Bonum Certa Men Certa

IBM's LVFS (Linux Vendor Firmware Service) is a Malicious Remote Backdoor and You Should Turn It Off Now

Reprinted with permission from Ryan Farmer.

The Linux Vendor Firmware Service is a Malicious Remote Backdoor, and You Should Turn it Off Now.



For context, see: You May Get “Failed to load signature: Need more input” Error on Debian 12 and Other Distributions With LVFS. What is LVFS?



As that article is now incorporated by reference, let us continue the series.



I even ran into this with KDE the other day. The Linux Vendor Firmware Service screwed up, but the error message was vague and Plasma Discover (the software center) merely passed it along to me, the user, verbatim.



It turns out it’s not even KDE’s fault. If something happens lower down in the stack it just opens a dialog box and pastes “What LVFS said.” So the solution was kill LVFS by removing it from the list of “software repositories”.



The only thing it includes for my Lenovo computers are Microsoft blacklists of things they don’t want your computer to boot, when you have “Security Theater Boot” turned on, which I do not. So disabling it closes a serious hole in my actual security.



In my case, once I finally tracked down the root cause for the error message, it turned out that IBM is misconfiguring their “Content Delivery Network” for LVFS and causing a four byte signature mismatch.



So LVFS runs into that problem, it too was “designed” by IBM, and the error message is bogus and jargon (of course), and never hints that LVFS is the problem, so KDE passed the message to me and it was unclear what even happened.



If it takes me half an hour to figure out what’s happening, you’ve messed up and most people wouldn’t even stand a chance.



Since LVFS is a remote backdoor, not even controlled by Debian, and a repo for blobs thrown in directly by hardware vendors, one has to wonder how this made it past not only the Debian Social Contract, but how it is Debian Free Software Guidelines compatible, or acked by Debian Security.



Hmm.



If they’re worried about Free Software Guidelines enough to not include CPU microcode updates, why are they including a repo they don’t even control for Microsoft Security Theater Boot revocation lists? Thrown in directly by Microsoft!



If CPU and sound firmware is defined as “Non-Free software“, then why aren’t firmware blobs thrown in by Microsoft and hardware vendors into IBM’s remote backdoor, LVFS?



This violates the Debian Free Software Guidelines:



Free redistribution.



Inclusion of source code.



Allowing for modifications and derived works.



Integrity of the author’s source code (as a compromise).



No discrimination against persons or groups.



No discrimination against fields of endeavor, like commercial use.



The license needs to apply to all to whom the program is redistributed.



License must not be specific to a product. License must not restrict other software.

Debian Free Software Guidelines


When I highlight “License must not restrict other software.”, LVFS bringing in Microsoft “dbx” updates restricts other software. It stops bootloaders that were previously allowed using Microsoft’s third-party certificate from booting at all, at Microsoft’s sole discretion.



So LVFS puts Microsoft in control of your computer long after you’ve even removed Windows, and gives them a backdoor, a remote hole, to decide what you can boot in the future.



Nobody can even argue that these are Free Software, or that the user could load modified copies into the UEFI and run them. The only thing you CAN do is turn off LVFS so it doesn’t flash anymore “updates” into your UEFI firmware which can’t be backed out.



This probably violates the Debian Social Contract too:



Debian will remain 100% free.



We will give back to the free software community.



We will not hide problems.



Our priorities are our users and free software.



Works that do not meet our free software standards [go into ‘contrib’ or ‘non-Free’].

-Debian Social Contract


Again, firmwares are (usually) not Free, the dbx firmware’s sole purpose is to prevent the user from booting things. And firmware updates mostly happen to silently hide problems with hardware so that vendors don’t have to recall it and provide a corrected version or a refund.



The way LVFS itself is designed, hides problems. (Like the cryptic error messages IBM put inside it to make it not obvious where its own errors come from!)



That last one is extraneous, as no Free operating system has ever tried to stop the user from adding non-Free bits.



Technically, you could take the FSF-approved Triquel GNU/Linux distribution, and add the regular Linux kernel, with blobs, and run Google Chrome. You’d be missing the whole reason that Trisquel even exists, and basically turn it back into Ubuntu….but it wouldn’t stop you.



Technically, disabling proprietary software and Snap making sure it doesn’t end up in the distribution is better than running Ubuntu even if the user does end up running a normal, blobbed, Linux kernel. But the reason the FSF endorses Trisquel is that it does not promote ANY ethical harms against the user. The FSF does not endorse Debian, because there has been far too much compromise, including LVFS.



Finally, Debian Security.



This thing is not hosted by Debian, and it’s a source of blobs that nobody is allowed to decompile and study. Nobody can audit them. Some make permanent, non-reversible changes to your computer, at the whim of a manufacturer, for malign purposes in the case of Microsoft “dbx” updates.



How did this all get past Debian Security?



To turn off LVFS:



Open Plasma Discover, go to Settings, and uncheck everything that says “LVFS” under “Firmware Updates”.



lvfs turned off



It should look like this after it asks for your administrative password.



GNOME Software also has an option to disable LVFS repositories, but I don’t have GNOME on any of my computers now. It shouldn’t be that difficult to find.



Unfortunately, if Microsoft or other “vendors” have damaged your computer already through IBM’s remote backdoor, then there’s not much you can do to revert it, but you can make them stop throwing in more things. In the future, perhaps you should even install Debian or your chosen Linux distribution offline and make sure LVFS is turned off before you even allow the computer onto the Internet.



Alternatively, you could get rid of the fwupd junk to make sure LVFS doesn’t come back:



WARNING! This is definitely a more radical step than turning off the LVFS repos, but since there’s nothing in those repos for my laptop except Microsoft “dbx” updates, I decided I didn’t want fwupd at all.



If you have a computer from a vendor that actually updates your UEFI or if System76 is updating Coreboot for you this way (I don’t know if this is how they service it or not. ASK THEM.), you may want to skip this.



NOTE: I did this on Debian 12 KDE and it worked for me without proposing anything stupid or unrelated to fwupd.



I don’t know what happens to GNOME or other Linux distributions if you try to remove fwupd, and frankly I don’t care since I no longer use GNOME.



If you attempt to remove it from GNOME, be careful that it does not propose removing other important packages!



Also note, there may be other fwupd packages to tie it into GNOME that I didn’t include here.



If you totally destroy your OS somehow, you get to keep both pieces. 🙂



How to remove fwupd



I opened Synaptic Package manager, and typed fwupd, and arranged the packages so it shows the installed ones.



Then right-clicked and selected “mark for complete removal” fwupd, fwupd-amd64-signed, libfwupd2, and plasma-discover-backend-fwupd.



Alternatively,



sudo apt purge fwupd fwupd-amd64-signed libfwupd2 plasma-discover-backend-fwupd



I then verified that LVFS is gone from Plasma Discover:



No more lvfs



Will this screw up direct loading sound, graphics, WiFi, and CPU firmware?



No, the kernel direct-loads these on boot, so my system did not have any trouble when I restarted it. I verified that the processors still have the latest firmware from Intel and the firmware for my devices is still loading normally.



fwupd appears to only manage updates to system firmwares.



On some computers, this can include entire UEFI upgrades, but on mine it doesn’t. I don’t want UEFI upgrades in the background even if it did. They can screw up and brick your entire PC. The firmware that’s in there now works. The one they offer you has Never Worked.

Recent Techrights' Posts

Coming Soon: Microsoft Fake Results, Mass Layoffs, and Silence About All the People Microsoft Pressured to "Quit" (So That They Don't Get Counted as Layoffs)
there will be more mass layoffs
Speed of GNU/Linux
The media seldom speaks of the dangers of "proprietary software"
Proprietary Windows Versus "Linux" News (Trying to Keep People on Windows, Never Exploring GNU/Linux)
Good editors know better how to recognise threats and not give them lip service
Ensuring That Every Computer User Anywhere in the World Can Take Control of All His or Her Computers
We must fight the people who attack general-purpose computing, in particular those who push this agenda very aggressively inside Linux
Gemini Links 28/04/2025: Autism and Structural Navigation
Links for the day
What Happened to the Open Source Initiative (OSI) Elections: The Purge, the Cover-up, and the Witch-hunts
OSI has gone "full Microsoft"
 
China is Already Culling GAFAM (Not Just Microsoft Windows)
OS monoculture or "OS hegemony" may be coming to an end
The "Telephone Operating System in the Vatican" is 95 Years Old, Vatican Moved to GNU/Linux
Maybe Microsoft is down to zero already
If Tesla Shares (and Alleged Value) Fell 55% (From $489 to $222) in a Few Months Maybe It's Not Worth Anything At All (It's Just Gambling)
Tesla swasticars have turned from a "status symbol" into a "public embarrassment" and cause for casual humiliation
Chromebooks' Adoption in Sweden No Longer Depends on Schools
School breaks are when classrooms are shut
No, IBM is Not Investing $150 Billion in the US and It Doesn't Even Have That Kind of Money
Here we go again... media as a vehicle of lobbying and misinformation
Leak: The EPO's General Consultative Committee (GCC) Does Not Consult Staff on Crucial Matters and Bypasses the Administrative Council (AC) to Do Illegal Things
violations against the EPO's very staff
New Leaks Coming Soon, We Maintain 100% Record of Successful Resistance to Censorship
We won't be told what we can and cannot say (especially when it's true)
Central African Republic (CAR): Vista 11 is Only ~0.2% Market Share
99.8% to go!
BSD and GNU/Linux Replaced Microsoft in Secure Servers, All Microsoft Has Left is LLM Slop for Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD)
the FUD machine never rests
Gemini Links 28/04/2025: A Simple Task Tracking and Auto-Prioritization Tool and Other Programs
Links for the day
Links 28/04/2025: Canada's Election, Pakistan-India Conflict
Links for the day
Glue Inside Your Pizza (or Why People Will Get Fed Up With Slop)
People are given "answers" from non-intelligence word dumpsters
Links 28/04/2025: Cyberattacks Happening, Chatbots Disappointing, and "Free Speech Under Fire"
Links for the day
Phone Adoption Very Low in Vatican, Windows Usage Fell Nonetheless
Even in places where people still use desktops/laptops most of the time (and have access to these) Windows is gradually losing ground
GNU/Linux 9% in Cuba, Vista 11 Waning, Android Dominant
Microsoft has pretty much lost Cuba
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Sunday, April 27, 2025
IRC logs for Sunday, April 27, 2025
In 24 Countries Observed by statCounter Vista 11 is Still Less Than a Quarter of Windows Users Despite All Other Versions Being 'Expired'
They ought to move to GNU/Linux
Links 27/04/2025: Pope Goodbyes, "Politics of Fear", Slop Redux and More Google Shutdowns (Google Debt Had Grown This Year)
Links for the day
Links 27/04/2025: Serenity Dialectics, Hockey Jersey Ethics, and More
Links for the day
Links 27/04/2025: Death of Nest Thermostats, Death of Metaverse
Links for the day
Links 27/04/2025: Projects Workflow and Discovering Technology
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Saturday, April 26, 2025
IRC logs for Saturday, April 26, 2025
Microsoft Isn't on the Map in USSR
To them, it's either Google or Yandex
In Central America Windows Became a Small Force
These are countries where Windows used to have well over 95% of the "market"
What's Very Vexing to GAFAM, EPO and Others Is That It's Incredibly Hard to Censor Us (and Nobody Ever Successfully Did That Before)
resist, do not capitulate
Site May be Even Faster Now
It basically takes less than a tenth of a second to serve the page
Receiving SLAPPs and Collecting Them Like Trophies (the SLAPPs Always Fail)
People who file lawsuits bring even more attention to themselves (or to embarrassing statements about them)
Year of GNU/Linux on the Laptop?
It's not happening only in Lenovo
What People Must Understand About the Open Source Initiative (OSI)
some facts about the Open Source Initiative (OSI)
Many of the Scandals Are Interconnected (Overlapping People and Corporations)
We're only getting started
More Copyright Lawsuits Against LLM Slop Providers and Suppliers of LLM Slopfarms Would Benefit Society
It's not just bad for the Web and for society; it's also legally dangerous
Links 26/04/2025: General Assassinated in the Town of Balashikha, US Promoting Seafloor Mining
Links for the day
Links 26/04/2025: Facebook Layoffs Again, Remembering What's Real, and Say No to Mass Surveillance
Links for the day
Links 26/04/2025: NOAA Budget Cuts and "Dog Days Ahead"
Links for the day
In defence of JD Vance, death of Pope Francis
Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
Three Years in Prison for Disney Employee’s ‘Menu Hacking’: The Economic Fallout of Digital Menus
Reprinted with permission from Ryan Farmer
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Friday, April 25, 2025
IRC logs for Friday, April 25, 2025