EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

08.26.08

Financial Fraud Claimed at Microsoft; Microsoft Paid Microsoft Witness to Shut Up

Posted in Finance, Fraud, Microsoft at 6:28 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

The following old article is hugely damaging and we are fortunate to have found a copy of it in the Web Archive. It vanished from the Seattle Weekly.

This article, which is titled “Microfraud?”, provides a testimony from a Microsoft insider who claims financial fraud. Interestingly enough (but not so surprisingly), Microsoft paid him a fortune to go away, keep quiet, and for the terms of the settlement not to be disclosed (recall Iowa and Caldera for similar examples).

Here are the opening paragraphs from this article.

THE ALLEGATIONS WERE shocking: For years, Microsoft has systematically distorted its profit figures in an effort to consistently beat Wall Street expectations and keep its stock price steadily rising. The false reports would violate SEC regulations, and amount to outright fraud.

More shocking was the source of the allegations: Microsoft’s chief of internal audits, Charlie Pancerzewski, who reported directly to the company’s chief financial officer.

Most shocking of all was what happened to Pancerzewski when he reported the suspicious bookkeeping to his supervisors, Microsoft CFO Mike Brown and chief operating officer Bob Herbold, in the spring of 1995. Soon afterward, Pancerzewski—who for nearly five years had received stellar performance evaluations—received his first-ever unsatisfactory one, and was eventually forced to resign.

Two months ago, Microsoft quietly settled a lawsuit containing these allegations, filed in 1997 by Pancerzewski under the Whistleblowers Protection Act. The auditor claimed he was wrongfully terminated after telling his supervisors that Microsoft might be breaking securities and tax laws. The lawsuit made its tortuous way through several rounds of pretrial motions until last fall, when US District Judge Carolyn Dimmick denied Microsoft’s final plea for summary judgment, finding credible evidence that Microsoft may have violated SEC rules, as Pancerzewski alleged. Shortly thereafter, Microsoft and Pancerzewski settled out of court. Terms of the agreement were sealed, but one source who claims familiarity with the case says that Microsoft paid Pancerzewski $4 million.

Microsoft is claimed to have lost $18 billion in 1998. That is another article that magically vanished, but we managed to find a copy.

More recently, one financial manager from Microsoft was prosecuted for embezzlement [1, 2, 3]. If the legal system is functional, more Microsoft employees might need to be put in prison and it goes all the way to the top (managers). One of them ended up jailed about a month ago. There are other examples, such as Robert Bach, a Microsoft chief who was accused of inside-trading [1, 2]. There was never a trail, but there sure was evidece.

Novell, for that matter, is no saint, either. Novell too is said to be cooking its books, but the SEC does not see it.

There is a lot of investigation to do on this, and we shall continue to do it. Please post any corrections you may have so that we don’t make improper accusations.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

4 Comments

  1. julian67 said,

    August 26, 2008 at 9:49 pm

    Gravatar

    The page referenced hasn’t vanished at all.

    It’s available at http://www.seattleweekly.com/1999-01-06/news/microfraud.php and dates from 1999. I accessed it without difficulty.

    It relates that most of the allegations were proven unfounded “Judge Dimmick threw out most of Pancerzewski’s allegations (including the European tax issue and a separate age discrimination claim) for lack of evidence, but left it for the trial to determine the truth of his charge that Microsoft fraudulently “borrowed” from its cash reserves in relatively lean reporting periods and hoarded cash in the reserves during fatter times, in order to give a more orderly appearance to its earning pattern.”

    No report of any resulting adjudication is made.

  2. Cypress said,

    August 26, 2008 at 11:44 pm

    Gravatar

    Excellent article. It’s nice to see that people don’t forget and that not everything can be buried and forgotten. :)

  3. Sander Marechal said,

    August 27, 2008 at 1:52 am

    Gravatar

    Roy, please do what Eric S. Raymond did.

    Make a copy of those relevant articles. Then publish the article here *in full* but with enough of your own comments mixed in that it falls entirely under fair use. See the Halloween FAQ at http://www.catb.org/~esr/halloween/faq.html point “Would you please make un-annotated versions available?”.

    If external articles are important then it’s worth making copies. It keeps the information from disappearing from under our feet.

  4. Roy Schestowitz said,

    August 27, 2008 at 11:46 am

    Gravatar

    Update: in USENET, Rex Ballard has posted the following response:


    Message-ID: <d7e98c92-d352-4e27-a4f9-179712da3ad3@26g2000hsk.googlegroups.com>
    From: Rex Ballard <rex.ballard@gmail.com>
    Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
    Subject: Re: [Old] Microsoft is a Financial Fraud (Like Enron), Says Top Microsofter!
    Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 09:29:48 -0700 (PDT)

    > Microfraud?
    > ,—-[ Quote ]
    > | THE ALLEGATIONS WERE shocking: For years, Microsoft has systematically
    > | distorted its profit figures in an effort to consistently beat Wall Street
    > | expectations and keep its stock price steadily rising. The false reports
    > | would violate SEC regulations, and amount to outright fraud.

    This wasn’t such a big surprise, but the Clinton Administration wasn’t
    interested in investigating securities fraud that publicly. They
    understood that even the RUMOR of an SEC investigation could trigger
    panic around that stock, then that industry, and finally the entire
    market.

    The Bush administration put Harvey Pitt in charge of the SEC, and
    Harvey wanted to make a name for himself by initiating a bunch of very
    public investigations of former Bush supporters who didn’t come
    through for George W Bush when needed. The offenses were often less
    than 1% but the public investigation triggered panic selling that
    crashed 98% of the value of the stock, with WorldCom investors left
    with nothing, over a 1% irregularity.

    But the Bush Administration had zero interest in prosecuting
    Microsoft, who had made a number of political contributions, AND a
    number of contributions to charities suggested by Carl Rove and Jack
    Abramhov. Microsoft could have inflated it’s numbers by 25% but Bush
    wasn’t even going to enforce the actual judgement against Microsoft
    that they already had. Microsoft’s executives admitted under oath, in
    depositions, and in email divulged during discovery that they
    routinely engaged in fraud, extortion, blackmail, sabotage, and
    obstruction of justice, but the Bush Administration felt “Companies
    should have a right to profit from their innovations”. McCain has
    made an identical statement – I wonder how much Microsoft gave to the
    “streight talk express” and it’s puppet charities, and whether McCain
    is aware of how owned he is.

    Even though there have been something like 9,000 complaints against
    Microsoft and specific anticompetitive business practices, the DOJ has
    packed the “Technical committee” with Micrososft friendly members, so
    they don’t see anything wrong. And the DOJ itself tries to overrule
    several other states and say “There’s not a problem”.

    > | More shocking was the source of the allegations: Microsoft’s chief of
    > | internal audits, Charlie Pancerzewski, who reported directly to the company’s
    > | chief financial officer.

    And he reported the irregularities back in 1997, when nobody cared.

    > | Most shocking of all was what happened to Pancerzewski when he reported the
    > | suspicious bookkeeping to his supervisors, Microsoft CFO Mike Brown and chief
    > | operating officer Bob Herbold, in the spring of 1995. Soon afterward,
    > | Pancerzewski—who for nearly five years had received stellar performance
    > | evaluations—received his first-ever unsatisfactory one, and was eventually
    > | forced to resign.

    Yep. Microsoft was probably the leader in that corporate disease that
    made examples of a few
    “trouble-makers” who “weren’t team players” and “didn’t have the
    company religion”. It’s a good
    way to keep the others who know about the “little problem” from
    getting any “dangerous ideas”.

    > | Two months ago, Microsoft quietly settled a lawsuit containing these
    > | allegations, filed in 1997 by Pancerzewski under the Whistleblowers
    > | Protection Act. The auditor claimed he was wrongfully terminated after
    > | telling his supervisors that Microsoft might be breaking securities and tax
    > | laws. The lawsuit made its tortuous way through several rounds of pretrial
    > | motions until last fall, when US District Judge Carolyn Dimmick denied
    > | Microsoft’s final plea for summary judgment, finding credible evidence that
    > | Microsoft may have violated SEC rules, as Pancerzewski alleged. Shortly
    > | thereafter, Microsoft and Pancerzewski settled out of court. Terms of the
    > | agreement were sealed, but one source who claims familiarity with the case
    > | says that Microsoft paid Pancerzewski $4 million.

    Typical Microsoft tactic. Try to get a preliminary judgement, and if
    the judge gives
    you a clearly unfavorable ruling suggests further investigation, they
    bury the case
    by offering a settlement, having the records sealed, and barring the
    other party from
    testifying against Microsoft.

    > http://web.archive.org/web/20070308032343rn_2/www.seattleweekly.com/1

    > Why was this article removed last year? Why was the man paid 4 million to keep
    > is mouth shut? This is hugely damaging! It’s a smoking gun.

    > Another thing to point to when people ask: “why is Microsoft a criminal
    > organisation?”
    >
    > Recent:

    > Ex-Microsoft Manager Sentenced for Fraud
    > http://www.hardocp.com/news.html?news=MzM3NjYsLCxoZW50aHVzaWFzdCwsLDE=
    >
    > Ex-Microsoft Manager Pleads Guilty, Sentenced For Embezzlement
    > http://www.crn.com/software/209400603

    Notice how quickly the federal prosecutors went after the ex manager
    who was defrauding Microsoft. In the plea-bargain, she got 22 months,
    and just under $1 million in settlements.
    The 22 months may have helped her get into “club fed” and the actual
    amount might have been $1 million minus her own legal fees.

    > Ex-Microsoft manager ordered to prison
    > http://www.upi.com/Business_News/2008/07/19/Ex-Microsoft_manager_orde
    >
    > Ex-Microsoft manager jailed for $1m fraud
    > http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/2222135/microsoft-manager-jailed-1m
    >
    > Ex-Microsoft Manager Gets 22 Months for Fraud
    > http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/148642/exmicrosoft_mana
    >
    > Ex-Microsoft boss sentenced
    > http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/371393_msftcourt19.html
    >
    > Former Microsoft Manager Gets 2 Years In Jail
    > http://news.portalit.net/fullnews_former-microsoft-manager-gets-2-yea

    > Kirkland woman senteced to 22 months, ordered to repay nearly $1 million, for
    > embezzlement scheme
    > http://www.pnwlocalnews.com/news/25634819.html

    Wow, mess with Microsoft and your punishment will make LOTS of papers
    - message, don’t mess with Microsoft, they will mess you up.

What Else is New


  1. Links 23/4/2019: Kodi 'Leia' 18.2 and DeX Everywhere

    Links for the day



  2. Code of Coercion

    Entryism is visible for all to see, but pointing it out is becoming a risky gambit because of the "be nice!" (or "be polite!") crowd, which shields the perpetrators of a slow and gradual corporate takeover



  3. António Campinos Would Not Refer to the EPO's Enlarged Board of Appeal If He Did Not Control the Outcomes

    António Campinos and his ilk aren’t interested in patent quality because his former ‘boss’, who publicly denied there were issues and vainly rejected patent quality concerns as illegitimate, is now controlled by him (reversal of roles) and many new appointees at the top are "yes men" (or women) of Campinos, former colleagues whom he bossed at EUIPO (as expected)



  4. Links 22/4/2019: Linux 5.1 RC6, New Release of Netrunner and End of Scientific Linux

    Links for the day



  5. USPTO and EPO Both Slammed for Abandoning Patent Quality and Violating the Law/Caselaw in Order to Grant Illegitimate Patents on Life/Nature and Mathematics

    Mr. Iancu, the ‘American Battistelli’ (appointed owing to nepotism), mirrors the ‘Battistelli operandi’, which boils down to treating judges like they’re stooges and justices like an ignorable nuisance — all this in the name of litigation profits, which necessitate constant wars over illegitimate patents (it is expensive to prove their illegitimacy)



  6. IRC Proceedings: January 27th, 2019 – March 24th, 2019

    Many IRC logs



  7. IRC Proceedings: December 2nd, 2018 – January 26th, 2019

    Many IRC logs



  8. Links 21/4/2019: SuperTuxKart's 1.0 Release, Sam Hartman Is Debian’s Newest Project Leader (DPL)

    Links for the day



  9. The EPO's Use of Phrases Like “High-Quality Patent Services” Means They Know High-Quality European Patents Are 'Bygones'

    The EPO does a really poor job hiding the fact that its last remaining objective is to grant as many European Patents as possible (and as fast as possible), conveniently conflating quality with pace



  10. A Reader's Suggestion: Directions for Techrights

    Guest post by figosdev



  11. Links 20/4/2019: Weblate 3.6 and Pop!_OS 19.04

    Links for the day



  12. The Likes of Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys (CIPA), Team Campinos and Team UPC Don't Represent Europe But Hurt Europe

    The abject disinterest in patent quality and patent validity (as judged by courts) threatens Europe but not to the detriment of those who are in the 'business' of suing and printing lots of worthless patents



  13. The Linux Foundation Needs to Change Course Before GNU/Linux (as a Free Operating System) is Dead

    The issues associated with the Linux Foundation are not entirely new; but Linux now incorporates so many restrictions and contains so many binary blobs that one begins to wonder what "Linux" even means



  14. Largest Patent Offices Try to Leave Courts in a State of Disarray to Enable the Granting of Fake Patents in the US and Europe

    Like a monarchy that effectively runs all branches of government the management of the EPO is trying to work around the judiciary; the same is increasingly happening (or at least attempted) in the United States



  15. Links 19/4/2019: PyPy 7.1.1, LabPlot 2.6, Kipi Plugins 5.9.1 Released

    Links for the day



  16. Links 18/4/2019: Ubuntu and Derivatives Have Releases, digiKam 6.1.0, OpenSSH 8.0 and LibreOffice 6.2.3

    Links for the day



  17. Freedom is Not a Business and Those Who Make 'Business' by Giving it Away Deserve Naming

    Free software is being parceled and sold to private monopolisers; those who facilitate the process enrich themselves and pose a growing threat to freedom in general — a subject we intend to tackle in the near future



  18. Concluding the Linux Foundation (LF) “Putting the CON in Conference!” (Part 3)

    Conferences constructed or put together based on payments rather than merit pose a risk to the freedom of free software; we conclude our series about events set up by the largest of culprits, which profits from this erosion of freedom



  19. “Mention the War” (of Microsoft Against GNU/Linux)

    The GNU/Linux desktop (or laptops) seems to be languishing or deteriorating, making way for proprietary takeover in the form of Vista 10 and Chrome OS and “web apps” (surveillance); nobody seems too bothered — certainly not the Linux Foundation — by the fact that GNU/Linux itself is being relegated or demoted to a mere “app” on these surveillance platforms (WSL, Croûton and so on)



  20. The European Patent Office Does Not Care About the Law, Today's Management Constantly Attempts to Bypass the Law

    Many EPs (European Patents) are actually "IPs" (invalid patents); the EPO doesn't seem to care and it is again paying for corrupt scholars to toe the party line



  21. The US Supreme Court (SCOTUS) Once Again Pours Cold Water on Patent Maximalists

    Any hopes of a rebound or turnaround have just been shattered because a bizarre attack on the appeal process (misusing tribal immunity) fell on deaf ears and software patents definitely don't interest the highest court, which already deemed them invalid half a decade ago



  22. Links 17/4/2019: Qt 5.12.3 Released, Ola Bini Arrested (Political Stunts)

    Links for the day



  23. Links 16/4/2019: CentOS Turns 15, Qt Creator 4.9.0 Released

    Links for the day



  24. GNU/Linux is Being Eaten Alive by Large Corporations With Their Agenda

    A sort of corporate takeover, or moneyed interests at the expense of our freedom, can be seen as a 'soft coup' whose eventual outcome would involve all or most servers in 'the cloud' (surveillance with patent tax as part of the rental fees) and almost no laptops/desktops which aren't remotely controlled (and limit what's run on them, using something like UEFI 'secure boot')



  25. Reader's Claim That Rules Similar to the Code of Conduct (CoC) Were 'Imposed' on LibrePlanet and the FSF

    Restrictions on speech are said to have been spread and reached some of the most liberal circles, according to a credible veteran who opposes illiberal censorship



  26. Corporate Media Will Never Cover the EPO's Violations of the Law With Respect to Patent Scope

    The greed-driven gold rush for patents has resulted in a large pool of European Patents that have no legitimacy and are nowadays associated with low legal certainty; the media isn't interested in covering such a monumental disaster that poses a threat to the whole of Europe



  27. A Linux Foundation Run by People Who Reject Linux is Like a Children's Charity Whose Management Dislikes Children

    We remain concerned about the lack of commitment that the Linux Foundation has for Linux; much of the Linux Foundation's Board, for example, comes from hostile companies



  28. Links 15/4/2019: Linux 5.1 RC5 and SolydXK Reviewed

    Links for the day



  29. Links 14/4/2019: Blender 2.80 Release Plan and Ducktype 1.0

    Links for the day



  30. 'Poor' (Multi-Millionaire) Novell CEO, Who Colluded With Steve Ballmer Against GNU/Linux, is Trying to Censor Techrights

    Novell’s last CEO, a former IBMer who just like IBM decided to leverage software patents against the competition (threatening loads of companies using "platoons of patent lawyers"), has decided that siccing lawyers at us would be a good idea


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts