08.26.08

Financial Fraud Claimed at Microsoft; Microsoft Paid Microsoft Witness to Shut Up

Posted in Finance, Fraud, Microsoft at 6:28 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

The following old article is hugely damaging and we are fortunate to have found a copy of it in the Web Archive. It vanished from the Seattle Weekly.

This article, which is titled “Microfraud?”, provides a testimony from a Microsoft insider who claims financial fraud. Interestingly enough (but not so surprisingly), Microsoft paid him a fortune to go away, keep quiet, and for the terms of the settlement not to be disclosed (recall Iowa and Caldera for similar examples).

Here are the opening paragraphs from this article.

THE ALLEGATIONS WERE shocking: For years, Microsoft has systematically distorted its profit figures in an effort to consistently beat Wall Street expectations and keep its stock price steadily rising. The false reports would violate SEC regulations, and amount to outright fraud.

More shocking was the source of the allegations: Microsoft’s chief of internal audits, Charlie Pancerzewski, who reported directly to the company’s chief financial officer.

Most shocking of all was what happened to Pancerzewski when he reported the suspicious bookkeeping to his supervisors, Microsoft CFO Mike Brown and chief operating officer Bob Herbold, in the spring of 1995. Soon afterward, Pancerzewski—who for nearly five years had received stellar performance evaluations—received his first-ever unsatisfactory one, and was eventually forced to resign.

Two months ago, Microsoft quietly settled a lawsuit containing these allegations, filed in 1997 by Pancerzewski under the Whistleblowers Protection Act. The auditor claimed he was wrongfully terminated after telling his supervisors that Microsoft might be breaking securities and tax laws. The lawsuit made its tortuous way through several rounds of pretrial motions until last fall, when US District Judge Carolyn Dimmick denied Microsoft’s final plea for summary judgment, finding credible evidence that Microsoft may have violated SEC rules, as Pancerzewski alleged. Shortly thereafter, Microsoft and Pancerzewski settled out of court. Terms of the agreement were sealed, but one source who claims familiarity with the case says that Microsoft paid Pancerzewski $4 million.

Microsoft is claimed to have lost $18 billion in 1998. That is another article that magically vanished, but we managed to find a copy.

More recently, one financial manager from Microsoft was prosecuted for embezzlement [1, 2, 3]. If the legal system is functional, more Microsoft employees might need to be put in prison and it goes all the way to the top (managers). One of them ended up jailed about a month ago. There are other examples, such as Robert Bach, a Microsoft chief who was accused of inside-trading [1, 2]. There was never a trail, but there sure was evidece.

Novell, for that matter, is no saint, either. Novell too is said to be cooking its books, but the SEC does not see it.

There is a lot of investigation to do on this, and we shall continue to do it. Please post any corrections you may have so that we don’t make improper accusations.

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

4 Comments

  1. julian67 said,

    August 26, 2008 at 9:49 pm

    Gravatar

    The page referenced hasn’t vanished at all.

    It’s available at http://www.seattleweekly.com/1999-01-06/news/microfraud.php and dates from 1999. I accessed it without difficulty.

    It relates that most of the allegations were proven unfounded “Judge Dimmick threw out most of Pancerzewski’s allegations (including the European tax issue and a separate age discrimination claim) for lack of evidence, but left it for the trial to determine the truth of his charge that Microsoft fraudulently “borrowed” from its cash reserves in relatively lean reporting periods and hoarded cash in the reserves during fatter times, in order to give a more orderly appearance to its earning pattern.”

    No report of any resulting adjudication is made.

  2. Cypress said,

    August 26, 2008 at 11:44 pm

    Gravatar

    Excellent article. It’s nice to see that people don’t forget and that not everything can be buried and forgotten. :)

  3. Sander Marechal said,

    August 27, 2008 at 1:52 am

    Gravatar

    Roy, please do what Eric S. Raymond did.

    Make a copy of those relevant articles. Then publish the article here *in full* but with enough of your own comments mixed in that it falls entirely under fair use. See the Halloween FAQ at http://www.catb.org/~esr/halloween/faq.html point “Would you please make un-annotated versions available?”.

    If external articles are important then it’s worth making copies. It keeps the information from disappearing from under our feet.

  4. Roy Schestowitz said,

    August 27, 2008 at 11:46 am

    Gravatar

    Update: in USENET, Rex Ballard has posted the following response:


    Message-ID: <d7e98c92-d352-4e27-a4f9-179712da3ad3@26g2000hsk.googlegroups.com>
    From: Rex Ballard <rex.ballard@gmail.com>
    Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
    Subject: Re: [Old] Microsoft is a Financial Fraud (Like Enron), Says Top Microsofter!
    Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 09:29:48 -0700 (PDT)

    > Microfraud?
    > ,—-[ Quote ]
    > | THE ALLEGATIONS WERE shocking: For years, Microsoft has systematically
    > | distorted its profit figures in an effort to consistently beat Wall Street
    > | expectations and keep its stock price steadily rising. The false reports
    > | would violate SEC regulations, and amount to outright fraud.

    This wasn’t such a big surprise, but the Clinton Administration wasn’t
    interested in investigating securities fraud that publicly. They
    understood that even the RUMOR of an SEC investigation could trigger
    panic around that stock, then that industry, and finally the entire
    market.

    The Bush administration put Harvey Pitt in charge of the SEC, and
    Harvey wanted to make a name for himself by initiating a bunch of very
    public investigations of former Bush supporters who didn’t come
    through for George W Bush when needed. The offenses were often less
    than 1% but the public investigation triggered panic selling that
    crashed 98% of the value of the stock, with WorldCom investors left
    with nothing, over a 1% irregularity.

    But the Bush Administration had zero interest in prosecuting
    Microsoft, who had made a number of political contributions, AND a
    number of contributions to charities suggested by Carl Rove and Jack
    Abramhov. Microsoft could have inflated it’s numbers by 25% but Bush
    wasn’t even going to enforce the actual judgement against Microsoft
    that they already had. Microsoft’s executives admitted under oath, in
    depositions, and in email divulged during discovery that they
    routinely engaged in fraud, extortion, blackmail, sabotage, and
    obstruction of justice, but the Bush Administration felt “Companies
    should have a right to profit from their innovations”. McCain has
    made an identical statement – I wonder how much Microsoft gave to the
    “streight talk express” and it’s puppet charities, and whether McCain
    is aware of how owned he is.

    Even though there have been something like 9,000 complaints against
    Microsoft and specific anticompetitive business practices, the DOJ has
    packed the “Technical committee” with Micrososft friendly members, so
    they don’t see anything wrong. And the DOJ itself tries to overrule
    several other states and say “There’s not a problem”.

    > | More shocking was the source of the allegations: Microsoft’s chief of
    > | internal audits, Charlie Pancerzewski, who reported directly to the company’s
    > | chief financial officer.

    And he reported the irregularities back in 1997, when nobody cared.

    > | Most shocking of all was what happened to Pancerzewski when he reported the
    > | suspicious bookkeeping to his supervisors, Microsoft CFO Mike Brown and chief
    > | operating officer Bob Herbold, in the spring of 1995. Soon afterward,
    > | Pancerzewski—who for nearly five years had received stellar performance
    > | evaluations—received his first-ever unsatisfactory one, and was eventually
    > | forced to resign.

    Yep. Microsoft was probably the leader in that corporate disease that
    made examples of a few
    “trouble-makers” who “weren’t team players” and “didn’t have the
    company religion”. It’s a good
    way to keep the others who know about the “little problem” from
    getting any “dangerous ideas”.

    > | Two months ago, Microsoft quietly settled a lawsuit containing these
    > | allegations, filed in 1997 by Pancerzewski under the Whistleblowers
    > | Protection Act. The auditor claimed he was wrongfully terminated after
    > | telling his supervisors that Microsoft might be breaking securities and tax
    > | laws. The lawsuit made its tortuous way through several rounds of pretrial
    > | motions until last fall, when US District Judge Carolyn Dimmick denied
    > | Microsoft’s final plea for summary judgment, finding credible evidence that
    > | Microsoft may have violated SEC rules, as Pancerzewski alleged. Shortly
    > | thereafter, Microsoft and Pancerzewski settled out of court. Terms of the
    > | agreement were sealed, but one source who claims familiarity with the case
    > | says that Microsoft paid Pancerzewski $4 million.

    Typical Microsoft tactic. Try to get a preliminary judgement, and if
    the judge gives
    you a clearly unfavorable ruling suggests further investigation, they
    bury the case
    by offering a settlement, having the records sealed, and barring the
    other party from
    testifying against Microsoft.

    > http://web.archive.org/web/20070308032343rn_2/www.seattleweekly.com/1

    > Why was this article removed last year? Why was the man paid 4 million to keep
    > is mouth shut? This is hugely damaging! It’s a smoking gun.

    > Another thing to point to when people ask: “why is Microsoft a criminal
    > organisation?”
    >
    > Recent:

    > Ex-Microsoft Manager Sentenced for Fraud
    > http://www.hardocp.com/news.html?news=MzM3NjYsLCxoZW50aHVzaWFzdCwsLDE=
    >
    > Ex-Microsoft Manager Pleads Guilty, Sentenced For Embezzlement
    > http://www.crn.com/software/209400603

    Notice how quickly the federal prosecutors went after the ex manager
    who was defrauding Microsoft. In the plea-bargain, she got 22 months,
    and just under $1 million in settlements.
    The 22 months may have helped her get into “club fed” and the actual
    amount might have been $1 million minus her own legal fees.

    > Ex-Microsoft manager ordered to prison
    > http://www.upi.com/Business_News/2008/07/19/Ex-Microsoft_manager_orde
    >
    > Ex-Microsoft manager jailed for $1m fraud
    > http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/2222135/microsoft-manager-jailed-1m
    >
    > Ex-Microsoft Manager Gets 22 Months for Fraud
    > http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/148642/exmicrosoft_mana
    >
    > Ex-Microsoft boss sentenced
    > http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/371393_msftcourt19.html
    >
    > Former Microsoft Manager Gets 2 Years In Jail
    > http://news.portalit.net/fullnews_former-microsoft-manager-gets-2-yea

    > Kirkland woman senteced to 22 months, ordered to repay nearly $1 million, for
    > embezzlement scheme
    > http://www.pnwlocalnews.com/news/25634819.html

    Wow, mess with Microsoft and your punishment will make LOTS of papers
    - message, don’t mess with Microsoft, they will mess you up.

What Else is New


  1. 'Ethical Source' is Not Ethical and Not a Movement But a Misguided Self-Serving PR Stunt

    Something which is neither enforceable nor ethical is being promoted by profoundly unethical media in the pockets of large corporations



  2. InteLeaks – Part XXI: Intel Seeking Advice From a Bunch of Clowns (Harbor 'Research')

    A firm called Harbor 'Research' is making dubious recommendations to Intel; as shown in the above video, there's also an obsession with buzzwords (typically suggestive of a lack of technical grasp/understanding)



  3. IRC Proceedings: Monday, January 18, 2021

    IRC logs for Monday, January 18, 2021



  4. The US Election Was Not Rigged, But the Nomination Process Was (Undermined to Maintain Control by Oligarchy)

    Cheating/driving the left out of the Democratic Party seems like a longstanding tradition and we know who stands to gain from it; moreover, problems remain in the voting process because it's controlled by secret code of companies like Microsoft (in spite of the openwashing)



  5. InteLeaks – Part XX: Redacted (for Names Only) Release of Intel File About Developer eXperience (DX) Meddling in GNU/Linux

    Today (or tonight) we release the first 'phase' of InteLeaks in a sensibly redacted form; coming up next is a surprise from Team Microsoft



  6. Sites in Bed With the EPO and UPC 'Covering' the 'News' Without Mentioning Any of the Overt Abuses

    It is rather sad that blogs like IP Kat have turned into proponents of abusive EPO management and Team UPC increasingly resorts to lying using pseudonyms (to avert criticism and accountability); much of the rebuttal or response that’s hinged on reality/facts can only be found in comments, which are still subjected to a face-saving moderation process (conducted by Team UPC)



  7. Suppressed Facts of the Free Software Movement and Its Community of Volunteers – Part IV: Stories From the Depths of the Free Software Foundation (FSF)

    To reduce or alleviate suspicions and a potential of mistrust the FSF needs to become more transparent and liberate information (such as the real reason Bradley Kuhn left, as noted in the previous part)



  8. Links 18/1/2021: GNU Radio 3.9, Wikipedia at 20

    Links for the day



  9. InteLeaks – Part XIX: Intel's Web 'Experts' Seen as Microsoft Champions Dealing With the Platform Microsoft is Looking to Destroy

    Things aren't rosy at Intel because the hires aren't suitable for the job of documenting and/or presenting GNU/Linux-centric products (whose target audience is Free software developers)



  10. Adding Images as Characters to the Daily Bulletins of Techrights

    Our daily bulletins now have inside them coarse graphics, depicted using characters alone, and the tool used to generate them announced a new release earlier today; we showcase some of its features (in a new video)



  11. Links 18/1/2021: Weekly Summaries and Linux 5.11 RC4

    Links for the day



  12. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, January 17, 2021

    IRC logs for Sunday, January 17, 2021



  13. The Oligarchs' Parties Will Never Choose the Side of Software Freedom Because Free Software Cannot Bribe Officials

    The tough reality is that next week's (or this coming week's, depending on what Sunday counts as) inauguration ceremony is partly symbolic as all the same and important issues remain largely untouched, for corporations control almost everything of significance



  14. COVID-19 Has Actually Helped Software Freedom Due to Financial and 'Spare Time' Factors

    Developers and users are increasingly exploring what the Free software world has to offer; this is actually measurable and it contradicts claims to the contrary



  15. Future Plans and Using Videos to Complement Text

    Remarks on recent and impending site changes; We are not replacing text with video, we're just trying to enhance the presentation a bit, especially where visuals help make a point or where browsing through Web sites (or leaks) is more suitable than static, linear presentation



  16. InteLeaks – Part XVIII: Intel Does Not Know How to Properly Do Research and It Seems Apparent Unscientific Methods Are Used to Justify Poor Documentation

    There appears to be a severe crisis at Intel; they cannot recruit scientists (or those whom they recruited are walking away) and as a result the company produces bad products with poor documentation (or highly defective chipsets that top-notch marketing cannot compensate for); in this video we walk through some examples of how studies are being conducted (as already noted in Part XVII)



  17. Suppressed Facts of the Free Software Movement and Its Community of Volunteers – Part III: The Free Software Foundation (FSF) Seems More Like a Victim of Destabilisation Campaigns

    The Free Software Foundation (FSF), which turns 36 later this year, is looking to raise money that helps support the GNU Project, soon 38 years old and likely the most important Free software project to exist (ever)



  18. Links 17/1/2021: EasyOS on Raspberry Pi and GNU libsigsegv 2.13

    Links for the day



  19. InteLeaks – Part XVII: The High Cost of Microsoft Windows Users in GNU/Linux Development Teams

    A look inside Intel explains what holds back the technical team, which bemoans the lesser technical people getting in the way and not even using the product that they are writing about



  20. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, January 16, 2021

    IRC logs for Saturday, January 16, 2021



  21. Suppressed Facts of the Free Software Movement and Its Community of Volunteers – Part II: Why Bradley Kuhn Left the Free Software Foundation (FSF)

    The founder of the FSF is still at the FSF (albeit not publicly) and the person who lobbied to oust him has basically been 'banished' by the founder



  22. Links 16/1/2021: LibreOffice 7.1 Release Candidate, Zeroshell 3.9.5, FreeBSD Report, and GhostBSD 21.01.15

    Links for the day



  23. Free Speech on the Web Not Respected by Companies That Used to Support Software Freedom

    Mozilla does not have to make its Web browser about politics; it can just make an excellent piece of software that is neutral about the Web pages that it renders, based on the user's personal preferences



  24. Suppressed Facts of the Free Software Movement and Its Community of Volunteers – Part I: We Are Under Attack by Corporations and Their Salaried Facilitators

    The corporate takeover (taking over the Commons, produced by volunteers who are motivated by altruism) is a subject we must speak about and somehow tackle; this series will highlight uncomfortable or difficult truths



  25. InteLeaks – Part XVI: Intel Cannot Do Command Line, Even When It's Vastly Simpler and More Suitable for Development

    The Developer eXperience (DX) team at Intel seems to be full of Microsoft drones instead of developers and/or mildly technical people; this has not only harmed the quality of documentation but also upset staff, alienating people who actually understand what developers need (more than buzzwords like "DX")



  26. IRC Proceedings: Friday, January 15, 2021

    IRC logs for Friday, January 15, 2021



  27. Links 15/1/2021: KaOS 2021.01, Whisker Menu 2.5.2, Istio 1.8.2

    Links for the day



  28. InteLeaks – Part XV: Intel is Blind to Blind and Colour-Blind People

    Intel does not seem to grasp very basic concepts associated with accessibility; nevertheless, Intel shamelessly tries painting itself as "woke" and a "justice warrior" (policing speech while overlooking much-needed practical work)



  29. Links 15/1/2021: GStreamer 1.18.3 and Proton 5.13-5

    Links for the day



  30. IRC Proceedings: Thursday, January 14, 2021

    IRC logs for Thursday, January 14, 2021


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts