Summary: Apple's misbehaviour not only attracts an antitrust probe but it also shows whose interests Apple is serving (other than its own)

Steve Jobs is against freedom. He just is. He redefines freedom by calling the banning of everything he does not endorse the "freedom" from this thing (be it competition, GPL-licensed software, or pornography). Skip to around 22 minutes from the start of this new video from Professor Larry Lessig. Lessig is a longtime Mac user, but he really gives it to Jobs in that talk. He also recognises that GNU/Linux (yes, he calls it "GNU Linux") is the better way to go.

Here is the latest example of controversial censorship by Apple. [via]

Not since Amazon removed digital copies of "1984" from people's Kindles while they slept has there been such a hilarious episode in the ongoing slapstick farce "Let's See What Happens When Corporations Become Publishers."

Apple has censored a "Ulysses" comic book app -- just in time for "Bloomsday" -- because of a picture of Buck Mulligan's stately, plump cartoon penis.

There are many examples just like that. Apple is still controlling people's phones, as a gatekeeper at least.

According to this article, Apple may be faking its sales figures (statistics being gamed).

During his WWDC 2010 keynote address, Apple CEO Steve Jobs boasted that the iPhone was currently number two behind RIM in smartphone sales. He quoted a Nielsen survey but there was a noticeable absentee in Apple’s stats - Symbian. So what’s the truth?

Apple's fake or artificial hype is a subject that we covered here many times before. "Lies, damned lies, and technology hype" is the headline of this new article about Apple's numbers.

Now we come to Apple's latest anti-competitive practices. "Apple Wants to Kill Its Mobile Advertising Competitors," says this article:

Apple (AAPL) seemed to relent on letting other advertising networks have access to iPhones and iPads. But that’s an illusion. The company’s actions, in context, show that Steve Jobs wants to completely lock down advertising and control all forms of revenue when it comes to iOS. The result is now an escalating level of federal scrutiny that should make any CEO nervous.

More coverage in:

• Apple to Allow Third-Party Mobile Ads, Just not Those from Google



• Is Apple locking Google out of iPhone ad space?



• Apple stems Google's ad ambitions

Google has already responded:

• Google mobile ad chief fires back at Apple lockout



• Google slams Apple over iPhone ad ban



• Google Attacks Apple's Mobile Ad Terms for iPhone, iPad



• Google slams Apple over ads policy

TechCrunch has published "The Conundrum Of Being An Independent Mobile Ad Network Under Apple’s Rules" and Tobin drew our attention to the lack of control over corporate power. Will the government step in to counter Apple? Well, before Apple's hypeAd service is even launched, an antitrust concern [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] goes through and the "FTC Will Investigate Apple," says AndroidGuys (biased source, but there are others like Wired).

“Apple not only dishonours freedom but it also supports other companies that dishonour freedom.”Given that Google's CEO used to serve in Apple, one would think that Apple should support Google but it is helping Microsoft in new ways [1, 2, 3] although only to an extent. According to more boosting from Todd Bishop, it's not just Safari but hypePhone too where Apple links to Microsoft. This is not the first time that Apple helps Microsoft. They have a lot in common.

In conclusion, Apple cannot be trusted by Free software proponents. Apple not only dishonours freedom but it also supports other companies that dishonour freedom. Why pretend that this is not the case? ⬆