02.09.19

EPO President Campinos Works With Patent Trolls and With Team UPC to Promote Software Patents

Posted in Europe, Patents at 11:17 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Lowering patent quality for the litigation ‘industry’ that profits from it proportionally (at the public’s expense)

4iP Council

Summary: The EPO has taken another tumble by collaborating with ’4iP Council’, a patent extremists’ lobby; it is moreover becoming apparent that a lot of European Patents are bogus (not valid) and the management of the EPO is eager to grant yet more of these

ANOTHER week has ended and it ended no better than most. The European Patent Office (EPO) continues to show signs that it’s unwilling if not unable to change. It’s just succession of Plan Battistelli, courtesy of his fellow Frenchman and old friend António Campinos.

“It gives us neither comfort nor solace to see the EPO retweeting ’4iP Council’ on Friday (yesterday). They’re part of the propaganda mill of Team UPC, of patent trolls and of litigators…”We would really, really love to see genuine change/difference; so far what we’ve seen is more advocacy for software patents in Europe than under Battistelli. We’ve also seen more staff reductions. Will the EPO be running out of staff? Can their examination division be replaced with/by over-glorified “AI”? The EPO is not advertising openings and sources say there’s a hiring freeze for years to come (with about a quarter of the staff expected to retire by then). Whatever or whoever they’re hiring, they’re not hiring experienced examiners, they look for cheaper ones (or none, maybe some algorithms). The only thing we saw is this a few days ago. Has the Office realised that it’s rapidly running out of talent?

It gives us neither comfort nor solace to see the EPO retweeting ’4iP Council’ on Friday (yesterday). They’re part of the propaganda mill of Team UPC, of patent trolls and of litigators; They work with trolls and collaborate with Team UPC on lobbying for software patents in Europe. This is what the EPO has retweeeted: “Our latest report is a collaboration with @EPOorg on computer implemented & #AI #inventions: how many, how to apply, examination criteria … & more. Download here: https://bit.ly/2E0JOK9 #4IR, #patents pic.twitter.com/3PtKxmoOkk”

So they’re working together on promoting “computer implemented & #AI #inventions” (i.e. patents on algorithms). The EPO not only reweeted this; it participated in this (it says “collaboration”). The UPC, a Trojan horse for software patents in Europe, will never become a reality, so perhaps they just try to legitimise such ludicrous patents (that European courts strike down). That’s not to say that there’s a 0% chance of UPC (in some form) materialising some time in the future. Team UPC has not given up entirely. Now it’s the turn of McCarter & English LLP’s Susan Okin Goldsmith and Bharadwaj, Kritika. Under “IP Considerations to Deal with No Deal” they bring up the usual talking points, boosting the same old lies about UPC (e.g. that it’s still possible in spite of Brexit). Dream on…

The three Frenchmen

Back to the subject of software patents, yesterday Florian Müller once again demonstrated the low quality of (some) European Patents when he wrote about USPTO and EPO post-grant reviews:

Also on Tuesday, German website WinFuture.de scooped everyone by finding out from resellers that Apple will apparently have a workaround ready in a month’s time. It’s illustrative of the utter absurdity of the envelope tracker SNAFU that a workaround would have to be created, replacing a non-infringing (in all likelihood, given the two U.S. decisions) chip. Contrary to what some people on the Internet appear to think, it’s not an admission. It’s simply that, should WinFuture.de be right (which I tend to believe it is), any infringement allegations by Qualcomm against the modified variants of the iPhone 7 and iPhone 8 would require a whole new determination on the merits, while a contempt proceeding involving the previously adjudicated chipset could be decided against Apple if the court relied on its agnostic–by now, most likely counterfactual–infringement finding again. If the standard in a contempt proceeding required Qualcomm to prove an actual infringement, a workaround would most likely not be needed, but the court might favor the same approach once again and adopt Qualcomm’s attorneys’ fiction. As the saying goes, discretion is the better part of valor.

Yesterday–Wednesday–delivered the next round of bad news for that Qualcomm patent. Technically it’s U.S.-only news, but due to major overlaps it also has important implications for an opposition proceeding before the European Patent Office, which will hold an opposition hearing on May 24 (chairman: Manuel Pavón Mayo; 1st examiner: Ali Hijazi; 2nd examiner: Thomas Agerbaek). The U.S. inter partes review no. IPR2018-01154 targeting claims 15-20 of the U.S. envelope tracker patent is most interesting in this regard as the claims and the prior art references are most similar to the issues before the EPO’s opposition division.

[...]

Before the EPO, Intel attacks the relevant European claims as being anticipated by a prior art reference named Hou, but also argues that they’re obvious over Kwak + Kim, or alternatively over Stauth + Tanabe. Further reference is made in Intel’s European opposition brief to prior art references named Midya, Lee, Wu, Mathe, Kim, Kang, and Chu.

Finally, here’s Intel’s European opposition brief (Appled raised the same issues and is represented by the same Samson & Partner patent attorneys):

Does it not bother the EPO’s management that European Patents are found to be invalid? Only yesterday the EPO wrote: “Want to be better equipped to face the challenges posed by prior art on the internet?”

So the EPO makes prior art sound like a bad thing and the Internet a nuisance for showing that many European Patents are wrongly granted. As Florian Müller explained some years ago, by blocking access to Techrights the Office already limits examiners’ access to a lot of potential prior art. We post a lot of stuff in our daily links.

The truth of the matter is that Campinos has done nothing and will do nothing regarding the quality of patents, only the “quality of service” (defined in terms of speed).

Friday afternoon it became known (warning: epo.org link) that the President of the EPO met patent maximalists from another continent: Iancu, LESI and AIPLA. At least we know whose interests EPO President Campinos serves…

In the EPO’s own words:

The European Patent Office (EPO) and the Licensing Executives Society International (LESI) have signed a Memorandum of Understanding on bilateral co-operation to help innovators make better use of the European patent system. The agreement was signed by EPO President António Campinos and LESI President François Painchaud on the occasion of LESI’s recent Winter Planning Meeting in Miami, Florida.

This enhanced co-operation will enable the EPO and LESI to extend the reach of joint activities for stakeholders in the innovation ecosystem, especially small and medium-sized enterprises, industry representatives, technology transfer experts, publicly funded research organisations, IP advisors, innovation centres, user associations, IP offices and government policy makers.

The Memorandum of Understanding between both partners will remain in effect for a period of five years and extends the successful history of co-operation between the EPO and LESI.

[...]

During his mission to the United States President Campinos also met with Andrei Iancu, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), and they agreed that their offices would investigate possible new measures for further enhancing bilateral co-operation.

[...]

During the visit, President Campinos also engaged with many key US partners and stakeholders, including the Association of Corporate Patent Counsel (ACPC) and the American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA). In these meetings the EPO President provided insights into the Office’s strategic plan and vision for the coming years, and invited patent system users to contribute to the EPO’s corresponding public consultation.

How often does President Campinos, resident of the top floor in Munich, actually meet scientists? Almost never. He doesn’t care about them. He’s out of touch. He’s not a scientist himself, having come from the banking ‘industry’ and a family of politicians (the domain of lawyers).

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

This post is also available in Gemini over at:

gemini://gemini.techrights.org/2019/02/09/low-patent-quality-for-litigation/

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, April 17, 2021

    IRC logs for Saturday, April 17, 2021



  2. Tolerating the Intolerant and Lacking Tolerance for Opposing Views

    The person who shouted...



  3. Letter of Support for Richard Stallman - Doing Better in Community

    "How do you support someone you’ve known for years who is unfairly attacked and publicly maligned?"



  4. Richard Stallman on Rejecting Workplace Bureaucracy in the 1970s

    Dr. Richard Stallman, the Free Software Foundation's founder, explains what inspired him to get involved in non-software matters



  5. Renata Avila: Trying to Understand the Lynching of Stallman

    Reproduced from the original



  6. Breaking News: EDPS Admits That It is Powerless to Investigate Claims of GDPR Non-compliance at the EPO

    Nobody is truly in charge at the EDPS (and in Europe at large); they say EPO is "company" and all one can do is kindly ask the EPO itself to obey the law and stop outsourcing European data to American military contractors



  7. Links 17/4/2021: Linux 5.13 in Sight, Holland Warming up to Free Software

    Links for the day



  8. Richard Stallman Vilified by Those Who Don't Know Him, Says Sylvia Paull

    Republished "In Support of Richard Stallman"



  9. [Meme] Linux Foundation Can't Use Linux

    Two examples from yesterday, highlighting what a bunch of hypocrites run the marketing operation now disguised as ‘research’; Jason Perlow from Microsoft signed/published this newsletter highlight from the failing “Linux” Foundation — a foundation that calls itself “Linux” while its newsletter is still hosted by Microsoft Windows+proprietary IIS and this latest report is made with proprietary software on a Mac



  10. [Meme] Haters Gonna Hate, Don't Apologise to a Libelling Mob

    As was already pointed out before, you cannot appease a mob by talking back to it, certainly not by issuing an apology (putting oneself in a position of weakness)



  11. What the EPO Has 'Normalised' in Europe...

    Under the cover of 'new normal', Europe's second-largest institution crushes the law and crushes its own staff



  12. Lots of Information in Sight, But Minimal Distraction

    How I keep focused on reading and writing whilst at the same time keeping an eye on important incidents, such as DDOS attacks and urgent messages coming in



  13. IRC Proceedings: Friday, April 16, 2021

    IRC logs for Friday, April 16, 2021



  14. Hate Letter Against FSF (Concern Trolls): 1415 Committers, Letter in Support of FSF (With Its Founder Back): 5116

    Taking into account people who asked for their names to be removed from the defamatory hate letter (inciting people, based on falsehoods), it's not impossible that the support letter really triples or quadruples it in terms of number of signatures



  15. Richard Stallman: Sharing is Good... We Need to Legalise It

    Dr. Richard Stallman, the Free Software Foundation's founder, explains his take on copyright and the artificial restriction being used against sharing



  16. Nadine Strossen and Hannah Wolfman-Jones Rebut Accusations Against Stallman and Choose Him as Coauthor

    "Here are her thoughts and the response she received from Nadine, extracted verbatim with their permission from the original article"



  17. Links 17/4/2021: GNOME 40 in Tumbleweed, Devuan 4.0 Alpha, Kate Editor Makes a Leap

    Links for the day



  18. EPO Staff Union Takes the EPO 'to Court' (the ILO's Tribunal, as the EPO Cannot be Taken to a Proper Court)

    The Staff Union of the EPO (SUEPO) Committees are preparing a legal battle over unlawful and unjust measures taken collectively against hard-working (overworked during pandemic) members of staff; the European public should support them



  19. The Latest Anti-RMS Coup Attempt Targets the GNU Project (Because the FSF Coup Has Clearly Failed) by Infringing and Disregarding Trademark Conventions

    A fake "GNU" (not the original GNU, just riding the coattails of the name "GNU") is trying to find/gain traction and we must oppose it because it's an extension of the very same coup attempt (same plotters) that manufactured a whole bunch of libel to incite people and blackmail the Free Software Foundation (FSF)



  20. Links 16/4/2021: Mozilla Dumping FTP, Corporations Still Concern-Trolling FSF

    Links for the day



  21. The EFF Attacks Software Freedom and Promotes Fake Privacy Linked to Microsoft

    Only weeks after attacking Software Freedom (the ad hominem way, which is easier) the EFF endorses a Microsoft-linked privacy abuse, misframing it as some sort of privacy champion



  22. Richard Stallman on How Corporate Media Limits What People Are Allowed to Think and Say (Updated)

    What the founder of the FSF told yours truly a number of years ago about the behaviour of corporate (funded and controlled by corporations) media



  23. Exposing Hard Truths is the First Step or the Path Towards Justice

    A reflection and a moment taken to set aside tribalism (shallow differences based on allegiances of personal comfort), for we need look back at actual facts — however inconvenient at times — and consider the reality of the situation



  24. IRC Proceedings: Thursday, April 15, 2021

    IRC logs for Thursday, April 15, 2021



  25. [Meme] Laundering Bribes as 'Cooperation Money'

    Germany has financial interest in ensuring that EPO abuses carry on and nobody holds the EPO accountable



  26. Articles in Support of Richard Stallman

    Reproduced with permission



  27. EPOLeaks on Misleading the Bundestag -- Part 20: Taking Stock

    Benoît Battistelli's legacy at the EPO is a legacy of corruption and cover-up; we take stock of how illegality was defended and persists to this day



  28. Links 15/4/2021: Zorin OS 16 Beta and Pushing Linux to GitHub- and Microsoft-Connected Rust

    Links for the day



  29. [Meme] Enemies With Common Interests

    The Software Freedom Movement (or Free Software Movement) has many enemies; some of them just hide in the shadows or speak out through shadowy front groups/NGOs that they semi-officially sponsor



  30. [Meme] Germany's Red Cash Cow

    EPO brings a lot of money to the German state. But at what cost to citizens and Germany’s public image?


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts