11.18.19

Gemini version available ♊︎

Openwashing Institutionalised NPEs (OIN) and Software Patents With Notorious Managers From the EPO

Posted in Deception, Europe, Patents at 3:42 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Fake European Patents disguised as “hey hi” (AI), 4IR, and other mumbo jumbo

Grants lots of fake patents. Waits for S* to hit the fan.

Summary: There’s a strong push for software patents in Europe (basically fake European Patents on abstract ideas) and IAM leads/participates in it with help from OIN, Grant Philpott (EPO) and — maybe soon — Breton (EU)

European Patent Office (EPO) President António Campinos and his predecessor Battistelli have both promoted illegal software patents in Europe. They know those patents cannot be legally granted, so they make up new words, buzzwords, acronyms, misleading terms and sometimes they ride hype waves — the same ones Iancu at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is riding as well because 35 U.S.C. § 101 otherwise stands in the way.

“This is of course most devastating to those who cannot afford legal battles — those who can be abused — threatened with litigation or actually sued — and be compelled to shell out ‘protection money’ (for patents that are not valid).”We’ve entered a new kind of ‘era’ in the patent system; many patents can now be presumed invalid. It just takes money (petitions or court time) to prove the invalidity. This is of course most devastating to those who cannot afford legal battles — those who can be abused — threatened with litigation or actually sued — and be compelled to shell out ‘protection money’ (for patents that are not valid). In last night’s daily links we provided about a dozen new examples of software patents perishing in the US; we stopped covering such pertinent cases last year because priorities have changed. What hasn’t changed is this reality of software patents being worthless garbage.

Over in IRC, oiaohm pointed out this paper that says: “In German bifurcated litigation system, in 12% of infringement cases where infringement was found by the courts, the infringed patent was eventually invalidated.”

Got that? We’ve heard similar stories from the US lately. But nowadays Europe becomes more of the same. Caselaw centered around SCOTUS and the Federal Circuit (CAFC) is used, sometimes in Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) inter partes reviews (IPRs) and sometimes in court cases, to throw out patents which were deemed “infringed”. Well, if “1+1=2″ is a patent, then everything and everyone is infringing, but the patent itself is a joke.

This past weekend Benjamin Henrion said that “CAFC belongs to the patent industry, fully captured court. SCOTUS vs CAFC is a 10:0 score at the moment.”

“CAFC actually improved in recent years,” I responded, as “SCOTUS has overturned CAFC decisions from the Rader — not Sharon Prost — era.”

Over the weekend Henrion did some research into Openwashing Institutionalised NPEs (OIN) — a subject that we covered here in relation to that awful EU paper. We nowadays find ourselves having to rely on our own research because investigative reporting in the area of patents barely exists. Henrion’s tweets contain more information in them than this ‘shopping list’ journalism (a data dump of no value, entitled generically “Patents were assigned in New Hampshire from Nov. 3 to Nov. 10″ as if it’s machine-generated). We’ve also just seen this ‘article’ from the patent maximalists of “Bloomberg Law” — a site that constantly pushes for litigation and for abstract patents under the guise of the “hey hi” (AI) hype, a buzzword resurrected for some corporate agenda. The site is composed almost purely by the litigation industry and for the litigation industry; but it’s presented as “news”. Billionaire Michael Bloomberg has no money for journalists. Instead he lets ‘news’ (self-promotional corporate propaganda) be written by lawyers, such as Yohan Liyanage and Kathy Berry of Linklaters LLP in this case. They say that “[t]he software code underlying the AI system may be protected by literary copyright, although its functionality and underlying algorithms may not (as copyright protects the expression of ideas and not the ideas themselves). Training datasets may also be protected by literary copyright if they are sufficiently creative and, in the European Union, potentially also by the separate “sui generis” database right if they have been subject to sufficient investment. All elements of an AI system (code, algorithms, data etc.) may comprise trade secrets if they are kept confidential.”

Then it proceeds to the usual suggestion that such code should also have patents on it. Because hey, why the heck not? More litigation! More money for lawyers like them.

But getting back to the point, Henrion took note of this new agenda of an EU conference. “Open Source Beyond 2020″ is the title of this conference and it “does not even mention the threat of software patents, especially with Unitary software Patents and patent trolls, one of the top worries for software companies and developers…”

Well, take a quick look at who’s in this conference. These people do not represent FOSS, but the EU tells us that they do. The likes of OIN, i.e. front groups for the interests of IBM et al. Henrion also wrote: “The GNOME Foundation now wants 1M USD. They have also failed to answer FFII’s demand. Time for an open letter #gnome #troll #oin”

As an associate of ours put it this morning: “Any word on how GNOME will deal with the patent troll? Better for them to fight software patents in general but it looks like they will make the mistake of aiming for the individual troll instead.”

They’re being led by OIN, which clearly uses the wrong approach — the software patents-friendly approach. Henrion was rightly upset to see OIN working and co-authoring papers with Fraunhofer. “We suffered for 20 years with the Fraunhofer MP3 patents,” he said. “People have short memories.”

OIN calls them “charitable”…

Then again, look who runs OIN.

IAM is meanwhile preparing another software patents lobbying ‘event’. It’s coming up this week (2 days from now) and hype waves will be used to promote software patents, with front groups such as CIPU in the shadows, based on this page. Looking through the list of speakers, it’s very much as revealing as it gets; Grant Philpott (EPO), Microsoft and others in this IAM event. Philpott threatened me for showing his E-mail about Microsoft et al. EPO is deeply corrupt and it threatens those who produce evidence of it. The EPO is a bullying organisation, but that’s “small potatoes” for the likes of Philpott; he used to work in the Army, which literally kills people. Is it Philpott or Pol Pot?

Henrion took note of the next EPO phase: “EPO now uses software patents instead of CII: “Previously, Philpott was Chief Operating Officer in the information communication technology sector, where he was at the forefront of ensuring the EPO’s stable and predictable approach to software patenting.” http://www.iam-events.com/events/iot-ip-2019/speakers-6e588d27158140d98ee1f35b75c3e976.aspx …”

They’re so shameless about it. They’re doing illegal things. And going back to OIN, watch how it not only participates in the EPO’s software patents advocacy events but also IAM’s (the patent trolls’ lobby):

Mirko Boehm, our Linux System Definition Director, will join senior executives from Bosch, Telefonica, and Siemens in a panel discussion to address the “New Protection Paradigms” during the IoT IP conference November 20 in Munich, Germany. Experts estimate there will be 22.5 billion IoT devices globally by 2025. IAM’s IoT Intellectual Property (IP) conference provides a platform for senior IP decision makers across industries to discuss the opportunities, challenges and strategies which are rapidly changing in a world that depends on interoperability and security, increasingly through the use of Open Source Software (OSS).
Register here: http://www.iam-events.com/…/event-summary-6e588d27158140d98…

That’s what the Open Invention Network published in Facebook (yes, Facebook) this weekend and on November 12th it said:

As Open Source Software (OSS) continues to transform software development — from start-up companies to worldwide enterprises — the conversations are shifting towards new business models, technology’s impact on all industries, and the intersection of open source and standards. Our Director for the Linux System Definition, Mirko Boehm, has co-authored “The Relationship Between Open Source Software and Standard Setting,” a Joint Research Centre (JRC) Policy Report for the European Commission (EC). It will be presented during its “Open Source Beyond 2020 – Powering a Digital Europe” workshop in Belgium Nov 14-15.

https://ec.europa.eu/…/workshop-about-future-open-source-so…

#opensource #linux #patent #openinventionnetwork

Stay classy, OIN. You’re rather blatantly on the side of the trolls these days. Your management has patent trolls in it.

You do not speak for “Open Source Software (OSS)”; you sometimes speak for companies that attack “Open Source Software (OSS)”.

Later today we shall publish part 7 of the Breton series. Breton’s series will have at least 18 parts and it is very much relevant to the EPO, as later parts will show. Breton’s French nationality isn’t key here but his connection to a bunch of French patent trolls. He’s friends with Battistelli and companies that lobby for software patents, so if elected to EU leadership, he would ‘champion’ software patents for sure… just like OIN. Maybe he’ll appoint OIN official spokesperson for “Open Source Software (OSS)”, speaking for members like IBM and Microsoft.

As Henrion put it, “Someone should ask Breton if he will propose a new software patent directive if the Parliament asks for it, under the inter-institutional agreement [] Breton in the hands of the EPO and the patent mafia https://www.epo.org/news-issues/news/2018/20180607.html … #epo #breton [] Still does not have answers on how SMEs are supposed to defend themselves against patent trolls. Mr Breton was driving many patent extorsion/licensing plans, and is an EPO friend. Don’t know if Thomson was still extracting MP3 royalties when he was active, but still.”

He worked for that company 1997-2002 when MP3 was ‘all the rage’ with almost no ubiquitous alternatives; all these patents were software patents.

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

Decor ᶃ Gemini Space

Below is a Web proxy. We recommend getting a Gemini client/browser.

Black/white/grey bullet button This post is also available in Gemini over at this address (requires a Gemini client/browser to open).

Decor ✐ Cross-references

Black/white/grey bullet button Pages that cross-reference this one, if any exist, are listed below or will be listed below over time.

Decor ▢ Respond and Discuss

Black/white/grey bullet button If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

DecorWhat Else is New


  1. Links 26/05/2022: AlmaLinux OS 9.0, MooseX::Extended for Perl Introduced

    Links for the day



  2. Links 26/05/2022: Kernel Events and Systemd-Free GNU/Linux Distributions

    Links for the day



  3. Links 26/05/2022: DuckDuckGo Increasingly Exposed as Microsoft Proxy

    Links for the day



  4. EPO Celebrates Software Patents Again, Dubbing Them 'Hey Hi' (AI) and '4IR'

    The ludicrous state of the EPO is demonstrated by yesterday’s puff piece about “four million” (merely requests for monopoly in Europe; most come from outside Europe) and L’Oréal, which claims to have “invented” something that was already done in the 1990s if not the 1980s



  5. [Meme] EPO's Monkey Business: Lowering the Patent Examination Bar

    As we shall show in a moment, EPO President António Campinos has lowered the quality of patents and applications; sooner or later he might outsource the job to ‘livestock’



  6. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, May 25, 2022

    IRC logs for Wednesday, May 25, 2022



  7. Heads of Patent Offices Are Immune to Coronavirus

    The overconfident chiefs of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and EPO might love speaking about COVID-19 (in relation to patents), but they do not take it seriously themselves



  8. Links 26/05/2022: Plex Finally on GNU/Linux

    Links for the day



  9. The General Consultative Committee of the EPO Exposes a Disaster and a Lack of Genuine Dialogue

    The General Consultative Committee (GCC) at the EPO deals with unlawful proposals from António Campinos (he’s happy to violate laws, constitutions, protocols, conventions, just like Benoît Battistelli did) and once again the abuses by managers is covered up; it’s as if the Office is run by unaccountable gangsters who arrogantly curse at everyone whilst insisting they’re the nicest people ever



  10. The Latest Letter to Josef Kratochvìl and the Heads of Delegation of the Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation

    A week-old letter from the Central Staff Committee (CSC) to the Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation highlights the nature of a crisis; there's no genuine dialogue and staff of the EPO (i.e. the scientists who do all the actual work) is constantly under attack



  11. [Meme] The Recordings Must Have Accidentally Been Lost While Breaking the Rules

    The EPO‘s “nicest” chief, Monopoly Tony, won’t even mention the recordings…



  12. Links 25/05/2022: ‘V Rising’ on GNU/Linux and Pearl Linux OS 11

    Links for the day



  13. Links 25/05/2022: Librem Tries Another Approach

    Links for the day



  14. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, May 24, 2022

    IRC logs for Tuesday, May 24, 2022



  15. Links 24/05/2022: nginx-1.22.0 and WordPress 6.0

    Links for the day



  16. [Meme] Divine Protection

    You won’t find Monopoly Tony (António Campinos) wearing a mask at the EPO because the rules of the Office do not apply to him



  17. António Campinos and the Alicante Clique (EPO Management, Appointed Based on Nepotism Despite Lack of Qualifications) Nowadays Exploiting Kids for PR Charades

    The sick old habit of exploiting kids for Public Relations (PR) and marketing purposes is all too common at the EPO (they’re constantly exploiting “the children” to associate criticism of the EPO with demeaning the young and innocent), but the management — which enjoys nepotism and immunity rather than relevant skills — carries on today and it’s being called “inaugural”



  18. [Meme] Snake on a Plane

    The EPO‘s President ‘Monopoly Tony’ (António Campinos), whom you never see wearing a mask (none of the photo ops; he does not even socially distance himself from peers, he wears sneakers instead of masks) during the height of a pandemic, is the "f***ing president"; don’t tell him to wear one…



  19. Microsoft GitHub Exposé — Part XX — Entering Phase II

    We're about to resume the long-running series about the sick clique which ran GitHub until the assault on women became too much of a liability (among other wrongdoings and PR blunders)



  20. Links 24/05/2022: Fedora 37 Test Days and Tor Browser 11.0.13

    Links for the day



  21. Microsoft Vidal, as USPTO Director, Already Plays 'Political Cards' to Disguise and Deflect Away From the Corporate Agenda

    Microsoft Vidal, another corporate pawn in charge of the world’s most dangerous patent system, is using soft-spoken defle



  22. Links 24/05/2022: WAL-G 2.0

    Links for the day



  23. IRC Proceedings: Monday, May 23, 2022

    IRC logs for Monday, May 23, 2022



  24. Unethical Advertising, Published as So-called 'Articles', in CNX Software

    As we noted earlier this year, the CNX team is looking for money in the wrong places



  25. Links 23/05/2022: Broadcom to Buy VMware?

    Links for the day



  26. LibreOffice Conference 2022, As Before, Puts the Keynotes on Sale (the Rich Buy Influence, the Price Doubles)

    Discrimination against the community; talks and mentions are based on money, not merit ($2000 has become $4000 in just one year)



  27. Links 23/05/2022: Kdenlive 22.04.1 and New Alpine Linux Released

    Links for the day



  28. António Campinos Promotes Software Patents Using Buzzwords and Sketchy Loopholes With Dubious Legal Basis

    ‘Monopoly Tony’ (António Campinos) is shamelessly manipulating EPO processes at both ends (sender and receiver) to facilitate the illegal granting of invalid European software patents; we’re meant to think this former EU official and imposter (banker) is some guru in the sciences because he reads a lousy speech crafted for him with lots of meaningless buzzwords peppered all over it (he’s not good at reading it, either)



  29. [Meme] Jorgotta Be Kidding Us, Campinos!

    Monopoly Tony (António Campinos) runs the EPO by attacking the very legal basis of the EPO’s existence



  30. Unified Patent Court (UPC) Relies Too Much on Lies and Mischief Without Any Basis in Law

    Today’s video runs through the typical (weekly) lies from Team UPC — lies that are very easy to debunk; Team UPC not only drafted the thing but also looks to profit from it while misleading politicians and bribing publishers to spread intentionally misleading statements (lies)


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts