EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

07.14.09

How the Gates Foundation Helps Getting Children Addicted

Posted in Africa, America, Asia, Bill Gates, Finance, GNU/Linux, Microsoft, Patents at 2:51 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

“They’ll get sort of addicted, and then we’ll somehow figure out how to collect sometime in the next decade.”

Bill Gates

Summary: The Gates Foundation makes children dependent not only on expensive drug patents [1, 2] but on Microsoft also

ON NUMEROUS occasions in the past we explained all those Microsoft addictions that are imposed upon young children and adolescents through their school systems. They essentially get indoctrinated without being offered any choice/escape, and assumed to be receptive of the software they are taught to depend on. It is software which was designed to take away their independence and freedom, turning them to perpetual customers. In our latest post on the subject, we showed that “Elevate America” is somewhat of an equivalent of “EDGI”, which may be specifically intended to make people “addicted”, as Bill Gates honestly put at least once in the past. This does not prevent Microsoft and its loyal press (Seattle P-I in this case) from describing all this “addiction” as generous donation. Spot the latest spin:

Microsoft will contribute up to $50 million’s worth in software, training and certifications to worldwide higher education and workforce training, the company announced today at a forum it hosted in Paris.

If not a shameless lie, this is deception at best. Software has no cost associated with duplication, so Microsoft is inflating numbers and casting the state-funded conversion of schools to Microsoft recruitment camps as something charitable.

To address a similar subject, all schools in Brazil are moving to GNU/Linux and the Huffington Post has just covered this massive transformation.

Fifty million Brazilian students will have Christmas in July when software Santa slips down the chimney to give them a free ticket on the information highway.

With Microsoft software licenses costing up to 1000 percent more in Brazil than in the US, the ProInfo program launched by the government of president Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva reduces dependence on costly foreign software just as the sugar ethanol program for cars reduces dependence on expensive foreign oil. The program, administered through the national education secretariat. provides free operating systems, backbone and educational content employing Linux, Debian and KD3 freeware.

Beneath the surface, this story is a lot more complicated. Michael has just visited Brazil on behalf of Red Hat or the OSI and here is what he found out about things Microsoft does (or tries to do) in Brazil.

On the alarm front, I heard specific confirmation of a storyline I’ve been following, which is that the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is basically telling governments: if you want contributions/investments from us, then you’ll give Microsoft cabinet-level access to inform policy, and you’ll use Microsoft products. For example, donations to educational initiatives require installing and teaching Microsoft products. It is similar to another story line reported by Roy Shestowitz. My informant told me that she was fortunately able to point out to the President that this was against Brazil’s sovereignty and interest, and is one of the reasons that President Lula came to FISL, to show is support for the freedoms that “software livre” (aka free software, aka open source) mean to Brazil.

This sure sounds like a form of extortion and it is hardly surprising given what we saw in other countries such as India. Blackmail through withdrawal of incentives in something that we previously saw in Kenya for example. Bill Gates uses the Foundation to pressure governments — and sometimes companies — to buy Microsoft (and only Microsoft). There are of course many other issues such as the fact that Bill and Melinda Gates use their Foundation to avoid paying tax, just as Microsoft uses Ireland to bring taxation down to near 0%. As a timely note on the subject, Groklaw highlights this new document about Xilinx losing its right to play such games around revenue tax. The tide is changing, despite Microsoft's blackmail of Obama.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

10 Comments

  1. Andrew Macabe said,

    July 14, 2009 at 10:59 am

    Gravatar

    On software: Packaging and storing windows on store shelves is really a losing proposition in itself. To microsoft it’s more an investment by establishing a commercial/consumer value on products (windows, msoffice, etc.) no one in their right frame of mind would actually pay or even copy. Given that the “value” for the product is therefore established, the campaigning for profit begins by snaring the various governmental depts; education, military, police, charities, etc. How many packaged, boxed products does a corporation get when it pays a site license for a windows os?

    There is nothing of any value that the USA can export except its GNP, which is its natural resources (natural gas, coal, etc. – Welcome to the order of 3rd world countries, America), so, it’s concentrating on Intellectual Property licensing (money from nothing-patents on ideas and concepts) and pushing American corporate mentality (ACTA, CompTIA, BSA, etc.) on to other countries.

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Both ACTA and ACT are pushing American corporate mentality, but I think you meant “ACT” (Microsoft front). ACTA is the initiative to transform the world into a global intellectual monopoles police.

    Andrew Macabe Reply:

    The Jonathan Zuck group.

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Which used to be called ATL.

    Andrew Macabe Reply:

    Thanks, I always screw up acronyms.

  2. Jose_X said,

    July 14, 2009 at 3:20 pm

    Gravatar

    If the B&M Foundry donates in one year $100,000,000 of MS products/services (that would be less than 1% of the money the charity has), that number comes out as Microsoft revenues, with a high percentage of that as earnings. MSFT is priced at at least 10 times earnings. This means that 100 million investment helped MSFT gain or maintain some 1 billion dollars in market cap. Since Gates has MSFT shares he sells, this means by investing 100 million from his left pocket, he made 10 times that into his right pocket.

    Well, not exactly because he only profits from a small part of MSFT’s total market cap.

    Can he thus turn 60 billion into 600 billion market cap? Well, yes in a sense, if he went all out.. at least for a year he could pull that off and if the market did not realize what was going on. Of course, he owns a fraction of MSFT, so he would not want to use his charity to subsidize all other MSFT investors. However, if he got many to contribute to B&M Foundry, then he would be using their money.

    Also, you can apply this to even more spectacular P/E ratios if you do it with small companies, eg, with small “high-growth” pharm companies owned by Bill.

    So if Bill owns all of some small company, and he feeds that company 100 million over 5 years so that when the company goes public at the end of the five years, it made 50 million in that last year, then the IPO might result in a P/E of 100 or more. 50 million times 100 is 5 billion. Gates would likely own at least 30 percent at the time of the IPO (I’m guessing this figure). That would mean that his B&M Foundry’s 100 million investment would have netted Bill over 1 billion dollars at least if he were able to cash in at the IPO price. [Yes, I excluded taxes in this simplified analysis.]

    In practice he can use the B&M Foundry not to entirely support such a pyramid scheme but to help fuel it and to give this private businesses competitive advantages over everyone else. Throw in pharm patents and you are looking at monopolies in the making. Repeat for some other industries. And to think, all of these would be largely controlled by a small number of people and be supporting each other.

    Bill didn’t invent this, but I have a hunch he will try to exploit it to the max.

    Yes, there are laws, but how many loopholes exist? Point is Bill is likely leveraging this significantly if not nearly as much as might be suggested by the above simplified model.

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    This is not new. Some distinguished medical professionals publicly accused Gates of monopolising in their field using a “charity” as a vehicle. You can find articles about it.

    Jose_X Reply:

    I had not heard of actual competitors complaining. I would like to read up on this.

    Jose_X Reply:

    I would like to read up on this…and if I had heard (probably here), I do not recall anything like what you mentioned.

    The basis for this is because you have markets pricing companies at many times earnings. Thus you can feed some of your gains from selling at the high price of the business back into revenues.

    If the company has a high profit margin, then the revenues mostly become earnings.

    This, thus, finishes out the cycle, as these extra earnings get multiplied many-fold to lead to even greater pricing of the company.

    Of course, those that have lots of influence over the pricing of companies (ie, those with savvy and access that lead them to buy low) know what is going on and won’t pay a high price, but they can exploit the ignorance among most of the investment public.

    And you don’t have to go all out with this technique (or exclusively). The point is that the B&M Foundry is helping to distort markets. This hurts consumers and many others.

    It also shows that patent monopolies are being exploited to lead to or to help preserve larger monopolies.

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Here is the latest article I am aware of:

    http://www.hindu.com/2009/05/10/stories/2009051055151000.htm

    Journal critique on Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation grant pattern

    New Delhi: The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation’s pattern of funding in the form of grants for global health programmes and projects has been criticised in a research paper in The Lancet.

    Older:

    http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/16/science/16malaria.html

    Gates Foundation’s Influence Criticized

    The chief of malaria for the World Health Organization has complained that the growing dominance of malaria research by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation risks stifling a diversity of views among scientists and wiping out the world health agency’s policy-making function.

    In a memorandum, the malaria chief, Dr. Arata Kochi, complained to his boss, Dr. Margaret Chan, the director general of the W.H.O., that the foundation’s money, while crucial, could have “far-reaching, largely unintended consequences.”

    Many of the world’s leading malaria scientists are now “locked up in a ‘cartel’ with their own research funding being linked to those of others within the group,” Dr. Kochi wrote. Because “each has a vested interest to safeguard the work of the others,” he wrote, getting independent reviews of research proposals “is becoming increasingly difficult.”

What Else is New


  1. Battistelli and Topić Lose Their Bogus 'Case' Against Judge Corcoran After They Defamed Him and Ruined His Career/Life

    The SLAPP action against Judge Patrick Corcoran, who has so far won all cases involving the EPO, is finally dismissed in Germany; what remains is an ugly legacy at the EPO, wherein everyone bold enough to say something about corruption at the top is having his or her life — not just career — destroyed



  2. Even Media of the Patent Microcosm Mentions the Decline in Quality of Patents at the EPO, Based on Its Very Own Stakeholders, While IAM Ignores the News

    The whole world basically accepts, based on patent examiners as well as those whom they interact with (patent agents), that patent quality at the EPO has sunk; but the EPO and IAM continue to vigorously deny that as it threatens some people's nefarious agenda



  3. Links 20/6/2018: Qt 5.11.1, Oracle Solaris 11.3 SRU 33, HHVM 3.27.0, Microsoft Helping ICE

    Links for the day



  4. Patent Extremists Are Unable to Find Federal Circuit Cases That Help Them Mislead on Alice

    Patent extremists prefer talking about Mayo but not Alice when it comes to 35 U.S.C. § 101; Broadcom is meanwhile going on a 'fishing expedition', looking to profit from patents by calling for embargo through the ITC



  5. What Use Are 10 Million Patents That Are of Low Quality in a Patent Office Controlled by the Patent 'Industry'?

    The patent maximalists are celebrating overgranting; the USPTO, failing to heed the warning from patent courts, continues issuing far too many patents and a new paper from Mark Lemley and Robin Feldman offers a dose of sobering reality



  6. The Eastern District of Texas is Where Asian Companies/Patents/Trolls Still Go After TC Heartland

    Proxies of Longhorn IP and KAIST (Katana Silicon Technologies LLC and KAIST IP US LLC, respectively) roam Texas in pursuit of money of out nothing but patents and aggressive litigation; there's also a Microsoft connection



  7. EPO Insiders Correct the Record of Benoît Battistelli’s Tyranny and Abuse of Law: “Legal Harassment and Retaliation”

    Battistelli’s record, as per EPO-FLIER 37, is a lot worse than the Office cares to tell stakeholders, who are already complaining about decline in patent quality



  8. Articles About a Unitary Patent System Are Lies and Marketing From Law Firms With 'Lawsuits Lust'

    Team UPC has grown louder with its lobbying efforts this past week; the same lies are being repeated without much of a challenge and press ownership plays a role in that



  9. The Decline in Patent Quality at the EPO Causes Frivolous Lawsuits That Only Lawyers Profit From

    The European Patent Office (EPO) will continue granting low-quality European Patents under the leadership of the Battistelli-'nominated' Frenchman, António Campinos; this is bad news for science and technology as that quite likely means a lot more lawsuits without merit (which only lawyers profit from)



  10. What Battistelli's Workers Think of His Latest EPO Propaganda

    "Modernising the EPO" is what Battistelli calls a plethora of human rights abuses and corruption



  11. Links 19/6/2018: Total War: WARHAMMER II Confirmed for GNU/Linux, DragonFlyBSD 5.2.2 Released

    Links for the day



  12. More Media Reports About Decline in Quality of European Patents (Granted by the EPO)

    What the media is saying about the letter from Grünecker, Hoffmann Eitle, Maiwald and Vossius & Partner whilst EPO communications shift attention to shallow puff pieces about how wonderful Benoît Battistelli is



  13. Beware Team UPC's Biggest Two Lies About the Unitary Patent (UPC)

    Claims that a Unified Patent Court (UPC) will commence next year are nothing but a fantasy of the Liar in Chief, Benoît Battistelli, who keeps telling lies to French media (some of which he passes EPO money to, just like he passes EPO money to his other employer)



  14. Diversity at the EPO

    Two decades of EPO with 16-17 years under the control of French Presidents (and nowadays predominantly French management in general with Inventor Award held in France almost half the time) is "diversity at the EPO"



  15. Orrin Hatch, Sponsored the Most by the Pharmaceutical Industry, Tries to Make Its Patents Immune From Scrutiny (PTAB)

    Orrin Hatch is the latest example of laws being up for sale, i.e. companies can 'buy' politicians to act as their 'couriers' and pass laws for them, including laws pertaining to patents



  16. Links 17/6/2018: Linux 4.18 RC1 and Deepin 15.6 Released

    Links for the day



  17. To Keep the Patent System Alive and Going Practitioners Will Have to Accept Compromises on Scope Being Narrowed

    35 U.S.C. § 101 still squashes a lot of software patents, reducing confidence in US patents; the only way to correct this is to reduce patent filings and file fewer lawsuits, judging their merit in advance based on precedents from higher courts



  18. The Affairs of the USPTO Have Turned Into Somewhat of a Battle Against the Courts, Which Are Simply Applying the Law to Invalidate US Patents

    The struggle between law, public interest, and the Cult of Patents (which only ever celebrates more patents and lawsuits) as observed in the midst of recent events in the United States



  19. Patent Marketing Disguised as Patent 'Advice'

    The meta-industry which profits from patents and lawsuits claims that it's guiding us and pursuing innovation, but in reality its sole goal is enriching itself, even if that means holding science back



  20. Microsoft is Still 'Cybermobbing' Its Competition Using Patent Trolls Such as Finjan

    In the "cybersecurity" space, a sub-domain where many software patents have been granted by the US patent office, the patent extortion by Microsoft-connected trolls (and Microsoft's 'protection' racket) seems to carry on; but Microsoft continues to insist that it has changed its ways



  21. Links 16/6/2018: LiMux Story, Okta Openwashing and More

    Links for the day



  22. The EPO's Response to the Open Letter About Decline in Patent Quality as the Latest Example of Arrogance and Resistance to Facts, Truth

    Sidestepping the existential crisis of the EPO (running out of work and issuing many questionable patents with expectation of impending layoffs), the PR people at the Office choose a facts-denying, face-saving 'damage control' strategy while staff speaks out, wholeheartedly agreeing with concerned stakeholders



  23. In the United States the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Which Assures Patent Quality, is Still Being Smeared by Law Firms That Profit From Patent Maximalism, Lawsuits

    Auditory roles which help ascertain high quality of patents (or invalidate low-quality patents, at least those pointed out by petitions) are being smeared, demonised as "death squads" and worked around using dirty tricks that are widely described as "scams"



  24. The 'Artificial Intelligence' (AI) Hype, Propped Up by Events of the European Patent Office (EPO), is Infectious and It Threatens Patent Quality Worldwide

    Having spread surrogate terms like “4IR” (somewhat of a 'mask' for software patents, by the EPO's own admission in the Gazette), the EPO continues with several more terms like “ICT” and now we’re grappling with terms like “AI”, which the media endlessly perpetuates these days (in relation to patents it de facto means little more than "clever algorithms")



  25. Links 15/6/2018: HP Chromebook X2 With GNU/Linux Software, Apple Admits and Closes a Back Door ('Loophole')

    Links for the day



  26. The '4iP Council' is a Megaphone of Team UPC and Team Battistelli at the EPO

    The EPO keeps demonstrating lack of interest in genuine patent quality (it uses buzzwords to compensate for deviation from the EPC and replaces humans with shoddy translators); it is being aided by law firms which work for patent trolls and think tanks that propel their interests



  27. Grünecker, Hoffmann Eitle, Maiwald and Vossius & Partner Find the Courage to Express Concerns About Battistelli's Ugly Legacy and Low Patent Quality

    The astounding levels of abuse at the EPO have caused some of the EPO's biggest stakeholders to speak out and lash out, condemning the Office for mismanagement amongst other things



  28. IAM Concludes Its Latest Anti-§ 101 Think Tank, Featuring Crooked Benoît Battistelli

    The attack on 35 U.S.C. § 101, which invalidates most if not all software patents, as seen through the lens of a Battistelli- and Iancu-led lobbying event (set up by IAM)



  29. Google Gets Told Off -- Even by the Typically Supportive EFF and TechDirt -- Over Patenting of Software

    The EFF's Daniel Nazer, as well as TechDirt's founder Mike Masnick, won't tolerate Google's misuse of Jarek Duda's work; the USPTO should generally reject all applications for software patents -- something which a former Commissioner for Patents at the USPTO seems to be accepting now (that such patents have no potency after Alice)



  30. From the Eastern District of Texas to Delaware, US Patent Litigation is (Overall) Still Declining

    Patent disputes/conflicts are increasingly being settled outside the courts and patents that aren't really potent/eligible are being eliminated or never brought forth at all


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts