EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

11.20.19

EPO Geared Towards Financial Exploitation of Europe Instead of Serving Europe

Posted in Deception, Europe, Microsoft, Patents at 1:35 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Remember that most European Patents aren’t even European

We're called the European Patent Organisation. Because we organise the Office for maximal exploitation by America and Asia.

Summary: For the financial benefit of law firms and patent offices (they profit from processing loads of patents and lawsuits) Europe is being reverted back to Medieval Times when exercising invention and free thought (or free coding) was a luxury of the rich alone

THE BRETON series will soon explore the connection to the European Patent Office (EPO). The series will be finished about one week from now. Don’t obsess over nationalities though; sure, Breton and Macron are French. And sure, Team Campinos/Battistelli is predominantly French (those two presidents are). But it’s much better to follow the commercial — not the national — trail. It’s all about money; it’s never about Europe. And no, it’s not about money for Europe but from Europe. The public sector, through privatisation, is being looted by these people. Serco already does some of the work of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO); Campinos already hands over some of the EPO's work over to Serco as well. This is pillage and plunder, but it’s done by people in suits rather than pirates in dingies.

“Call it the “EPO Laboratory”. Campinos already did his “experiments” with the EUIPO (outsourcing an EU agency to India).”We continue to watch with great concern the events that unfold at the EPO; some people refer to this as “corporate globalism” (the idea that massive and well-connected corporations set in motion the devouring of all public assets, workers and Commons worldwide). The EPO isn’t just a symptom; one might say it’s a model or a case study. Call it the “EPO Laboratory”. Campinos already did his "experiments" with the EUIPO (outsourcing an EU agency to India).

The corporate media (or “mainstream media”) is also part of the problem. It’s owned by large publishers — in effect multinational corporations — and very rich people, including some of the world’s richest people. As such, “the press” (or “the media”) often reflects not public opinion or popular discourse; instead it’s lecturing the public, seeking to ‘manufacture consent’. In social control media it’s even worse as people are censored, spied on, and subjected to propaganda from states and corporations (the real clients of such social control networks).

It has become rather frustrating to see how even those who wrote about the EPO’s Serco outsourcing deal have since then deleted their articles. Even the press release was deleted, but the PDF of the announcement is still on Serco’s site. Why are they trying so hard to hide what’s happening? This relates in a lot of ways to Breton and Atos — a subject we’ll publish something about later today (part 10 of the Breton series).

“It has become rather frustrating to see how even those who wrote about the EPO’s Serco outsourcing deal have since then deleted their articles.”The EU hoped to impose on the European public an inherently unconstitutional system called (or rather dubbed, with plenty of euphemisms) “UPC”. Helped by EPO lobbying (e.g. bribing media and scholars), the EU sought to hand over control of courts to those who violate the law every day. But the UPC is dead, for numerous reasons. Several complaints, including constitutional ones, have been filed. In some cases, such as in Hungary, courts sided with complainants. Studies commissioned by those not loyal to Team UPC have also disproved the alleged premises. The UPC was a lie — a system from which multinationals were set to gain, along with their lawyers in Europe. We’ve just noticed that Bristows’ Luke Maunder perpetuates the old lies with “Luxembourg government advertises for leader of UPC’s IT team” (similar to this PR stunt from earlier this year).

Team UPC spent at least 4 years advertising jobs that do not exist and will never ever exist. It even developed an IT system that will never be used. It’s part of their lobbying tactic. These ads, by the way, are against the law (faking job openings). They admitted to the media (Financial Times) that they merely try to fake an impression (illusion) of “progress”. Anyone can just throw out there some ad. In Bristows’ own words: “The position is located in the CTIE (Centre des Technologies de l’Information de l’Etat, State Information Technology Centre) in Luxembourg.”

Position for a job that does not exist and won’t exist. In a country that barely exists except for tax (evasion) purposes. It’s a ‘hopping point’ for rich multinationals.

“Are patent offices supposed to be in the lobbying business? No.”As an avid proponent of the EU I’m often left wondering why these law firms are so eager to tarnish the EU's reputation with these dirty tricks.

Earlier this week corrupt EPO management openly bragged (warning: epo.org link) about lobbying — equipped with paid-for lies — about patents in Brussels.

Are patent offices supposed to be in the lobbying business? No.

This is what the EPO wrote:

The EPO last week presented two of its studies at an event in the European Parliament hosted by Jörgen Warbon MEP, Vice-President SME Europe of the European People’s Party group. The Office’s study on High-growth firms and intellectual property rights, as well as its recently published Patent commercialisation scoreboard: European SMEs, were presented to MEPs and other stakeholders at a breakfast debate co-organised by SME Europe and the EPO.

In his opening address Mr Warborn reinforced the pivotal role of intellectual property (IP): “IP is the measurement of our competitiveness”. He also noted, however, that EU growth in patents is being outpaced by that of China and India. “IP offices located in Asia receive 66.8% of all patent applications filed worldwide, whereas only 11% of the global total is filed in the EU.”

Does the EPO nowadays control the European Parliament? Shouldn’t that work the other way around? Notice how they’re lying about SMEs. The EPO is bad for SMEs and the UPC even more so. But facts don’t matter. EPO just buys (pays for) “the facts”.

“Does the EPO nowadays control the European Parliament? Shouldn’t that work the other way around?”We’ve meanwhile also learned about Microsoft (US) lobbyists, ACT, pushing for software patents in Europe in this Berlin event; remember that those same liars also attacked Linux and ODF.

Why doesn’t the media mention these attacks? Why are we all so exposed to the EPO’s propaganda?

As the old saying/adage goes, “follow the money…”

Riana Harvey of IP Kat is, as usual, a megaphone of EPO management and its propaganda, lobbying with their press releases yesterday (she often links to Watchtroll, the litigation fanatics who attack judges). Watchtroll’s latest article is “European Patent Office launches new Espacenet” — yet another EPO puff piece.

“Why doesn’t the media mention these attacks? Why are we all so exposed to the EPO’s propaganda?”Remember when IP Kat actually questioned what these liars had said? Remember when the blog wasn’t just a bunch of lawyers? How about IAM, which is literally funded by patent trolls? IAM still refuses to report on EPO protests and corruption, but it’s perfectly happy to repeat press releases of the EPO. It’s just a propaganda rag in the EPO’s pockets.

The only thing they had to say about the EPO? “An EPO agreement with China’s national IP administration looks set to boost Chinese tech companies’ moves into European markets.” Jacob Schindler promoted this nonsense through the parent company of IAM, which interjects IAM’s nonsense (EPO megaphone) into news feeds.

“So-called ‘Hey Hi!’ has been around for more than half a century; but nowadays the media shuffles the labels a bit. Automation? “Hey Hi!” Computers? “Hey Hi!” Algorithms? “Hey Hi!””Going back to the ‘Kats’, as we noted the other day IP Kat promotes the “Hey Hi!” (AI) hype. It’s totally out of control nowadays, especially in patent zealots’ circles. Mind this new comment that says: “I am unpersuaded by the “lack of incentive for AI developers” argument. The personal computer created a new era of content creation. No one argued at the time that Apple or IBM should have any rights in the output created with their products. Google Translate is an AI solution (something people tend to overlook, this is the ‘AI effect’). No one is arguing that Google should enjoy rights in the translations created with its product.”

So-called ‘Hey Hi!’ has been around for more than half a century; but nowadays the media shuffles the labels a bit. Automation? “Hey Hi!” Computers? “Hey Hi!” Algorithms? “Hey Hi!”

Everything is “Hey Hi!”

“What good is an opposition which is rushed? For an opposition proceeding to be effective time is needed; finding prior art doesn’t take 10 seconds.”We’ve also just noticed IAM’s sister site “World Trademark Review” (WTR is as credible as IAM, i.e. not so much) stating that “Singapore IP [sic] Office chief executive confirmed as candidate as WIPO leadership race prepares for take-off”. Singapore’s IPOS promotes nonsensical software patents (disguised using buzzwords such as “FinTech”) just like WIPO (even though they’re illegal in almost the whole world!). Disguised as a ‘news’ site, WTR is actually a pressure group/front of the litigation ‘business’ (law firms), just like Life Sciences Intellectual Property Review (close to WIPR and WIPO), which continues crafting EPO propaganda. How to spin EPO scuttling proper appeals or challenges to fake patents (making it harder to find evidence) as a positive thing? Here we go: “EPO successful in cutting opposition times” (optimal time would be zero, i.e. reject the appeal!)

The European Patent Office (EPO) has made strides in streamlining its opposition procedures, new data from Mewburn Ellis has shown.

According to the new report, published November 14, the EPO is on track to meet its target timeframe for patent oppositions of 15 months by 2020.

The EPO introduced its streamlining initiative in July 2016, aimed at reducing the amount of time it takes to conclude European patent opposition proceedings.

What good is an opposition which is rushed? For an opposition proceeding to be effective time is needed; finding prior art doesn’t take 10 seconds. Evidence must be provided. If they strive to just shorten the window (“cutting opposition times”), that’s basically adopting the same approach that lowers patent quality by cutting examination times. Then again, when the EPO is run like a private sector (Serco for instance), all that matters is money, right? Not justice, not truth, not quality of service and so on…

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. Links 15/12/2019: Wine 5.0 RC1 Released, KDE Frameworks 5.65.0, Qubes OS 4.0.2 RC3

    Links for the day



  2. It Matters a Lot What You Call the System

    Why the best name for the best operating system would be "GNU", not "Linux" (media has twisted the words so as to marginalise GNU and its politics/philosophy)



  3. Only the EPO Goes as Far as Bribing Publishers (the Media) to Promote Software Patents and Publish Fictional Stories

    The world’s patent offices are growing tired of granting software patents which courts later toss out (because these patents are not valid); not only does the EPO advocate such patents — typically using a bundle of buzzwords — it’s also bribing the media to help



  4. EU Needs to Show That It Cares About SMEs and Not 'European Champions' That Are Actually Foreign Monopolies

    Judging by the EU’s nearly blind and unconditional support for the management of the EPO — no matter how abusive and corrupt it has gotten — one has to wonder if the ex-EU official in charge of the EPO reveals a profound democracy deficit as well as growing dangers to Europe’s businesses — the productive firms to which patent maximalism often represents far more risk than opportunity



  5. Guest Article: The Free Software Movement Should Come Out From the Box

    "From now onwards we have to think from a user’s rights perspective and mobilise users of Free software. They should know what rights they ought to get."



  6. IRC Proceedings: Friday, December 13, 2019

    IRC logs for Friday, December 13, 2019



  7. Links 13/12/2019: QEMU 4.2.0, GNU Guile 2.9.7

    Links for the day



  8. Links 13/12/2019: Zorin OS 15.1, Vim 8.2

    Links for the day



  9. Linux Foundation Has Outsourced All the Licence Compliance Stuff to Microsoft, a Serial GPL Violator

    OpenChain Specification/OpenChain Project and Automated Compliance Tooling (ACT) are yet more examples -- the latest of many -- of the Linux Foundation being outsourced to Microsoft, not only for code but also documentation and hosting



  10. IRC Proceedings: Thursday, December 12, 2019

    IRC logs for Thursday, December 12, 2019



  11. Copyleft: Keeping Code Free

    Now that news about "Linux" is dominated by promotion of proprietary software we ought to remember what perpetrators of such a strategy seek to eliminate



  12. Plans That Worked, Plans That Failed

    "I am still looking for good news, but the more good I try to find, the more nastiness I uncover. This is by far, Free software's worst year ever. 2019 Sucks!"



  13. Links 12/12/2019: KDE Applications 19.12, Qt Creator 4.11, New VirtualBox

    Links for the day



  14. Brand Dilution in Action

    Microsoft's proprietary software which spies on people and businesses is getting a "free ride" on the "Linux" brand; and nobody seems to care, nobody seems to notice how perverse that it



  15. At the EPO Money -- Not Quality -- is King

    Financiers are ruining quality



  16. The EPO's Strategic Failure 2023

    Potemkin social dialogue



  17. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, December 11, 2019

    IRC logs for Wednesday, December 11, 2019



  18. EPO Promoting Software Patents in Countries Where These Are Illegal

    The EPO's vision of 'unitary' software patents (patents on algorithms in countries that disallow such patents, as per their national laws) won't materialise, but in the meantime a lot of Invalid Patents (IPs) are granted in the form of European Patents (EPs) and this is wrong



  19. We Support GNU and the FSF But Remain Sceptical and Occasionally Worry About an RMS-less FSF

    Richard Stallman (RMS) is not in charge of the FSF anymore (it's Stallman who created the FSF) and there's risk the decisions will be made by people who don't share Stallman's ethics or the FSF's spirit



  20. Links 11/12/2019: Huawei Lobbied by Microsoft (Because of GNU/Linux) and Microsoft Still Googlebombs Linux to Promote 'Teams'

    Links for the day



  21. Links 11/12/2019: Edge Native Working Group, CrossOver 19.0 Released

    Links for the day



  22. Instead of Fixing Bug #1 Canonical/Ubuntu Contributes to Making the Bug Even More Severe (WSL/EEE)

    Following one seminal report about Canonical financially contributing to Microsoft's EEE efforts — celebrated openly by GNU/Linux opponentsclosing bug #1 Ubuntu basically decided not that it was fixed but that it would no longer attempt to fix it (“wontfix”)



  23. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, December 10, 2019

    IRC logs for Tuesday, December 10, 2019



  24. Today's Example of Microsoft's Faked 'Love'

    “On 7 September 2017, users began noticing a message that stated “Skype for Business is now Microsoft Teams”. This was confirmed on 25 September 2017, at Microsoft’s annual Ignite conference,” according to Wikipedia



  25. Links 10/12/2019: Kubernetes 1.17, Debian Init Systems GR

    Links for the day



  26. 'Cancel Culture' as 'Thoughtpolice' Creep

    Richard Stallman spoke about an important aspect of censorship more than 2 decades ago (before “Open Source” even existed); it was published in Datamation (“Censoring My Software”) 23 years before a campaign of defamation on the Internet was used to remove him from MIT and FSF (censoring or ‘canceling’ Stallman himself)



  27. Microsoft Still Hates GNU/Linux and Mark Shuttleworth Knows It (But He is Desperate for Money)

    We're supposed to believe that a PR or image management (reputation laundering) campaign alone can turn Microsoft from GNU/Linux foe into friend/ally



  28. Actions Against EPO Corruption and Unitary Patent (UPC) Injustice/Lobbying

    The EPO is apparently going on strike again and an action against the UPC is scheduled for later this week (protest in Brussels)



  29. “The Fifth Freedom as a Meme”

    The issue with systemd (or SystemD) has provoked or at least stimulated discussions about the limits of the famous Four Freedoms



  30. IRC Proceedings: Monday, December 09, 2019

    IRC logs for Monday, December 09, 2019


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts