Bonum Certa Men Certa

The European Patent Office is in a State of Transition, But Not Battistelli's Transition or 'Reform'

The end of heartless leadership

Wizard of Oz



Summary: As Battistelli is expected to be on his way out (some sources tell us ejection is likely to happen in June), there is no denying that big changes are afoot and we take stock of some

We previously published hundreds of articles about the European Patent Office, which had threatened to sue us for writing about its many abuses. Two of the latest developments we might as well want to repeat/highlight/cover in depth. These developments are as follows:



  1. About 60% of the EPO's staff voted for a strike two days ago. They are fed up with the management's abuses. There are strikes and protests imminent.
  2. The President is probably about to get sacked (or pressured to resign), mostly for his abuses against the course of (in)justice and union-busting.


A lot of this is being covered in German and in Dutch (among other languages). It's in newspapers, television programs, and radio. These articles or broadcasts also increasingly cover the role of EPO abuses in staff suicides, which soared under Battistelli.

“A more diplomatic president would have heeded the warnings earlier: when in a hole it’s usually best to stop digging.”
      --Anonymous
Not so much coverage about these matters can be found in the UK, possibly due to language barriers and the distance from the patent offices/headquarters, which are all in central Europe (continental). The Register, WIPR and a few IP-centric news sites are being the exception when it comes to coverage in the English language (there is only one writer at The Register who's keeping abreast of EPO developments, so the other coverage mostly targets lawyers, who are a niche audience).

“The EPO said that the door is still open to SUEPO to sign the MOU,” said this very recent article from WIPR. So the wolf said his door is open to sheep. This is merely pretense of amicability or peace. How many people are willing to fall for it? Lesser informed journalists might interpret this as 'evidence' of these problems having been resolved, or SUEPO being the vicious, merciless party.

According to this new article from MIP (English site for lawyers):

The Administrative Council also discussed the envisaged structural reform of the Boards of Appeal which may lead to a relocation of the Boards of Appeal to premises not shared with other departments of the EPO, possibly even remote from Munich, such as in Berlin or Vienna. Concrete proposals could be decided upon by the Administrative Council as early as at its March meeting.


The headline of the article says "Organisational concerns in spite of performance gains," but it shouldn't be taking at face value the so-called 'results' that the EPO keeps repeating even in Twitter this morning and afternoon [1, 2, 3], despite these so-called 'results' being deficient and increasingly the subject of ridicule. See what Francisco Moreno, whom we recently mentioned here, wrote about it last week:

Filings & Applications

Churras & Merinas

Pears & Apples

Platos & Tazas

#EPOresults


People who work in this area increasingly realise that the EPO isn't telling the full story, just as it's lying to journalists and lying to staff. When I leaked a document which the EPO later admitted was authentic the EPO's Twitter account told angry lawyers that I was "wrong" (for merely showing a document!). A week later the EPO threatened to sue me.

We were rather amused this morning to see that someone in IP Kat doubting the legitimacy of the leaked documents we published last night. Well, we have the originals (definitely authentic) but published the text only in order to protect the source. Here is one response posted in relation to that:

This seems to show what will be the line of defense of battistelli will be: disciplinary authority is my prerogative, there is no legal basis for an external/independent review.

This guy does not seem to understand the pressure under which the AC - and the ministers at home (see the answer of Haas in the BR report) - find itself as a result of the intense media coverage about the EPO.

He may get away with his stupid arguments, but this will make the things only worse because the question will continue to linger:

if the disciplinary action were taken following the law - as they continue to repeat -, WHY IS IT THAT THE PRESIDENT DOES NOT WANT ANYBODY TO HAVE A LOOK AT IT?

If battistelli does not agree with the requests of the AC, he may always file an appeal at the ILO ...


Here is a response to the above:

He won't need to do that.

Look at Article 10 of the Rules of Procedure of the Administrative Council: "Article 18 - Specific provisions concerning the review and appeal procedures for Council decisions (1) The President of the European Patent Office shall draft an opinion for the Council on the request for review. (2) Taking into account the opinion referred to in paragraph 1, the Council, in accordance with Article 109 of the Service Regulations for permanent employees of the European (a) shall decide whether the request for review is receivable and, if so, (b) shall take a decision on the merits of the request for review."

http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/F44EA2A833862CD9C1257B1A00322E35/$File/CAD12010_en.pdf

In other words all he has to do is to file a request for review. He then gets to draft the opinion on the basis of which the Council decides on his request.


Lastly, here is a comment which says Battistelli "has dug himself into a hole" and that "when in a hole it's usually best to stop digging."

The President has dug himself into a hole, despite warnings and instructions to the contrary from the AC, and now he can't get out of it without presenting SUEPO a major victory. A more diplomatic president would have heeded the warnings earlier: when in a hole it's usually best to stop digging.

This presents the AC with a problem. What's needed at the present time is conciliation, not a major victory for one side or the other. But the President is making conciliation impossible.


Whether the PR team admits it or not (it is paid to lie to or mislead people), the EPO is in a state of transition right now. There's turmoil that only a major overhaul can end.

Recent Techrights' Posts

People's Understanding of the History of GNU/Linux is Changing
RMS is not a radical, he's just clever enough to see and foresee what's going on
Microsofters Were Scheming to Take Over This Entire Web Site (in Their Own Words!)
Money gets spent censoring/deplatforming people who speak about real issues; no money gets spent actually tackling those underlying issues
Bicycles for the Minds and the Story Harrison Bergeron
"The goal of having people in charge of the tools they use and that the tools should amplify ability" has long been abandoned
[Video] Cory Doctorow Explains DMCA: DRM in the Browser (or Webapp) Will "Make It a Felony to Protect Your Privacy While You Use It."
Pycon US Keynote Speaker Cory Doctorow
 
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Thursday, May 29, 2025
IRC logs for Thursday, May 29, 2025
Links 29/05/2025: Chinese Cracking Against EU Institutions (Prague), More Assaults on Media and Its Funding Sources
Links for the day
EPO Workers Caution That the Officials Are Still Illegally Trying to Replace Staff With Slop (to Lower Quality and Validity of European Patents)
Nobody in Europe voted for any of this
Links 29/05/2025: US Health Deficit and Malware Disguised as Slop Generator
Links for the day
Links 29/05/2025: Turtle Roadkill, Modern 'Tech' as a Sting
Links for the day
Thanks for All the Fish, Linux Format
people who once wrote for it (or for other magazines) comment on the importance of this news
Links 29/05/2025: YouTube Problem and Giant Privacy Hole in Microsoft OneDrive
Links for the day
United States Courts With Sworn Testimonies Are on Our Side, We'll Present the Same Here
Chronicling what happened is a moral imperative
Serial Sloppers Ruin and Lessen the Incentive to Cover "Linux"
The Serial Sloppers (SSs) ought to be named and shamed, but almost nobody does this
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, May 28, 2025
IRC logs for Wednesday, May 28, 2025
Links 28/05/2025: 'Emulation Layers' (Measurements and Linguistics), Libraries, and Discomfort
Links for the day
Links 28/05/2025: More Arrests for Bitcoin-Connected Torture and Prosecutions for Dieselgate-Linked Executives
Links for the day
Even Microsoft (MSN) Covers Richard Stallman's Public Talk in Milan 2 Days Ago
He spoke in Spanish earlier this month (Alicante)
Gemini Links 28/05/2025: Techo-authoritarianism With Slop Plagiarism and "No Online June" (Going Offline)
Links for the day
Links 28/05/2025: GitHub MCP Exploited and MathWorks Discovers Huge Windows TCO
Links for the day
Very High Attendance Level at Richard Stallman's Talk Shows People Can Relate to His Message
Smear campaigns have their limits
Gemini Links 28/05/2025: Celsius-Fahrenheit, Endless Scrolling/Infinite Scrolling, and Trapping LLM Slop Bots
Links for the day
Prison gate backdrop to baptism by Fr Sean O'Connell, St Paul's, Coburg
Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
More Photos From This Week's Milan Talk by Richard Stallman
The posts are in Italian, not English
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, May 27, 2025
IRC logs for Tuesday, May 27, 2025