11.11.11

Gemini version available ♊︎

Patent Lawyers Compare Patent Monopolies to Children

Posted in Europe, Patents at 12:58 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Will somebody think about the patents!!

Parent with patent

Summary: A glance at the sordid mess created by patents, companies’ real attitude towards patents, and propaganda from patent lawyers who monetise this mess, where legal instruments subvert real competition

IN THE MIDST of patent wars we learn about the surge in number of lawsuits, which are by no means indicators of progress. The patents storm raises the cost of everything and eliminates a lot of companies. Small companies are unable to compete and according to Rupert Murdoch’s press, “more small tech companies in the Bay Area are prioritizing patenting their own inventions as a defense and seeking patent services from law firms and businesses that help defend patent suits.”

“This means that resources get funnelled into unwanted areas rather than development.”So they get patents not because they like patents but because they are afraid of lawsuits. This means that resources get funnelled into unwanted areas rather than development. Can anyone still argue in favour of patents as facilitators of innovation? With a straight face even? That’s just the sad state in the United States and over in Europe there are attempts to make things equally bad. Well, software patents are “back again in the UK, data being processed within the computer was a physical concept, not an abstract one,” writes the FFII’s president. He cites this patent lawyers’ blog which implicitly compares children to patents (yes, honestly!):

As a caring society, we seek to protect both our children and our inventions. Occasionally one is presented with an opportunity to protect the two simultaneously. One such opportunity came in Protecting Kids the World Over (PKTWO) Ltd, in re [2011] EWHC 2720 (Pat), a decision of Mr Justice Floyd (Patents Court, England and Wales) from 26 October which somehow got lost in the wash. This decision touches once again on the potential exclusion from patent protection of an invention which looks jolly useful and, in this Kat’s opinion, would be bound to sell well — but which is afflicted by the twin blights of being implemented by computer and of being a simulation of a mental act.

Those lawyers from London crave patents on algorithms just because it would mean more business (e.g. litigation and trolling) for them. Beware those parasitical elements that write about patents. To them, “innovation” means ways of bamboozling a judge into imposing a fine on innocent parties, passing money from one company to another by bypassing real competition. Microsoft is a good example of this and we shall cover it in the next post.

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

Decor ᶃ Gemini Space

Below is a Web proxy. We recommend getting a Gemini client/browser.

Black/white/grey bullet button This post is also available in Gemini over at this address (requires a Gemini client/browser to open).

Decor ✐ Cross-references

Black/white/grey bullet button Pages that cross-reference this one, if any exist, are listed below or will be listed below over time.

Decor ▢ Respond and Discuss

Black/white/grey bullet button If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

10 Comments

  1. mcinsand said,

    November 11, 2011 at 2:08 pm

    Gravatar

    >>Can anyone still argue in favour of patents as facilitators of innovation?
    >> With a straight face even?

    I can, but I am apparently from a different planet than the software world. For us, patents make it safe to invest in the research needed to develop and implement new ideas, but we actually make things, and those things have to be described in detail with clear boundaries. Without patents, investment in research centers would be stupid, since those that invest would be helping the competition, as well… best to let the state of technology remain static, if investment makes no sense. We don’t deal in formulae and language, though; what we handle are matters of composition and physical structure (no, nothing so silly as rounded corners). We steer clear of our competitors’ patented areas and, in doing so, those barriers do drive us to create our own technologies.

    The difference between my work area and software is also very stark in highlighting how your use of ‘extortion’ is precise and accurate (there is a difference). In fact, their behavior is not only a good case for antitrust action, but it also falls into what I have been taught in my career as a way to lose patent rights. If they had valid patents, if they had patents with merit, the way to protect themselves would be to proclaim that Linux, Android, HTC, whatever infringes on claims x, y, and z of patent . That isn’t what they have been doing, though. For years now, they have been indimidating an industry, claiming to have patents, but not providing any infringement information, claim numbers, or patent numbers. In other words, they have been proclaiming knowledge of infringement without giving any means for halting the infringement. Granted, one reason is no doubt to keep the ridiculousness of the patents under a shroud (emulating a pointing device? really?). That could help with getting rid of software patents, as the ’rounded corners’ and ‘slide to lock’ patents are building public awareness of how the USPTO is failing to do its job.

    Anyway…

    MS is not protecting any patent rights. They are publicly claiming to know of infringements and doing nothing, except in the case of some examples. That is a way to dilute and then maybe eventually lose those rights.

    More importantly, whether or not there is consensus about patents as a whole, threatening companies and an industry without being public and clear on alleged infringements is extortion. It is racketeering, and I’m pretty certain it is illegal in the US; if you’re going to cast a cloud over a group with no clear evidence, that is criminal behavior.

    Sorry for the ramble, especially if I was unclear from discontinuity, but I had a quick minute and need to get back to work.

    Regards,
    mc

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Right. When I said patents I implicitly referred to BM patents and swpats (software patents), among others like genetic patents. “Patents” is abbreviation like “Linux” (shorthand for GNU/Linux/X/etc., usually).

    There are no ways to ‘work around’ mathematics and logic.

    mcinsand Reply:

    There is no need to debate software patents, or other patents on language or mathematics (I include logic in both). However, our patent system is broken, and a good healthy overall debate is needed on all levels. I saw your reply when I was logging in to supply a couple of caveats. Most importanly, although I was providing a perspective where I see the patent system as a driving force for new developments, that does not emcompass all that patents are currently touching. Also, we cannot ignore that I am part of that particular system. I only meant to provide what I see as part of the discussion.

    We can look back for decades to see patent system failures. SLR camera manufacturers all had patents on their particular lens bayonet mount systems, despite the fact that they all (or at least all but one) clearly anticipated each other. And, if you want another bit of concrete evidence for how our patent system is royally messed up, go read US patent number 6,960,975. I would have laughed, if I had not felt more like crying.

    Regards,
    mc

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Patent 6,960,975: Stargate Spaceship
    http://gizmodo.com/136753/patent-6960975-stargate-spaceship

    Apple claims to have ‘invented’ he tablet with bevelled edges and some buttons. Maybe someone should have patented that stuff from TV in the 60s:

    clip1: Apple iPad in the 1969 classic: 2001 A SPACE ODYSSEY
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JQ8pQVDyaLo

    Michael Reply:

    Where does Apple claim to have invented the tablet with bevelled edges and some buttons?

    Oh.

    You made that up.

    Roy… you do that a lot. You argue against straw men because your claims are not supportable.

    Michael Reply:

    People who actually make things, such as Apple and Google, understand the importace of protecting their investments. Roy simply cannot understand that, so he has no problem with Samsung doing all it can to copy Apple:

    http://i.imgur.com/TmUj2.jpg
    http://goo.gl/S2AJR
    http://goo.gl/bWDs6
    http://goo.gl/NjrfV

    As far as the “rounded corners” claim – that is a myth Roy keeps pushing. Nobody sued anyone else over “rounded corners”.

  2. mcinsand said,

    November 11, 2011 at 4:27 pm

    Gravatar

    The tablet in 2001 is very relevant in that it shows how anticipated the basic concept is. If we do allow *REAL* technology patents, then storage, processor, batteries, and display could involve some innovation.

    Imagine a line of dots with coordinates (0,0), (1,1), (2,2), and (3,3). As we look at the line, is (4,4) innovative? Absolutely not, yet this is where the USPTO is falling down on the job and where Apple and MS derive much of their bullying ‘IP’ stick. I have had examiners use this concept (if not specific example) as an explanation for a rejection. Sometimes, I was able to explain how I saw my filing as a significant deviation from the existing line. However, if I was not successfull, then the idea was rejected because it was so clearly anticipated by the existing ‘dots.’

    Regards,

    mc

  3. Michael said,

    November 11, 2011 at 7:37 pm

    Gravatar

    Some stats from your links:

    U.S. lawsuits over mobile technology: 270

    Wow. That is a lot. A lot more than just what MS and Apple, your “duopoly” is involved in. Shows how biased you are. But it gets even more extreme. You claim that the defendants are being attacked. But who is the most common defendant:

    Of the 10 largest patent lawsuits of the last 10 years:
    * 6 were tech-related
    * 4 saw Microsoft as the defendant.
    * %6 Billion was awarded total

    What! In the 4 largest lawsuits, Microsoft was the *defendant*, the one being attacked to use your terminology.

    If we go by your logic that it is the defendant that is being attacked, Microsoft is the biggest victim in this mess. Completely contrary to your claims.

    I know you hate patents, but you have yet to suggest a way for companies to prevent others from clearly doing wrong by copying their work, as shown here:

    http://i.imgur.com/TmUj2.jpg
    http://goo.gl/S2AJR
    http://goo.gl/bWDs6
    http://goo.gl/NjrfV

    Without a solution, your complaints do no good.

    Mikko Reply:

    still trolling with false pictures

    Michael Reply:

    Your lack of refutation is noted. Do you think some of the “after” pictures come from “before”? If so, then please show it – if you do I will be happy to admit to my error.

DecorWhat Else is New


  1. [Meme] EPO Administrative Council Believing EPO-Bribed 'Media' (IAM Still Shilling and Lying for Cash)

    IAM continues to do what brings money from EPO management and Team UPC, never mind if it is being disputed by the patent examiners themselves



  2. The EPO's Mythical “Gap” Has Been Found and It's Bonuses for People Who Use Pure Fiction to Steal From Patent Examiners

    The phony president who has the audacity to claim there's a budget gap is issuing millions of euros for his enablers to enjoy; weeks ahead of the next meeting of national delegates the Central Staff Committee (CSC) tells them: "Events show that the delegations’ concerns about functional allowances have materialised. The lack of transparency and inflation of the budget envelope gives rise to the suspicion that high management is pursuing a policy of self-service at the expense of EPO staff, which is difficult to reconcile with the Office’s claimed cost-saving policy, and to the detriment of the whole Organisation."



  3. Video: Making the Internet a Better Place for People, Not Megacorporations

    Following that earlier list of suggested improvements for a freedom-respecting Internet, here's a video and outline



  4. Links 30/11/2021: KDE Plasma 5.23.4, 4MLinux 38.0, Long GitHub Downtime, and Microsoft's CEO Selling Away Shares

    Links for the day



  5. A Concise Manifesto For Freedom-Respecting Internet

    An informal list of considerations to make when reshaping the Internet to better serve people, not a few corporations that are mostly military contractors subsidised by the American taxpayers



  6. Freenode.net Becomes a 'Reddit Clone' and Freenode IRC is Back to Old Configurations After Flushing Down Decades' Worth of User/Channel Data and Locking/Shutting Out Longtime Users

    Freenode is having another go; after “chits” and “jobs” (among many other ideas) have clearly failed, and following the change of daemon (resulting in massive loss of data and even security issues associated with impersonation) as well as pointless rebrand as “Joseon”, the domain Freenode.net becomes something completely different and the IRC network reopens to all



  7. Jack Dorsey's Decision is a Wake-up Call: Social Control Media is Just a Toxic Bubble

    The state of the World Wide Web (reliability, preservation, accessibility, compatibility etc.) was worsened a lot more than a decade ago; with social control media that’s nowadays just a pile of JavaScript programs we’re basically seeing the Web gradually turning into another Adobe Flash (but this time they tell us it’s a “standard”), exacerbating an already-oversized ‘bubble economy’ where companies operate at a loss while claiming to be worth hundreds of billions (USD) and generally serve imperialistic objectives by means of manipulation like surveillance, selective curation, and censorship



  8. IRC Proceedings: Monday, November 29, 2021

    IRC logs for Monday, November 29, 2021



  9. Links 29/11/2021: NuTyX 21.10.5 and CrossOver 21.1.0

    Links for the day



  10. This Apt Has Super Dumbass Powers. Linus Sebastian and Pop_OS!

    Guest post by Ryan, reprinted with permission



  11. [Meme] Trying to Appease Provocateurs and Borderline Trolls

    GNU/Linux isn’t just a clone of Microsoft Windows and it oughtn’t be a clone of Microsoft Windows, either; some people set themselves up for failure, maybe by intention



  12. Centralised Git Hosting Has a Business Model Which is Hostile Towards Developers' Interests (in Microsoft's Case, It's an Attack on Reciprocal Licensing and Persistent Manipulation)

    Spying, censoring, and abusing projects/developers/users are among the perks Microsoft found in GitHub; the E.E.E.-styled takeover is being misused for perception manipulation and even racism, so projects really need to take control of their hosting (outsourcing is risky and very expensive in the long run)



  13. Links 29/11/2021: FWUPD's 'Best Known Configuration' and Glimpse at OpenZFS 3.0

    Links for the day



  14. President Biden Wants to Put Microsofter in Charge of the Patent Office, Soon to Penalise Patent Applicants Who Don't Use Microsoft's Proprietary Formats

    The tradition of GAFAM or GIAFAM inside the USPTO carries on (e.g. Kappos and Lee; Kappos lobbies for Microsoft and IBM, whereas Lee now works for Amazon/Bezos after a career at Google); it's hard to believe anymore that the USPTO exists to serve innovators rather than aggressive monopolists, shielding their territory by patent threats (lawsuits or worse aggression) and cross-licensing that's akin to a cartel



  15. Microsoft GitHub Exposé — Part VIII — Mr. Graveley's Long Career Serving Microsoft's Agenda (Before Hiring by Microsoft to Work on GitHub's GPL Violations Machine)

    Balabhadra (Alex) Graveley was promoting .NET (or Mono) since his young days; his current job at Microsoft is consistent with past harms to GNU/Linux, basically pushing undesirable (except to Microsoft) things to GNU/Linux users; Tomboy used to be the main reason for distro ISOs to include Mono



  16. Dr. Andy Farnell on Teaching Cybersecurity in an Age of 'Fake Security'

    By Dr. Andy Farnell



  17. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, November 28, 2021

    IRC logs for Sunday, November 28, 2021



  18. Links 29/11/2021: Linux 5.16 RC3 and Lots of Patent Catch-up

    Links for the day



  19. By 2022 0% of 'News' Coverage About Patents Will Be Actual Journalism (Patent Litigation Sector Has Hijacked the World Wide Web to Disseminate Self-Promotional Misinformation)

    Finding news about the EPO is almost impossible because today’s so-called ‘news’ sites are in the pockets of Benoît Battistelli, António Campinos, and their cohorts who turned the EPO into a hub of litigation, not science; this is part of an international (worldwide) problem because financial resources for journalism have run out, and so the vacuum is filled/replaced almost entirely by Public Relations (PR) and marketing



  20. Trying to Appease Those Who Never Liked Free Software or Those Who Blindly Loved All Patent Monopolies to Begin With

    It’s crystal clear that trying to appease everyone, all the time, is impossible; in the case of the EPO, for example, we hope that exposing Team Battistelli/Campinos helps raise awareness of the harms of patent maximalism, and when speaking about Free software — whilst occasionally bashing the alternatives (proprietary) — we hope to convince more people to join the “Good Fight”



  21. Links 28/11/2021: Laravel 8.73 Released, GitHub Offline for Hours

    Links for the day



  22. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, November 27, 2021

    IRC logs for Saturday, November 27, 2021



  23. Links 27/11/2021: Nvidia’s DLSS Hype and Why GNU/Linux Matters

    Links for the day



  24. [Meme] Linus Gabriel Sebastian Takes GNU/Linux for a (Tail)'Spin'

    If you’re trying to prove that GNU/Linux is NOT Windows, then “haha! Well done…”



  25. GNU/Linux is for Freedom and It'll Gain Many Users When (or Where) People Understand What Software (or Computing) Freedom Means

    Software that respects people's freedom (and by extension privacy as well) is an alluring proposition; those who choose to try GNU/Linux for the wrong reasons are likely the wrong target audience for advocates



  26. Amid Reports of Microsoft's Competition Crimes in Europe...

    European companies are complaining, but they seem to overlook the principal aspect of an imperialistic system with bottomless pockets (almost 30 trillion dollars in debt already; US national debt soared again last month); Microsoft is shielded by a political system with military (“defence”) as bailout budget to help cushion international expansion for data grab and technical leverage, as we've seen in the case of EPO (this is all political, not technical, and should thus be treated as a political/corruption issue)



  27. Is Linus Trolling the GNU/Linux Community?

    This new video responds to what many sites have been provoked into amplifying



  28. Links 27/11/2021: Tux Paint 0.9.27 and SeaMonkey 1.1.19 in EasyOS

    Links for the day



  29. [Meme] Keeping Our Distance From Microsoft

    The OSI is the dagger, the Linux Foundation is the knife, and many others are the sword by which Microsoft tries to get into the very heart of GNU/Linux and extinguish the Free software movement



  30. Microsoft Edge Encourages Indebted Americans to Guilt-spend Just in Time for Christmas

    Guest post by Ryan, reprinted with permission


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts