Microsoft Starts Suing Companies Over Patents
- Dr. Roy Schestowitz
- 2008-07-31 08:23:55 UTC
- Modified: 2008-07-31 08:25:09 UTC
Defensive schmifensive
Microsoft has found itself under more financial stress than ever before in recent years [1, 2]. Licensing company appears to be its vocation, just as some experts already predict. The following news is supporting evidence of this.
Microsoft said it has filed a complaint with the International Trade Commission after failing to be able to negotiate a licensing deal with Primax Electronics. In the complaint, Microsoft is seeking an order barring Primax from importing infringing products into the United States.
This is significant. It's quite a new thing for Microsoft to attack smaller companies using its questionable intellectual monopolies. Mr. Bishop has some
more details.
Microsoft also is expected to file suit in U.S. District Court, seeking damages.
The next time Microsoft sheds
crocodile tears, claiming it is the biggest victim of patents, bring up this development. Microsoft is among the attackers and it's clearly a part of this problem. It's aggressive enough to go as far as
an embargo. This is a monopolistic embargo and by no means the same as a
reactionary embargo to crime and abuse.
⬆
Comments
Saul Goode
2008-07-31 21:30:37
I don't think this development constitutes evidence of a change in MS policy. They remain reluctant to do anything (such as actually bringing suit) which might bring into question the viability of software patents. They might even prefer losing software patent infringement cases rather than lose having patents to threaten customers and to restrict competition from smaller upstart rivals -- what's a few hundred million in penalties if it lets you retain a stranglehold on an entire industry.
Roy Schestowitz
2008-07-31 21:44:32
Remember that some patent trolls can make a lot of money without ever going to court. How about Intellectual Ventures, which you can almost synonimise with a Microsoft spin-off? It pretends to be benevolent because it pressures (extorts), not sues.
Bark vs bite. Both are harmful.
twitter
2008-12-18 14:30:33
The only question now is whether this is the bite that proves the bark, or another sign of the M$ death spiral. Given the other evidence, I'd say death spiral. The confident monopolist of 10 years ago would never have bothered.
Roy Schestowitz
2008-12-18 14:34:59