11.19.08

Gemini version available ♊︎

Analyst Lies and Novell Business Growth

Posted in Deception, FUD, GNU/Linux, Microsoft, Novell at 11:17 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

No Value

A reader from Brazil has just informed (even warned) us that Novell is trying in Brazil what it has already done in India [1, 2, 3, 4] and in China.

Novell’s non-organic growth and proprietary niches aside, the company constantly deceives the public in order to earn some new business. In the process, Novell ridicules software like GNU/Linux (anything other than SUSE) and OpenOffice.org (in order to sell Go-OO support).

“Novell ridicules software like GNU/Linux (anything other than SUSE) and OpenOffice.org (in order to sell Go-OO support).”It’s a horrible way of doing business, but that’s just what Novell does, for Microsoft’s benefit and with Microsoft’s endorsement (sometimes assistance too). That’s the key point. Watch what happened in India less than a week ago. Novell did exactly that.

Some readers might remember a bogus study on satisfaction with the Novell deal. It was conducted by the very ‘impartial’ (and increasingly-assimilated) Novell and Microsoft, then shredded to pieces [1, 2]. The public scrutiny and criticism did not prevent Novell’s Justin Steinman from making outrageous statements like “I think the vast majority, and I’d quantify that at about 80 percent to 85 percent, of the open source community actually supports this deal [with Microsoft].”

Mary Jo Foley cites the new ComputerWorld article where I am interviewed, but she refutes my claims with the words of the Yankee Group.

Red Hat held firm and wouldn’t succumb to CEO Steve Ballmer’s infringement sabre-rattling. In March 2007, Yankee Group issued a study noting that Novell’s share was growing vis-a-vis Red Hat’s, and said Microsoft’s certificate distribution was the main reason. And Microsoft and Novell proudly touted customers who they claimed were eager to seek shelter from potential Microsoft patent lawsuits by signing up for SuSE Linux.

Yankee Group, eh? Their history with Microsoft [1, 2] speaks more loudly than their so-called ‘research’, which is merely being ordered by clients (IBM is one of them too). Would this study from the Yankee Group be anything like those other lies which they produced a few months ago and were later forced to retract for falsehoods?

“Open source is not a movement; it’s a religion. It is a set of principles and practices that let everyone share non-existent or semi-existent intellectual property. Remember the Communist Manifesto: “From each according to his ability, to each according to his need.” It is this generation’s Woodstock.”

Howard Anderson Framingham
Founder of The Yankee Group (2007)

If anyone is interested in other figures about Novell’s growth (or lack thereof), the results from Alfresco's barometer are worth revisiting. Alfresco’s bias, if any, is in Novell’s favour. As Alfresco’s marketing VP stated some days ago, “I was at Novell when Novell vice-chairman Chris Stone and others began to feel their way toward Linux, first with the Ximian acquisition and then with the SUSE acquisition.

Analysts: “Just Ignore Them”

The last time we wrote about the Gartner Group was yesterday. Glyn Moody had kicked off quite a debate around the Web, stretching from CNET to OStatis and beyond.

Moody spoke to Eben Moglen of the Software Freedom Law Center who indicated that while license violations happen, a civil phone call explaining the situation results in companies willingly complying. Moglen indicates that serious consequences for an infringing company would only arise from a willing, persistent disregard for the applicable license.

Asay makes the further point — a good one — that a company should plain and simple have a plan for managing software whether it be open source or proprietary. I’d go so far to add that a plan is needed, regardless of company size or industry (it doesn’t matter that IT isn’t the business’s main focus — it is necessary to know what is running, where). Part of software management is license management — and though there are differences between development licenses, and end user licenses, there are overlaps.

Software has rules — regardless of whether the source is open or not. Businesses (and users) shouldn’t think (or be led to believe) otherwise. But the open source method — and approach to upholding the licenses — seems a compelling reason to use it, rather than a liability.

Moody has just identified similar ‘analyst’ disinformation being disseminated, so he comments on “analyst cluelessness” yet again.

[F]or Wikipedia: nobody gets paid, but look at the results. In just a few years it has succeeded in creating an unmatched respository of human knowledge, to the point where it is pretty widely regarded as the first place to look stuff up, despite its undeniable imperfections.

As with Gartner, this seems to be a case of analysts simply telling their clients what they want to hear, rather than what they need to know. Hence my general contempt for the breed, with a few honourable exceptions – RedMonk and the 451 Group spring to mind – that both know what they are talking about, and tell it as it is.

The problem with analysts is not that they are clueless; their main problem is that in order to earn money they need to lie, spin, deceive, embellish and accentuate every now again, on behalf of their paying customers, future (prospective) paymasters [1, 2, 3], or former paymasters.

There used to be something that’s akin to analysts who are less corruptible and less likely to be bribed; it was called academia, but that too is being deluged by corporations these days [1, 2, 3].

We will soon have a detailed FAQ that sheds light on Novell and its negative impacts. A lot of semi-truths are disinformation get spread by the press to confuse people and rewrite the story we all knew it back in 2006.

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

Decor ᶃ Gemini Space

Below is a Web proxy. We recommend getting a Gemini client/browser.

Black/white/grey bullet button This post is also available in Gemini over at this address (requires a Gemini client/browser to open).

Decor ✐ Cross-references

Black/white/grey bullet button Pages that cross-reference this one, if any exist, are listed below or will be listed below over time.

Decor ▢ Respond and Discuss

Black/white/grey bullet button If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

A Single Comment

  1. Jose_X said,

    November 19, 2008 at 12:34 pm

    Gravatar

    “From each according to his ability, to each according to his need.”

    Except that the unpaid giving is voluntary and often done very enthusiastically. The paid giving, of course, can be forced (or lose job).

    As for the receiving, anyone can take advantage of this material to improve their free market business as well as however one might gain from having access to no-charge software usable with few if any restrictions and with the ability to change it to suit.

    That’s hardly communism. Are all hobbyists now communists? Are all private donors communists? Are all nonprofit corp employees communists? Are all people paid to collaborate with competitors on some projects communists as well? The people insinuating that this is the case should lose their jobs for dishonesty or for some level of incompetence (unless their jobs skills require one or both of these skills).

DecorWhat Else is New


  1. Links 04/06/2023: Why Flatpak and Wealth of Devices With GNU/Linux

    Links for the day



  2. Gemini Links 04/06/2023: Rosy Crow 1.1.3 and NearlyFreeSpeech.NET

    Links for the day



  3. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, June 03, 2023

    IRC logs for Saturday, June 03, 2023



  4. Links 04/06/2023: Azure Outage Again (So Many!) and Tiananmen Massacre Censored

    Links for the day



  5. Links 03/06/2023: Qubes OS 4.2.0 RC1 and elementaryOS Updates for May

    Links for the day



  6. Gemini Links 03/06/2023: Hidden Communities and Exam Prep is Not Education

    Links for the day



  7. Links 03/06/2023: IBM Betraying LibreOffice Some More (After Laying off LibreOffice Developers)

    Links for the day



  8. Gemini Links 03/06/2023: Bubble Woes and Zond Updates

    Links for the day



  9. Links 03/06/2023: Apache NetBeans 18 and ArcaOS 5.0.8

    Links for the day



  10. IRC Proceedings: Friday, June 02, 2023

    IRC logs for Friday, June 02, 2023



  11. The Developing World Abandons Microsoft Windows, GNU/Linux at All-Time Highs on Desktops/Laptops

    Microsoft, with 80 billion dollars in longterm debt and endless layoffs, is losing the monopolies; the media doesn’t mention this, but some publicly-accessible data helps demonstrate that



  12. Links 02/06/2023: Elive ‘Retrowave’ Stable and Microsoft's Half a Billion Dollar Fine for LinkeIn Surveillance in Europe

    Links for the day



  13. Linux Foundation 'Research' Has a New Report and Of Course It Uses Only Proprietary Software

    The Linux Foundation has a new report, promoted by Clickfraud Spamnil and others; of course they’re rejecting Free software, they’re just riding the “Linux” brand and speak of “Open Source” (which they reject themselves)



  14. Links 02/06/2023: Arti 1.1.5 and SQL:2023

    Links for the day



  15. Gemini Links 02/06/2023: Vimwiki Revisited, SGGS Revisited

    Links for the day



  16. Geminispace/GemText/Gemini Protocol Turn 4 on June 20th

    Gemini is turning 4 this month (on the 20th, according to the founder) and I thought I’d do a spontaneous video about how I use Gemini, why it's so good, and why it’s still growing (Stéphane Bortzmeyer fixed the broken cron job — or equivalent of it — a day or two after I had mentioned the issue)



  17. HMRC Does Not Care About Tax Fraud Committed by UK Government Contractor, Sirius 'Open Source'

    The tax crimes of Sirius ‘Open Source’ were reported to HMRC two weeks ago; HMRC did not bother getting back to the reporters (victims of the crime) and it’s worth noting that the reporters worked on UK government systems for many years, so maybe there’s a hidden incentive to bury this under the rug



  18. Our IRC at 15th Anniversary

    So our IRC community turns 15 today (sort of) and I’ve decided to do a video reflecting on the fact that some of the same people are still there after 15 years



  19. IRC Proceedings: Thursday, June 01, 2023

    IRC logs for Thursday, June 01, 2023



  20. Links 02/06/2023: NixOS 23.05 and Rust 1.70.0

    Links for the day



  21. Gemini Links 02/06/2023: Flying High With Gemini and Gogios Released

    Links for the day



  22. Links 01/06/2023: KStars 3.6.5 and VEGA ET1031 RISC-V Microprocessor in Use

    Links for the day



  23. Gemini Links 01/06/2023: Scam Call and Flying High With Gemini

    Links for the day



  24. Links 01/06/2023: Spleen 2.0.0 Released and Team UPC Celebrates Its Own Corruption

    Links for the day



  25. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, May 31, 2023

    IRC logs for Wednesday, May 31, 2023



  26. Tux Machines Closing the Door on Twitter Because Twitter is Dead (for a Lot of People)

    Tux Machines recently joined millions of others who had already quit Twitter, including passive posting (fully or partly automated)



  27. Links 31/05/2023: Inkscape’s 1.3 Plans and New ARM Cortex-A55-Based Linux Chip

    Links for the day



  28. Gemini Links 31/05/2023: Personality of Software Engineers

    Links for the day



  29. Links 31/05/2023: Armbian 23.05 Release and Illegal UPC

    Links for the day



  30. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, May 30, 2023

    IRC logs for Tuesday, May 30, 2023


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts