EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

12.10.07

Microsoft Sends Paid Army to Fight OpenDocument Format in Europe

Posted in Deception, Europe, Finance, Fraud, Microsoft, Novell, Open XML, OpenDocument at 6:00 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Steve Ballmer on ODFRemember Holland's decision to adopt OpenDocument Format (ODF)? Well, as long as you have many people on Microsoft’s payroll (or blood supply, as in the case of Novell), no policy favourable to OpenDocument will be tolerated. Just ask people who lost their job over it.

Anyway, Holland is no exception. Have a look.

Proposed legislation that would mandate the use of the Open Document Format (ODF) across the entire Dutch government has infuriated Microsoft.

[...]

Microsoft Netherlands has engaged in fierce lobbying in an attempt to derail the plan. The company argues that the current definition is too narrow, specifically by mandating ODF rather than open standards in general

It isn’t the first time that we mention cases where Microsoft money is being used to combat OpenDocument format. This is unacceptable. Meanwhile, Microsoft’s Platform Strategy Manager in Germany talks about Office Developer Conference discounts as well.

Remember:

OpenDocument is all about fair competition.

OOXML is, as a Microsoft executive puts it, “a simple matter of [Microsoft’s] commercial interests!“

In other, more sidal news, Microsoft tries to disguise its many OOXML crimes by demonising IBM. We wrote about this yesterday. Microsoft believes that by trying to portray IBM as evil, its own sins will be forgotten. Sadly for Brian Jones et al, the Internet never forgets. When all of this is over (maybe even beforehand) Microsoft might be sued for the trail of corruptions it has left in its attempt to derail ODF, the ISO, and even the integrity of world governments.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

4 Comments

  1. SubSónica said,

    December 11, 2007 at 3:40 am

    Gravatar

    Oh, yeah. The good ol’ heavy politician lobbying when MSFT sees its biggest captive customer (governments) trying to escape the decades-lasting lock-in.

    Will they fly Ballmer over there to lobby top politicians as they did in Spain in 2006 when the largest regional government (Andalusia) started to consider a migration to Linux? (He also did so with Munich, and simmilar dismal maneovers were performed in Denmark in order to get support for software patentability bills trying to be introduced in the EU.)

    http://www.google.es/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.canalsur.es%2Fhtml%2Finformativos%2F-ArchivoNoticias%2F2006%2F10.Octubre%2F17%2F171006-bp-005-AND.htm&langpair=es%7Cen&hl=es&ie=UTF8
    Original news (in spanish):
    http://www.canalsur.es/html/informativos/-ArchivoNoticias/2006/10.Octubre/17/171006-bp-005-AND.htm

    This is very much geostrategic politics. They are trying to avoid the “domino effect” a countrywide adoption of FOSS or truly-open standards (this excludes MSOOXML) and its endorsement by an important government would have over the entire international environment. By isolating the “rotten apple” and overthrowing any initiative by public institutions to adopt FOSS and open standards they try to avoid the growing awareness about the advantages of open technologies and its suitability to serve best the governments’ obligations to the citizens and the best use of taxpayers’ hard earned money. Word is spreading fast and high:
    http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/activities/opensource/cases/index_en.htm

    But they keep trying to disinform and propagate FUD:
    http://www.theinquirer.net/en/inquirer/news/2006/10/16/lobbyists-denigrate-open-source-in-leaked-letter-to-ec

    The alternative is caving to Microsoft wishes. Ballmer’s is that all governments end up locked-in forever with agreements like the one they are trying to get in Chile:
    http://www.google.es/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fayerwayer.com%2F2007%2F07%2Fciudadanos-chilenos-ahora-son-propiedad-de-microsoft-corporation%2F&langpair=es%7Cen&hl=es&ie=UTF8
    http://www.fayerwayer.com/2007/07/ciudadanos-chilenos-ahora-son-propiedad-de-microsoft-corporation/

    More analysis on these issues:
    http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fsubsonica.blogsome.com%2F2006%2F10%2F17%2Fpresiones-a-nuestros-representantes-electos-en-contra-del-software-libre-y-del-open-source%2F&langpair=es%7Cen&hl=en&ie=UTF8

    It is our obligation to keep dennouncing all these maneovers against all of us and the public interest.

  2. SubSónica said,

    December 11, 2007 at 4:29 am

    Gravatar

    I also want to rescue a couple of valuable pieces of opinion on the comments to the same news as appeared at slashdot:
    http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/12/10/2317232

    It *IS* all about Microsoft.

    I say this jokingly, but also quite seriously. Jokingly because technically, it isn’t about Microsoft… it could easily have been about Word Perfect if they were still the dominator in document formats. Truly, it is about perpetual access to data through the used of non-proprietary and fully documented formats. “ODF” isn’t here to stay… it might last another 10, maybe 20 years at most before something far superior comes along. But ODF is fully documented and could be translated into whatever the next great format standard will be.

    But seriously, it *IS* about Microsoft because Microsoft has lost the trust of their users and customers. They have done this with amazingly consistent and persistent erosion. With every new release, with every security problem, with every denial, with every DRM addition, with every copyright protection service, with every Genuine Advantage(r), with every BSA audit, with every criminal conviction, with every attempt to evade or forestall punishment, with every shameless act for which they have become quite notorious in the IT community… the ignorant public has started to notice what upsets their nerds ever so much. And now they are starting to re-think the way they store their data because at any moment, they want to be able to change their operating platform. They trusted Microsoft for at least the past 10 years with their operating systems, applications and data. Microsoft had their, our and even my personal trust for quite some time. The trust is gone or disappearing and now people are taking action.

    And is it really the best way for Microsoft to handle this problem? I mean to lobby and complain? Why not attempt to save their business by changing their course and direction!? What is so bad about change?! Is actual competition too much for Microsoft to handle? Can’t they just make a “better product” instead of playing all of these government games?

    Perhaps the Microsoft apologists would care to suggest a possible reason why they can just serve the interests of their customers rather than fighting to save their business model? The customer wants ODF. Why shouldn’t Microsoft provide that to them?

    [...] And the next comment: [...]

    “And is it really the best way for Microsoft to handle this problem? ”
    It is the only way they know how.

    “I mean to lobby and complain? Why not attempt to save their business by changing their course and direction!? ”
    They can no more change this course and direction than we can change our own DNA (excluding retroviruses, etc). Besides, they’d have to want to change. And they don’t. They pride themselves in this method and culture and approach.

    “What is so bad about change?!
    It hurts. It is unfamiliar. The outcome is not certain. Like Dell now trying to do retail. Don’t think that was the first thing on their list. They are having to play in a game in which they are newcomers.

    “Is actual competition too much for Microsoft to handle? ”
    Yes. They don’t know how to compete the normal way. With an actual salable product, on the merits.

    “Can’t they just make a “better product” instead of playing all of these government games?”
    This IS their product. It is what they do, what they are best at. What they do better than anyone else. Software is just the arena. They are not so much a software company as they are a “protect windows and office at all freaking costs” company. That is the bottom line to everything they do.

  3. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 11, 2007 at 4:51 am

    Gravatar

    SubSónica,

    You have provided some very valuable references that tell a great story. All I can add is the following related citation and story, whose shades return to mind.

    Gates blackmailed Danish gv’ment

    Microsoft boss Bill Gates threatened to kill 800 Danish jobs if Denmark opposed the European Computer Implemented Inventions Directive, reports today’s Danish financial daily Børsen, quoted by NoSoftwarePatents.com.

    [...]

    According to Børsen, last November Gates told Danish pm Anders Fogh and two ministers that he’d kill all 800 jobs in Navision, a Danish company acquired by Microsoft in 2002, unless the EU quickly decided to legalize software patents through the directive.

    Microsoft will continue to play whack-a-mole with ODF and Free software. It’s like a totalitarian regime targeting any little seedling of revolt or opposition. The least we can do is keep our eyes open and have it all documented. Thanks for all the information. Information is our friend and with over 10,000 pageviews per day our message is getting out there.

  4. eet said,

    December 11, 2007 at 3:38 pm

    Gravatar

    You are one crazy bunch of hillbillies, gotta give you that! Have a nice day in Jesusland!

    Note: comment has been flagged for arriving from an incarnation of a known (eet), pseudonymous, forever-nymshifting, abusive Internet troll that posts from open proxies and relays around the world.

What Else is New


  1. The EPO Has Sadly Taken a Side and It's the Patent Trolls' Side

    Abandoning the whole rationale behind patents, the Office now led for almost a year by António Campinos prioritises neither science nor technology; it's all about granting as many patents (European monopolies) as possible for legal activity (applications, litigation and so on)



  2. Where the USPTO Stands on the Subject of Abstract Software Patents

    Not much is changing as we approach Easter and software patents are still fool's gold in the United States, no matter if they get granted or not



  3. Links 19/3/2019: Jetson/JetBot, Linux 5.0.3, Kodi Foundation Joins The Linux Foundation, and Firefox 66

    Links for the day



  4. Links 18/3/2019: Solus 4, Linux 5.1 RC1, Mesa 18.3.5, OSI Individual Member Election Won by Microsoft

    Links for the day



  5. Microsoft and Its Patent Trolls Continue Their Patent War, Including the War on Linux

    Microsoft is still preying on GNU/Linux using patents, notably software patents; it wants billions of dollars served on a silver platter in spite of claims that it reached a “truce” by joining the Open Invention Network and joining the LOT Network



  6. Director Iancu Generally Viewed as a Lapdog of Patent Trolls

    As Director of the Office, Mr. Iancu, a Trump appointee, not only fails to curb patent trolls; he actively defends them and he lowers barriers in order to better equip them with bogus patents that courts would reject (if the targets of extortion could afford a day in court)



  7. Links 17/3/2019: Google Console and IBM-Red Hat Merger Delay?

    Links for the day



  8. To Team UPC the Unified Patent Court (UPC) Has Become a Joke and the European Patent Office (EPO) Never Mentions It Anymore

    The EPO's frantic rally to the very bottom of patent quality may be celebrated by obedient media and patent law firms; to people who actually produce innovative things, however, this should be a worrisome trend and thankfully courts are getting in the way of this nefarious agenda; one of these courts is the FCC in Germany



  9. Links 16/3/2019: Knoppix Release and SUSE Independence

    Links for the day



  10. Stopping António Campinos and His Software Patents Agenda (Not Legal in Europe) Would Require Independent Courts

    Software patents continue to be granted (new tricks, loopholes and buzzwords) and judges who can put an end to that are being actively assaulted by those who aren't supposed to have any authority whatsoever over them (for decisions to be impartially delivered)



  11. The Linux Foundation Needs to Speak Out Against Microsoft's Ongoing (Continued) Patent Shakedown of OEMs That Ship Linux

    Zemlin actively thanks Microsoft while taking Microsoft money; he meanwhile ignores how Microsoft viciously attacks Linux using patents, revealing the degree to which his foundation, the “Linux Foundation” (not about Linux anymore, better described as Zemlin’s PAC), has been compromised



  12. Links 15/3/2019: Linux 5.0.2, Sublime Text 3.2

    Links for the day



  13. The EPO and the USPTO Are Granting Fake Patents on Software, Knowing That Courts Would Reject These

    Office management encourages applicants to send over patent applications that are laughable while depriving examiners the freedom and the time they need to reject these; it means that loads of bogus patents are being granted, enshrined as weapons that trolls can use to extort small companies outside the courtroom



  14. CommunityBridge is a Cynical Microsoft-Funded Effort to Show Zemlin Works for 'Community', Not Microsoft

    After disbanding community participation in the Board (but there are Microsoft staff on the Board now) the "Linux Foundation" (or Zemlin PAC) continues to take Microsoft money and polishes or launders that as "community"



  15. Links 14/3/2019: GNOME 3.32 and Mesa 19.0.0 Released

    Links for the day



  16. EPO 'Results' Are, As Usual, Not Measured Correctly

    The supranational monopoly, a monopoly-granting authority, is being used by António Campinos to grant an insane amount of monopolies whose merit is dubious and whose impact on Europe will be a net negative



  17. Good News Everyone! UPC Ready to Go... in 2015!

    Benoît Battistelli is no longer in Office and his fantasy (patent lawyers' fantasy) is as elusive as ever; Team UPC is trying to associate opposition to UPC with the far right (AfD) once again



  18. Links 13/3/2019: Plasma 5.15.3,Chrome 73 and Many LF Press Releases

    Links for the day



  19. In the Age of Trumpism EFF Needs to Repeatedly Remind Director Iancu That He is Not a Judge and He Cannot Ignore the Courts

    The nonchalance and carelessness seen in Iancu's decision to just cherry-pick decisions/outcomes (basically ignoring caselaw) concerns technologists, who rightly view him as a 'mole' of the litigation 'industry' (which he came from)



  20. Links 12/3/2019: Sway 1.0 Released, Debian Feuds Carry On

    Links for the day



  21. Microsoft is Complaining About Android and Chrome OS (GNU/Linux) Vendor Not Paying for Microsoft Patents (Updated)

    Microsoft, which nowadays does the patent shakedown against GNU/Linux by proxy, is still moaning about companies that don’t pay ‘protection’ money (grounds for antitrust action or racketeering investigation)



  22. Watchtroll Has Redefined "Trolls" to Mean Those Who Oppose Software Patents (and Oppose Trolls), Not Those Who Leverage These for Blackmail Alone

    The controversial change to 35 U.S.C. § 101 guidance is being opposed by the public (US citizens who oppose American software patents), so patent maximalists like Janal Kalis (“PatentBuddy”) and extremists like Gene Quinn (Watchtroll) want us to believe that the public is just “EFF” and cannot think for itself



  23. EPO's Latest 'Results' Show That António Campinos Has Already Given Up on Patent Quality and is Just Another Battistelli

    The patent-granting machine that the EPO has become reports granting growth of unrealistic scale (unless no proper examination is actually carried out)



  24. Links 11/3/2019: Linux 5.0.1, Audacity 2.3.1, GNU Coreutils 8.31

    Links for the day



  25. US Patent Law Currently Not Changing Much and Software Patents Are Still in Limbo

    Surveying the news, as we still meticulously do (even if we don't write about it), it seems clear that American courts hardly tolerate software patents and proponents of such patents are losing their voice (or morale)



  26. EPO Examiner: “I Have Been Against Software Patents and Eventually 3/4 of My Job is Examining Software Patent Applications.”

    Overworked examiners aren't being given the time, the tools and the freedom to reject patents, based on prior art, patent scope and so on; it is beginning to resemble a rubber-stamping operation, not an examining authority



  27. Europe Will Pay a High Price for Software Patents Advocacy by António Campinos in Europe's Patent-Granting Authority

    EPO President António Campinos — like Iancu at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) — is still promoting software patents in Europe even though such patents are clearly detrimental to Europe’s interests



  28. António Campinos -- Like His Father -- Lacks Support From Colleagues, Endorsed Only From the Top

    History lessons from Wikileaks



  29. Links 10/3/2019: GNU and GNOME Releases

    Links for the day



  30. Koch Brothers' Oil Money is Poisoning Academia and Distorting Scholarly Work/Research on Patents

    Meddling in patent law by the Kochs, the oil tycoons who can be seen everywhere Conservative think tanks are, shows no signs of abatement


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts