June 02, 2025