EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

09.28.18

How Team UPC is Reacting to the Demise of EPO- and EU-Connected Court That Would Have Put Patent Maximalists in Charge

Posted in Europe, Patents at 4:59 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

France at the centre, as usual

The three Frenchmen

Summary: The three Frenchmen above are unlikely to ever see a Unitary Patent or Unified Patent Court; this is only bad news for patent trolls and law firms that represent them, hoping to make a killing across Europe with frivolous litigation and threats of litigation

THE previous post focused on the decline of patent quality at the USPTO — a problem which has spread to Europe. For the time being, however, courts can compensate for that. Patent maximalists are hoping for bogus courts with lack of oversight and a bias in favour of EPO management, software patents etc. (bypassing national courts)

Such courts would fall under a “Unified Patent Court” or UPC as they call it. If only if ever became a reality. After a series of rebrands and a lot of mischief it has ground to a halt and there’s no escaping the reality that UPC is running out of time. Even patent maximalists and firms that pushed hard for UPC (we call them “Team UPC”) are losing hope. Towards the end of this week we saw one law firm saying: “The implications for the Unitary Patent and the Unified Patent Court depend on whether the Unified Patent Court Agreement comes into force – it will do so if it is ratified by Germany. If it does and there is no deal relating to the UK’s involvement in it, then UK businesses will be able to apply for Unitary Patents and enforce them in the Unified Patent Court. However, UK businesses will only have the option of obtaining a UK patent (whether by applying to the UK Patent Office or through the EPC system) and enforcing their UK patent rights in the UK courts.”

These are pretty loaded statements that rely on the false assumption of a 'continental' UPC ever coming into fruition. It cannot, not outside the UK. Published this morning from Mark Bell of Dehns (part of Team UPC) was an article which says this:

Although the unitary patent and the Unified Patent Court have yet to come into force, its subsequent fate may well be affected by the UK leaving the EU.

Were the Unified Patent Court to never come into force, there will be no change for businesses in the UK or the EU at the point that the UK leaves the EU, even though the UK has ratified the Unified Patent Court Agreement.

Were the Unified Patent Court to come into force (once Germany has ratified the Unified Patent Court Agreement), the UK will seek to remain within the Unified Patent Court and the unitary patent system. However, depending on whether this takes place before the UK leaves the EU (the latest thinking on this is that this seems unlikely) or after leaving the EU, may affect the UK’s ability to participate in these systems.

Were the UK to be part of the unitary patent and the Unified Patent Court systems (e.g. before the UK leaves the EU), one scenario is that the UK would need to withdraw from them (e.g. when the UK leaves the EU). Businesses (both in the UK and overseas) would therefore no longer be able to use the unitary patent and the Unified Patent Court to protect their inventions within the UK. Instead, as they are able to now, they are able to seek patent protection in the UK via the UK Intellectual Property Office or the European Patent Office (a non-EU institution).

How can Dehns honestly say this after the release of this paper from the Max Planck Institute? People asked this in the comments (so-called ‘interview’ with other Dehns staff) only to hear some excuse about the ‘interview predating this paper. The reality is, they intentionally ignore anything which doesn’t suit their financial agenda, i.e. more of the usual. Bristows went further and smeared the paper, calling it “controversial” even though no controversy exists.

As we said some days ago, "lost in the noise created by Team UPC this week is the simple fact that the British government now admits it’s willing to abandon all Unified Patent Court (UPC) Agreement (UPCA) plans" and this latest interpretation is more correct than most things lawyers have said about UPC (compare to the infamous two lies). To quote:

The UK has ratified the Unified Patent Court Agreement, but it still needs to be ratified by Germany and it is unclear if this will occur before 29 March 2019. If the UPC does not come into force, there will be no changes for UK and EU businesses at the point that the UK exits the EU.

If the UPC does come into force, the notice confirms that the Government will “explore whether it would be possible to remain within” the UPC and UP systems even in a hard Brexit scenario.

By contrast, see what a totally and completely stuffed/stacked panel at the AIPPI event (as one might expect) said (or is reported to have said):

Carr was one of six panellists (all speaking in a personal capacity) who took part in the “Briefing: hot topics in IP” session during the 2018 AIPPI World Congress in Cancún, Mexico, which finished yesterday, September 26.

While refusing to express any views about the wisdom of Brexit itself, Carr noted that one of the most difficult topics to deal with post-Brexit will be IP exhaustion.

[...]

Finally, on the Unified Patent Court (UPC) Agreement and the unitary patent, Carr said: “In my opinion, if we reach a deal then I think the UK will participate … and we have a valuable contribution to make. If there’s no deal, I think it’s unlikely that we will participate … I don’t think it would be in the interests of other European countries to allow us to do so.”

Also in the session, Judge Klaus Grabinski of the German Federal Court of Justice discussed the UPC Agreement in more depth.

“When you look into the UPC’s life, you may get a feeling that we are now in a situation which is rather unclear. Europe has been struggling to get a common court in the patent field for more than 60 years,” he said, before adding that Brexit and a constitutional complaint in Germany are the two main roadblocks to the UPC.

The above isn’t to be mistaken for the constitutional court, or FCC. A different court, the German Federal Court of Justice, is named above. IP Kat wrote about it a couple of days ago in relation to this case now referred to CJEU. What the above suggests is that even judges can recognise the seriousness of the barriers, and the constitutional complaint isn’t the sole barrier.

It should be noted that the above event promoted patent trolls’ agenda, as one might expect from AIPPI World Congress. Bristows did coverage of it in two parts [1, 2] for IP Kat and irony wasn’t overlooked by Benjamin Henrion, who wrote: “Consumers not invited to the FRAND conference: “Tadanobu Andou concluded by reminding the meeting that patent licence fees are in the end paid by end users. In setting licensing fees have to consider how much end users are ready to pay.””

Well, Bristows are “liars and patent zealots,” I told him, as they “push SEP/FRAND agenda” for their clients that are patent trolls. This is why they’re also pursuing UPC like they’d go bankrupt if it fell through.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. Is Linux Foundation a Microsoft Branch Now?

    The so-called ‘Linux’ Foundation (LF) nowadays helps Microsoft cement its monopoly — the very opposite of what ages ago it said the LF would do



  2. Are Songs Property? And Maths Also Property? Artificial Monopolies Are Not Property...

    Patent maximalists continue to face stronger arguments from their sceptics, who rightly allege that words are being intentionally misused and numbers fabricated so as to distort underlying facts



  3. Battistelli Blocked Techrights at EPO (Banned for More Than 5 Years), So CEIPI Won't Respect Access to Information Either

    The use of censorship to confront people who talk about (not even expose) corruption isn't novel; but the adoption of this approach in Europe (not just places like Russia and China) is definitely noteworthy



  4. IRC Proceedings: Monday, February 17, 2020

    IRC logs for Monday, February 17, 2020



  5. Links 18/2/2020: Linux 5.6 RC2, Wine 5.2, GNU Social Contract and Sparky 2020.02 Special Editions

    Links for the day



  6. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, February 16, 2020

    IRC logs for Sunday, February 16, 2020



  7. Links 16/2/2020: MX Linux 19.1 and MyPaint 2.0

    Links for the day



  8. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, February 15, 2020

    IRC logs for Saturday, February 15, 2020



  9. Guest Article: Au Revoir, GNU/Linux

    "Funny how OSI just ended up being another vehicle for their takeover of the computing world..."



  10. Former Microsoft Employee: ZDNet is Owned by Microsoft (and Others) in Some Senses

    A noteworthy message we've received from someone who knows Microsoft from the inside



  11. Links 15/2/2020: Blender 2.82, Qt 5.15 Alpha and NetBSD 9.0 Released

    Links for the day



  12. Microsoft Views 'Open Source' as a Zero-Cost Heist Opportunity (Making Proprietary Software/Spyware Using Other People's Free Labour)

    Making GPL-licensed (copyleft) software and hosting it outside Microsoft’s jaws is the best way to counter the abusive monopolist, which still says it “loves” what it is actually attacking



  13. Did Microsoft 'Buy' ZDNet?

    A look at what ZDNet tells its readers (screenshot from this morning) and a rare look at how its writers are censored/suppressed



  14. Anatomy of a Crime and Protection From Prosecution

    It’s hard to forget what António Campinos hides for his friend



  15. Today's EPO is a Fraud Managed by Frauds

    Beneath the scandals associated with systematic abuse against staff, union-busting (silencing whistleblowers) and en masse granting of invalid patents — the hallmark of grotesque maladministration — lie a bunch of even greater crimes



  16. IRC Proceedings: Friday, February 14, 2020

    IRC logs for Friday, February 14, 2020



  17. One Need Only Look at ZDNet's 'Linux' Section to Understand It's a Microsoft Propaganda Operation

    A timely new snapshot (or screenshot) that demonstrates what ZDNet became after hiring Microsoft employees as ‘journalists’ and censoring on behalf of Microsoft, defaming Free software figures and so on



  18. Links 14/2/2020: New Release of KStars, OpenSSH 8.2, Rhythmbox 3.4.4, Flatpak 1.6.2

    Links for the day



  19. The Uselessness of Social Control Media and Why We Need RSS Feeds' Resurgence More Than Ever

    Social control media became pure noise or misinformation, usually in pursuit of financial expansion alone, and it is also a censorship machine which discourages not falsehoods but unconventional thinking



  20. Another New 'Clown' for the UPC 'Circus'

    A former writer of IPPro Magazine (which seems to be defunct now) reports another shuffle -- perhaps the fifth in a few years -- of "IP" [sic] Minister for the UK; it doesn't bode well for the Unified Patent Court (UPC)



  21. IRC Proceedings: Thursday, February 13, 2020

    IRC logs for Thursday, February 13, 2020



  22. Links 13/2/2020: Ubuntu 18.04.4 LTS, Septor 2020, Endless OS 3.7.7, Wayland 1.18.0, KDE Plasma 5.18 and GTK 3.98 Released

    Links for the day



  23. The Microsoft Propaganda Model

    Classic new examples (real screenshots) of how Microsoft-funded media entraps people looking for information about "Linux" to actually push Microsoft talking points and marketing, cover-up, face-saving lies etc.



  24. What's Evil is Forcing People to Use Something They Don't Want and Typically Dislike

    The difference between Google Search and Microsoft is that many people actually want to use Google (and don't have to)



  25. 2020: The Year Microsoft Became Honest... About Being Corrupt and Criminal

    Microsoft is destroying any past attempts to portray itself as a reformed company or 'recovering criminal'; nothing is really changing and everyone has noticed



  26. Free Software is Being Abandoned by Opponents of Software Patents and It's Being Attacked by Patent Trolls

    The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) is rotting away as an advocate against software patents; Patents on algorithms are still being granted (even when courts repeatedly reject these) and Red Hat's Chief Patent Counsel remains Manny Schecter, one of the loudest proponents of such patents (citing the likes of Adam Mossoff this week, in effect Koch operatives); this is a very big problem because Free software projects come under a barrage of lawsuits, using patents like those IBM lobbies ferociously to legitimise



  27. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, February 12, 2020

    IRC logs for Wednesday, February 12, 2020



  28. Links 12/2/2020: KDE Neon 5.18, Tails 4.3 and WordPress 5.4 Beta

    Links for the day



  29. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, February 11, 2020

    IRC logs for Tuesday, February 11, 2020



  30. Links 11/2/2020: New Firefox and KDE Plasma

    Links for the day


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts