EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

09.11.11

Cablegate: Japan Working to Cultivate More Patent Monopolies in China, Rooting for Global Patent System (With Software Patents)

Posted in Asia, Cablegate, Law, Patents at 4:25 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Cablegate

China-Japan locator

Summary: A 5-year-old vision of a world where patent lawsuits can be filed globally and the rules on patents not prescribed based on domestic interests

The United States and Japan are the primary two countries that foster software patents, with perhaps a few more on the verge, e.g. Korea (see this recent trade agreement).

The following Cablegate cable states that “JIPA’s goal is to improve the quality of patent examination in China as the Chinese government rapidly increases the number of patent examiners to correspond to the increased number of patent applications filed in China.”

It also alludes to the EU Patent when it says that “JIPA strongly supports the Trilateral Initiative — which he referred to as a “Global Patent System” — of the Japan Patent Office (JPO), US Patent Office (USPTO) and the EU Patent Office (EUPO) to establish a system of sharing examination results so that a patent applicant could use the examination results from one patent office to petition for expedited processing in another office. He noted that similar discussions were taking place within WIPO but were going nowhere because of the huge differences in approach and capabilities.”

This cable from 2006 is added below in its entirety.


VZCZCXRO4870
PP RUEHFK RUEHKSO RUEHNH
DE RUEHKO #0617/01 0340831
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 030831Z FEB 06
FM AMEMBASSY TOKYO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 8244
INFO RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 0390
RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA 2747
RUEHKSO/AMCONSUL SAPPORO 5615
RUEHOK/AMCONSUL OSAKA KOBE 7468
RUEHFK/AMCONSUL FUKUOKA 4409
RUEHNH/AMCONSUL NAHA 7056
RUESLE/AMCONSUL SHANGHAI 1972
RUEHGZ/AMCONSUL GUANGZHOU 1179

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 TOKYO 000617 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SIPDIS 
 
STATE for EAP/J, EAP/EP, EB/TPP/MTA/IP 
USDOC for DAS HLevine 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: KIPR [Intellectual Property Rights], ECON [Economic Conditions], ETRD [Foreign Trade], JP 
SUBJECT: JAPANESE IPR ASSOCIATION FOCUSSED ON CHINA AND 
PATENTS 
 
 
¶1.  SUMMARY:  The Japan Intellectual Property Association 
(JIPA) is concentrating its international efforts on: 1) 
combating Chinese counterfeits of Japanese products and 
2) promoting an international mutual recognition system 
for patent searches, according to Secretary-General Hideo 
Doi in a recent meeting with EconOff.  In China JIPA is 
running several training programs aimed at Chinese 
Customs, Trademark, and Patent officials, and is 
compiling a database of people convicted of IPR crimes in 
China for the use of the Chinese government. 
End Summary 
 
¶2.  BACKGROUND: The Japan Intellectual Property 
Association (JIPA) considers itself the world's largest 
IPR industry organization with over a thousand members 
representing large and medium chemical, electronics, and 
manufacturing firms in Japan.  Among its international 
outreach programs, JIPA offers training in China, Taiwan, 
Thailand, and Korea.  The current JIPA president Naoto 
Kuji comes from Honda, (which has been concerned about 
counterfeit auto parts in China) and will be replaced 
this year by Kazuo Kamisugi of Wako Chemicals, a chemical 
and pharmaceutical manufacturer. 
 
JIPA Activities in China 
 
¶3.  JIPA has shifted its strategy in China to what Doi 
called a carrot and stick approach because it realized 
that just demanding that China improve its IPR 
environment was counter-productive.  Therefore, JIPA, 
working closely with the Japanese government (MOFA, METI, 
JETRO),  has developed a broad program to work with 
Chinese officials to improve IPR enforcement including: 
 
(a)  Training Customs Officials to distinguish between 
authentic and fake goods.  JIPA also helped compile a how- 
to manual for the training. 
 
(b)  Training Trademark Bureau officials on how to combat 
trademark infringements.  In early 2006, JIPA also plans 
a study session with the Trademark Bureau to address the 
issue of unclear standards for determining trademark 
infringements.  (Doi explained that Chinese manufacturers 
are producing numerous fakes using look-alike or sound- 
alike brands, e.g. Hongda, instead of Honda.) 
 
(c)  Training Chinese Patent Office examiners to improve 
their skills and knowledge.  JIPA provided technical 
training on patents for advanced technology in both 
automobiles and electronics in 2005.  JIPA's goal is to 
improve the quality of patent examination in China as the 
Chinese government rapidly increases the number of patent 
examiners to correspond to the increased number of patent 
applications filed in China. 
 
(d)  Compiling a database of names of people who have 
been convicted of IPR crimes by various security agencies 
in China.  Doi observed that IPR criminals tend to repeat 
their crimes, so JIPA decided to provide the Chinese 
government with a comprehensive database that could be 
shared by different Chinese government agencies. 
 
Japanese firms concerns 
 
¶4.  Japanese firms in China have been most concerned with 
counterfeiting of industrial products such as automobile 
parts, home electronics/appliances, and industrial 
equipment.  Doi also noted that a couple of years ago 
most Japanese companies did not think it was worth the 
expense to file a law suit for IPR infringement because 
of the ineffectiveness of the Chinese courts, but that 
now more Japanese companies are willing to file suits and 
go to court. 
 
¶5.  Doi added that JIPA and its members have been working 
closely with the US Embassy and the American Chamber of 
Commerce in Beijing because their concerns and approaches 
are very similar. 
 
Rooting for a "Global Patent System" 
 
TOKYO 00000617  002 OF 002 
 
 
 
¶6.  JIPA strongly supports the Trilateral Initiative -- 
which he referred to as a "Global Patent System" -- of 
the Japan Patent Office (JPO), US Patent Office (USPTO) 
and the EU Patent Office (EUPO) to establish a system of 
sharing examination results so that a patent applicant 
could use the examination results from one patent office 
to petition for expedited processing in another office. 
He noted that similar discussions were taking place 
within WIPO but were going nowhere because of the huge 
differences in approach and capabilities. 
 
SCHIEFFER


It is this kind of patent globalisation that can further suppress the 5 billion or so people who are already denied access to crucial knowledge.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. Links 15/8/2018: Akademy 2018 Wrapups and More Intel Defects

    Links for the day



  2. Antiquated Patenting Trick: Adding Words Like 'Apparatus' to Make Abstract Ideas Look/Sound Like They Pertain to or Contain a 'Device'

    35 U.S.C. § 101 (Section 101) still maintains that abstract ideas are not patent-eligible; so applicants and law firms go out of their way to make their ideas seem as though they're physical



  3. Open Invention Network (OIN) Member Companies Need to Become Unanimous in Opposition to Software Patents

    Opposition to abstract software patents, which even the SCOTUS and the Federal Circuit nowadays reject, would be strategically smart for OIN; but instead it issues a statement in support of a GPL compliance initiative



  4. President Battistelli 'Killed' the EPO; António Campinos Will 'Finish the Job'

    The EPO is shrinking, but this is being shrewdly disguised using terms like "efficiency" and a low-profile President who keeps himself in the dark



  5. Links 14/8/2018: Virtlyst 1.2.0, Blender 2.8 Planning Update, Zorin OS 12.4, FreeBSD 12.0 Alpha

    Links for the day



  6. Berkheimer Changed Nothing and Invalidation Rates of Abstract Software Patents Remain Very High

    Contrary to repetitive misinformation from firms that 'sell' services around patents, there is no turnaround or comeback for software patents; the latest numbers suggest a marginal difference at best — one that may be negligible considering the correlation between expected outcomes and actions (the nature of risk analysis)



  7. Lockton Insurance Brokers Exploiting Patent Trolls to Sell Insurance to the Gullible

    Demonstrating what some people have dubbed (and popularised) "disaster capitalism", Lockton now looks for opportunities to profit from patent trolls, in the form of "insurance" (the same thing Microsoft does)



  8. Patent Lawyers Writing Patent Law for Their Own Enrichment Rather Than for Innovation

    We have become detached from the original goals and come to the point where patent offices aren't necessarily run by people qualified for the job of advancing science and technology; they, unlike judges, only seem to care about how many patents get granted, irrespective of their quality/merit



  9. Links 13/8/2018: Linux 4.18 and GNU Linux-libre 4.18 Arrive

    Links for the day



  10. PTAB is Loathed by Patent Maximalists Because It Can Potentially Invalidate Thousands of Software Patents (More Than Courts Can Handle)

    The US patent system has become more resistant to software patents; courts, however, are still needed to invalidate such patents (a potentially expensive process) because the USPTO continues to grant these provided some fashionable buzzwords/hype waves are utilised (e.g. "facial recognition", "blockchain", "autonomous vehicles")



  11. Gene Quinn and 'Dallas Innovates' as Couriers of Agenda for Patent Trolls Like iPEL

    Failing to hide their real purpose and malicious agenda, sites whose real purpose is to promote a lot of patent litigation produce puff pieces, even for patently unethical trolls such as iPEL



  12. Software Patents, Secured by 'Smart' and 'Intelligent' Tricks, Help Microsoft and Others Bypass Alice/Section 101

    A look at the use of fashionable trends and buzzwords to acquire and pass around dubious software patents, then attempting to guard these from much-needed post-Alice scrutiny



  13. Keep Boston (and Massachusetts in General) From Becoming an Infestation Zone for Patent Litigation

    Boston, renowned for research and innovation, has become somewhat of a litigation hotbed; this jeopardises the state's attractiveness (except perhaps to lawyers)



  14. Links 12/8/2018: Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, Mesa 18.1.6 Release Notice, New Linux Imminent

    Links for the day



  15. Thomas Massie's “Restoring America’s Leadership in Innovation Act of 2018” (RALIA) Would Put the US Patent System in the Lions' (or Trolls') Mouth Again

    An anti-§ 101 and anti-PTAB bill from Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) strives to remove quality control; but by handing the system back to patent trolls he and his proponents simply strive to create more business of litigation, at the expense of innovation



  16. EPO-Style Problem-Solution: Tackling Backlog by Granting Lots of Low-Quality (Bogus) European Patents, Causing a Surge in Troll/Frivolous Litigation

    The EPO's lack of interest in genuine patent quality (measuring "quality" in terms of speed, not actual quality) may mean nothing but a litigation epidemic; many of these lawsuits would be abusive, baseless; those harmed the most would be small businesses that cannot afford a legal defense and would rather settle with those who exploit questionable patents, notably patent trolls



  17. Links 11/8/2018: PGP Clean Room 1.0, Ring-KDE 3.0.0, Julia 1.0

    Links for the day



  18. Propaganda Sites of Patent Trolls and Litigators Have Quit Trying to Appear Impartial or Having Integrity

    The lobbying groups of patent trolls (which receive money from such trolls) carry on meddling in policy and altering perception that drives policy; we present some new examples



  19. Months After Oil States the Patent Maximalists Still Try to Undermine Inter Partes Reviews (“IPRs”), Refusing to Accept Patent Quality

    The patent maximalists in the United States, seeing that the USPTO is moving away from patent maximalism, is desperate for a turnaround; prominent patent maximalists take it all out on PTAB



  20. The Unified Patent Court (UPC) Agreement is Paralysed, So Team UPC is Twisting Old News

    Paralysis of the Unified Patent Court Agreement (UPCA) means that people are completely forgetting about its very existence; those standing to benefit from it (patent litigation firms) are therefore recycling and distorting old news



  21. Patents as Profiteering Opportunities for Law Firms Rather Than Drivers of Innovation for Productive Companies

    A sample of news from yesterday; the patent microcosm is still arguing about who pays attorneys’ fees (not whether these fees are justified) and is constantly complaining about the decline in patent litigation, which means fewer and lower attorneys’ fees (less work for them)



  22. Links 9/8/2018: Mesa 18.2 RC2, Cockpit 175, WPA-2 Hash Cracking

    Links for the day



  23. Patent Maximalists -- Not Reformers -- Are the Biggest Threat to the Viability of the Patent System and Innovation

    Those who strive to infinitely expand patent scope are rendering the patent system obsolete and completely losing sight of the very purpose of the patent system, whose sanity US courts and lawmakers gradually restore (one ruling and one bill at a time)



  24. WeMove.EU Tackles Low Patent Quality at the European Patent Office (EPO)

    The breadth of European Patents, which now cover even nature itself, worries public interest groups; Team UPC, however, wants patent scope to expand further and António Campinos has expressed his intention to further increase the number of grants



  25. Links 8/8/2018: KDE Neon for Testing, New LibreOffice Release, Dart 2.0

    Links for the day



  26. Links 7/8/2018: TCP Vulnerability in Linux, Speck Crypto Code Candidate for Removal

    Links for the day



  27. PTAB Needs to Expand and Become More Accessible to More Challengers of Wrongly-Granted Patents

    Challenges to US patents at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) are helping to raise the bar for litigators; those who value the quality of patents should welcome rather than condemn PTAB and PTAB ought to be expanded to facilitate more scrutiny of granted patents



  28. Supreme Court and Federal Circuit Precedents Might Make District Courts (Outside Texas) More Sceptical of Patents

    As patent lawsuits scatter around the United States (not as concentrated around Texas anymore) there's a real chance of turnaround in terms of outcomes; we look at some recent cases



  29. The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) is Cleaning Up the United States' Patent System

    The highest patent court (bar the US Supreme Court, SCOTUS) is rejecting a lot of patents, not only software patents; this is long overdue and is bad news to patent lawyers (not to companies that actually create and sell things)



  30. Racing to the Bottom, the António Campinos-Led EPO Continues to Promote Software Patents, Just Like China

    The EPO is being transformed into 'SIPO Europe', a dangerous gamble which would leave European firms more susceptible to frivolous litigation and generally reduce the value of previously-much-coveted European Patents


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts