Reference: Courts of Texas
THE Eastern District of Texas (TXED/EDTX) has been getting a bad name. It's now nationally recognised (if not internationally renowned/notorious) for fostering patent trolls. They typically use software patents granted by the USPTO and they enjoy courts whose attitude is plaintiff-friendly and tolerant/accepting of software patents in spite of Alice. After TC Heartland, however, it became a lot harder to drag companies into these courts.
"Ironically, for Eastern Texas at least, this whole gamble on the 'litigation' industry may, from now on, actively discourage companies from coming and encourage those which have an office there to leave that district."The other day Watchtroll recalled a "complaint filed by SimpleAir in the Eastern District of Texas. The Federal Circuit reversed and remanded the lower court’s decision" (as usual).
It also recalled Portal Communications [1, 2], an EDTX case in which Apple is accused of patent infringement by a de facto troll (someone's 'monetisation' shell). There's also this new update on the case of an old patent troll called VirnetX. In VirnetX Inc. et al v Apple Inc. (Eastern Texas again) there was an attempt to deny Apple a right to defense:
The court denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment that the redesigned version of defendant's adjudicated product infringed its network security patents because there were genuine disputes of material fact which precluded a finding of collateral estoppel.