Bonum Certa Men Certa

Software Patent Holders Who Wish to Kiss Goodbye to Software Patents

Model



Summary: The push against software patents spreads wider than generally imagined

SOME weeks/months ago Techrights was approached by a patent holder who felt he had been mistreated and exploited by Microsoft and Apple. In the FFII's mailing lists we have just seen a similar story, which goes as follows:





I am no fan of software patents and would like them to be abolished. However, my name is on a software patent issued to a former employer many years ago! The work which was patented was very technical and was the result of considerable numbers of man-hours of discussion of how best to solve a technical problem. Although the patent is not frivolous, I do not believe that the work was sufficiently innovative that a patent is reasonable -- any of our competitors at the time who had been willing to invest resources in solving this problem would have come up with essentially the same solution.

I have been approached by a lawyer for the current owner of the patent who is using it in litigation. I have no desire to support that litigation. On the other hand, all they are asking me for (for the moment, at least) is to be willing to confirm certain facts.

I would be interested in the view of the list on what action I should take. Some actions I am considering include:

1) Answer their questions. I have respect for the law and feel a duty to co-operate with the legal process. I am not an expert and it is for others to argue whether the patent is valid.

2) Decline to answer their questions (possibly on the basis that it was a long time ago and I can't remember). But take no further action.

3) Tell them my view, as a listed inventor, that the patent should not have been granted and the litigation is unreasonable.

4) Track down and tell their opponents my view, as a listed inventor, that the patent should not have been granted.

Also, should I tell my current employer? The patent and the case are nothing to do with them, but they might have a view on whether they wish to see me potentially called as a witness or even on which of the actions above I should take. My current thought is that it is nothing to do with them.

[...]

It appears I have not been clear. I am NOT looking for any legal advice, thanks. I am confident that I understand my legal obligations and if that changes I will seek professional legal advice, in my own jurisdiction.

I am, however, interested in the views of the list on the ethical issues involved. As someone who does not support software patents, do you feel there is a moral obligation (not commenting on whether there is a legal one) to the (successors to the) former employer who bought out my rights for token sum many years ago? Or, at the opposite extreme, should a campaigner against software patents actively campaign to have their own patents invalidated?

And do you feel there is any moral obligation to give my current employer (who also holds many software patents, although none in which I am involved) a say in my actions in this area (again, without commenting on any legal agreements I may have with my employer).

I realize that asking a list full of lawyers for ethical advice may be foolish but there must be some non-lawyers on the list :-)


Any ideas on this would be appreciated.

Recent Techrights' Posts

Disposable to Microsoft
There is an extensive set of people who got used by Microsoft, only to be thrown away a month later or a year later or a decade later
The UEFI 9/11 - Part VII - This Coming Week Many PCs Will Refuse to Boot "Linux" (Because of Microsoft's Expired Certificate)
The real solution is, disable "secure boot" or "SecureBoot" while it's still possible. [...] Just like submarine patents, a lot of this problem was "hibernating" for a while
The Thing Nobody in Red Hat Wants to Talk About Openly
There is a real sentiment or worry among Red Hatters, Europeans and Americans in particulars (because of higher salary expectations)
Slopwatch: Small Parade of Fake News About "Linux" and Scams Borrowing the Name (or Word) "Linux"
In practice, LLMs are a risk
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Friday, September 05, 2025
IRC logs for Friday, September 05, 2025
Genini Links 05/09/2025: Community, ROOPHLOCH, and PITkit
Links for the day
Links 05/09/2025: Vaccine Sceptics Poison the Well, Two Exploited Vulnerabilities Patched in Android
Links for the day
Gemini Links 05/09/2025: Logitech Lift and DIY Gemini Servers
Links for the day
Links 05/09/2025: Sainsbury's Caught Spying on In-Store Shoppers and Microsoft "OpenAI is Using Legal Threats to Harass its Critics"
Links for the day
BASIC Predates Microsoft by Over a Decade, Microsoft-Controlled Sites Like The Register MS Don't Want You to Know This
The state of the media is really bad when it relies a lot on oligarchs' money and is appointing editors who are working for oligarchs
Analogies for "Memory Safety" in Rust
Don't worry, it's Rust! It can do anything!
Brian Kernighan, "Only Third to Dennis Richie and Ken Thompson" (UNIX), Agreed With Someone Who Said Rust Was Just Hype, Should Not Replace C
17 hours ago
Reminder: Microsoft's "Secure Boot" Certificate for "Linux" Will be Expired in One Week
Many PCs won't manage to 'rotate' to another certificate
"Many of the Red Hat Employees Are Still Looking for Work"
Shame on IBM's CEO
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Thursday, September 04, 2025
IRC logs for Thursday, September 04, 2025
Microsoft Started With Code Literally From The Trash, Nothing Has Improved Since
The reality is, there are systems and code that are reliable. But they're not Microsoft's.
Hypothesis That New McKinsey/Microsoft Executive Inside Red Hat Will Outsource Research and Development Operations to India (Like They Do in IBM)
IBM is floundering
Slopwatch: Scams, Fake Articles About "Linux", Plagiarism, and Worse
Perhaps some time soon the LLMs or the "Big LLMs" will run out of money (to borrow) and go offline, leaving those slopfarms in a tough place
Gemini Links 04/09/2025: Means of Production and Rusting Out
Links for the day
Links 04/09/2025: Science, Hardware, and Eyes on China
Links for the day
Gemini Links 04/09/2025: Digital Minimalism and Social Control Media
Links for the day
IBM's GNU/Linux Divestment, Based on Hard But Anecdotal Evidence (IBM Fails to Recognise How Much Money It Made and Can Still Make From "Linux")
Love us or hate us, a lot of what we've been saying about Red Hat under IBM turns out to be rather accurate
Links 04/09/2025: Massive Microsoft Staff Cuts (Barely Reported), "Strange Conspiracy Theory Is Reportedly Spreading Inside OpenAI"
Links for the day
Activists Can Win, But Keep an Eye on the Ball and on the Trophy
GitHub is dying, it was a loss-making trap, not free hosting
Gemini Links 04/09/2025: Katrina Remembered, Distracted Driving, and Virtual Economics
Links for the day
At This Point It's No Longer Matthew Garrett But People Who Fund Matthew Garrett (or Companies That Fund His SLAPPs Against My Wife and I)
The only thing worse than misogynists are misogynists who fail to respect other people's right to go on holiday
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, September 03, 2025
IRC logs for Wednesday, September 03, 2025
The UEFI 9/11 - Part VI - This Serious Harm Was Planned for Over a Decade, Not an Accident or Merely Some Misfortune
The term "Serious Harm" is legally meaningful here
GNOME Unfit for Diversity and Inclusion
GNOME's leadership is using "bad words"
Brodie Robertson Addressing the Recently-Discovered Comments
Most people probably knew nothing about this until he wrote a response
Red Hat QA Team "Had Shrunk by Half Over the Past Year." (After IBM Divestment)
If Red Hat's workforce is being moved to the East, then RHEL can become a national security problem
Slopwatch: "Open Source" and "Linux" News Faked, Made by Bots and Entered Into Google News
Spam combined with slop about "Linux" has entered Google News