Summary: A look at some of the latest privacy-washing of Microsoft (the worst privacy offender in the software world) and the parallel actions of Bill Gates and fellow plutocrats
Surveillance is a hot subject these days. People finally oppose mass surveillance because they know a lot better just how bad it is, owing for the most part to leaks.
Virtually
no software company has been worse than Microsoft when it comes to surveillance, not even Google or
Facebook, which is a monstrous surveillance machine that's partly owned by Microsoft. We were rather disgusted to see the role that GigaOM, the network of Om Malik, played in providing Microsoft with a "propaganda platform" (to use a now-comical term from the US State Department). How much did Microsoft pay Malik in 2006 (or thereabouts) when he embedded Microsoft propaganda inside his articles (Microsoft still does such things)? Nobody knows how much, but there were payments involved. This criminal company, Microsoft, paid for
AstroTurfing of this kind and now it pushes
the preposterous idea of opening 'transparency centres', owing to Malik's hosting. Microsoft admits it is hurt by the public's understanding that it's in bed with the NSA [1], so it lies to the public using Malik's platform. Here is
more of that, also
from HP.
The situation has gotten so serious that even British banks are now worried about Fog Computing [2], especially if it involves NSA/PRISM companies like Microsoft (the #1 company in PRISM).
Speaking of surveillance, Bill Gates, who is
a famous proponent of the NSA, uses taxpayers-funded Establishments, such as schools and public media (e.g. PBS and NPR), for surveillance. These are common targets for Bill Gates bribes. It's a perception game. You bribe the right people to get the agenda rectified. He also invests in surveillance companies such as
G4S and InBloom (along with Rupert Murdoch). The other day we found
this good article on this topic, titled "PARCC Security Breaches Revealed; Microsoft, InBloom, News Corp. Implicated".
The article says: "When LouisianaVoice broke the story about the stealth agreement between the Louisiana Department of Education (DOE) and Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp. whereby DOE would provide News Corp. with personal information on Louisiana’s public school students for use by a company affiliated with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the resulting firestorm resulted in cancellation of the agreement.
"Or did it?
"Remember, too, that it was Murdoch who, in 2010, speaking of the enormous business opportunity in public education awaiting corporate America, said, “When it comes to K through 12 education, we see a $500 billion sector in the U.S.”
"In June of 2012, Erin Bendily, assistant deputy superintendent for departmental support and former education policy adviser to Gov. Bobby Jindal emailed Louisiana Superintendent of Education John White:
"“I think we need to start with a very strong introduction and embed more CCSS (Common Core State Standards) alignment/integration throughout. This sounds harsh, but we should show that our current/old educator evaluation system is crap and the new system is stellar.”"
We covered
Common Core before. It's all about turning schools into indoctrination centres (of the rich) and Professor Diane Ravitch, a
vocal opponent of Gates (who calls for Federal action against him),
has this new article about "Making Schools Poor" (so that they can be bought out). To quote: "It pretends that great teachers will magically appear after principals gain the power to fire teachers without the necessity of hearings. But inner-city schools already have high teacher turnover and difficulty attracting well-qualified teachers. What’s needed most in schools that serve the poorest children is adequate resources, a full curriculum, and a stable, experienced staff. The Vergara decision will do nothing to improve working conditions, to attract better qualified teachers, or to increase the resources available to the neediest children."
The talking point which belittles teachers and accuses them of being inadequate has been famously pushed forth by Gates, who seeks to replace teachers with surveillance gadgets (bracelets) and centralised surveillance systems to monitor (profile) both teachers and students. No doubt Gates is a big champion of surveillance and everyone should make no mistake about Microsoft's privacy policy (note Gates' current role in the company's strategy). Microsoft would even read people's personal E-mails to
get them jailed and deported (nothing to do with national security or even three-letter agencies).
⬆
Related/contextual items from the news:
-
Microsoft admitted that, since the scandal broke, it has seen concrete evidence that trust in its services is plummeting.
