EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

02.09.19

EPO President Campinos Works With Patent Trolls and With Team UPC to Promote Software Patents

Posted in Europe, Patents at 11:17 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Lowering patent quality for the litigation ‘industry’ that profits from it proportionally (at the public’s expense)

4iP Council

Summary: The EPO has taken another tumble by collaborating with ’4iP Council’, a patent extremists’ lobby; it is moreover becoming apparent that a lot of European Patents are bogus (not valid) and the management of the EPO is eager to grant yet more of these

ANOTHER week has ended and it ended no better than most. The European Patent Office (EPO) continues to show signs that it’s unwilling if not unable to change. It’s just succession of Plan Battistelli, courtesy of his fellow Frenchman and old friend António Campinos.

“It gives us neither comfort nor solace to see the EPO retweeting ’4iP Council’ on Friday (yesterday). They’re part of the propaganda mill of Team UPC, of patent trolls and of litigators…”We would really, really love to see genuine change/difference; so far what we’ve seen is more advocacy for software patents in Europe than under Battistelli. We’ve also seen more staff reductions. Will the EPO be running out of staff? Can their examination division be replaced with/by over-glorified “AI”? The EPO is not advertising openings and sources say there’s a hiring freeze for years to come (with about a quarter of the staff expected to retire by then). Whatever or whoever they’re hiring, they’re not hiring experienced examiners, they look for cheaper ones (or none, maybe some algorithms). The only thing we saw is this a few days ago. Has the Office realised that it’s rapidly running out of talent?

It gives us neither comfort nor solace to see the EPO retweeting ’4iP Council’ on Friday (yesterday). They’re part of the propaganda mill of Team UPC, of patent trolls and of litigators; They work with trolls and collaborate with Team UPC on lobbying for software patents in Europe. This is what the EPO has retweeeted: “Our latest report is a collaboration with @EPOorg on computer implemented & #AI #inventions: how many, how to apply, examination criteria … & more. Download here: https://bit.ly/2E0JOK9 #4IR, #patents pic.twitter.com/3PtKxmoOkk”

So they’re working together on promoting “computer implemented & #AI #inventions” (i.e. patents on algorithms). The EPO not only reweeted this; it participated in this (it says “collaboration”). The UPC, a Trojan horse for software patents in Europe, will never become a reality, so perhaps they just try to legitimise such ludicrous patents (that European courts strike down). That’s not to say that there’s a 0% chance of UPC (in some form) materialising some time in the future. Team UPC has not given up entirely. Now it’s the turn of McCarter & English LLP’s Susan Okin Goldsmith and Bharadwaj, Kritika. Under “IP Considerations to Deal with No Deal” they bring up the usual talking points, boosting the same old lies about UPC (e.g. that it’s still possible in spite of Brexit). Dream on…

The three Frenchmen

Back to the subject of software patents, yesterday Florian Müller once again demonstrated the low quality of (some) European Patents when he wrote about USPTO and EPO post-grant reviews:

Also on Tuesday, German website WinFuture.de scooped everyone by finding out from resellers that Apple will apparently have a workaround ready in a month’s time. It’s illustrative of the utter absurdity of the envelope tracker SNAFU that a workaround would have to be created, replacing a non-infringing (in all likelihood, given the two U.S. decisions) chip. Contrary to what some people on the Internet appear to think, it’s not an admission. It’s simply that, should WinFuture.de be right (which I tend to believe it is), any infringement allegations by Qualcomm against the modified variants of the iPhone 7 and iPhone 8 would require a whole new determination on the merits, while a contempt proceeding involving the previously adjudicated chipset could be decided against Apple if the court relied on its agnostic–by now, most likely counterfactual–infringement finding again. If the standard in a contempt proceeding required Qualcomm to prove an actual infringement, a workaround would most likely not be needed, but the court might favor the same approach once again and adopt Qualcomm’s attorneys’ fiction. As the saying goes, discretion is the better part of valor.

Yesterday–Wednesday–delivered the next round of bad news for that Qualcomm patent. Technically it’s U.S.-only news, but due to major overlaps it also has important implications for an opposition proceeding before the European Patent Office, which will hold an opposition hearing on May 24 (chairman: Manuel Pavón Mayo; 1st examiner: Ali Hijazi; 2nd examiner: Thomas Agerbaek). The U.S. inter partes review no. IPR2018-01154 targeting claims 15-20 of the U.S. envelope tracker patent is most interesting in this regard as the claims and the prior art references are most similar to the issues before the EPO’s opposition division.

[...]

Before the EPO, Intel attacks the relevant European claims as being anticipated by a prior art reference named Hou, but also argues that they’re obvious over Kwak + Kim, or alternatively over Stauth + Tanabe. Further reference is made in Intel’s European opposition brief to prior art references named Midya, Lee, Wu, Mathe, Kim, Kang, and Chu.

Finally, here’s Intel’s European opposition brief (Appled raised the same issues and is represented by the same Samson & Partner patent attorneys):

Does it not bother the EPO’s management that European Patents are found to be invalid? Only yesterday the EPO wrote: “Want to be better equipped to face the challenges posed by prior art on the internet?”

So the EPO makes prior art sound like a bad thing and the Internet a nuisance for showing that many European Patents are wrongly granted. As Florian Müller explained some years ago, by blocking access to Techrights the Office already limits examiners’ access to a lot of potential prior art. We post a lot of stuff in our daily links.

The truth of the matter is that Campinos has done nothing and will do nothing regarding the quality of patents, only the “quality of service” (defined in terms of speed).

Friday afternoon it became known (warning: epo.org link) that the President of the EPO met patent maximalists from another continent: Iancu, LESI and AIPLA. At least we know whose interests EPO President Campinos serves…

In the EPO’s own words:

The European Patent Office (EPO) and the Licensing Executives Society International (LESI) have signed a Memorandum of Understanding on bilateral co-operation to help innovators make better use of the European patent system. The agreement was signed by EPO President António Campinos and LESI President François Painchaud on the occasion of LESI’s recent Winter Planning Meeting in Miami, Florida.

This enhanced co-operation will enable the EPO and LESI to extend the reach of joint activities for stakeholders in the innovation ecosystem, especially small and medium-sized enterprises, industry representatives, technology transfer experts, publicly funded research organisations, IP advisors, innovation centres, user associations, IP offices and government policy makers.

The Memorandum of Understanding between both partners will remain in effect for a period of five years and extends the successful history of co-operation between the EPO and LESI.

[...]

During his mission to the United States President Campinos also met with Andrei Iancu, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), and they agreed that their offices would investigate possible new measures for further enhancing bilateral co-operation.

[...]

During the visit, President Campinos also engaged with many key US partners and stakeholders, including the Association of Corporate Patent Counsel (ACPC) and the American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA). In these meetings the EPO President provided insights into the Office’s strategic plan and vision for the coming years, and invited patent system users to contribute to the EPO’s corresponding public consultation.

How often does President Campinos, resident of the top floor in Munich, actually meet scientists? Almost never. He doesn’t care about them. He’s out of touch. He’s not a scientist himself, having come from the banking ‘industry’ and a family of politicians (the domain of lawyers).

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. The European Patent Office Remains a Crooked Patent Office That Harms Staff and Abolishes the Rule of Law

    The EPO remains a sordid mess, but those who follow mainstream media might not know anything about it because it's not covered anywhere in 2019



  2. USPTO and EPO Faking Growth by Granting Patents on Everything in Nature, But Campaigners Strike Back

    The patent microcosm is eating the world; everything under the Sun must be patented, they insist, even life itself (so they can 'pirate' the Commons and then charge us a tax for 'access' or 'license' to it)



  3. IBM Happy That Patent Quality at EPO Collapsed and It's Easy to Get Software Patents

    The EPO keeps granting illegal European Patents and the media almost never mentions this illegality because it's in too amicable a relationship (typically financial) with the EPO



  4. The Linux Foundation's Staff Uses Windows and Microsoft. Now the Foundation Outsources the Coding and Hosting, Too (to Microsoft of Course).

    The disturbing turns of the self-described "Linux" Foundation, which seems to be promoting proprietary software and even Microsoft rather than Linux and Free/Open Source software while the role or capacity of Torvalds is being gradually diminished



  5. Links 25/6/2019: Raspberry Pi 4, Ubuntu's Change of Mind, Wayland’s Weston 6.0.1

    Links for the day



  6. Patent Extremism: Stacking the Panels, the Surveys, the Hearings, the Debates

    Projection tactics would have the public believe that those who oppose corruption are simply radicals; patent polarity has come to the point where if one isn't a "true believer" in blackmail (patent trolls) or opposes bribery, then one is simply a "fringe" and akin to terrorists



  7. Links 24/6/2019: Linux 5.2 RC6, Skrooge 2.20.0, ZFS vs. OpenZFS

    Links for the day



  8. The EPO Needs a President Who Obeys the Law, Not One Who Obeys Battistelli

    Succession based on nepotism at Europe's second-largest institution served to shown how inherently broken things had become and why cover-up of injustices is nowadays paramount (not fixing the flaws/ills but merely perpetuating them)



  9. With Water (Treatment) Already Patented It Won't Take Long for Patents (and Patent Royalties) on Air

    A 'paper economy' is what Europe turns into if the current trajectory is followed (led by lawyers, not producers)



  10. Bill Gates Said He Was on a “Jihad” Against GNU/Linux, But GNU/Linux Users/Developers Engaged in Self-Defense Are Foul-Mouthed 'Microsoft Haters'?

    Microsoft, which routinely commits very serious crimes, tries to come across as some sort of philanthropy whereas those who share their work with the public (for greater good) are described as erratic, rude and unworthy of respect from corporations (outcasts basically, deprived of income source)



  11. What Patents the EPO Has Just Awarded (With a Special Reward), Not Just Granted

    The EPO's practice of elevating some patents over the other patents (European Patents) is perhaps more of a societal liability than the EPO cares to realise



  12. Required Reading: Mental State of Team Battistelli/Campinos

    On the heels of yesterday's article about Team Battistelli/Campinos, here are some recommended/required papers on the problem which likely plagues the Office



  13. Links 23/6/2019: Wine 4.11, FreeBSD 11.3 RC2

    Links for the day



  14. Microsoft Apparently Did a Patrick Durusau on Wim Coekaerts to Broaden Its Control Over GNU/Linux

    Microsoft tactics for defection and takeover of the competition (without coming across as hostile) aren't new tactics; internal documents from Microsoft explain how to achieve this



  15. EPO Directors Would be Wise to Rebel Against Team Campinos While They Still Have the Job

    As the EPO continues its bold journey towards dictatorship (where presidencies are passed between friends and ‘circles’ are former colleagues or close confidants) Techrights urges those who have power to speak out — e.g. EPO judges and Directors — to do something before it’s too late



  16. American Front Group Open Invention Network (Riding the Linux Brand) is a Proponent of Software Patents in Europe

    The impact of American multinationals in Europe is difficult to deny; in fact, we're observing the same old lobbying/lobbies still working hard albeit more covertly (typically using front groups)



  17. Say 'Hey Hi' to Software Patents

    Using the “AI” (“HEY HI”) hype the ‘community’ of patent maximalists hopes that every little (and possibly very old) algorithm will suddenly sound amazing and innovative — to the point where it becomes unthinkable to deny a patent monopoly on it



  18. A Personal Note From Ted MacReilly (How Microsoft Works Against GNU/Linux)

    A tongue-in-cheek write-up highlighting the ways Microsoft insiders think and how they strategise against GNU/Linux and Free/libre software



  19. The Linux Foundation's New Vice Chair, Wim Coekaerts, Worked for Microsoft

    The Linux Foundation is boosting the Microsoft boosters and calls that "community"



  20. Links 21/6/2019: GNOME 3.33.3, 32-Bit Support Further Neglected, DragonFlyBSD 5.6.1 Released

    Links for the day



  21. Leaked: Harassment of EPO Directors by Team Campinos

    “New BIT organisation and staff changes,” a novel kind of newspeak, means that Directors are being severely punished without due process at all (“hidden disciplinary measure without disciplinary proceedings”)



  22. Patent Professionals in Europe Have Devolved Into a Marketing Industry

    Lies, buzzwords and hype waves is all that the patent bubble in Europe boils down to these days; loads of bogus patents get granted only for European judges to smack these down (if one can afford the court battle)



  23. Almost Six Months After Iancu Said He Would Make Software Patents Great Again Nothing Has Actually Changed

    We're just a fortnight away from the ludicrous plan of Iancu celebrating 6 months (without accomplishing anything)



  24. Links 20/6/2019: Kubernetes 1.15, Alpine 3.10.0 and Librem 5 June Software Update

    Links for the day



  25. Ignore the EPO's Dumb Festival and Focus on the Abuses Against the Workforce and Its Quality of Work

    Don’t lose sight of the appalling behaviour of the management of the EPO; the last thing it wants is press coverage about its gross abuses and corruption — an aspect it spent literally millions of euros to bury (gaming the news cycle)



  26. Microsoft Attempting to Destroy the Careers of Its Critics, Including Free Software Proponents

    Microsoft isn't changing and has not changed; the tactics described above are still being used, even by its "Open Source" (or "Open at Microsoft") people, who did this to me



  27. Links 19/6/2019: Linux Mint Vs Vista 10, Qt 5.13 Released

    Links for the day



  28. The Linux Foundation's Business Model

    The Linux Foundation's plan, illustrated



  29. Links 18/6/2019: i386 Abandoned by Canonical and a New osquery 'Community'

    Links for the day



  30. Indifference or Even Hostility Towards Patent Quality Results in Grave Injustice

    The patent extravaganza in Europe harms small businesses the most (they complain about it), but administrative staff at patent offices only cares about the views of prolific applicants rather than the interests of citizens in respective countries


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts