12.10.19

Gemini version available ♊︎

Actions Against EPO Corruption and Unitary Patent (UPC) Injustice/Lobbying

Posted in Europe, Patents at 5:00 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Patent terrorism

Summary: The EPO is apparently going on strike again and an action against the UPC is scheduled for later this week (protest in Brussels)

WE are generally pleased to see/read news about patents in the US because 35 U.S.C. § 101 endures many challenges (another one reported on yesterday; it’s in Daily Links). USPTO-granted software patents won’t withstand scrutiny. Moreover, the USPTO can be sued (as habitually happens). But as long as software patents are being granted in Europe and Team Battistelli/Campinos tries to swap European courts with something that the European Patent Office (EPO) better controls there remains a real threat. Campinos recently pressured judges at the EPO to allow software patents. It’s really that crude and blatant. Is the President of the EPO also the chief judge? Or a whole panel of judges? That would of course be a serious violation of the EPC at every level*.

“Is the President of the EPO also the chief judge? Or a whole panel of judges? That would of course be a serious violation of the EPC at every level.”We are grateful to each and every patent examiner who participated in the recent strike ballot. We imagine that virtually all of them voted for a strike. To quote the couple of comments from RIP Kat (Märpel’s anonymous blog), “Anonymous” said: “Not really correct: 54% participation and 83,2% of the participants in favour of a strike. About 3000 epo staff voted in favor of a strike. In view of the enormous efforts by Campinos to convince staff of the non- existence of the alleged gap, this shows that he clearly did not convince a big part of epo staff and shows a clear failure of his so-called transparent communication strategy.”

“Anonymous Concerned examiner” said (with our emphasis added): “Märpel could also have written that only 417 voted against the strike and for Campinos project. That is little more than the top floors of the Isar building.

“As an examiner, however, I like that the figure is presented as “83″. It reminds me of Article 83 EPC, the one we use when an application document is so unclear that we can’t do anything with it. Maybe it is a symbol of Campinos financial studies?”

Well put, well framed. So we know that technical people at the EPO aren’t happy. They want things to change. From those we’ve spoken to we always learn that examiners also oppose software patents. But they’re under pressure to grant some, even if they know it’s in violation of the EPC (like the EPO’s guidelines themselves).

“The EPO continues to lie about its impact on SMEs, denying the fact that in reality they’re discriminated against and barely get/pursue patents.”“What are the latest trends in self-driving vehicle innovation? This EPO study reveals the most-active companies too,” the EPO tweeted yesterday.

“Way to frame software patents as “Cars” — one of several tricks (“Hey Hi”, “Blockchain”, “IoT”) for painting illegal patents as ground-breaking,” I responded. They also tweeted their usual nonsense about “SMEs”. The EPO continues to lie about its impact on SMEs, denying the fact that in reality they’re discriminated against and barely get/pursue patents.

Our FFII friends at Brussels are meanwhile preparing action on the ground. As Benjamin “NO Software Patents” Henrion put it yesterday, quoting Richard Stallman: “The volunteer activists drifted away, thinking the battle won, but the corporate lobbyists for software patents were paid to stay on the job. Now they have contrived another sneaky method: the “unitary patent” system proposed for the EU…”

“Demonstration against Unitary Software Patents” is planned, Henrion told me yesterday, setting the time and place as follows: “thu 12dec@12h00, Brussels regional parliament (PRB)” (the same time Brits are voting).

“We are calling for a demonstration against the UPC this thursday at noon,” he said, “in front of the Brussels Parliament. UPC is on the agenda the day after.”

This didn’t happen overnight, as he first told me about it last week and yesterday he tweeted: “We are preparing a demonstration against the Unitary Patent Court (UPC) and its patent trolls, stay tuned!”

Henrion is still preparing this protest (same day as British election) and needs to interact with those who attend. There’s lots at stake and having just earned television coverage in Belgium (an event he organised), one can hope the UPC protest can accomplish something similar.
_____
* Incidentally, Rose Hughes (AstraZeneca UK litigation team) has just published this ‘Katty’ post about T 2037/18. The ‘Kats’ used to write a great deal about the fact that judges had come under attack and lost their independence. But not anymore. From the EPO’s Boards of Appeal that totally lack independence:

T 2037/18 is an EPO Boards of Appeal case that considers how much an opponent needs to prove in the Notice of Opposition itself. The case related to a dispute between Bombardierand Siemens regarding Bombardier’s EP patent (EP2619063) for a train carriage. Siemens cited a train (the TDR Series 460) as prior art against the patent, alleging prior use by Bombardier’s customer Transregio Deutsche Regionalbahn (TDR). The case centred around whether the transfer of the train from Bombardier to TDR could be considered to have taken place under conditions of confidentiality. Crucial questions in the case were a) on which party the burden of proof should be laid and b) whether this burden was on the opponent in the Notice of Opposition. Another key question was whether the burden of proof placed on Siemens in opposition had been the equivalent of asking them to prove a negative (or more philosophically speaking, had it been like asking the opponent to prove the existence of the philosophical “celestial teapot”).

The Opposition Division (OD) did not consider the information provided by Siemens on the TDR 460 train to be enough to substantiate the opposition. The OD particularly considered that the process of transfer between Bombardier and TDR should be considered as having taken place under conditions of implied confidentiality. The OD thus found that the burden of proof had been on Siemens to demonstrate the lack of such conditions of confidentiality between Bombardier and TDR in the Notice of Opposition. In the absence of any such proof the opposition was considered inadmissible.

The appeal case explored the issue of whether the burden of proof really should be viewed as resting with the opponent in such a case.

There’s more in there on what was decided on “existence of confidentiality agreements”; as usual, Hughes conveniently ignores the fact that the decision may lack legitimacy due to judges lack of autonomy — an issue they themselves have repeatedly complained about.

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

Decor ᶃ Gemini Space

Below is a Web proxy. We recommend getting a Gemini client/browser.

Black/white/grey bullet button This post is also available in Gemini over at this address (requires a Gemini client/browser to open).

Decor ✐ Cross-references

Black/white/grey bullet button Pages that cross-reference this one, if any exist, are listed below or will be listed below over time.

Decor ▢ Respond and Discuss

Black/white/grey bullet button If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

DecorWhat Else is New


  1. EPO Has No F-ing Oversight

    Earlier today SUEPO mentioned this new article demonstrating that EPO President António Campinos can very obviously and blatantly violate the Code of Conduct of the Office without facing any consequences; there are translations too, so the report is now available in four languages



  2. [Meme] Linux-Rejecting Foundation

    The Linux Foundation never really leads by example; by default, it uses proprietary software



  3. Linux Foundation Almost Never uses Open Source

    The Linux Foundation uses proprietary software (look where they hire and take money from) and be sure they're probably not even aware of it



  4. Links 17/05/2022: Many More Games on GNU/Linux, YaST Development Report

    Links for the day



  5. Links 17/05/2022: Rocky Linux 8.6 and Budgie Desktop in Fedora

    Links for the day



  6. Patent Examiners Rising Up Against EPO Abuse

    Unhappy with the law-breaking autocracy (the EPO‘s management breaks the law as a matter of routine), fast-deteriorating working conditions and rapidly-decreasing quality of work (or lack of compliance with the law), workers have escalated further, topping off strikes and industrial actions with a large-scale petition



  7. [Meme] What Managers (Really) Mean by Acting Professionally

    The myth of 'professionalism' needs to die along with the façade of conformity as prerequisite for employment (Linus Torvalds can work just fine in a bathrobe in his own home)



  8. Internal Poll: 93% of European Patent Office (EPO) Workers Are Unhappy With the EPO

    On top of strike/s and industrial action/s there are now also petitions; at the EPO, almost all staff is "disgruntled" because of utterly corrupt and defunct leadership



  9. Links 17/05/2022: OpenSUSE Leap 15.4 Release Candidate

    Links for the day



  10. IRC Proceedings: Monday, May 16, 2022

    IRC logs for Monday, May 16, 2022



  11. Links 16/05/2022: FreeBSD 13.1 and Inkscape 1.2 Released

    Links for the day



  12. Archiving Latest Posts in Geminispace (Like a Dated Web Directory But for Gemini)

    Earlier today we saw several more people crossing over from the World Wide Web to Gemini; we're trying to make a decent aggregator and archive for the rapidly-expanding Geminispace, which will soon have 2,500 capsules that are known to Lupa alone



  13. Microsoft Vidal Does Not Want to Listen (USPTO is Just for Megacorporations)

    Microsoft Vidal knows her real bosses. They’re international corporations (multinationals like Microsoft), not American people.



  14. Links 16/05/2022: China Advances on GNU/Linux and Maui 2.1.2 is Out

    Links for the day



  15. Jim Zemlin: Chief Revenue Officer in 'Linux' Seat-Selling Foundation

    Board seats in the Linux Foundation are basically a product on sale, based internal documents



  16. Reminder: Linux Foundation's Last IRS Filing is Very Old (Same Year the CFO Left)

    People really need to ask the Linux Foundation, directly, why its filings are years behind; this seems like a sensitive subject



  17. Linux Foundation Does Not Speak for GNU/Linux Users

    There's a serious problem in the "Linux" world as the so-called 'Linux' Foundation claims to speak for us (the GNU/Linux community) while in fact speaking against us (on the payroll of those looking to extinguish us)



  18. IBM's Lennart Poettering on Breaking Software for Pseudo Novelty

    Recently-uploaded ELCE 2011 clip shows a panel with Linus Torvalds, Alan Cox, Thomas Gleixner, Paul McKenney, and Lennart Poettering (relevant to novelty or perceived novelty that mostly degrades the experience of longtime users, e.g. Wayland and systemd)



  19. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, May 15, 2022

    IRC logs for Sunday, May 15, 2022



  20. Links 15/05/2022: Linux 5.18 RC7 and Calls for More Mass Surveillance

    Links for the day



  21. Audio: Mark Shuttleworth Marketed to Young Males, With Sexy Pictures

    The Web is rotting away, old links become broken links within months or years, so I’ve decided to encode a 3-minute segment of the whole as Ogg



  22. What a Difference Half a Decade Makes (When Linux Foundation is 'Having Fun')

    Media shaming campaigns may have taken their toll on the founder of Linux, who is now bossed by someone who rejects Linux and is married to a Microsoft booster. Like Richard Stallman under FSF guidance (and conditions for return, mostly for fear of further media assaults and attack dogs), he has become a more publicity-shy and private person. The Linux Foundation has in effect reduced the founder of what it’s called after (Linux) into a weekly release manager and mascot, whose brand it is gradually diluting/cheapening.



  23. Links 15/05/2022: GNU libiconv 1.17

    Links for the day



  24. [Meme] Unitary Patent and Unified Patent Court (UPC) Cannot Be Reconciled With the Law

    Unitary Patent and Unified Patent Court (UPC)? Impossible. But Team UPC counts on an endless torrent of fake news managing to convince you (and more importantly politicians) otherwise.



  25. Even Team Battistelli is Sometimes Admitting -- Out in Public! -- That Unified Patent Court (UPC) is Neither Legal Nor Desirable

    Daniel X. Thomas and other people who are “too old to punish” (consequences to their career profoundly minimised owing to seniority) are among those who push back against the Unitary Patent or Unified Patent Court (UPC); any sane person — not a career-climbing litigation zealot — can identify the pertinent facts and realise that what’s going on here is an injustice of unprecedented proportions in the patent discipline



  26. [Meme] Common Sense at EPO

    The European examiners who deal with patents prefer a system that works for science, for Europe, not for foreign megacorporations that amass millions of low-quality patents and weaponise these to discourage competition



  27. Patent Granting at the EPO Has Collapsed by 24% Owing to Much-Needed Industrial Action

    Seeing that the EPO’s management routinely violates the law and even the very legal basis of the EPO’s existence (it is a monopoly in Europe; no body has the authority to compete against it), the EPO’s examiners have embarked on a ‘Work-to-Rule’ campaign — working in compliance with the rules as defined 49 years ago and revised over the decades — and the European Patent Convention (EPC) takes priority over unlawful demands from middle and upper management; this is proving highly effective so far and it will carry on until demands are met, i.e. until the law is obeyed and staff is treated with respect/dignity



  28. [Meme] Milan is a Suburb in London

    As long as Italy is not the UK and London means London “proper” (not the French town called London) the UPCA is invalid and no matter how much Team UPC (and its puppets in EPO management) may plead, this whole system is bound to implode



  29. The Latest Propaganda Tactics of Team UPC: Pretending Unified Patent Court Already Exists and Unitary Patents Are Default When If Fact None Even Exists

    8 years ago Benoît Battistelli said that the UPC was imminent; now, after 4 years of António Campinos, it’s still not here and Team UPC speculators say it won’t happen this year, either; just like the EPO constantly lies (both to the public and to its very own staff) Team UPC continues to lie to itself (self-delusion) and to us; both also routinely break the law, engage in deliberate violations of longstanding conventions, and scrap constitutions, which in turn becomes a breaking point for the EU’s credibility and the legal profession



  30. Links 15/05/2022: More Azure Shutdowns and Windows Security Blunders Aplenty

    Links for the day


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts