Bonum Certa Men Certa

All the Usual Suspects Are Still Working Hard to Harm the Legitimacy if Not Existence of Patent Quality Control

Low-quality, dubious and illegitimate patents are being used by them to extract money from productive companies

David Ruschke



Summary: With David Ruschke (above) out of his role and other former judges leaving the Office one wonders if the new Office leadership is just scheming to hide a decline in patent quality by simply removing quality assessors

THE Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) deals with thousands of inter partes reviews (IPRs) which invalidate thousands of software patents, typically with the Federal Circuit affirming (or declining to deal with appeals). The European Patent Office (EPO) has a similar mechanism and it came under many attacks in recent years. Those who dislike PTAB generally dislike patent quality. It's as simple as this.



"PTAB would not be necessary had the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) stopped granting fake patents on algorithms and other dubious patents."Days ago we noticed that Michael Rosen continues to bash PTAB for the greedy sponsors of the American Enterprise Institute. We have bo idea why Google News syndicates as 'news' this propaganda of patent trolls-affiliated think tanks. It's connected loosely to Koch-funded think tanks and scholars, who also meddled in Oil States, hoping to influence the outcome at SCOTUS, potentially ending IPRs.

PTAB would not be necessary had the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) stopped granting fake patents on algorithms and other dubious patents.

Unified Patents has just stopped another patent troll in its tracks, owing to PTAB as usual. In its own words:

On November 13, 2018, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) issued a final written decision in Unified Patents Inc. v. Plectrum, LLC, IPR2017-01430 holding claims 8 and 11 of U.S. Patent 5,978,951 unpatentable. The patent is owned and asserted by Plectrum, LLC, a new NPE [troll] formed after acquiring several patents formerly owned by Hewlett Packard.


No doubt we'll keep seeing new attempts to discredit if not destroy PTAB. The Federal Circuit Bar Association (FCBA), patent maximalists [1, 2] who have nothing to do with the Federal Circuit itself, are advertising webcasts [1, 2]. Trying to work around PTAB challenges is their goal; the same is done by law firms directly, e.g. this other newly-advertised upcoming 'webinar' about PTAB (there are others). Patent Docs keeps pushing these every weekend. We already explained how politicians, lobbyists etc. are pitted against PTAB and if one check who pays them, then the motivations become pretty clear.

"The future of PTAB may sadly depend on lobbyists, i.e. bribes. There's a powerful lobby doing anything it can to scuttle PTAB, but there's a reactionary lobby from technology companies (CCIA, HTIA and so on)."Robert Schaffer, Joseph Robinson and Dustin Weeks recently wrote about PTAB, not adding anything particularly new about the recently-alluded-to Arista PTAB IPRs (ITC arrogantly ignores these).

Gene Quinn, joining the above trio, also published a little note about an exceptional "mixed decision". To quote: "When determining if a reference was a printed publication mere indexing is insufficient – you must prove that the indexing was “meaningful” enough to provide access to the public. Also, when challenging substitute claims during an IPR, the Petitioner must provide claim construction if it is important to their invalidity argument; otherwise, it is not error for the Board to focus on the ordinary meaning of the substitute claim language."

So again they just try to work around the challenges, knowing that IPRs are typically successful and PTAB typically squashes patents it looks into (based on reasonable evidence). The future of PTAB may sadly depend on lobbyists, i.e. bribes. There's a powerful lobby doing anything it can to scuttle PTAB, but there's a reactionary lobby from technology companies (CCIA, HTIA and so on).

Recent Techrights' Posts

Drug Addiction is a Real Problem, It Destroys Families
a rather sensitive matter
 
Links 07/06/2025: Slop Companies Retain All Private Data, More Books Banned in the US
Links for the day
Gemini Links 07/06/2025: "A Monk's Guide to Happiness" and "Wireless Earbuds"
Links for the day
Links 07/06/2025: More Rumours of Mass Layoffs in Microsoft's XBox Division, New COVID Variant
Links for the day
Abuse Inside the Polish Patent Office (UPRP) - Part IV: Political Scrutiny and Errors/Inconsistencies in Official Documents
When such organisations receive scrutiny they start focusing on cover-up and muzzling of facts (or crushing people who say the truth)
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Friday, June 06, 2025
IRC logs for Friday, June 06, 2025
Slopwatch: LinuxTechLab, Planet Ubuntu, Anti-Linux FUD, and Microsoft SPAM
It's not easy to altogether avoid take articles these days
Gemini Links 06/06/2025: "MBA Tear" and Slop ('AI') as Plagiarism
Links for the day
Links 06/06/2025: "Convicted Felon and MElon Trade Insults" and Europe Snubbed by US Again
Links for the day
Links 06/06/2025: Microsoft XBox Bracing For More Mass Layoffs, Climate Disaster, Fake 'Money' Tokens From US President
Links for the day
Gemini Links 06/06/2025: Vanishing Cultures and MElon Implosion
Links for the day
Extortion is a Crime, Even If You're Based in Another Continent and Work for Microsoft
reported to British authorities
We're in 6/6 Now, Almost Halfway in 2025
2025 was probably the best year for us
South Americans Are Saying Goodbye to Microsoft
We're hardly even "Cherry-Picking" or conveniently singling out one South American nation
Abuse Inside the Polish Patent Office (UPRP) - Part III: Data Protection Failures, Just Like at the European Patent Office (EPO)
Just less than a decade ago we showed that the EPO had illegally shared staff data with third parties
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Thursday, June 05, 2025
IRC logs for Thursday, June 05, 2025
Pushing Microsoft's Proprietary Trash/Trap as "Open" and "Linux" (Windows is 'Linux' Now?)
Maybe it's time to just stop saying "FOSS". The people who use that term are promoting Microsoft.
Slopwatch: Comparing Linux to Vermin, Attacking BSD With LLM Slop, and Helping Microsoft Demonise Linux/OpenBSD/SSH Over Weak User Passwords
Microsoft must be laughing its arse off, seeing how a bunch of Serial Sloppers (no skills, no comprehension, no integrity, no creativity) and slopfarms use Microsoft LLM to flood the Web with anti-Linux FUD
Links 05/06/2025: US Poised for Another $2.4 Trillion to Debt, Cops Want GAFAM Kill Switches
Links for the day
Links 05/06/2025: First US Spacewalk 60 Years Ago, GNU Octave 10.2.0 is Out
Links for the day
Scandinavia Saying Goodbye to Microsoft
The Danes have had enough of Microsoft
GNU/Linux Measured at 6% in Bangladesh, According to statCounter
Windows isn't growing, it's going away
Nat Friedman Had Left Microsoft GitHub Exactly One Week Before Matthew Garrett Sent His First SLAPP (Which Was an Empty Threat, He Was Abusing the Legal System of Another Continent to Terrorise Critics Who Had Just Unearthed Major Microsoft Scandals)
And it was likely talked about by his lawyers around the exact same time Nat Friedman was packing up
Gemini Links 05/06/2025: Loop Earplugs Review and ANS Forth
Links for the day
Armenian Adoption of GNU/Linux
Russian influence in Armenian must be worrying to Microsoft
Abuse Inside the Polish Patent Office (UPRP) - Part II: Turning a Once-Respected Patent Office Into a Circus and Laughing Stock
It's not legal, but administrators who don't care about the law and don't fear the law would just go ahead and turn things to junk
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, June 04, 2025
IRC logs for Wednesday, June 04, 2025