EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

03.16.07

FUD for Thought: What If Microsoft Bought Novell?

Posted in GNU/Linux, GPL, Law, Microsoft, Novell at 11:36 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Free Software Magazine raises an interesting question which probably results from speculations about acquisition costs. Could Microsoft ever pay to hijack Novell’s agenda, rather than just control and abuse it by proxy?

Did Novell really believe the agreement would result in increased Linux revenue (to what it would have been)? Do they really think interoperability with Microsoft will be improved? Or have I simply got the wrong end of the stick? The person of wisdom whom I asked put a different perspective on it.

If Microsoft ever truly considered a hostile/friendly takeover, would it inherit GNU/Linux software? Despite the existence of so-called ‘peacemakers’, to whom disregard of the GPL seems acceptable, the deal is unlikely to last, at least in its present form. OSTG has a new article on the Novell deal and its effect on GPLv3 (namely the continuing delays). It is becoming apparent that Novell will see screws tightened on software which it relies on.

Although the FSF soon judged the agreement technically legal under the current version of the GPL, Eben Moglen, general counsel for the FSF and the principal legal architect for GPLv3, is quoted as saying, “Our strategy is to use GPLv3 against the deal.”

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

4 Comments

  1. gpl1 said,

    March 17, 2007 at 1:14 am

    Gravatar

    very interesting. I hadn’t thought that MS had thrown a wrench purposely into the GPL3 before, but now it seems so. The “unintended consequences” that Eben Moglen mentions

    BTW very sad to see so many commenters on Linux.com against the gpl3, which is as many have said, a bug fix for the four freedoms that the GPLv2 was supposed to provide (trusted computing/tivo drm, and more recently, patent licensing shenanigins). Stop talking about the smoke shield of “interoperability”, and comment on the ROYALTIES MS receives from Suse off the backs of GPL coders from other companies and coders, as well as the limited patent “covenant not to sue” that goes against the spirit of the GPL2. Otherwise, I will simply take it as propoganda by a poster paid to confuse the issue.

    How many of these companies now benefiting from GPL’d code would have said the GPLv2 would have never worked? Is Red Hat really happy that Novell gets to use patent protections against them for their own customers (instead of licensing for all GPL users) and that Microsoft gets royalties from gpl’d software?

  2. Draconishinobi said,

    March 17, 2007 at 11:17 pm

    Gravatar

    I hear Linus is very very very much against the GPLv3 …

    http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2007/03/in_search_of_gp.html

    “In the meantime, Linux kernel author, Linus Torvalds, weighed in with a thoughtful critique of GPLv3 versus GPLv2, some of which is recounted here. The Web master of a sister publication had been forced to remove an earlier Torvalds commentary on GPLv3, he says, because it was laced with so many swear words that it violated the site’s posting policy.”

    I wonder how all this will turn out. Is the GPLv2 enough to stop M$ from destroying Linux ? Can M$ destroy Linux ? Or maybe corrupt it beyond recognition ? Maybe now the development of the Hurd kernel will proceed a bit faster ?

    I suppose Linus may be right about more politics being embedded in GPLv3, politics that he doesn’t agree with … still I think GPLv3 covers loopholes left open in GPLv2 that companies like M$ can take advantage of for personal gain.

  3. Roy Schestowitz said,

    March 17, 2007 at 11:51 pm

    Gravatar

    As Shane suggested before, they ought to make a GPLv2.1 — a licence that leaves Novell out in the cold through slight ‘patches’ to GPLv2. Whether Linus wants Novell out of his house or not, who knows? He never said a thing. Stuart Cohen of the OSDL weighed in and got in trouble.

  4. shane said,

    March 18, 2007 at 8:53 am

    Gravatar

    Remember, Novell is working from within the GPL drafting committee B to ensure that they can keep their MS deal and still comply with the GPL3.

    Here’s an article talking about the GPL3 drafting process, what FSF is trying to accomplish, and how obtuse the language must be – it doesn’t look good, GPL3 is just going to introduce new loopholes and may not effectively fix the old ones.

    Patch GPL2, leaving known security holes in a product in order to force an upgrade to a new product that has features I may not want or need, that’s Microsoft’s strategy.

What Else is New


  1. Links 21/2/2020: EasyOS 2.2.11 Released, Microsoft's Control of the Linux Foundation Increases and More Binary Blobs Arrive

    Links for the day



  2. IRC Proceedings: Thursday, February 20, 2020

    IRC logs for Thursday, February 20, 2020



  3. Video: LinuxWorld 1999, Torvalds and Stallman

    LinuxWorld 1999, Torvalds and Stallman



  4. GNU World Order is a Personal Sacrifice, LinuxWorld Just Business

    As the Linux Foundation shows, Linux is just business (and proprietary software) as usual, software patents included, whereas it’s GNU that continues the Free Software Movement’s battles



  5. Links 20/2/2020: Oracle Solaris 11.4 SRU18, Mesa 20, VirtualBox 6.1.4

    Links for the day



  6. Open Source Did Not Win, It Was Assimilated to and by Proprietary Software

    Don’t fall for the whole “Open Source has won!” spiel; You know we’ve lost the battle (and were in effect gradually conquered) at OSI and elsewhere when those who speak for the OSI are Michael Cheng (Facebook), Max Sills (Google), and Chris Aniszczyk (Linux Foundation); they say “Open Source Under Attack” (FOSDEM talk) but their employers are the ones attacking and they downplay openwashing



  7. Former Microsoft Employees Don't Like Talking About Past and Present Microsoft Back Doors (Designed for Spy Agencies)

    In a typical Microsoftian fashion, once they cannot defend the illusion/delusion that Microsoft values security the 'Softers' run away and block any further debate



  8. Techrights Warns Against Impending Extradition Efforts (Passage of Julian Assange to His Death in the United States)

    Imprisonment of journalists who are effective at exposing crimes (of the powerful, not petty crimes) must never be condoned



  9. Team UPC: Many Mouths and No Ears

    The mental condition of Team UPC gets more worrisome by the week



  10. Team UPC Insults Judges Because the UPC is Dead and UPC Lobbyists Have Nothing Left to Lose

    More judge-shaming tactics are in the mix; Team UPC seems to feel like there's nothing left to lose as the UPC is already dead (hope itself is next to die)



  11. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, February 19, 2020

    IRC logs for Wednesday, February 19, 2020



  12. China Bashing is Grounded in Fear (That They Can Simply Do Better Than the West)

    The atmosphere of hate towards China — fuelled partly by a white supremacist in the White House — is unhelpful and insulting; dignity and understanding is the way to go



  13. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, February 18, 2020

    IRC logs for Tuesday, February 18, 2020



  14. FFII Press Release: Germany Can No Longer Ratify the Unitary Patent Due to Brexit and the Established AETR Case-law, says FFII

    Germany cannot ratify the current Unitary Patent due to Brexit and the established AETR case-law. The ratification of the UPC (Unified Patent Court) by Germany would constitute a violation of the AETR case-law, which was used during the EPLA negotiations in 2006 to consider a deal with non-EU countries, such as Switzerland.



  15. DRM (Proprietary Software) Already Makes Mozilla Firefox Broken, Unreliable, Undependable (Dependent on Binary Blobs)

    More people are beginning to realise that Mozilla resorted to self-harming DRM and self-inflicted damage that impacts Firefox; can Mozilla (re)join the anti-DRM coalitions?



  16. EPO and Other Patent Updates Over RSS

    Site syndication (over RSS feeds or XML/Atom) is vastly better than what became popular in recent years (censored, centralised, discriminatory "Social Control Media"); here are some feeds of interest



  17. When It Comes to a Unitary Patent System, Bad (or Intentionally Dishonest) Legal Advice Has Become the Norm

    The Unified Patent Court and Unitary Patent (UPC and UP, respectively) reinforce the old saying about lawyers being liars, doing anything to attract clients (to take their money); the UPC is basically dead, but fiction, falsehoods and outrageous fantasies still find their way into Web sites of law firms



  18. Links 19/2/2020: KDE Plasma 5.18.1, GNOME 3.36 Beta 2 and WordPress 5.4 Beta 2

    Links for the day



  19. Is Linux Foundation a Microsoft Branch Now?

    The so-called ‘Linux’ Foundation (LF) nowadays helps Microsoft cement its monopoly — the very opposite of what ages ago it said the LF would do



  20. Are Songs Property? And Maths Also Property? Artificial Monopolies Are Not Property...

    Patent maximalists continue to face stronger arguments from their sceptics, who rightly allege that words are being intentionally misused and numbers fabricated so as to distort underlying facts



  21. Battistelli Blocked Techrights at EPO (Banned for More Than 5 Years), So CEIPI Won't Respect Access to Information Either

    The use of censorship to confront people who talk about (not even expose) corruption isn't novel; but the adoption of this approach in Europe (not just places like Russia and China) is definitely noteworthy



  22. IRC Proceedings: Monday, February 17, 2020

    IRC logs for Monday, February 17, 2020



  23. Links 18/2/2020: Linux 5.6 RC2, Wine 5.2, GNU Social Contract and Sparky 2020.02 Special Editions

    Links for the day



  24. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, February 16, 2020

    IRC logs for Sunday, February 16, 2020



  25. Links 16/2/2020: MX Linux 19.1 and MyPaint 2.0

    Links for the day



  26. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, February 15, 2020

    IRC logs for Saturday, February 15, 2020



  27. Guest Article: Au Revoir, GNU/Linux

    "Funny how OSI just ended up being another vehicle for their takeover of the computing world..."



  28. Former Microsoft Employee: ZDNet is Owned by Microsoft (and Others) in Some Senses

    A noteworthy message we've received from someone who knows Microsoft from the inside



  29. Links 15/2/2020: Blender 2.82, Qt 5.15 Alpha and NetBSD 9.0 Released

    Links for the day



  30. Microsoft Views 'Open Source' as a Zero-Cost Heist Opportunity (Making Proprietary Software/Spyware Using Other People's Free Labour)

    Making GPL-licensed (copyleft) software and hosting it outside Microsoft’s jaws is the best way to counter the abusive monopolist, which still says it “loves” what it is actually attacking


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts