Comments

• Jose_X

  2009-01-04 21:15:42

  It's interesting how the focus here is so consistent with and reinforcing of a path of monopolization ("never lose"). One might think that perhaps this is hyperbole or that it is an oversimplification and addressed to a small aggressive task force within Microsoft. One might be tempted to think that ethics would have been factored in there somewhere (instead of possibly factored out as suggested by the FUD box). One might think that no one is taking "never lose" seriously... but we have seen the result of Microsoft's march, principally through the software industry, and then through the various courtrooms or government offices.
  
  Never lose!

• G. Michaels

  2009-01-04 21:40:53

  C'mon now Roy, you didn't "expose" anything. James Plamodon (or someone claiming to be him) posted a comment on your blog, which you didn't even reply to, pointing you to his blog, and then used what he wrote on there to write up another "expose" with his articles and your recycled "evidence".
  
  Why do you insist on over-hyping everything you do?
  
  Note: writer of this comment adds absolutely nothing but stalking and personal attacks against readers, as documented here.