"Here's an oldie but goodie," says a reader to us. It is an article discussing Microsoft's dilemma that it faced when Hotmail ran on UNIX very well, which was damaging for Microsoft's corporate pride as it contradicted the hype about NT. Microsoft touted it as "better UNIX than UNIX". We wrote about this before [1, 2].
MS paper touts Unix in Hotmail's Win2k switch
An older MS internal whitepaper from August 2000 on switching Hotmail, which MS acquired in 1997, from front-end servers running FreeBSD and back-end database servers running Solaris to a whole farm running Win2K, reads like a veritable sales brochure for UNIX, but concludes that the company ought to set the right example by ensuring that each division "should eat its own dogfood."
The whitepaper, by MS Windows 2000 Server Product Group member David Brooks, has been posted on the Web by Security Office, which says it discovered the item and numerous other confidential MS documents on a poorly protected server. There are a number of other fascinating documents posted, in which the careful reader will find a veritable treasure map for hacking the citadel, but the one I enjoyed best was the comparison between Win2K and UNIX.
Microsoft still does not acknowledge a weakness in its Internet Explorer browser that was pointed out seven weeks ago and enables attackers to hijack what are supposed to be secure Web sessions.