EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

01.08.10

Microsoft’s Home State is Running Out of Money While Microsoft Avoids Paying Tax

Posted in America, Boycott Novell, Finance, Microsoft at 6:46 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Summary: Washington warns that it may go broke within months, which brings back to the table Microsoft’s massive tax dodge (over a billion dollars in this state)

MICROSOFT IS not paying the tax it must pay in Washington, but it has taxpayers pay for a new Microsoft bridge, for example, right there in Washington. This type of behaviour upsets former Microsoft employee Mr. Reifman, who shows that Washington is going broke. From the Seattle Times:

Washington state government is in danger of running out of money if the Legislature fails to act quickly, state Treasurer Jim McIntire says.

“With no improvement in the state’s overall cash position, the entire state treasury could be depleted as soon as September 2010,” McIntire said in a letter sent to the governor and legislative leaders last month.

The Legislature ought to force companies like Microsoft to actually pay taxes. They can start by collecting what Microsoft has avoided paying over the years. Microsoft does not mind if the country goes up in flames as long as Ballmer and his minions continue to hoard cash and enjoy the benefits of potentially-unconstitutional tax exemptions (Gates needn’t pay taxes either because he found loopholes that he is exploiting). There is increasing poverty near Microsoft's campus, including tent cities. This demonstrates the injustice.

As in any situation where the corporations control the press, people hardly get access to this information, which is true. Take EveryBlock for example. A few months ago we showed Microsoft and NBC taking over such an independent site [1, 2] and now we find this update from Joseph Tartakoff:

Hyperlocal news aggregator EveryBlock is making its first big move since being purchased by MSNBC.com over the summer: Visitors to the site will now be able to write up announcements of their own, which will show up along with EveryBlock’s existing automated blurbs which are pulled from local municipal sources and news sites.

Municipal sources and news sites tend to just echo business interests; thus, they rarely speak about the looting of the public and other matters that affect the population at large. We have said more about these media monopolies in the recent posts found below.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

16 Comments

  1. Needs Sunlight said,

    January 8, 2010 at 8:26 am

    Gravatar

    The speculation about Gates and Ballmer wanting the US to go up in flames would be supported or disproved if more details of the meeting between Gates and Hu were published. In a flagrant show of disrespect to the Office of the President, Hu’s first visit snubbed the Whitehouse until after a meeting with Gates.

    But even without that, there are a lot of telltales that do back the ideal that Gates and Ballmer wanting the US to go up in flames:

    - the voting machine scandals, made possible by three levels of MS prodcuts

    - the onging malware catastrophes, made only possible by political and illegal pressure to keep functional systems out of the market.

    - the ongoing disasters, such as air traffic control collapse, traceable to malfeasants putting MS products into mission-critical roles

    etc.

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    I very much doubt that Gates is ‘colluding’ with China (makes little sense) despite his China connections at the Gates Foundation and Ballmer’s near-appointment as China ambassador (McCain’s idea), but clearly they are after their own interests, namely money and power.

    In the news today (OT):

    http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20527426.900-get-ready-for-chinas-domination-of-science.html?DCMP=OTC-rss&nsref=online-news

    dyfet Reply:

    In recard to the latter, I could comment on air traffic control and the FAA. First, in the 90′s, before the days of “homeland” security, the FAA was known from the perspective of federal contracting as a “dirty agency”, and in fact the worst. While I had known contracting officers from a number of different federal agencies at the time (the company I was engineering director for sold GNU/Linux servers to manage high-end Fujitsu switching equipment, along with said switches, among other things) who were stubborn and sometimes stupid, most seemed to actually have high ethical standards nontheless.

    Until the FAA, we certainly never encountered any that were dishonest. The FAA was the first time I encountered someone who expected a bribe to get a contract. This was not unique, as another time one had a wife he had setup as a 8a qualified firm, and noted if we sub’d through his wife, to which he could then legally give preferential treatment to.

    Strangely enough I learned many years later the FAA tac centers use RedHat, mostly for the system which also shows all the planes in the air that some TV newscasts use. That display is actually drawn on X. So apparently some parts of the FAA does honest work.

  2. TheTruth said,

    January 8, 2010 at 10:54 am

    Gravatar

    so which is it Roy, MS is either not paying tax and making a profit or as you claim it’s in financial trouble and borrowing money, it can only be one or the other.

    Do you think that all the 90 thousand employees do not pay income tax ? or that there is not a GST or VAT type tax on every purchase.
    And the extra tax paid by just having high money turnover.

    As for charity, do you remember when the big thing in Linux was to register as a charity so you can avoid taxes. (want me to find the links for you).

    Cononical:

    “Canonical Ltd.[5] is a private company founded (and funded) by South African entrepreneur Mark Shuttleworth for the promotion of free software projects. Canonical is registered in the Isle of Man”

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canonical_Ltd.

    Remember that Isle of Man is where cononical is based.

    http://www.lowtax.net/lowtax/html/isleofman/jimtax.html

    “In the Isle of Man there is no general capital gains tax, turnover tax or capital transfer tax, and there are no stamp duties. Apart from VAT, the only significant tax is income tax which is levied at a maximum rate of 18% on individuals, and until 2006 on corporations (companies). ”

    Oh thats right im a Troll, so even if I provide FACTS and proof that you are biased and usually WRONG…

    You’ll just accuse me of being a troll and you will ignore any proof that you are as usual wrong and biased, no wonder almost no one takes any notice of what you say Roy…

    So Roy just because you say something it does not mean it even close to being true, in general when most people read what you say, they automatically assume the exact opposite is true.

    They (and I) consider you as a 4th rate spin doctor, who thinks if you say something enough times it will become true.

    People work that out quickly, as soon as they see the constant references to you’re sources that are generally you’re own articles.

    so you are you’re own “source”, that you constantly refer back too, trouble is we dont believe you now, and we certainly dont believe you then. when you quote yourself as your own “source”.

    You are the laughing stock of the FOSS world Roy, along with RMS and PJ constantly doing more damage than good.
    With your lies.

    Feel free to try to disprove my links and facts, that would be interesting to see.

    But you wont, you’ll just attack me, and anyone else that does not belong to your cult.

    your_friend Reply:

    It’s both! Amazing but true, a company can avoid taxes and still not make enough money to support itself. As Roy has noticed, the state of Washington is looking a decade’s worth of skipped taxes. Instead of paying up, Microsoft is arrogantly demanding a bridge be built so that their employees can get to the new Microsoft Mall. I’m not sure payment in full of Microsoft’s tax evasion will save the state from running out of money, but I’m entirely sure that Microsoft should spend its own money building and maintaining a bridge between two pieces of Microsoft property.

    There’s no need to attack you. What you say is damnation enough.

  3. TheTruth said,

    January 8, 2010 at 12:40 pm

    Gravatar

    so the FSF being a charity and begging for money, is OK for you.

    But not for anyone else, so why is it ok for the FSF and cononical to rought the tax system, and it’s not ok for commercial companies to give money to charity as well.

    MS is not a registered charity, FSF IS.

    FSF asked for money to “promote Open source software” then uses that money to wage FUD campains against their perceived enemies.

    goto badvista.com, 7 deadly sins, defective by design, and see where you FSF charity donations are going, as if attacking other companies is “promoting free software”.

    This is where you charity money is going, with little or NO promotion of Free software. Just a knee jerk reaction to anything FSF hates. (which seems to be most things).

    So Roy, why not go after the criminals that play the charity and tax system and take you’re donations and do not do with your donation what they claim to do in their charter.

    This is criminal, oh, but thats right it’s the FSF and RMS can do no bad.

    Again, I can provide all the links you need to confirm my statements.
    (which seems to be something Roy, you are not often capable of doing, preferring to link to your own FUD instead).

    @your-friend,,, so what about cononical roughting the tax system, is that ok too ??
    Oh I provided facts and proof, something which you have no real argument against. As you well know im right..

    (and it’s better to say nothing and have people think your a fool, than to say something and confirm it)..

    ****************

    “Mission
    The Free Software Foundation (FSF), founded in 1985, is dedicated to promoting computer users’ rights to use, study, copy, modify, and redistribute computer programs. The FSF promotes the development and use of free software, particularly the GNU operating system and its GNU/Linux variants – and free documentation for free software. The FSF also helps to spread awareness of the ethical and political issues of freedom in the use of software. Current projects include GPL Version 3; the GPL Compliance Lab; the Free Software Directory; and Savannah, software development services provided to free software developers around the world. Additionally, FSF is committed to furthering the development of the GNU Operating System, providing development systems for GNU software maintainers.”

    where in their “mission” does it say they will spend all your charity conations on attacking Vista, MS, proprietary software, and anything else they dont agree with.

    why is it ok for the FSF to claim to promote GNU/Linux, but then take your money and use it all to attack MS ??

    This is misrepresentation of money, give for one specific reason, as detailed in the FSF mission, yet misappropriated to be used as a personal tool to attack others.

    I see little or no effort from the FSF to promote GNU/Linux or its capabilities, features or too try to promote GNU/Linux in any way.

    This is criminal, and I would think is far worse that trying to help third world countries, famine and poverty.

    But to Roy the FSF and RMS can do no wrong, as it’s clear RMS is the spiritual leader of the BN sect.

    http://www.defectivebydesign.org/

    FSF sponsored web site, using your charity donations, NOT promoting open source.

    http://badvista.fsf.org/

    same deal

    “is dedicated to promoting computer users’ rights to use, study, copy, modify, and redistribute computer programs. The FSF promotes the development and use of free software, particularly the GNU operating system and its GNU/Linux variants – and free documentation for free software. ”

    where in the FSF mission statement did they say they would use all your donations to attack Microsoft ??

    It does not,, so the FSF lie to you, and misappropriate you’re donations for their own gains, they are NOT using it as they stated in their mission statement.

    Mabey the FSF needs to be investigated by the charities commision and de-listed or corruption and unethical behaviour..

    http://en.windows7sins.org/

    this is where you FSF donations are going, as well as flying reps around the world on junkets.

    http://en.windows7sins.org/

    there is nothing on this FSF funded web site that even comes close to meeting the FSF’s charity mission statement, so is the FSF into providing false statements to governments to play the system ??

    it’s clear that is the case, and this is not just something im making up, you are welcome to go to the web sites and see for yourself.

    You can argue all you like against me, but you cant argue against the FSF and THEIR own statements and web sites.

    The FSF is sponsoring web sites to attack Microsoft, (oh wait, Roy is saying the MS is sponsoring web sites to attack linux).

    How about some links Roy to confirm you’re “facts” ive shown you the FSF’s web sites, The FSF’s mission statement, it’s all there.

    So where are you’re examples of MS doing this same thing,

    As far as I know MS is __NOT__ a registered charity, and they dont have a charity mission statement that they totally disregard.

    As does the FSF.

    Then tell me how cononical is not roughting the UK tax system by basing the head office in the Is of Man ?

    So Roy, where is your credibility now ?? down the toilet ??

  4. TheTruth said,

    January 8, 2010 at 12:51 pm

    Gravatar

    mabey someone should lodge a complaint with the IRS and the charity commision regarding the FSF’s misappropriation of funds and breaches of their mission statement.

    Then the FSF can be a “convicted criminal” as well.

    Or a class action from all the donators to the FSF, to recoup the funds the FSF are illegally using. !!!..

    Either FSF revise their “mission statement” or have their charity status revoked. And stop them lieing about their real motives and goals.

    There is more than enough evidence to confirm the FSF is in breach of their mission statement and misappropriating funds.

  5. TheTruth said,

    January 8, 2010 at 7:58 pm

    Gravatar


    Mission

    The Free Software Foundation (FSF), founded in 1985, is dedicated to promoting computer users’ rights to use, study, copy, modify, and redistribute computer programs. The FSF promotes the development and use of free software, particularly the GNU operating system and its GNU/Linux variants – and free documentation for free software. The FSF also helps to spread awareness of the ethical and political issues of freedom in the use of software. Current projects include GPL Version 3; the GPL Compliance Lab; the Free Software Directory; and Savannah, software development services provided to free software developers around the world. Additionally, FSF is committed to furthering the development of the GNU Operating System, providing development systems for GNU software maintainers.

    your_friend Reply:

    I’m not sure I see a violation of mission or any conflict with non profit, even charity tax status. What are you talking about?

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Nothing of substance from this “Mutex” nym.

  6. TheTruth said,

    January 9, 2010 at 3:09 am

    Gravatar

    can you read, and did you read the mission ??

    if you did, you would not be asking that question.

    And nice to see you chime in Roy, and thinks for your accurate, honest, detailed response.

    Oh as usual, when you’re claims are questions, and it’s shown you are biased and a would be cult leader.

    But when confronted with FACTS and proof, all you can do is revert to ad hominem attackes.

    I suppose it either personal attacks, or ad nauseam.

    “”This is not a hate site. This is neither a crusade nor any type of propaganda front. We have our mind set on a single goal: finding out the truth.”

    Really are you REALLY interested in finding out the truth ROY??

    It seems to me, and most of the planet that truth is not what you seek, it’s dirt for you’re propaganda.

    wiki:

    PROPAGANDA

    your_friend Reply:

    Oh, I see, you don’t understand how the Bad Vista and Windows Seven Sins campaigns are promoting free software use. That’s easy to clear up.

    The idea behind most Windows criticism is show how non free software owners abuse users as a way of explaining the benefits of free software. All non free software has its problems but Microsoft’s are numerous and glaring enough to create whole websites. The problems that the FSF points at are problems non free software will never have.

    These websites are only a small part of what the Free Software Foundation does, but it’s important documentation. Sadly, their reach is tiny next to the massive hype machine of newspapers, trade rags and TV broadcast that Microsoft has purchased. Lawyers work to defend copyleft software and activists organize and other important work goes on all the time. There are lots of good things people’s donations to the Free Software Foundation buys.

  7. TheTruth said,

    January 9, 2010 at 3:40 am

    Gravatar

    PROPAGANDA: is a form of communication aimed at influencing the attitude of a community toward some cause or position.
    (thats what you do ROY).

    “As opposed to IMPARTIALLY providing information, propaganda in it’s most basic sense, presents information primarily to influence an audience.

    PROPAGANDA: often presents facts selectively (thus possibly LYING BY OMISSION) to encourage a particular synthesis, or uses loaded messages to produce an emotional rather than rational response to the information presented.
    The desired result is a change of the attitude towards the subject in the target audience to further a POLITICAL agenda.

    “PROPAGANDA is neutrally defined as a systematic form of purposeful persuasion that attempts to influence the emotions, attitudes, opinions, and actions of specified targets audiences for idealogical, political or commercial purposes through the controlled transmission of ONE-SIDED messages (which may or MAY NOT be FACTUAL) via mass and direct media channels”

    Yes, thats what you do ROY, You are NOT looking for truth, you are following the classic Propaganda techniquse.

    PROPAGANDA: TECHNIQUES:
    Ad hominem – Yep you got that one down.
    Ad nauseam – Again check
    Appeal to fear
    AZppeal to prejudice
    Bandwagon
    BIG LIE
    Blacks and white fallacy
    Demonizing the ENEMY (you read that one close didnt you ROY)
    DISINFORMATION
    Half_TRUTH
    Intentional vagueness
    Labelling
    Name-calling (how’s you’re MAFIAA going ROY ?)
    Obtain disapproval or Reducto ad Hitlerum
    Oversimplification
    Quotes out of context
    Rationalization
    Reg Herring
    Repetitiohn, Repitition, repetition
    SCAPEGOATING
    Sterotyping (Gates of borg?)
    Testomonial
    Transfer
    FUD

    PROPAGANDA compaigns often follow a strategic transmission pattern to indoctrinate the target group.

    A number of techniques based in SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL research are used to generate propaganda. Many of these same techniques can be found under LOGICAL FALLACIES, since propagandists use arguments that, whilesometimes convincing , are not necessarily valid.

    Appeal to authority
    Appeals to authority cite prominent figures to support a position, idea, argument, or course of action. (Roy loves RMS)

    Ad Hominem, you know what that means ROY, it’s attacking your opponent, as opposed to attacking their arguments. (usually because you’re incapable of attacking the argument.

    Ad nauseam
    Tireless repetition of an idea. (this approach works best when media sources are limited and controlled by the propagator. (like ROY and BN) :)

    (you’re just too easy to take apart ROY, it’s hardly a challenge at all!!)

    Appeal to fear:
    Appeals to fear seek to build support by instilling anxieties and panic (FUD).
    You do that all the TIME ROY.

    Bandwagon Bandwagon and “inevitable-victory” appeals.

    DEMONIZING THE ENEMY:
    Making individuals from the opposing faction, or those who support the opposing viewpoint appear to be subhuman.

    (yep you do that do)

    So how is it you can say you are not a propagandist

    OBTAIN DISAPPROVAL or REDUCTIO AD hITLERUM:
    This techniques (as ROY well knows) is used to persuade a target audience to disapprove of an action or idea by suggesting that the idea is popular with gropus hated, freared, or held in contempt by the target audience.
    Thus if a group that supports a certain policy is led to believe that underirable, subversive, or contemptible people support the same policy,

    OVERSIMPLIFICATION Favorable generalities are used to provide simple answers to complex social, political, econimic \, or military problems.

    ROY ALL YOU DO IS PROPAGANDA:

    I dont know why im bothing to explain this to you, as ROY you KNOW exactly what you are doing, and why.

    We all know what you are doing ROY, and you just saying it’s not a hate site or a propaganda front does not wash with your statements and actions.

    It appears you use the Wiki on propaganda as you’re BN “User manual”.

    That and the guild to extremist groups…

    So again, ROY you have not let me down, you again, as usual have failed to address the issues, prefering to resort to low level Ad hominem attacks.

    (as if propaganda is the only tool in your toolbox).

    ROY, you are a very one dimentional person, based on my reading of your comments and propaganda.

    But you do provide quite some amusement for anyone with any knowledge of the subjects you claim to represent.

    When are you going to give up, after 3+ years it seems BN is not moving forward, but appears to be going backwards.

    But you dont care about Free software, you care about you’re own ego and feeding you’re cult members.

  8. TheTruth said,

    January 9, 2010 at 4:50 am

    Gravatar

    My point of the reference to propaganda, is that you make claims (ROY) about MS dodging taxes, because they have offices in different locations, (and even different countries).

    But when I say (and prove) that the FSF also seeks to dodge taxes, and does so by providing false claims as their mission statement, and at the same time misappropriating the donated funds to wage their own propaganda campain.

    Cononical does the same thing, but you lie by ommision as go after MS when you well know cononical does the same thing basing their head office on the Isle of Man, which is a known tax haven.

    But ofcourse, ROY you are not interesting in “only the truth” you are only interested in digging dirt, and waging a smear campaign against your percieved enemy, at the same time, you obviously are not interested in the truth, as if you did you would also report on Cononical and FSF using charaties and tax havens to increase their profit and to avoide taxes.

    So why ROY, is it ok for you to go after MS and NOT any other group, is it because you want to provide and diseminate propaganda to acheive you’re own goals, and to create Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt (deception) against MS.

    Why is it, you and FSF always talk about improving GNU/Linux, but then all you do is attack you’re perceived enemies.

    This is weak, and it clearly shows you’re credibility and intent.

    No wonder no one believes you anymore ROY..
    But you allready know that, you gave up your credability a very long time ago.

    ROY BTW: you posted on your IRC that you are a Software Engineer ?

    How is that ROY, what degree do you have in engineer, or in computer science. And are you employed as an engineer ??

    IF not, you are NOT a software engineer, and judging by your inability to run you’re own web site, (seeing all the help you need), If you are as you claim a software engineer, you must not be a very good one.

    (this does not require a response, ROY ive allready formed my opinion about your integrity, and you’re claim you’re a software engineer I find highly ammusing..

    Anyway, you’re credibility is shot ROY, you’re bias is clear for all to see.
    And you’re techniques of propaganda and the formation of you’re extremist/hate group is a classic study of the formation of Cults, or sects, or extremists.

    Im sure I could find a couple hunderd or so links to support my statements, and I could use ONLY your statements and words to do it.

    As I said ROY, you are too easy to take apart, and all you can do in return is call me names.. LOL.. You really are the laughing stock of web.

  9. TheTruth said,

    January 9, 2010 at 5:00 am

    Gravatar

    You’re blog web site, says it’s not a blog, thats a lie ROY and you know it.. do you know what a blog is, or are you into redifining words in true RMS style.

    For you info: (as you allready ‘should’ know” this is what a BLOG IS.

    “A blog (a contraction of the term “web log”)[1] is a type of website, usually maintained by an individual with regular entries of commentary, descriptions of events, or other material such as graphics or video. Entries are commonly displayed in reverse-chronological order. “Blog” can also be used as a verb, meaning to maintain or add content to a blog.”

    So what part of the definition of a blog does not apply to you and this web site ROY ???

    Please explain, (if you can).. and tell us why you constantly lie to us?

    -usually maintained by an individual with regular entries
    -commentary,
    -descriptions of events,
    -or other material such as graphics or video.
    -displayed in reverse chronological order.

    So what you’re saying ROY, is that you do not do any of the above so therefore BN is not a blog !!.. (WHAT IS IT).. oh thats right it’s a propaganda / hate site.

    And a seed site for extremeists… (again, you’re just too easy ROY).

What Else is New


  1. Team UPC is Interjecting Itself Into the Media Ahead of Tomorrow's Lobbying Push Against the European Council and Against European Interests

    A quick look at the growing bulk of UPC lobbying (by the legal firms which stand to benefit from it) ahead of tomorrow's European Council meeting which is expected to discuss a unitary patent system



  2. IP Kat is Lobbying Heavily for the UPC, Courtesy of Team UPC

    When does an IP (or patent) blog become little more than an aggregation of interest groups and self-serving patent law firms, whose agenda overlaps that of Team Battistelli?



  3. Leaked: Conclusions of the Secretive EPO Board 28 Meeting (8th of September 2016)

    The agenda and outcome of the secretive meeting of the Board of the Administrative Council of the EPO



  4. Letter From the Dutch Institute of Patent Attorneys (Nederlandse Orde van Octrooigemachtigden) to the Administrative Council of the EPO

    The Netherlands Institute of Patent Attorneys, a group representing a large number of Dutch patent practitioners, is against Benoît Battistelli and his horrible behaviour at the European Patent Office (EPO)



  5. EPO's Board 28 Notes Battistelli's “Three Current Investigations/Disciplinary Proceedings Involving SUEPO Members in The Hague."

    The attack on SUEPO (EPO staff representatives) at The Hague appears to have been silently expanded to a third person, showing an obvious increase in Battistelli's attacks on truth-tellers



  6. Links 28/9/2016: Alpine Linux 3.4.4, Endless OS 3.0

    Links for the day



  7. Cementing Autocracy: The European Patent Office Against Democracy, Against Media, and Against the Rule of Law

    The European Patent Office (EPO) actively undermines democracy in Europe, it undermines the freedom of the press (by paying it for puff pieces), and it undermines the rule of law by giving one single tyrant total power in Eponia and immunity from outside Eponia (even when he breaks his own rules)



  8. Links 28/9/2016: New Red Hat Offices, Fedora 25 'Frozen'

    Links for the day



  9. Team Battistelli Intensifies the Attack on the Boards of Appeal Again

    The lawless state of the EPO, where the rule of law is basically reducible to Battistelli's ego and insecurities, is again demonstrated with an escalation and perhaps another fake 'trial' in the making (after guilt repeatedly fails to be established)



  10. After the EPO Paid the Financial Times to Produce Propaganda the Newspaper Continues to Produce UPC Puff Pieces, Just Ahead of EU Council Meeting

    How the media, including the Financial Times, has been used (and even paid!) by the EPO in exchange for self-serving (to the EPO) messages and articles



  11. Beware the Patent Law Firms Insinuating That Software Patents Are Back Because of McRO

    By repeatedly claiming (and then generalising) that CAFC accepted a software patent the patent microcosm (meta-industry) hopes to convince us that we should continue to pursue software patents in the US, i.e. pay them a lot more money for something of little/no value



  12. The US Supreme Court Might Soon Tighten Patent Scope in the United States Even Further, the USPTO Produces Patent Maximalism Propaganda

    A struggle brewing between the patent 'industry' (profiting from irrational saturation) and the highest US court, as well as the Government Accountability Office (GAO)



  13. Patent Trolling a Growing Problem in East Asia (Software Patents Also), Whereas in the US the Problem Goes Away Along With Software Patents

    A look at two contrasting stories, one in Asia where patent litigation and hype are on the rise (same in Europe due to the EPO) and another in the US where a lot of patents face growing uncertainty and a high invalidation rate



  14. The EPO's Continued Push for Software Patents, Marginalisation of Appeals (Reassessment), and Deviation From the EPC

    A roundup of new developments at the EPO, where things further exacerbate and patent quality continues its downward spiral



  15. The Battistelli Effect: “We Will be Gradually Forced to File Our Patent Applications Outside the EPO in the Interests of Our Clients”

    While the EPO dusts off old files and grants in haste without quality control (won't be sustainable for more than a couple more years) the applicants are moving away as trust in the EPO erodes rapidly and profoundly



  16. Links 27/9/2016: Lenovo Layoffs, OPNFV Third Software Release

    Links for the day



  17. The Moral Depravity of the European Patent Office Under Battistelli

    The European Patent Office (EPO) comes under heavy criticism from its very own employees, who also seem to recognise that lobbying for the UPC is a very bad idea which discredits the European Patent Organisation



  18. Links 26/9/2016: Linux 4.8 RC8, SuperTux 0.5

    Links for the day



  19. What Insiders Are Saying About the Sad State of the European Patent Office (EPO)

    Anonymous claims made by people who are intimately familiar with the European Patent Office (from the inside) shed light on how bad things have become



  20. The EPO Does Not Want Skilled (and 'Expensive') Staff, Layoffs a Growing Concern

    A somewhat pessimistic look (albeit increasingly realistic look) at the European Patent Office, where unions are under fire for raising legitimate concerns about the direction taken by the management since a largely French team was put in charge



  21. Patents Roundup: Accenture Software Patents, Patent Troll Against Apple, Willful Infringements, and Apple Against a Software Patent

    A quick look at various new articles of interest (about software patents) and what can be deduced from them, especially now that software patents are the primary barrier to Free/Libre Open Source software adoption



  22. Software Patents Propped Up by Patent Law Firms That Are Lying, Further Assisted by Rogue Elements Like David Kappos and Randall Rader (Revolving Doors)

    The sheer dishonesty of the patent microcosm (seeking to bring back software patents by misleading the public) and those who are helping this microcosm change the system from the inside, owing to intimate connections from their dubious days inside government



  23. Links 25/9/2016: Linux 4.7.5, 4.4.22; LXQt 0.11

    Links for the day



  24. Patent Quality and Patent Scope the Unspeakable Taboo at the EPO, as Both Are Guillotined by Benoît Battistelli for the Sake of Money

    The gradual destruction of the European Patent Office (EPO), which was once unanimously regarded as the world's best, by a neo-liberal autocrat from France, Benoît Battistelli



  25. Bristows LLP's Hatred/Disdain of UK/EU Democracy Demonstrated; Says “Not Only Will the Pressure for UK Ratification of the UPC Agreement Continue, But a Decision is Wanted Within Weeks.”

    Without even consulting the British public or the European public (both of whom would be severely harmed by the UPC), the flag bearers of the UPC continue to bamboozle and then pressure politicians, public servants and nontechnical representatives



  26. Released Late on a Friday, EPO Social 'Study' (Battistelli-Commissioned Propaganda) Attempts to Blame Staff for Everything

    The longstanding propaganda campaign (framing staff as happy or framing unhappy staff as a disgruntled minority) is out and the timing of the release is suspicious to say the least



  27. Links 23/9/2016: Latest Microsoft and Lenovo Spin (Now in ‘Damage Control’ Mode)

    Links for the day



  28. White Male-Dominated EPO Management Sinks to New Lows, Again

    Benoît Battistelli continues to make the EPO look like Europe's biggest laughing stock by attempting to tackle issues with corny photo ops rather than real change (like SUEPO recognition, diverse hiring, improved patent quality, and cessation of sheer abuses)



  29. Journalism 102: Do Not Become Like 'Managing IP' or IAM 'Magazine' (the Megaphones of the EPO’s Management)

    Another look at convergence between media and the EPO, which is spending virtually millions of Euros literally buying the media and ensuring that the EPO's abuses are scarcely covered (if ever mentioned at all)



  30. Journalism 101: Do Not Believe Anything That Benoît Battistelli and the EPO's Management Say (Also Don't Fall for the UPC Hype)

    A survey/review (or an overview) of recent articles about the EPO and why they're wrong (mostly because they parrot the official lies from Battistelli's department)


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts