EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

02.10.11

Wall Street Journal and Bloomberg Confirm Elop Speaks With His Old Colleagues at Microsoft

Posted in Microsoft at 3:50 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Hands in love

Summary: Further confirmation that Nokia has something cooking with the abusive monopolist Elop (Nokia’s CEO) recently came from; other timely reminders of the impact of former Microsoft staff

YESTERDAY we wrote a difficult post about what the sociopaths from Microsoft appear to be doing to MeeGo. We included a lot of links there, so we’ll spare repetitions. Some sceptics used to accuse Techrights of theorising exactly all that, even months before it happened. As in many cases, we were actually right and Elop’s entryism role seems to be further validated by large publications (corporate press) right now.

This is just the unfortunate impact of Microsoft executives leaving the companies in droves, moving from a position of leadership in one division to controlling entire outside companies like VMware, Juniper, or Nokia. Here is a new article about Microsoft’s many other departures: [via]

Microsoft has seen key people abandoning positions across the board—from high, C-level executives to middle managers to evangelists and strategic engineers and architects. Throughout 2010, there were several key departures, and the brain drain spilled over into this year, with some big names leaving in January.

Recently we showed that the OOXML outage in Australia [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6] involved someone in government who had worked with Microsoft. Now that there’s some lip service thrown out there as “damage control” (about “open source”), Microsoft carries on playing along as recently covered by ITNews and now by ZDNet Australia. The problem with this government is that its people have vested interests involving Microsoft, so no wonder it favours OOXML, which is not a real standard. And speaking of OOXML apologists, see what Bruce Byfield has to say.

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email
  • Slashdot

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

4 Comments

  1. twitter said,

    February 10, 2011 at 6:53 pm

    Gravatar

    Ah, Bruce Byfield, an apologist always making defeat sound reasonable. Where can a person start with that one? How about the early 90′s? Here’s what the old man says he remembers about Word Perfect:

    In effect, many people accept that because free software alternatives are less widely known, their users must acquiesce to what is common. Just as in the early 1990s, WordPerfect filters for Microsoft Office had to be better than Microsoft Office filters for WordPerfect

    The problem with that line of reasoning is that none of it is true. Word Perfect was dominant in the early 90′s and technically superior. At that time, Microsoft was just beginning their political push to force Microsoft Office on schools, governments and other influential users. They had about as many users as OOXML does today. The bribes and corruption were about the same but the set of lies was different, they pushed “cost”. The change was disruptive, costly and fought everywhere it happened.

    Byfield presents the ODF side incompletely and with similar half backed logic to conclude that OOXML is some kind of convenience factor. OOXML is not convenient to anyone. It’s something that requires the user to go out and buy a $400 program, while ODF can be satisfied with a free download. This is why no one is using OOXML, not even Microsoft Office users. Every time they send something out, they get a slew of letters from people who have not spent lots of money on the new Office and they quickly learn not to offend people by using other formats. OOXML “filters” from Novell are defective by design, which is what the documents Groklaw dug up prove. Some features were just not going to be supported and that was part of the contract. Including these broken filters in Libre Office only sets people up for frustration and patent attacks. Developers are bright enough to know that and their protest is good news.

    Microsoft will go bankrupt before OOXML is a real problem. Developers should ignore it and distros should especially ignore code from Novell.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    For those who want to know the real WordPerfect story, here is an excerpt from ECIS:

    E. Microsoft’s Elimination Of Word Perfect

    “If we own the key ‘franchises’ built on top of the operating system, we

    dramatically widen the ‘moat’ that protects the operating system business…. We
    hope to make a lot of money off these franchises, but even more important is that

    7

    they should protect our Windows royalty per PC.”
    –Jeff Raikes, Microsoft President
    43

    “I have decided that we should not publish these [Windows 95 user interface]
    extensions. We should wait until we have a way to do a high level of integration
    that will be harder for likes of Notes, WordPerfect to achieve, and which will give
    Office a real advantage…. We can’t compete with Lotus and WordPerfect/Novell
    without this.”
    –Bill Gates, Microsoft founder and then-CEO
    44

    Beginning in 1994, Microsoft launched an anticompetitive campaign to extinguish
    WordPerfect, an office productivity application owned by Novell and competing with
    Microsoft’s Office suite. Office productivity applications (including word processing,
    spreadsheet, and presentation applications) are one of the most important groups of applications
    and contribute substantially to the applications barrier to entry protecting Microsoft’s operating
    system monopoly.

    When Microsoft began this campaign, WordPerfect enjoyed widespread popularity. In

    order to eliminate its competitor, Microsoft withheld crucial technical information about
    Windows, going so far as to extend the Windows API, the set of commands a program uses to
    communicate with the operating system, to ensure that WordPerfect did not work smoothly with
    Microsoft’s monopoly operating system.45 Microsoft also used its monopoly power to control
    industry standards, thus requiring WordPerfect to implement proprietary technology or risk
    incompatibility with Windows.46 And it excluded WordPerfect from the major channels of

    distribution for office productivity applications.47 For example, Microsoft forbade OEMs from
    pre-installing Novell products and gave discounts for refusing to sell other developers’ office
    productivity applications.48 As part of Microsoft’s strategy to eliminate Novell, “[a] top
    Microsoft executive wrote that Microsoft should ‘smile’ at Novell, falsely signifying Microsoft’s
    willingness to help the two companies’ common customers integrate their various products,

    8


    while actually ‘pulling the trigger’ and killing Novell.”
    49 Microsoft’s tactics were, again,
    extremely successful, as shown in the graphic below.50

    Microsoft extinguished WordPerfect and gained a monopoly in office productivity application

    suites, accomplishing its goal of “dramatically widen[ing] the moat” protecting its lucrative
    Windows monopoly.

    [...]

    45

    See Complaint ¶¶ 56, 6972, Novell, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp., No. JFM-05-1087, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11520
    (D. Md. June 10, 2005).

    46
    See id. ¶¶ 8494.

    47
    See id. ¶ 112.

    48
    See id. ¶ 117.

    49
    See id. ¶ 55.

    50
    Fred Vogelstein, Search and Destroy, FORTUNE, May 2, 2005, at 74, available at

    http://money.cnn.com/

    magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2005/05/
    02/8258478/index.htm (showing
    “Microsoft’s Battles” market share graphics). In 1993, WordPerfect accounted for more than 40% of word
    processing software sales, with annual sales of $700 million. See Complaint ¶ 150, Novell, Inc. v. Microsoft
    Corp
    ., No. JFM-05-1087, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11520 (D. Md. June 10, 2005). By 1996, WordPerfect’s

    share of sales had dropped to less than 10%, with annual sales of only $200 million. See id.

  2. dyfet said,

    February 11, 2011 at 7:21 am

    Gravatar

    So he dumps meego, makes windows mobile the future of the company, and the stock promptly collapses this morning. Sometimes even the markets recognize a loosing strategy.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Yes, I will cover this later today. Thanks.

What Else is New


  1. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, October 21, 2020

    IRC logs for Wednesday, October 21, 2020



  2. Living Humbly (With Older Technology or None) is More Compatible With Privacy- and Freedom-Respecting Technological Lifestyle

    Simplicity sometimes trumps so-called 'novelty', especially when it comes to human rights and users' freedom



  3. Reasons Why You (and Everybody Else) Should Join the Fight for Software Freedom

    Society is being closely watched and controlled (more so during/after the latest pandemic) and people must carefully consider the true importance of resisting proprietary technology (controlled remotely by state actors)



  4. Ways and Means to Reduce One's Dependency on Google's Various Monopolies and Near-Monopolies

    Getting rid of Google means a lot more than embracing DumbDumbGo (DDG) or some other sites that spy just like Google; we're taking stock of some options



  5. The European Commission is Still M.I.A. Regarding EPO Corruption (and the EPO's Management Plays Dirty, as Always)

    There's no change in the EU; the EUIPO and EPO enjoy complete and total immunity/impunity, with the Commission being manned by those who are deeply complicit



  6. 10 Reasons Why All This 'Edge for Linux' Coverage is a Total Farce

    The fake hype surrounding "Edge" is an inauthentic hype/buzz campaign made to coincide with anti-Google sentiments spread by Microsoft front/pressure groups



  7. Microsoft's IIS Has Collapsed Again This Past Month (and IIS Will Not and Cannot Survive This Way)

    Netcraft shows that Microsoft's decline further accelerates in the Web servers space; IIS is becoming financially unviable



  8. Links 21/10/2020: Alpine 3.12.1, Tor Browser 10.0.2

    Links for the day



  9. [Meme] US Department of Justice Should Have Taken on Microsoft Again, Not Google

    When lobbying, connections and political sway determine the actions of the American government it's hardly surprising that Bill Gates gets the Trump administration to fight for him (to make him even richer)



  10. [Meme] Banning Words, Gaslighting Volunteers

    What happens when institutions are themselves in violation of a CoC (institutional violation) and massive corporations that fund such institutional violations are defending demonisation of the individual (squashing ‘uncomfortable’ voices, even volunteers’)



  11. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, October 20, 2020

    IRC logs for Tuesday, October 20, 2020



  12. Links 21/10/2020: $8000 GNU/Linux Desktop, Tails 4.12, Open Infrastructure Foundation and Firefox Release

    Links for the day



  13. Never Feed the Internet Trolls, No Matter How Tempting It Becomes

    The tactics for removing critics of abuse (by framing them as "abusive") have evolved a lot in recent years; the best course of action is to never entertain provocateurs in any way whatsoever (just ignore them, give them no attention which they crave and feed on)



  14. Bill Gates: “I'm Not a Lawyer” (He Dropped Out of College, Where He Studied Law Before and After Breaking the Law Chronically)

    How Microsoft blackmailed other companies into supporting nothing but Microsoft and Windows; Bill Gates repeatedly lied to the interrogators about it, then said "I'm not a lawyer" (IANAL) even though he went to college to become one, just like his father who died last month



  15. Microsoft Has Not Changed Since Being Investigated (and Prosecuted) for Crimes at a Federal Level

    The media keeps telling us a bunch of worthless junk about Gates "saving the world" and Microsoft becoming a "nice" and "gentle" (or "soft") company, but nothing could be further from the truth



  16. Stick a Fork in the Open Source Initiative (OSI). OSI is Dead. Microsoft Bought OSI.

    OSI leadership proudly showing early signs of 'prognosis negative'; the OSI can never and will never recover from this; Microsoft killed it



  17. Links 20/10/2020: OpenZFS 2.0 RC4 and Trisquel GNU/Linux 9.0

    Links for the day



  18. People With God Complex Must Never be Allowed in Positions of Power

    The attack on Linus Torvalds — an attack which at his own expense/peril he fails to recognise/acknowledge — seeks to put both projects that he founded right in Microsoft’s palm



  19. IRC Proceedings: Monday, October 19, 2020

    IRC logs for Monday, October 19, 2020



  20. Corporate Media: GNU/Linux Can Only Succeed If/When Microsoft Dominates Everything Inside It

    The corporate takeover (or handover) of GNU/Linux would not have been possible without complicity of corruptible (bribed) media



  21. Bill Gates Explains How Microsoft and Apple Leverage Software Patents in Their Cross-Licensing Deals (to Perpetuate Duopoly/Shared Monopoly)

    A look back at Apple's and Microsoft's use or misuse of bogus software patents in bargaining (in effect excluding those who have not amassed tens of thousands of patents)



  22. Standards and Choices

    GNU/Linux is a very standards-based platform; having lots of choices (e.g. distros to choose from) isn’t the principal problem — or nowhere near the extent sabotage and illegal tactics by Microsoft have been



  23. IBM's “Emb(RACE)” Campaign is an Insult to History and Historians

    IBM wishes to be seen as some heroic saviour and warrior for black girls; this requires serious if not torturous revisionism to be believed



  24. There Are Too Many Types of Cars...

    "Choice is malicious," say the antagonists



  25. Reversal of Narratives by Internet Trolls (Spinning Reaction to Their Trolling as 'Abuse')

    Organisations that engage in demonisation of people (typically those who expose the abuses of such organisations) somehow evade the standards of Codes of Conduct, as if Codes of Conduct are covertly designed not to protect individuals but to empower those who already have all the powers (or front for powerful people/corporations)



  26. Ongoing (Albeit Secret) Campaign of Patent Extortion Against GNU/Linux Distributions Using Software Patents, Even Expired Ones in Europe

    GNU/Linux distros attacked by software patents, even in Europe where no such patents are supposed to exist (or have any legal bearing)



  27. Links 19/10/2020: Linux 5.9-ck1/MuQSS, Linux Kodachi 7.3

    Links for the day



  28. Java's James Gosling is Wrong. Free Software Advocates Never Suggested or Insinuated That Money-Making Was Ethically Wrong.

    The honorable James Gosling mischaracterises the stance of Free software advocacy, portraying it like it is an issue of money rather than respect for users



  29. Maybe This is What Codes of Conduct Were Made for? Or to Prevent? (Updated)

    When people bemoan the abuse they receive from a so-called 'anti-harassment' team (covering up corporate corruption in a project by ousting people) this is the kind of thing they receive from colleagues or former colleagues



  30. Media Contradicts Itself, Redefines Proprietary Software as 'Open'... for Microsoft

    Proprietary GitHub is being spun as Microsoft going "open" (nothing could be further from the truth) in another EEE-type move with diffusion and confusion


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts