Links: OSI Finds Its Spine, 'Open' Core Called Out
- Dr. Roy Schestowitz
- 2010-07-21 16:38:08 UTC
- Modified: 2010-07-21 16:38:08 UTC
Summary: With people like Simon Phipps in its house, the OSI regains credibility
Open core, Open core, more Open core… the debate goes on and on, with Monty the latest to weigh in.
When you get down to it this is a fight over branding – which is why the issue is so important to the OSI folks (who are all about the brand). I don’t actually care that much how SugarCRM, Jahia, Alfresco et al make the software they sell to their customers. As a customer I’m asking a whole different set of questions to “is this product open source?” I want to know how good the service and support is, how good the product is, and above all, does it solve the problem I have at a price point I’m comfortable with. The license doesn’t enter into consideration.
So if that’s the case (and I believe it is), why the fighting? Because of the Open Source brand, and all the warm-and-fuzzies that procures. “Open solutions” are the flavour of the decade, and as a small ISV building a global brand, being known as Open Source is a positive marketing attribute. The only problem is that the warm-and-fuzzies implied by Open source – freedom to change supplier or improve the software, freedom to try the software before purchasing, the existence of a diverse community of people with knowledge, skills and willingness to help a user in difficulty – don’s exist in the Open Core world. The problem is that for the most part, the Open Core which you can obtain under the OSI-approved license is not that useful.
Yesterday on Twitter, I said “Open Core is annoying because the “open core” bit is pretty much useless. It doesn’t do exactly what it says on the tin.”
Recently, there has been debate in the press about "Open Core". I don't care to debate the minor points but make a simple declaration:
* "Open Core" has NOTHING to do with "Open Source". Nearly all proprietary software, at this point, has various degrees of open source-licensed source code in its core.
* "Open Core" has none of the advantages of open source to the user and is merely a proprietary software company.
* "Open Core" puts the software user at a disadvantage in the same way that all proprietary software puts the user at a disadvantage.
While their marketing guy may claim “that overall, Sugar 6 is an open source product from an open source company”, it’s hard to see how they are anything other than a proprietary software company who share some code with a related open source project. Claiming to be “an open source company” seems an unacceptable use of the open source brand to me.
Once more there is a lot of heated discussion about what constitutes a “real” open source business model – that is, one that remains true to the spirit of open source, and doesn't just use it as a trendy badge to attract customers. But such business models address only a tiny part of running a company – how it generates money. What about the many other aspects of a firm?
Imagine a world where code used by the biggest clouds is freely available to any developer, anywhere. A world where that code was a standard used to build private clouds as well as a variety of new service offers. In this world, workloads could be moved around these clouds easily – you could fire your cloud provider for bad service or lack of features, but not have to rewrite the software to do it. Imagine an open source cloud operating system that lifts IT to the next level of innovation, just as Linux drove the web to new heights.
Free whitepaper – 10 top tips for getting IT into your CMO’s good books
NASA is dropping Eucalyptus from its Nebula infrastructure cloud not only because its engineers believe the open source platform can't achieve the sort of scale they require, but also because it isn't entirely open source.
NASA chief technology officer Chris Kemp tells The Reg that as his engineers attempted to contribute additional Eucalyptus code to improve its ability to scale, they were unable to do so because some of the platform's code is open and some isn't. Their attempted contributions conflicted with code that was only available in a partially closed version of platform maintained by Eucalyptus Systems Inc., the commercial outfit run by the project's founders.
I was surprised to see that Larry Augustin had posted to his blog, since he does that pretty infrequently, so I assume all of the questioning about whether or not SugarCRM is open source is hitting close to home. Not as bad as a flawed cell phone antenna design, but I guess bad enough.
While his post is very heartfelt, it is full of misdirection about the meaning of the term “open source”. He refers to the word “open” a lot, but “open” and “open source” are two different things. Heck, one of the most popular network management product suites of all time was called OpenView, but the “open” in the name had nothing to do with open source software.
I’ve been staying out of the recent resurgence in the “open core” debate (check out the 451 Group for a summary). If these fauxpen source vendors would simply call their product “open core” versus “open source” there wouldn’t be anything to talk about, but they need to market themselves as “open source” as opposed to “just another commercial software company with a great API” to get any traction.
Recent Techrights' Posts
- Amid Online Reports of XBox Sales Collapsing, Mass Layoffs in More Teams, and Windows Making Things Worse (Admission of Losses, Rumours About XBox Canceled as a Hardware Unit)...
- Windows has loads of issues, also as a gaming platform
-
- Consent & Debian's illegitimate constitution
- Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
- The Time Our Server Host Died in a Car Accident
- If Debian has internal problems, then they need to be illuminated and then tackled, at the very least in order to ensure we do not end up with "Deadian"
- China's New 'IT' Rules Are a Massive Headache for Microsoft
- On the issue of China we're neutral except when it comes to human rights issues
- Over at Tux Machines...
- GNU/Linux news for the past day
- IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, March 27, 2024
- IRC logs for Wednesday, March 27, 2024
- WeMakeFedora.org: harassment decision, victory for volunteers and Fedora Foundations
- Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
- Links 27/03/2024: Terrorism Grows in Africa, Unemployment in Finland Rose Sharply in a Year, Chinese Aggression Escalates
- Links for the day
- Links 27/03/2024: Ericsson and Tencent Layoffs
- Links for the day
- Links 27/03/2024: BBC Resorts to CG Cruft, Akamai Blocking Blunders in Piracy Shield
- Links for the day
- Android Approaches 90% of the Operating Systems Market in Chad (Windows Down From 99.5% 15 Years Ago to Just 2.5% Right Now)
- Windows is down to about 2% on the Web-connected client side as measured by statCounter
- Sainsbury's: Let Them Eat Yoghurts (and Microsoft Downtimes When They Need Proper Food)
- a social control media 'scandal' this week
- IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, March 26, 2024
- IRC logs for Tuesday, March 26, 2024
- Over at Tux Machines...
- GNU/Linux news for the past day
- Windows/Client at Microsoft Falling Sharply (Well Over 10% Decline Every Quarter), So For His Next Trick the Ponzi in Chief Merges Units, Spices Everything Up With "AI"
- Hiding the steep decline of Windows/Client at Microsoft?
- Free technology in housing and construction
- Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
- We Need Open Standards With Free Software Implementations, Not "Interoperability" Alone
- Sadly we're confronting misguided managers and a bunch of clowns trying to herd us all - sometimes without consent - into "clown computing"
- Microsoft's Collapse in the Web Server Space Continued This Month
- Microsoft is the "2%", just like Windows in some countries
- Links 26/03/2024: Inflation Problems, Strikes in Finland
- Links for the day
- Gemini Links 26/03/2024: Losing Children, Carbon Tax Discussed
- Links for the day
- Mark Shuttleworth resigns from Debian: volunteer suicide and Albania questions unanswered, mass resignations continue
- Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
- Links 26/03/2024: 6,000 Layoffs at Dell, Microsoft “XBox is in Real Trouble as a Hardware Manufacturer”
- Links for the day
- Gemini Links 26/03/2024: Microsofters Still Trying to 'Extend' Gemini Protocol
- Links for the day
- Look What IBM's Red Hat is Turning CentOS Into
- For 17 years our site ran on CentOS. Thankfully we're done with that...
- The Julian Paul Assange Verdict: The High Court Has Granted Assange Leave to Appeal Extradition to the United States, Decision Adjourned to May 20th Pending Assurances
- The decision is out
- The Microsoft and Apple Antitrust Issues Have Some But Not Many Commonalities
- gist of the comparison to Microsoft
- ZDNet, Sponsored by Microsoft for Paid-for Propaganda (in 'Article' Clothing), Has Added Pop-Up or Overlay to All Pages, Saying "813 Partners Will Store and Access Information on Your Device"
- Avoiding ZDNet may become imperative given what it has turned into
- Julian Assange Verdict 3 Hours Away
- Their decision is due to be published at 1030 GMT
- People Who Cover Suicide Aren't Suicidal
- Assange didn't just "deteriorate". This deterioration was involuntary and very much imposed upon him.
- Overworking Kills
- The body usually (but not always) knows best
- Former Red Hat Chief (CEO), Who Decided to Leave the Company Earlier This Month, Talks About "Cloud Company Red Hat" to CNBC
- shows a lack of foresight and dependence on buzzwords
- IRC Proceedings: Monday, March 25, 2024
- IRC logs for Monday, March 25, 2024
- Over at Tux Machines...
- GNU/Linux news for the past day
- Discord Does Not Make Money, It's Spying on People and Selling Data/Control (38% is Allegedly Controlled by the Communist Party of China)
- a considerable share exists
- In At Least Two Nations Windows is Now Measured at 2% "Market Share" (Microsoft Really Does Not Want People to Notice That)
- Ignore the mindless "AI"-washing
- Internet Relay Chat (IRC) Still Has Hundreds of Thousands of Simultaneously-Online Unique Users
- The scale of IRC