EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

08.21.08

Did Novell Contact You As Well to Manipulate News Coverage?

Posted in Deception, GNU/Linux, KDE, Microsoft, Novell, Patents at 6:52 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

I want you for money

Novell wants volunteers for code, time, Novell’s self-glory
Top KDE developer not happy with the Microsoft/Novell deal

We have already seen this many times before. If and when someone becomes a critic of Novell, the company tries to shut him or her up. If someone can produce good coverage about Novell, then the company greases him or her up. It’s just like Microsoft, only at a smaller scale.

We highlighted incidents where journalists or bloggers came under pressure after they had denounced Novell. It’s Novell seniors who often contact them ‘behind the scenes’ (Dragoon for example [1, 2])

Aaron Siego, who is probably the best-known KDE developer (he’s one of their public figures), does not like the Novell/Mirosoft deal and he tells the story we already know about — th story of Novell messing with people’s mind for positive coverage. They probably did this with Matt Asay, which is why he had a ‘sudden’ change of heart. How widespread is this phenomenon?

So I read this latest announcement, thought about the implications of it and then moved on .. until I was spammed by Novell’s marketing department asking what I thought about the press release. They said that if I wanted, I could even ring up their director of marketing via instant messenger and chat about it! This is a good example of public opinion management: they evidently know that it’s a sensitive area and so are trying to head off any problems by engaging people in the community directly and early on. Very early on in fact: I received my email just a few minutes after the press release was sent out and they attached a PDF of the press release to the email for my reference. Well done! (I mean that: it was a well executed plan.)

Who else did Novell contact like this? It’s supposed to be hush-hush.

Aaron continues:

And since they asked, I thought, “Sure, why not share my thoughts!” However, I thought I’d do it here instead of over AIM or Yahoo! Messenger with Justin S., partly because I don’t like being managed by other people’s marketing departments, but mostly because too many of the people who do speak in non-positive terms about this deal tend do so with argumentation that is too easy to discount by simply playing the “let’s be reasonable” card.

“Novell has already muted some of the possible ‘trouble makers’.”He too is beginning to realise that it’s about software patents. He should be furious. Novell’s message to him is something along the lines of: “please carry on coding for us, don’t bother with the details, we’ll just make some money with Microsoft and only we can offer peace of mind.”

Aaron closed this item, preventing comments from being added. What’s to be afraid of? That people might utter the truth, which seems misappropriate for a blog that represents opinion of a lead Plasma developer? Remember that Novell pushes money into this (Akademy funding, for instance) and it’s hard to slam your backer, no matter how selfish it may be.

We won’t be hearing much criticism, will we? Novell has already muted some of the possible ‘trouble makers’.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

6 Comments

  1. MonoHater said,

    August 22, 2008 at 5:20 am

    Gravatar

    MS is seeking to save their developer base, they want to lock the developers in their technology and tools.

    Pleaseee boycott mono/moonlight/opensuse…

  2. MonoHater said,

    August 22, 2008 at 5:25 am

    Gravatar

    Novell = Microsoft trojan horse

  3. Roy Schestowitz said,

    August 22, 2008 at 5:25 am

    Gravatar

    Linux.com is pushing Mono again: http://www.linux.com/feature/144663

    Watch the comments: “What’s with all the Mono: Linux.com has sure been pushing the mono-poly patent trap hard lately. Maybe you should change your name. [....] Why bother with Mono?: Is there anything you can do with Mono that you can’t do with Java? Of course Java is more mature, truly open, and unencumbered by patent threats.”

  4. MonoHater said,

    August 22, 2008 at 5:29 am

    Gravatar

    Slashdot / Linux.com / SF are all part of the gang that sold out

    This is novells doing. MS is inflitrating the FOSS camp using Novell. Novell is responsible for pushing mono everywhere.

    Say No to MoNO

  5. Roy Schestowitz said,

    August 22, 2008 at 5:43 am

    Gravatar

    Two weeks in a row and I’m not finding further progress on C#/Mono in KDE:

    http://commit-digest.org/issues/2008-08-10/

    Let’s hope it stays that way. Mono patches in KDE spotted in:

    http://boycottnovell.com/2008/08/14/mono-sneaks-into-kde/
    http://boycottnovell.com/2008/08/12/mono-spreads-fails/
    http://boycottnovell.com/2008/08/10/novell-poisons-openoffice/

  6. MonoHater said,

    August 22, 2008 at 5:48 am

    Gravatar

    http://beranger.org/blogo20/novell-ms-returns.png

What Else is New


  1. Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Foes Manipulate the Facts to Belittle the Impact of PTAB

    In an effort to sabotage PTAB with its inter partes reviews the patent microcosm is organising one-sided events that slam PTAB's legitimacy and misrepresent statistics



  2. Links 21/11/2017: LibreELEC (Krypton) v8.2.1 MR, Mesa 17.3.0 RC5

    Links for the day



  3. PTAB Inter Partes Reviews (“IPRs”) Are Essential in an Age When One Can Get Sued for Merely Mocking a Patent

    The battle over the right to criticise particular patents has gotten very real and the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) fought it until the end; this is why we need granted patents to be criticised upon petitions too (and often invalidated as a result)



  4. Chinese Patent Policy Continues to Mimic All the Worst Elements of the American System

    China is becoming what the United States used to be in terms of patents, whereas the American system is adopting saner patent policies that foster real innovation whilst curtailing mass litigation



  5. Links 20/11/2017: Why GNU/Linux is Better Than Windows, Another Linus Torvalds Rant

    Links for the day



  6. “US Inventor” is a “Bucket of Deplorables” Not Worthy of Media Coverage

    Jan Wolfe of Reuters treats a fringe group called “US Inventor” as though it's a conservative voice rather than a bunch of patent extremists pretending to be inventors



  7. Team Battistelli's Attacks on the EPO Boards of Appeal Predate the Illegal Sanctions Against a Judge

    A walk back along memory lane reveals that Battistelli has, all along, suppressed and marginalised DG3 members, in order to cement total control over the entire Organisation, not just the Office



  8. PTAB is Safe, the Patent Extremists Just Try to Scandalise It Out of Sheer Desperation

    The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA), which gave powers to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) through inter partes reviews (IPRs), has no imminent threats, not potent ones anyway



  9. Update on the EPO's Crackdown on the Boards of Appeal

    Demand of 35% increases from the boards serves to show that Battistelli now does to the 'independent' judges what he already did to examiners at the Office



  10. The Lobbyists Are Trying to Subvert US Law in Favour of Patent Predators

    Mingorance, Kappos, Underweiser and other lobbyists for the software patents agenda (paid by firms like Microsoft and IBM) keep trying to undo progress, notably the bans on software patents



  11. Patent Trolls Based in East Texas Are Affected Very Critically by TC Heartland

    The latest situation in Texas (United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in particular), which according to new analyses is the target of legal scrutiny for the 'loopholes' it provided to patent trolls in search of easy legal battles



  12. Alice Remains a Strong Precedential Decision and the Media Has Turned Against Software Patents

    The momentum against the scourge of software patents and the desperation among patent 'professionals' (people who don't create/develop/invent) is growing



  13. Harm Still Caused by Granted Software Patents

    A roundup of recent (past week's) announcements, including legal actions, contingent upon software patents in an age when software patents bear no real legitimacy



  14. Links 18/11/2017: Raspberry Digital Signage 10, New Nano

    Links for the day



  15. 23,000 Posts

    23,000 blog posts milestone reached in 11 years



  16. BlackBerry Cannot Sell Phones and Apple Looks Like the Next BlackBerry (a Pile of Patents)

    The lifecycle of mobile giants seems to typically end in patent shakedown, as Apple loses its business to Android just like Nokia and BlackBerry lost it to Apple



  17. EFF and CCIA Use Docket Navigator and Lex Machina to Identify 'Stupid Patents' (Usually Software Patents That Are Not Valid)

    In spite of threats and lawsuits from bogus 'inventors' whom they criticise, EFF staff continues the battle against patents that should never have been granted at all



  18. The Australian Productivity Commission Shows the Correct Approach to Setting Patent Laws and Scope

    Australia views patents on software as undesirable and acts accordingly, making nobody angry except a bunch of law firms that profited from litigation and patent maximalism



  19. EPO 'Business' From the United States Has Nosedived and UPC is on Its Death Throes

    Benoît Battistelli and Elodie Bergot further accelerate the ultimate demise of the EPO (getting rid of experienced and thus 'expensive' staff), for which there is no replacement because there is a monopoly (which means Europe will suffer severely)



  20. Links 17/11/2017: KDE Applications 17.12, Akademy 2018 Plans

    Links for the day



  21. Today's EPO and Team UPC Do Not Work for Europe But Actively Work Against Europe

    The tough reality that some Europeans actively work to undermine science and technology in Europe because they personally profit from it and how this relates to the Unitary Patent (UPC), which is still aggressively lobbied for, sometimes by bribing/manipulating the media, academia, and public servants



  22. Links 16/11/2017: WordPress 4.9 and GhostBSD 11.1 Released

    Links for the day



  23. The Staff Union of the EPO (SUEPO) is Rightly Upset If Not Shocked at What Battistelli and Bergot Are Doing to the Office

    The EPO's dictatorial management is destroying everything that's left (of value) at the Office while corrupting academia and censoring discussion by threatening those who publish comments (gagging its own staff even when that staff posts anonymously)



  24. EPO Continues to Disobey the Law on Software Patents in Europe

    Using the same old euphemisms, e.g. "computer-implemented inventions" (or "CII"), the EPO continues to grant patents which are clearly and strictly out of scope



  25. Links 16/11/2017: Tails 3.3, Deepin 15.5 Beta

    Links for the day



  26. Benoît Battistelli and Elodie Bergot Have Just Ensured That EPO Will Get Even More Corrupt

    Revolving door-type tactics will become more widespread at the EPO now that the management (Battistelli and his cronies) hires for low cost rather than skills/quality and minimises staff retention; this is yet another reason to dread anything like the UPC, which prioritises litigation over examination



  27. Australia is Banning Software Patents and Shelston IP is Complaining as Usual

    The Australian Productivity Commission, which defies copyright and patent bullies, is finally having policies put in place that better serve the interests of Australians, but the legal 'industry' is unhappy (as expected)



  28. Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Defended by Technology Giants, by Small Companies, by US Congress and by Judges, So Why Does USPTO Make It Less Accessible?

    In spite of the popularity of PTAB and the growing need/demand for it, the US patent system is apparently determined to help it discriminate against poor petitioners (who probably need PTAB the most)



  29. Declines in Patent Quality at the EPO and 'Independent' Judges Can No Longer Say a Thing

    The EPO's troubling race to the bottom (of patent quality) concerns the staff examiners and the judges, but they cannot speak about it without facing rather severe consequences



  30. The EPO is Now Corrupting Academia, Wasting Stakeholders' Money Lying to Stakeholders About the Unitary Patent (UPC)

    The Unified Patent Court/Unitary Patent (UPC) is a dying project and the EPO, seeing that it is going nowhere fast, has resorted to new tactics and these tactics cost a lot of money (at the expense of those who are being lied to)


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts