EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

09.11.11

Cablegate: Japan Working to Cultivate More Patent Monopolies in China, Rooting for Global Patent System (With Software Patents)

Posted in Asia, Cablegate, Law, Patents at 4:25 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Cablegate

China-Japan locator

Summary: A 5-year-old vision of a world where patent lawsuits can be filed globally and the rules on patents not prescribed based on domestic interests

The United States and Japan are the primary two countries that foster software patents, with perhaps a few more on the verge, e.g. Korea (see this recent trade agreement).

The following Cablegate cable states that “JIPA’s goal is to improve the quality of patent examination in China as the Chinese government rapidly increases the number of patent examiners to correspond to the increased number of patent applications filed in China.”

It also alludes to the EU Patent when it says that “JIPA strongly supports the Trilateral Initiative — which he referred to as a “Global Patent System” — of the Japan Patent Office (JPO), US Patent Office (USPTO) and the EU Patent Office (EUPO) to establish a system of sharing examination results so that a patent applicant could use the examination results from one patent office to petition for expedited processing in another office. He noted that similar discussions were taking place within WIPO but were going nowhere because of the huge differences in approach and capabilities.”

This cable from 2006 is added below in its entirety.


VZCZCXRO4870
PP RUEHFK RUEHKSO RUEHNH
DE RUEHKO #0617/01 0340831
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 030831Z FEB 06
FM AMEMBASSY TOKYO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 8244
INFO RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 0390
RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA 2747
RUEHKSO/AMCONSUL SAPPORO 5615
RUEHOK/AMCONSUL OSAKA KOBE 7468
RUEHFK/AMCONSUL FUKUOKA 4409
RUEHNH/AMCONSUL NAHA 7056
RUESLE/AMCONSUL SHANGHAI 1972
RUEHGZ/AMCONSUL GUANGZHOU 1179

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 TOKYO 000617 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SIPDIS 
 
STATE for EAP/J, EAP/EP, EB/TPP/MTA/IP 
USDOC for DAS HLevine 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: KIPR [Intellectual Property Rights], ECON [Economic Conditions], ETRD [Foreign Trade], JP 
SUBJECT: JAPANESE IPR ASSOCIATION FOCUSSED ON CHINA AND 
PATENTS 
 
 
¶1.  SUMMARY:  The Japan Intellectual Property Association 
(JIPA) is concentrating its international efforts on: 1) 
combating Chinese counterfeits of Japanese products and 
2) promoting an international mutual recognition system 
for patent searches, according to Secretary-General Hideo 
Doi in a recent meeting with EconOff.  In China JIPA is 
running several training programs aimed at Chinese 
Customs, Trademark, and Patent officials, and is 
compiling a database of people convicted of IPR crimes in 
China for the use of the Chinese government. 
End Summary 
 
¶2.  BACKGROUND: The Japan Intellectual Property 
Association (JIPA) considers itself the world's largest 
IPR industry organization with over a thousand members 
representing large and medium chemical, electronics, and 
manufacturing firms in Japan.  Among its international 
outreach programs, JIPA offers training in China, Taiwan, 
Thailand, and Korea.  The current JIPA president Naoto 
Kuji comes from Honda, (which has been concerned about 
counterfeit auto parts in China) and will be replaced 
this year by Kazuo Kamisugi of Wako Chemicals, a chemical 
and pharmaceutical manufacturer. 
 
JIPA Activities in China 
 
¶3.  JIPA has shifted its strategy in China to what Doi 
called a carrot and stick approach because it realized 
that just demanding that China improve its IPR 
environment was counter-productive.  Therefore, JIPA, 
working closely with the Japanese government (MOFA, METI, 
JETRO),  has developed a broad program to work with 
Chinese officials to improve IPR enforcement including: 
 
(a)  Training Customs Officials to distinguish between 
authentic and fake goods.  JIPA also helped compile a how- 
to manual for the training. 
 
(b)  Training Trademark Bureau officials on how to combat 
trademark infringements.  In early 2006, JIPA also plans 
a study session with the Trademark Bureau to address the 
issue of unclear standards for determining trademark 
infringements.  (Doi explained that Chinese manufacturers 
are producing numerous fakes using look-alike or sound- 
alike brands, e.g. Hongda, instead of Honda.) 
 
(c)  Training Chinese Patent Office examiners to improve 
their skills and knowledge.  JIPA provided technical 
training on patents for advanced technology in both 
automobiles and electronics in 2005.  JIPA's goal is to 
improve the quality of patent examination in China as the 
Chinese government rapidly increases the number of patent 
examiners to correspond to the increased number of patent 
applications filed in China. 
 
(d)  Compiling a database of names of people who have 
been convicted of IPR crimes by various security agencies 
in China.  Doi observed that IPR criminals tend to repeat 
their crimes, so JIPA decided to provide the Chinese 
government with a comprehensive database that could be 
shared by different Chinese government agencies. 
 
Japanese firms concerns 
 
¶4.  Japanese firms in China have been most concerned with 
counterfeiting of industrial products such as automobile 
parts, home electronics/appliances, and industrial 
equipment.  Doi also noted that a couple of years ago 
most Japanese companies did not think it was worth the 
expense to file a law suit for IPR infringement because 
of the ineffectiveness of the Chinese courts, but that 
now more Japanese companies are willing to file suits and 
go to court. 
 
¶5.  Doi added that JIPA and its members have been working 
closely with the US Embassy and the American Chamber of 
Commerce in Beijing because their concerns and approaches 
are very similar. 
 
Rooting for a "Global Patent System" 
 
TOKYO 00000617  002 OF 002 
 
 
 
¶6.  JIPA strongly supports the Trilateral Initiative -- 
which he referred to as a "Global Patent System" -- of 
the Japan Patent Office (JPO), US Patent Office (USPTO) 
and the EU Patent Office (EUPO) to establish a system of 
sharing examination results so that a patent applicant 
could use the examination results from one patent office 
to petition for expedited processing in another office. 
He noted that similar discussions were taking place 
within WIPO but were going nowhere because of the huge 
differences in approach and capabilities. 
 
SCHIEFFER


It is this kind of patent globalisation that can further suppress the 5 billion or so people who are already denied access to crucial knowledge.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. Links 19/10/2018: OpenBSD 6.4 and OpenSSH 7.9 Released

    Links for the day



  2. Ingve Björn Stjerna Has Just Warned That If Team UPC and the European Patent Office Rigged the Proceedings of the German Constitutional Court, Consequences Would be Significant

    The EPO is back to mentioning the Unified Patent Court and it keeps making it abundantly clear that it is only working for the litigation 'industry' rather than for science and technology (or "innovation" as they like to euphemise it)



  3. Links 18/10/2018: New Ubuntu and Postgres

    Links for the day



  4. It's Almost 2019 and Team UPC is Still Pretending Unitary Patent (UPC) Exists, Merely Waiting for Britain to Join

    Refusing to accept that the Unified Patent Court Agreement (UPCA) has reached its death or is at a dead end, UPC proponents — i.e. lawyers looking to profit from frivolous litigation — resort to outright lies and gymnastics in logic/intellectual gymnastics



  5. IAM and IP Kat Are Still Megaphones of Battistelli and His Agenda

    IAM reaffirms its commitment to corrupt Battistelli and IP Kat maintains its stance, which is basically not caring at all about EPO corruption (to the point of actively deleting blog comments that mention such corruption, i.e. 'sanitising' facts)



  6. The EPO Under António Campinos Relaxes the Rules on Software Patenting and the Litigation 'Industry' Loves That

    EPO management, which is nontechnical, found new terms by which to refer to software patents -- terms that even the marketing departments can endorse (having propped them up); they just call it all AI, augmented intelligence and so on



  7. Links 17/10/2018: Elementary OS 5.0 “Juno” Released, MongoDB’s Server Side Public Licence

    Links for the day



  8. Improving US Patent Quality Through Reassessments of Patents and Courts' Transparency

    Transparency in US courts and more public participation in the patent process (examination, litigation etc.) would help demonstrate that many patents are being granted — and sometimes asserted — that are totally bunk, bogus, fake



  9. Ask OIN How It Intends to Deal With Microsoft Proxies Such as Patent Trolls

    OIN continues to miss the key point (or intentionally avoid speaking about it); Microsoft is still selling 'protection' from the very same patent trolls that it is funding, arming, and sometimes even instructing (who to pass patents to and sue)



  10. Links 1610/2018: Linux 4.19 RC8, Xfce Screensaver 0.1.0 Released

    Links for the day



  11. Judge-Bashing Tactics, Undermining PTAB, and Iancu's Warpath for the Litigation and Insurance 'Industries'

    Many inter partes reviews (IPRs) at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) leverage 35 U.S.C. § 101 against software patents; instead of putting an end to such patents Director Iancu decides to just serve the 'industry' he came from (a meta-industry where his firm had worked for Donald Trump)



  12. 'Cloud', 'AI' and Other Buzzwords as Excuses for Granting Fake Patents on Software

    With resurgence of rather meaningless terms like so-called 'clouds' (servers/hosting) and 'AI' (typically anything in code which does something clever, including management of patents) the debate is being shifted away from 35 U.S.C. § 101 (Section 101); but courts would still see past such façade



  13. Corporate Media's Failure to Cover Patents Properly and Our New Hosting Woes

    A status update about EPO affairs and our Web host's plan to shut down (as a whole) very soon, leaving us orphaned or having to pay heavy bills



  14. Links 15/10/2018: Testing Ubuntu 18.10 Release Candidates, KaOS 2018.10 Released

    Links for the day



  15. USPTO FEES Act/SUCCESS Act Gives More Powers to Director Iancu, Supplying Patents for Litigation 'Business' and Embargo (ITC)

    Corruption of the US patent system contributes to various issues which rely on the extrajudicial nature of some elements in this system; companies can literally have their products confiscated or imports blocked, based on wrongly-granted patents



  16. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Decides That USPTO Wrongly Granted Patents to Roche

    Patent quality issues at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) — motivated by money rather than common sense — continue to be highlighted by courts; the USPTO needs to raise the bar to improve the legal certainty associated with US patents



  17. Even Judge Gilstrap From Texas is Starting to Accept That Software Patents Are Invalid

    Amid new lawsuits from Texas (e.g. against Citrix) we’re pleased to see that even “reprehensible” Rodney Gilstrap (that’s what US politicians call him) is learning to accept SCOTUS on 35 U.S.C. § 101



  18. Federal Circuit Doubles Down on User Interface Patents, Helps Microsoft-Connected Patent Trolls Curtail the Prime Competitor of Microsoft Office

    Patent trolls that are connected to Microsoft continue to sue Microsoft rivals using old patents; this time, for a change, even the Federal Circuit lets them get away with it



  19. Let's Hope Apple Defeats All the Abstract Patents That Are Leveraged Against It

    Apple can be viewed as a strategic 'ally' against patents that threaten Android/Linux if one ignores all the patent battles the company started (and has since then settled) against Android OEMs



  20. EPO Insider/Märpel Says President Campinos Already Acts Like Battistelli

    Unitary Patent (UPC) is a step towards making the EPO an EU institution like the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO); but it's not making any progress and constitutional judges must realise that Campinos, chosen by Battistelli to succeed him, is just an empty mask



  21. Quality of Patents Granted by the EPO is Still Low and Nobody Will Benefit Except Lawyers, Jubilant Over Growing Lenience on Software Patents

    Deterioration of patent quality at the EPO — a serious problem which examiners themselves are complaining about — is becoming rather evident as new guidelines are very lenient on software patenting



  22. 100 Days Into the Term of Campinos There is Already an EPO Suicide

    A seventh known suicide at the EPO since the so-called 'reforms' began; the EPO continues to pretend that everything is changing for the better, but in reality it's yet more nepotism and despotism



  23. Links 13/10/2018: Ubuntu Touch OTA-5, MidnightBSD 1.0 Ready

    Links for the day



  24. Links 11/10/2018: PostgreSQL 11 RC1 Released, Librem 5 Loves GNOME 3.32

    Links for the day



  25. Friend Brings a Friend, Boss Becomes Subordinate: the EPO Under António Campinos is Starting to Look a Lot Like Team Battistelli 2.0

    The new President of the EPO contributes to the perception that the Office is a rogue institution. Governance is all in reverse at the Office because it still seems like the Office President bosses the Council rather than be bossed by it (as intended, as per the EPC)



  26. UPC Cowardice: Team UPC Uses Cloaks of Anonymity to Discredit Authors of Scholarly UPC Paper They Don't Like

    Team UPC has sunk to the bottom of the barrel; now it uses anonymous letters in an effort to discredit work of Max Planck Institute staff, in the same way (more or less) that ad hominem attacks were attempted against the filer of the constitutional complaint in Germany



  27. New EPO Guidelines: Granting European Patents on Business Methods, Algorithms, Mental Acts and Other Abstract Stuff

    Keeping so-called 'production' high and meeting so-called 'targets' (allegedly set by Battistelli), Campinos relaxes the rules for "computer-implemented inventions" (one among many misleading terms that mean software patents in Europe)



  28. Open Invention Network is a Proponent of Software Patents -- Just Like Microsoft -- and Microsoft Keeps Patents It Uses to Blackmail Linux Vendors

    OIN loves Microsoft; OIN loves software patents as well. So Microsoft's membership in OIN is hardly a surprise and it's not solving the main issue either, as Microsoft can indirectly sue and "Microsoft has not included any patents they might hold on exfat into the patent non-aggression pact," according to Bradley M. Kuhn



  29. Links 10/10/2018: Unreal Engine 4.21 Preview, Red Hat Openshift Container Platform 3.11

    Links for the day



  30. Links 9/10/2018: Plasma 5.14, Flatpak 1.2 Plan

    Links for the day


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts