GGG Pot Calls the Kettle Black
"It means a situation in which somebody accuses someone else of a fault which the accuser shares, and therefore is an example of psychological projection, or hypocrisy. Use of the expression to discredit or deflect a claim of wrongdoing by attacking the originator of the claim for their own similar behaviour (rather than acknowledging the guilt of both) is the tu quoque logical fallacy." -The pot calling the kettle black
At this point we think GGG ("Restricted Boot" Garrett, "Microsoft Plagiarism" Graveley & "Gas The Jews" Lozza) may have just committed a breach and lied about numerous things; they never show up for their own hearings; the Court would be furious (of course we have saved verifiable, presentable evidence of this)
In a recent (still ongoing) series we explained that Lozza had committed perjury. The Court seems to have accordingly (de facto) banned Lozza. What about Lozza's collaborators?
Yesterday I alluded to recent abusive behavior by a law firm that had made it personal. The abuse in question seems to me like a breach or contempt of court. Months ago we covered 12 different grounds (we gave a detailed list) upon which they are themselves (based on my own verified assessment) in contempt of court even if it takes a lot of money for the Court to assess and affirm this. There's nothing "funny" about misusing the Court for PR stunts in social control media. However, it seems to have devolved into that.
Among alleged breaches, in the past we wrote about breaches of Civil Procedure Rules [1, 2] (as recently as this past July) and on numerous occasions in the past the hired guns shamelessly lied to the Court about our position. They keep trying to cheat or trick the Court based on misunderstandings and misconceptions (deliberate).
Sometimes it gets yet more blatant. Something more unique but not unprecedented happened some days ago. It was done by Garrett. (Not the first time he does this kind of thing)
Garrett has posted to social control media what theCcourt
distributed (as .docx) for the purpose of
draft/discussion but didn't seal or finalise until 3 days later.
I'm not sure he's allowed to do this, so I've asked around. We need
to discuss this in the open, I could in fact use readers' advice
too. Should we pursue an application to hold them accountable? It's
not cheap.
They seem to be doing the same in the Graveley case, e.g. bickering over the Post Office instead of the case and negligence (all the material was appropriately sent to the correct place and received properly). They keep lying to judges and to clerks.
To be clear, when talking about Garrett and Graveley we are talking about American men who did not attend hearings and there is no recording (footage or otherwise) of the latest hearing. In Garrett's case, he has repeatedly told lies about the hearing. He chose not to enter the courtroom and yet he has the audacity to publicly lecture people about what happened there based on hearsay from people he pays to tell him what he wants to hear; no wonder he fails to understand the outcome.
Some other time we'll tell the things they do behind the scenes aside from further extrajudicial threats. █
Image source: Coalman confronting a chimney sweep
.jpg){kind=link}