EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

10.20.07

Silverlight (and Moonlight/Mono, by Association) Becomes Part of the Antitrust Debate

Posted in America, Antitrust, Boycott Novell, Europe, Formats, Interoperability, Microsoft, Mono, Novell, Open XML, Protocol, Servers, Standard at 11:56 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Microsoft’s history with standards repeats itself. Nothing has changed and more states are beginning to wake up and see this.

In surprise move, attorneys general in four states that previously said antitrust agreement was working now argue Redmond’s “Microsoft’s Windows monopoly is indisputably resilient.”

Very few people have known about tomorrow’s lock-ins, but that’s because Microsoft keeps quiet about it. Microsoft knows why keeping quiet is the better way.

“It is a progressive hijack of the World Wide Web.”A new report sheds some more light on the issues. Unsurprisingly, Silverlight, which we’ve warned about since the start (mind Novell’s role as an accomplice and eyewitness), is in the middle of this debate too. We used to mention some complaints that had been made to the EU about this. It is a progressive hijack of the World Wide Web.

The states’ report seems to imply that Microsoft will try to find a way to tie Silverlight to IE in the future, and leverage the 80 percent market share of IE on the desktop to try and edge out competitors like Adobe AIR.

To recaputulate, watch the following older articles (January this year).

ECIS Accuses Microsoft of Plotting HTML Hijack

An industry coalition that has represented competitors of Microsoft in European markets before the European Commission stepped up its public relations offensive this morning, this time accusing Microsoft of scheming to upset HTML’s place in the fabric of the Internet with XAML, an XML-based layout lexicon for network applications.

Here is the text from an expired article that once appeared in CNN. It vanished for no reasons since then and even confirmed the suspicions that CNN’s archive is selective (excluding some Linux stories as well, according to people whom I spoke to).

Software rivals say Microsoft’s Vista illegal in Europe (at CNNMoney.com)

[...]

Software manufacturers, citing 2004 European Commission finding, contend the operating system violates server laws in Europe.

[...]

“Vista is the first step of Microsoft’s strategy to extend its market dominance to the Internet,” the ECIS statement said.

It said Microsoft’s XAML markup language was “positioned to replace HTML,” the industry standard for publishing documents on the Internet.

Microsoft’s own language would be dependent on Windows, and discriminatory against rival systems such as Linux, the group says.

They said a so-called “open XML” platform file format, known as OOXML, is designed to run seamlessly only on the Microsoft Office platform.

So, XAML and OOXML are a major part of this hijack attempt, which can be made successful by leveraging the monopoly on the desktop. There’s also SharePoint’s role here:

Could SharePoint Be Microsoft’s New Mode of Lock-In?

This could be a tough one for IT leaders. Business users are comfortable with Microsoft. They know how to use the Office interface, and apparently like it to the point users will create their own mini-BI tools from Excel and opt out of the corporate system. But, if Asay’s right, vendor lock-in could cause unforeseen problems or major costs down the road.

After reading Asay’s column and the interview with Nicholls, at least you’ll know which questions to ask before investing in either SharePoint or an alternative solution.

Be aware that Novell’s role here is not too obvious to see, but Novell not only supports OOXML (it began the OOXML translator project after it had signed the deal with Microsoft). Novell also uses the controversial Mono to support Microsoft’s Silverlight. This can turn Linux into a second-class citizen on the Web [1, 2, 3]. Novell should have demonstrated against it rather than support it (partially). But Novell sold out.

Mono is the devil

Sharepoint, OOXML, XPS, SOA (REST) [1, 2, 3, 4], and DRM-’boosted’ objects (maybe HD) are other components of tomorrow’s lockin. One needn’t look very far to find yet another component, which was officially announced just days ago — unified communications.

“We’re moving along the continuum that started way back when in the CTI days,” says Robins. “And now, with the computing horsepower that exists, the standardization of IP as the protocol of choice in terms of communications, we’ve now got the foundation for this to really propagate everywhere. It’s a wonderful thing. The value that Microsoft brings to the table is that they’re really the 800-pound gorilla, especially in the PC desktop computing space. So Microsoft is in a position to really make this happen in a very big way. One day all PBXs will interoperate with the Microsoft communications platform, and we’ll see what happens on the mobile side.”

Where are standards? Recall our discussion about Microsoft’s exclusive and closed relationship with Cisco. This is not a way to build an industry; it’s a way to have it destroyed (owned entirely by mono/duopolists).

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

5 Comments

  1. LiquidBoy said,

    October 21, 2007 at 10:07 pm

    Gravatar

    Your article is completely one sided. How about Adobe’s monopoly with PDF’s and Flash??

    At the end of the day Microsoft is a business that is trying to make software. For anyone that has taken the time to learn about Silverlight and other Microsoft technologies in depth we all know how great a thing that they have built.

    Silverlight and the .NET language are amazing developer tools that will foster in a new age online. It isnt tied into IE and it doesn’t jam it down anyones throat to install.

    Silverlight is a damn good technology for people that find Flash too foreign a language to learn. All us MS developers welcome this technology!!!

  2. Roy Schestowitz said,

    October 21, 2007 at 10:28 pm

    Gravatar

    Several points:

    1. Is it acceptance that Microsoft does not support Linux, Solaris and BSD when it comes to Silverlight? Moonlight it only built by a ‘subsidiary’ and it is/will be left behind. It also has patent deals involved, which is totally unacceptable for an open Web.
    2. Microsoft’s history assures us that Silverlight will be extended the Windows way. It is already ‘enhanced’ in Vista. Therein you lose parity on the Web.
    3. Why does Microsoft play all sorts of Mono tricks in its deals (contracts) with Linux companies? Sign of things to come?
    4. Would you want access to your Web content to depend on a company with a long history of betraying its partners?
  3. John Drinkwater said,

    October 24, 2007 at 10:32 am

    Gravatar

    LiquidBoy:
    “Silverlight and the .NET language are amazing developer tools that will foster in a new age online. It isnt tied into IE and it doesn’t jam it down anyones throat to install.”

    I seem to recall a certain “best selling” game’s website required Silverlight to view – that was certainly jammed down fan’s throats. They haven’t made a great thing, they have borrowed from great things.

    What will foster in a new age online will be open platforms, open standards, open tech. etc.
    HTML5 with <video>, <audio> support etc, SVG, ODF, and more.

  4. god said,

    January 1, 2008 at 7:08 am

    Gravatar

    “Is it acceptance that Microsoft”

    Microsoft is not acceptable. Microsoft is a criminal organization with monopoly anal plugs named DirectX to ram up your ass and force you to use for games. What is Silverlight in RuneCraft? That’s where they got the name from, even if they deny deny deny it.

    Fuck you microsoft you whores

  5. Frederick Twain said,

    August 13, 2008 at 7:07 pm

    Gravatar

    http://www.atelier-us.com/e-business-and-it/article/microsoft-receives-anti-trust-criticism-for-silverlight-technology

    This article has some further insiqht on the microsoft anti-trust issue involving silverlight.

What Else is New


  1. Demonstration Against Unitary Software Patents, Thursday 12 Dec in Brussels

    FFII's call to demonstrate against the UPC



  2. Links 9/12/2019: China on GNU/Linux, Canonical Wants Help to Improve Ubuntu

    Links for the day



  3. Links 9/12/2019: Linux 5.5 RC1, EasyOS Buster 2.1.9

    Links for the day



  4. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, December 08, 2019

    IRC logs for Sunday, December 08, 2019



  5. Mandatory Education for Those Who Use and Misuse Buzzwords Would Go a Long Way

    In an age of substitution — where marketing terms replace meaningful words and concepts — it has gotten more difficult to have honest debates, for example about the scope of patents



  6. Once Upon a Time Banter Was Allowed on Mailing Lists

    Hours ago Torvalds announced RC1 of the next Linux (kernel) release; it has been a while since he last said something ‘controversial’ (following his month at the penalty box); free speech deficit can make us weaker, not stronger (advantage to those who work in the dark)



  7. Links 8/12/2019: Debian Init Systems GR, NomadBSD 1.3

    Links for the day



  8. Can We Quit Celebrating DRM in GNU/Linux?

    Over the past couple of days various news sites and "Linux" sites expressed great satisfaction [1-5] over the passive embrace of Disney's DRM ploy (Disney+), even when Disney itself rejects DRM, seeing the harms practically caused by it [6,7]



  9. You Know WSL is Bad for GNU/Linux Because Anti-Linux People, Microsoft and Its Propagandists, Want People to Use That

    Microsoft and its boosters (and media partners) haven’t grown tired of spreading falsehoods to stigmatise and take control of GNU/Linux by creating their own versions and traps for it



  10. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, December 07, 2019

    IRC logs for Saturday, December 07, 2019



  11. 5 Years Ago the Linux Foundation Turned Linux.com Into a Non-Linux Site

    One can leverage the Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine to better understand how, over time, the Foundation called “Linux” deviated or diverged away from its mission statement for the sole purpose of raising corporate funds and selling influence to corporations (passing the community’s hard work to them — a form of tacit privatisation)



  12. Microsoft Redefining Ownership and Identity of GNU/Linux

    The idea that “Microsoft loves Linux” is as insane as it gets; but the lie which is “Microsoft loves Linux” is a powerful enabler of Microsoft entryism, e.g. if Greg steps down, does a Microsoft employee become the deputy of Linus Torvalds?



  13. Things That Cannot Be Said

    The limits on what we can say are mostly defined by what sources permit us to say publicly (for the sake of source protection)



  14. Fake European Patents (on Algorithms) Leading to Fake Embargoes

    Law firms have gotten their way in Germany; instead of supporting the productive workers the patent system is nowadays promoting the litigation 'industry' and it ought to be corrected



  15. From Moderate Advice to FUD and Misinformation: The Case of a VPN Vulnerability (CVE-2019-14899)

    What should have been a trivial bugfix in a variety of operating systems and bits of software — both proprietary and Free software — somehow became anti-Linux FUD, clickbait and worse



  16. Dangerous Thinker

    Society oughtn't be alarmed by people who say unusual things; it should be wary and sceptical of those corporations ever so eager to silence such people



  17. Unitary Patent (UPC) Died Along With the Credibility of Managing IP and the Rest of the UPC Lobby

    It is pretty astounding that Team UPC (collective term for people who crafted and lobby for this illegal construct) is still telling us lies, even in the absence of underlying supportive facts, and pressure groups disguised as "news sites" latch onto anything to perpetuate an illusion of progress (even in the face of a growing number of major barriers)



  18. IRC Proceedings: Friday, December 06, 2019

    IRC logs for Friday, December 06, 2019



  19. Links 7/12/2019: Fedora 31 Elections Results, Lots of Media Drama Over VPN Bug

    Links for the day



  20. Links 6/12/2019: DRM in GNU/Linux and Sparky Bonsai

    Links for the day



  21. The EPO Rejects Innovation

    The EPO ceased caring about the needs of scientists whose work involves invention; instead, EPO management crafts increasingly lenient guidelines that yield illegal European Patents (not compatible with the EPC) that heavily-besieged EPO judges are unable to stop



  22. Startpage CEO Robert Beens in 'Damage Control' Mode, Trying to Get Startpage Relisted After Selling to a Massive Surveillance Company

    PrivacytoolsIO is being lobbied by the CEO of Startpage to relist Startpage, based on no actual refutations at all



  23. IRC Proceedings: Thursday, December 05, 2019

    IRC logs for Thursday, December 05, 2019



  24. Links 5/12/2019: qBittorrent 4.2.0, Expensive Librem 5 and OpenBSD Bugs

    Links for the day



  25. Microsoft Staff Repeatedly Refuses to Tell How Many People Use WSL, Defends Patent Extortion and Blackmail of Linux Instead

    The people who develop WSL (mostly Microsoft employees) get easily irritated when asked how many people actually use this thing; but more interestingly, however, they reveal their disdain for GNU/Linux and support for Microsoft blackmail (for 'Linux patent tax')



  26. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, December 04, 2019

    IRC logs for Wednesday, December 04, 2019



  27. Links 4/12/2019: Tails 4.1, UCS 4.4-3 and Proxmox VE 6.1

    Links for the day



  28. Google Tightens Its Noose

    Now it’s official! Google is just a bunch of shareholders looking to appease the Pentagon at all costs



  29. Europeans Still Need to Save the European Patent Office From Those Who Attack Its Patent Quality

    Patent quality is of utmost interest; without it, as we're seeing at the EPO and have already seen at the USPTO for a number of years, legal disputes will arise where neither side wins (only the lawyers win) and small, impoverished inventors or businesses will be forced to settle outside the courts over baseless allegations, often made by parasitic patent trolls (possessing low-quality patents they don't want scrutinised by courts)



  30. We Never Accepted and Will Never Accept Corporate Money

    Corporate money is a unique problem because of its magnitude and the fact that it's impersonal; shareholders can only ever accept its supposed justifications if they're receiving something in return (of proportional worth to the payment/transaction)


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts