Bonum Certa Men Certa

2 Months and No Disclosure from the European Parliament

Budapest parliament



German parliament building at night



Summary: The illusion of transparency lingers on

THIS is the latest part in a series that explores Microsoft's invasion into EU panels and the Commission's unwillingness to allow transparency. To list previous posts chronologically (for context):



It has been two months and here is where we stand. They keep denying, procrastinating, and acting as though they don't understand simple requests. The latest correspondence (anonymised) is below.

I hereby file a confirmatory application on grounds of Article 7(4) EC/1049/2001.

> Dear Mr. Schestowitz, > > Thank you for your e-mail of the 20th of March registered on 23rd of March applying for a copy of documents in accordance with Regulation (EC) N€° 1049/2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents. > > Your application will be dealt with within the prescribed delays. You have requested access to the documents as follows: > > "I hereby request electronic access to all documents related to the Towards the European Software Strategy process in the posession of the EU-Commission, in particular access to the following documents: > * the list of participants in the industry expert group > * the list of WGs, WGs sleaders and observing Commission officials > * draft contributions of all industry Working groups on a the European Software Strategy > * draft input to all WG prepared by the Commission > * the participant list of the related meeting on January 20th in Brussels > * all submissions from industry to the ESS consultation under the applicable provisions of regulation 1049/2001 which grant me a right of access to all documents mentioned above." > > However, as we notified you previously (see our email dated 15th of April) we are unable to identify the documents refereed to in the sixth item "all submissions from industry to the ESS consultation". Please could you clarify your request so that we may continue to process this item. You have previously clarified item 4 on your list but not item 6. > > We are currently collecting the other requested documents and expect that we will be able to forward them to you shortly. > > Yours sincerely, > > [anonymised] > > -----Original Message----- > From: Roy Schestowitz [anonymised] > Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 5:47 PM > To: [anonymised] > Cc: s@schestowitz.com; [anonymised] > Subject: Re: Gestdem 2009/1562 FW: Document access application purpusant to Article 6 EC/1049/2001 (D/116606) > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > "Draft input to all WG prepared by the Commission" means the documents > the chairs of the working groups or participants received from the > Commission to guide the work in a particular group. > > > - -- > ~~ Best of wishes > > Roy S. Schestowitz > http://Schestowitz.com | GNU/Linux | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E > Freelance journalist @ http://itmanagement.earthweb.com/ > > >> Dear Mr. Schestowitz, >> >> Thank you for your e-mail of the 20th of March registered on 23rd of March applying for a copy of documents in accordance with Regulation (EC) N€° 1049/2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents. >> >> Your application will be dealt with within the prescribed delays. You have requested access to the documents as follows: >> >> "I hereby request electronic access to all documents related to the Towards the European Software Strategy process in the posession of the EU-Commission, in particular access to the following documents: >> * the list of participants in the industry expert group >> * the list of WGs, WGs sleaders and observing Commission officials >> * draft contributions of all industry Working groups on a the European Software Strategy >> * draft input to all WG prepared by the Commission >> * the participant list of the related meeting on January 20th in Brussels >> * all submissions from industry to the ESS consultation under the applicable provisions of regulation 1049/2001 which grant me a right of access to all documents mentioned above." >> >> However, we are unable to identify the documents refereed to in the fourth item "draft input to all WG prepared by the Commission" and the sixth item "all submissions from industry to the ESS consultation". Please could you clarify your request so that we may continue to process it. >> >> Yours sincerely, >> >> [anonymised]


They cannot deny access for much longer. This are already well overdue. According to the rules:

Article 7

Processing of initial applications

1. An application for access to a document shall be handled promptly. An acknowledgement of receipt shall be sent to the applicant. Within 15 working days from registration of the application, the institution shall either grant access to the document requested and provide access in accordance with Article 10 within that period or, in a written reply, state the reasons for the total or partial refusal and inform the applicant of his or her right to make a confirmatory application in accordance with paragraph 2 of this Article.

2. In the event of a total or partial refusal, the applicant may, within 15 working days of receiving the institution's reply, make a confirmatory application asking the institution to reconsider its position.

3. In exceptional cases, for example in the event of an application relating to a very long document or to a very large number of documents, the time-limit provided for in paragraph 1 may be extended by 15 working days, provided that the applicant is notified in advance and that detailed reasons are given.

4. Failure by the institution to reply within the prescribed time-limit shall entitle the applicant to make a confirmatory application.

Article 8

Processing of confirmatory applications

1. A confirmatory application shall be handled promptly. Within 15 working days from registration of such an application, the institution shall either grant access to the document requested and provide access in accordance with Article 10 within that period or, in a written reply, state the reasons for the total or partial refusal. In the event of a total or partial refusal, the institution shall inform the applicant of the remedies open to him or her, namely instituting court proceedings against the institution and/or making a complaint to the Ombudsman, under the conditions laid down in Articles 230 and 195 of the EC Treaty, respectively.

2. In exceptional cases, for example in the event of an application relating to a very long document or to a very large number of documents, the time limit provided for in paragraph 1 may be extended by 15 working days, provided that the applicant is notified in advance and that detailed reasons are given.

3. Failure by the institution to reply within the prescribed time limit shall be considered as a negative reply and entitle the applicant to institute court proceedings against the institution and/or make a complaint to the Ombudsman, under the relevant provisions of the EC Treaty.


They have no clue about the time limits of 1049/2001 and think they may discuss this ad nauseam. The process involving Ombudsman might be interesting.

On a related note, earlier today we were made aware of attempts in the UK to bring Free software to the government. Will the process be equally opaque?




UK citizens and MEPs support Europe-wide Free Software Pact



London, UK - Friday May 22, 2009 - The Free Software Pact initiative calls upon UK citizens and MEP candidates to stand up for the principles of a free society by backing free software in the upcoming European Parliament elections on June 4, 2009.



The Free Software Pact is a European initiative to allow candidates for the upcoming European elections to show the voting public that they favour the development and use of free software, and will protect it from threatening EU legislation. It is also a tool for citizens who value free software to educate candidates about it's importance and why they should, if elected, protect the European free software community. The European Parliament is the venue for crucial talks concerning free software, including software patents, interoperability and net neutrality. It is therefore vital to show election candidates why they should support, and sign, the Free Software Pact.



Mark Taylor, the coordinator for the Free Software Pact in the UK, said, The current UK Government is embarrassingly behind the rest of Europe in formulating public policy on the use of free software. Across the rest of the continent we see significant adoption and political support for free software. The Free software Pact is therefore an ideal way to draw attention to the reform the UK public sector needs and the enormous cost savings yet to be realized. For too long the UK has been dependent on the relationship with proprietary software companies like Microsoft, who are hell-bent on keeping our politicians confused on this matter. If you care about this situation, and the resulting cost to our economy, society and political culture, please contact the MEP candidates in your region and ask them to sign the Free Software Pact.



The Free Software Pact is also supported by Richard M. Stallman, founder and president of the Free Software Foundation, who said, Big dangers threaten the freedoms of free software in Europe: software patents, digital restrictions management (DRM), bundled sales and treacherous computing... I call on all European citizens who value free software to join this campaign, contact their candidates and have them sign the Free Software Pact.



A list of UK MEP candidates and their contact details can be found at http://www.bond.org.uk/pages/mep-candidate-contact-details.html. Candidates can support the Free Software Pact by signing a copy of the pact and faxing, mailing or emailing a copy by following the instructions at http://www.freesoftwarepact.eu/post/The-Free-Software-Pact.



About The Free Software pact



The Free Software Pact (FSP) is a citizen initiative, launched by Free Software advocacy associations April (France, http://www.april.org) and Associazione per il software libero (Italy, http://www.softwarelibero.it), to coordinate a European scale campaign in favour of free software. The FSP is providing materials and software to any volunteer who contributes to the initiative. More information can be found at their website http://www.freesoftwarepact.eu.



Media Contacts



Mark Taylor, UK Coordinator for the Free Software Pact



Phone: +44 7967 687379



Email: contact-uk@freesoftwarepact.eu



London - Big Ben

Recent Techrights' Posts

Inclusion of Dissent and Diversity of Views (Opinions, Interpretations, Scenarios)
Stand for freedom of expression as much as you insist on software freedom
Jonathan Cohen, Charles Fussell & Debian embezzlement
Reprinted with permission from disguised.work
GNU/Linux Continues to Get More Prevalent Worldwide (Also on the Desktop)
Desktops (or laptops) aren't everything, but...
 
Bad faith: Debian logo and theme use authorized
Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
Links 17/04/2024: TikTok Killing Youth, More Layoff Rounds
Links for the day
Jack Wallen Has Been Assigned by ZDNet to Write Fake (Sponsored) 'Reviews'
Wallen is selling out. Shilling for the corporations, not the community.
Links 17/04/2024: SAP, Kwalee, and Take-Two Layoffs
Links for the day
IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, April 16, 2024
IRC logs for Tuesday, April 16, 2024
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
Examining Code of Conduct violations
Reprinted with permission from the Free Software Fellowship
Ruben Schade's Story Shows the Toxicity of Social Control Media, Not GNU/Linux
The issue here is Social Control Media [sic], which unlike the media rewards people for brigading otherwise OK or reasonable people
Upgrading IRCd
We use the latest Debian BTW
The Free Software Community is Under Attack (Waged Mostly by Lawyers, Not Developers)
Licensing and legalese may seem "boring" or "complicated" (depending on where one stands w.r.t. development), but it matters a great deal
Grasping at Straws in IBM (Red Hat Layoff Rumours in 2024)
researching rumours around Red Hat layoffs
Who is a real Debian Developer?
Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
Links 16/04/2024: Many More Layoffs, Broadcom/VMware Probed (Antitrust)
Links for the day
Links 16/04/2024: Second Sunday After Easter and "Re-inventing the Wheel"
Links for the day
Upcoming Themes and Articles in Techrights
we expect to have already caught up with most of the administrivia and hopefully we'll be back to the prior pace some time later this week
Links 16/04/2024: Levente "anthraxx" Polyák as Arch Linux 2024 Leader, openSUSE Leap Micro 6 Now Alpha, Facebook Blocking News
Links for the day
Where is the copyright notice and license for Debian GNU/Linux itself?
Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
Halász Dávid & IBM Red Hat, OSCAL, Albania dating
Reprinted with permission from the Free Software Fellowship
Apology & Correction: Daniele Scasciafratte & Mozilla, OSCAL, Albania dating
Reprinted with permission from the Free Software Fellowship
Next Week Marks a Year Since Red Hat Mass Layoffs, Another Round Would be "Consistent With Other Layoffs at IBM."
"From anon: Global D&I team has been cut in half."
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Monday, April 15, 2024
IRC logs for Monday, April 15, 2024
Links 15/04/2024: Navartis, AWS and Tesla Layoffs
Links for the day
Gemini Links 15/04/2024: YAML Issues and Gemtext Specification 0.24.0
Links for the day
Richard Stallman to Give Public Talk in Portugal on Wednesday
new addition to his page
Richard Stallman's Hair Has Grown Back and He Does Not Talk About Cancer
May he live a long and happy life
New Video of Richard Stallman's Talk in Italy (Delivered a Week Ago)
a working copy of the video
Microsoft Windows Falling to New Lows in the United Kingdom and Worldwide
What's noteworthy here is that there's no sign at all of a Windows rebound
[Meme] Quantity of European Patents
they've rigged the system to make more money
Why do free software organizations eliminate community representatives?
Reprinted with permission from the Free Software Fellowship
[Teaser] Freenode LTD: What Happened
Upcoming series based on insiders' account with evidence
Links 15/04/2024: Signs of Desperation at Microsoft and Tesla Employees Brace for Mass Layoffs (Update: Yes, Over 10% at Tesla Laid Off)
Links for the day
Matthias Kirschner & FSFE People Trafficking, coercion of volunteers
Reprinted with permission from the Free Software Fellowship
Gemini Links 15/04/2024: Profectus Alpha 0.4 and RPG of One Capsule Progress
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Sunday, April 14, 2024
IRC logs for Sunday, April 14, 2024
Oceania: GNU/Linux Measured at Lower Than the International Average (4% or 7% Including ChromeOS)
statCounter's data
Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (HRTO) Does Not Wish to Become an Instrument of Cost-Free Harassment or 'Cheap Revenge', It Says "Justice is Not Free. Quite the Contrary. Justice is Expensive."
Long story short, there is no lawsuit, there is a just a hateful, lying idiot abusing "the system" (which this idiot rejects entirely)