11.07.08

Request for Mono Licence from Microsoft: Ascending to Nicos Tsilas

Posted in GNU/Linux, Microsoft, Mono, Novell, Patents at 3:12 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Microsoft Licensing seems to be refusing to respond to our previous polite requests for a Mono licence [1, 2], so we are left with no choice but to contact individual people. See the previous requests for context. Here is the latest.

From: Roy Schestowitz
To: ntsilas at microsoft.com
Date: Wed, Nov 7, 2008
Subject: Request for a written license for ECMA 334 implementation

Dear Nicos Tsilas,

I tried contacting iplg@microsoft.com a couple of times over the past month, but was unable to receive a reply. I am therefore expressing my determination to receive a licence for commercial distribution of Mono, in accordance with your terms presented by Bob Muglia:
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,2060750,00.asp

“There is a substantive effort in open source to bring such an
implementation of .Net to market, known as Mono and being driven by
Novell, and one of the attributes of the agreement we made with Novell
is that the intellectual property associated with that is available to
Novell customers.”

According to several legal analyses, Mono is not safe for those who are
not Novell customers to use. I would therefore like to purchase a licence.

Best regards,

Roy Schestowitz

Funnily enough, the man who interviewed Bob Muglia in the article above became a Microsoft employee. Incestuous press, eh?

Let’s hope for a prompt reply. We advise other people who are concerned about Mono (i.e. people who use Mono and are not Novell customers) to do likewise. Here are the contact details.

Nicos L. Tsilas
Senior Director IP & Interoperability Policy
Government and Industry Affairs

ntsilas at microsoft.com
Tel (425) 705-8476
Fax (425) 708-5204

Microsoft Corp
One Microsoft Way
Redmond, WA 98052-6399

This is the person with whom you get in touch for ‘permission’ to make programs play nice with each other, for a fee (paid to Microsoft).

As a side note, the author of the OSP will come to the workshop on patents on in the middle of this month. It takes place in Europe where software patents are not legal (but Microsoft is breaking the rules anyway, using loopholes). █

“[The EPO] can’t distinguish between hardware and software so the patents get issued anyway”.”

–Marshall Phelps, Microsoft

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.

Permalink Mail Send this to a friend

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

Microsoft Willing to Sell Us ‘Protection’ for Use of Mono

3 Comments

Penny Lane said,

November 9, 2008 at 8:00 am

Who is “the author of the OSP”?
Roy Schestowitz said,

November 9, 2008 at 8:22 am

I’d have to ask someone.
Penny Lane said,

November 9, 2008 at 12:21 pm

I’m keen to know.

What Else is New

Links 17/8/2019: Unigine 2.9 and Git 2.23

Links for the day
Computer-Generated Patent Applications Show That Patents and Innovations Are Very Different Things

The 'cheapening' of the concept of 'inventor' (or 'invention') undermines the whole foundation/basis of the patent system and deep inside patent law firms know it
Concerns About IBM's Commitment to OpenSource.com After the Fall of Linux.com and Linux Journal

The Web site OpenSource.com is over two decades old; in its current form it's about a decade old and it contains plenty of good articles, but will IBM think so too and, if so, will investment in the site carry on?
Electronic Frontier Foundation Makes a Mistake by Giving Award to Microsoft Surveillance Person

At age 30 (almost) the Electronic Frontier Foundation still campaigns for privacy; so why does it grant awards to enemies of privacy?
Caturdays and Sundays at Techrights Will Get Busier

Our plan to spend the weekends writing more articles about Software Freedom; it seems like a high-priority issue
Why Techrights Doesn't Do Social Control Media

Being managed and censored by platform owners (sometimes their shareholders) isn’t an alluring proposition when a site challenges conformist norms and the status quo; Techrights belongs in a platform of its own
Patent Prosecution Highways and Examination Highways Are Dooming the EPO

Speed is not a measure of quality; but today's EPO is just trying to get as much money as possible, as fast as possible (before the whole thing implodes)
Software Patents Won't Come Back Just Because They're (Re)Framed/Branded as "HEY HI" (AI)

The pattern we've been observing in recent years is, patent applicants and law firms simply rewrite applications to make these seem patent-eligible on the surface (owing to deliberate deception) and patent offices facilitate these loopholes in order to fake 'growth'
IP Kat Pays the Price for Being a Megaphone of Team UPC

The typical or the usual suspects speak out about the so-called 'prospects' (with delusions of inevitability) of the Unified Patent Court Agreement, neglecting to account for their own longterm credibility
Links 17/8/2019: Wine 4.14 is Out, Debian Celebrates 26 years

Links for the day
Nothing Says 'New' Microsoft Like Microsoft Component Firmware Update (More Hardware Lock-in)

Vicious old Microsoft is still trying to make life very hard for GNU/Linux, especially in the OEM channel/s, but we're somehow supposed to think that "Microsoft loves Linux"
Bill Gates and His Special Relationship With Jeffrey Epstein Still Stirring Speculations

Love of the "children" has long been a controversial subject for Microsoft; can Bill Gates and his connections to Jeffrey Epstein unearth some unsavoury secrets?
Links 16/8/2019: Kdevops and QEMU 4.1

Links for the day
The EPO's War on the Convention on the Grant of European Patents 2000 (EPC 2000), Not Just Brexit, Kills the Unitary Patent (UP/UPC) and Dooms Justice

Team UPC continues to ignore the utter failures that have led to lawlessness at the EPO, attributing the demise of the Unified Patent Court (UPC) to Brexit alone and pretending that it's not even a problem
Links 15/8/2019: GNOME's Birthday, LLVM 9.0 RC2

Links for the day
'Foundation' Hype Spreads in China

Nonprofits seem to have become more of a business loophole than a charitable endeavour; the problem is, this erodes confidence in legitimate Free software and good causes
Links Are Not Endorsements

If the only alternative is to say nothing and link to nothing, then we have a problem; a lot of people still assume that because someone links to something it therefore implies agreement and consent
The Myth of 'Professionalism'

Perception of professionalism, a vehicle or a motivation for making Linux more 'corporate-friendly' (i.e. owned by corporations), is a growing threat to Software Freedom inside Linux, as well as freedom of speech and many other things
Links 14/8/2019: Best Chromebooks, EPEL 8.0, LibreOffice 6.2.6

Links for the day
Being in Favour of Free/Libre Open Source Software Means Rejecting Software Patents

Those who believe in Software Freedom cannot at the same time believe that software patents are desirable; we've sadly come to a point where many companies that dominate so-called 'Open Source' groups actively lobby for such patents, in effect betraying the community they claim to be a part of
Links 14/8/2019: Apache Evaluated, HardenedBSD Has New Release

Links for the day
Planet Python is Being Overrun by Microsoft, Just Like PyCon and Python in General

Microsoft is perturbing the Free/Open Source software (FOSS) world from the inside, promoting Microsoft's most malicious proprietary software from within that world while taking positions of power in powerful FOSS projects
Coming Soon: The Innards of the Eric Lundgren Case That Microsoft is Desperate to Hide or Spin (by Defaming Lundgren)

Microsoft is rather stressed about Eric Lundgren coming out of prison and telling how Microsoft put him there; right now Microsoft is mostly name-calling while seeking to control public dialogues
Wrong Person in Charge of the Linux Foundation (and in Charge of Linus Torvalds)

There are several glaring issues when it comes to the leadership of Linux's steward; for one thing, it lacks actual background in... Linux
2019 Tech Glossary

This clavis refers to what the de facto definition may be, based on how (and when) media uses the words nowadays
The Silence of the Media Lamb

There are reasons that are perfectly legitimate to criticise media which is unable and more so unwilling to cover particular scandals for fear that coverage can be detrimental to the media's owners and sponsors
LINUX.COM Managed by Apple’s MacOS Users, Open Source Managed and Covered by People Who Reject Open Source

The narratives are being hijacked; people who we're supposed to assume speak for Linux and for Open Source support neither of these things; they're only in it for the money
The Linux Foundation's Open Source Summit is a Proprietary Software Marketing Venue

The distortion of the term Open Source and promotion of proprietary software such as GitHub shows that the foundation called after “Linux” is actually more of a front group of hostile corporations — large brands and rich people to whom Open Source represents a threat that needs to be controlled
Links 13/8/2019: Mir 1.4 Released, Qt PDF Discussed

Links for the day
Links 13/8/2019: KDevelop 5.4.1 and DragonFly 5.6.2 Released

Links for the day