08.16.07
Microsoft’s Linux Hijack Continues. Latest Victims: Scalix, Xen (Updatedx2)
The mainstream press neglects to mention the following aspect/angle of the stories. The XenSource acquisition by Citrix already shows signs of Linux neglect and this will not only affect Novell. It will affect Red Hat and others as well. Based on the announcement, it appears likely that Microsoft has something to do with this move, which gets Xen under tighter control.
The second extended deal — the one that involves Xandros/Scalix — was mentioned earlier on and has been updated twice since. It seems clear that Microsoft will use its proxies and partners to acquire other companies that it competes against (Scalix in this case). It’s a shield against antitrust complaints and it enables Microsoft to eliminate rivals or impose ‘innovation tax’ that crushes their competitive advantage.
In other news, KVM is apparently better than Xen in the sense that it is implemented more elegantly. Later today we will hear about a secret deal between Sun Microsystems and IBM.
Update: to say more about IBM, there is rising speculation that revolves around OpenSolaris. Bear in mind that IBM is also close to Sun because of OpenDocument format.
Longtime rivals IBM Corp. and Sun Microsystems Inc. have signed an agreement related to operating systems technologies, the two companies said Wednesday.
[...]
In fact, IBM has listed Solaris as one OS option for System X and BladeCenter systems on its Web site since May, according to the Internet Archive Web site.
It’s a big step for IBM, since the company has historically been a major proponent of Linux.
There is another word on the street which suggests that IBM might acquire a Linux company.
Wind River, a leader in real-time and embedded Linux is up for sale. Sources close to the deal say IBM is the buyer.
Busy August.
Update #2: Somebody else is thinking along the same lines and even reveals similarities to the Novell deal.
Citrix Buys VMware Rival XenSource; Will Someone Now Buy Citrix?
[...]
They note that Citrix built its core application delivery infrastructure business “on the back of its access to Microsoft source code.” XenSource, they note, in 2006 cut an exclusive deal for access to Microsoft’s fothcoming Viridian “hypervisor.”
[...]
“For Citrix, Viridian becomes the base operating system component for its next business,” the 451 analysts write. “This intentionally looks and feels like the genesis of Citrix Systems’ $1 billion current business – built on access to Microsoft source code and building tools to do what Microsoft doesn’t. Citrix, we believe, will save a couple of years development time by buying XenSource to get into the virtualization market.”
The 451 analysts also ask whether the deal could be prelude to Microsoft buying Citrix. “That way, Microsoft distances itself from the awkward GPL aspects of what XenSource does, fuses it own server consolidation story into a credible ‘virtualization desktop utility’ stack, and – not least – gets its hands on the lucrative $1 billion enterprise Windows revenue now generated by Presentation Server [which is Citrix’s lead product.]”
Finally, the 451 analysts offer this juicy tidbit: “Citrix executives are said to have considered an acquisition of VMware four years ago, but were frightened off by fears that such a move would antagonize Microsoft materially.”
John Drinkwater said,
August 16, 2007 at 5:27 pm
“secret deal between Sun Microsystems and IBM”
Er, I thought this was Boycott Novell
Seriously though, there is little evidence for a *secret* deal. IBM has been certifing OpenSolaris for a few of it’s platforms! (see Sun’s CEO blog post today), and both companies share similar interests when it comes to ODF. There are places they disagree too – IBM wasn’t impressed when Sun release Java as GPL. That is all.
Roy Schestowitz said,
August 16, 2007 at 5:33 pm
> Er, I thought this was Boycott Novell
Yes, I know, but I couldn’t help mentioning it because it sounded like a big thing. Details here: http://www.johnmwillis.com/?p=178
I meant to say “‘secret’ deal” because a word leaked before the actual announcement. It was reminiscent of the Novell/Microsoft deal. The Citrix-XenSource acquisition also came to The Register’s attention a day before the announcement (amid rumours).
Florian von Kurnatowski said,
November 16, 2007 at 10:02 am
Roy,
can you explain a bit further why you believe that the Scalix acquisition by Xandros has eliminated us from the list of Microsoft’s competitors?
I – in the role of Director of Product Management for Scalix – have supported the move all along, and after the first 100+ days under new ownership, I can certainly say that we’ve gained competitive strength, see more customer interest than ever and are better positioned to compete with Exchange … and there’s more to come!
Cheers,
Florian.
Roy Schestowitz said,
November 16, 2007 at 12:50 pm
Hi Florian,
At the time, the developments in Europe served as an open door to free use of protocols, which ought to have been standard in the first place.. The idea of licensing protocols is also a route to crippling Free software. The same goes for Samba.
Roy Schestowitz said,
November 16, 2007 at 10:28 pm
Florian, I’ve gathered some articles which I recommend that you read. I hope these will be helpful and I fear that many companies approach the Microsoft offers without sufficient information.
What the Microsoft/Xandros deal means for Linux
Xandros Linux signs up for Microsoft patent protection
Doing the Microsoft patent dance
Memo to Xandros CEO: you’re better off selling potatoes
Xandros layoffs? Just staffing ‘adjustments’
Mind you, I used to actually advocate Xandros and the same goes for Linspire and others. Even Scalix! I probably wrote about a dozen posts praising solutions from Scalix (culminating in the Specsaver deal which Mark Taylor manage to strike), but that was before the deal.