One of the vilest among the Microsoft pressure groups/analysts is IDC. The acronym is very deceiving because it does not reflect on the fact that IDC is just a component in the marketing pipeline. Shall a certain hypothesis require 'proof', IDC gets hired by a company that supplies its own data and methods to ensure a biased and self-flattering outcome (for income). To make matters worse, IDC sometimes conceals the sponsorships. Sadly enough, the Linux Foundation too went down this path quite recently. It's a serious issue that we wrote about many times before.
At the moment, as always, Microsoft is trying to influence lawmakers. How does it go about achieving this? By
paying the likes of IDC and using the BSA (another Microsoft lobbying option), which has done a lot of
legwork for Microsoft lately. It's the same old chorus that was seen about 3 months ago (it was also Microsoft+IDC+BSA at the time):
Microsoft has claimed that each dollar it “loses” to software piracy equals $5.50 in “lost opportunities” to the firm’s channel partners.
A Microsoft-sponsored white paper (pdf) released by IT analyst house IDC yesterday highlights the effects of copyright infringement on the software ecosystem across the tech industry.
[...]
The BSA has claimed that the value of just PC software that was counterfeited in 2007 was close to $50bn worldwide.
It's sponsored by Microsoft. Rest sure that the BSA will carry on trying to pass anti-FOSS laws on behalf of paymasters that including Microsoft Corporation. The BSA is
far from a friend of Free software. which renders its job obsolete.
Antagonism to Free software comes not just from Microsoft but from an entire ecosystem that needs to be identified and recognised for its goals.
The same problem that affects Free software also affects indie music. The other day we mentioned
G8 playing ball for Hollywood. Behind this you also have
alleged corruption from Vivendi and
the servitude of the French president.
According to
this new article from Heise, the ACTA, which was composed secretly by a few greedy and self-serving elites, is to be integrated into the law with endorsement from G8.
On the second day of the G8 meeting in Hokkaido, Japan, the rising price of food and oil were the focal points, along with climate change. But the heads of the G8 nations also found time to consider the troublesome issue of intellectual property. In their declaration on the global economy published today, they therefore called for an Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) to be adopted by the end of the year.
This is not a democracy. One again, it's the case involving a handful of monopolies hiacjking the system. rewriting laws the way they see fit. and thus securing (or expanding) their influence and wealth.
In part, Free software isn't just a case against proprietary software but also a case against political corruption, where affluence is equated to control. It's about breaking the "golden rule", namely that those who have the gold make the rules. They get to glorify themselves and daemonise the rest. Case of point below (from times when Microsoft 'warned' the government about the 'great threat' of open source).
⬆
"Open source is an intellectual-property destroyer [...] I can't imagine something that could be worse than this for the software business and the intellectual-property business. I'm an American; I believe in the American way, I worry if the government encourages open source, and I don't think we've done enough education of policymakers to understand the threat."
--Jim Allchin, Microsoft
