Bonum Certa Men Certa

New Ways of Working for António Campinos, Even From One's Own Home During a Crisis

Video download link | md5sum 2c262586c7d77d6801a59b7498527bf3



Summary: The European Patent Office (EPO) is taking advantage of a pandemic to take away basic rights of staff; in the video above, which is based on the document below, I give my personal views/thoughts

The Central Staff Committee (CSC) of the EPO wrote to António Campinos about his proposal for the pandemic, seeing that Europe is again the "epicenter" of the COVID-19 health crisis, with Germany on exceptionally high alert at the moment.



On "New ways of working," the CSC wrote (alluding to something published by Team Battistelli/Campinos), much needs to be said. They were preparing for a meeting when they wrote it. "Proposal in preparation of the GCC meeting" was the title circulated with this open letter. "In a meeting with the President on 16 November," they noted, "the Central Staff Committee (CSC) addressed some problematic aspects of “New ways of working”. We are now making concrete proposals in order to address the issues of core time and flexi-hours."

That was 3 days ago. I've converted the letter into HTML and decided to record a quick video, seeing that this is a very "tech rights" issue, especially at times of significance change and when self-serving management exploits the pandemic the tilt the systems in their own favour at workers' expense, often discarding basic rights, e.g. extensively spying on employees. A week ago the EPO's President was promoting European software patents under the guise of "Hey Hi" (in relation to JPO), but today's issue is less technical and more to do with human rights.

Here's the open letter in full:

European Patent Office | 80298 MUNICH | GERMANY

Mr António Campinos President of the EPO

By email

OPEN LETTER

Reference: sc21133cl Date: 18/11/2021

Preparation of the consultation on GCC/DOC 24/2021 (CA/77/21): “New ways of working”

Dear Mr President,

The topic of “New ways of working” is of interest to all staff and is essential for the performance and future of our Organisation. The Central Staff Committee believes that a jointly agreed text should be possible. Compared to the current applicable statutory regulations (especially on Part-Time Home Working), we appreciate your intention to extend geographical flexibility for all staff.

First, we take note that the period of notice according to Article 7(5) will be aligned with the current Part-Time Home Working provision and set at two months. Second, we welcome your willingness to extend the transitional provisions (Article 17) to children under the age of 4. Third, we understand that the entry into force (and presumably the period of the transitional measures) will be extended in accordance with the development of the pandemic.

There are however still some issues which need to be resolved and reflected in an amended version of the Circular for consultation in the General Consultative Committee (GCC). Our proposals are the following:

1. Core-time and flexi-hours

Current proposal:

Article 15(1): “All provisions of the Guidelines on arrangements for working hours concerning the accrual of flexi-hours and the establishment of core time are suspended by the Circular.”

Argument: Flexi-hours (as they are called) are a means for flexibility in managing one’s working time/schedule, when working on the Office premises. Teleworking is actually a means for flexibility in working location. Hence, the two concepts are entirely different. Creating one and removing the other does not mean increasing flexibility, rather it removes one form of flexibility and introduces another, where the beneficiaries are not the same.

A group of at least 25% of staff declared that they are not interested in geographical flexibility and others might not be allowed to make use of it due to the nature of their tasks. This group would be negatively affected by the reform as well as all others planning to work partly in the Office’s buildings.

In the current proposal, the Working time framework (Article 3 of the guidelines on arrangement for working hours, PART 4j CODEX) still sets the working day at a minimum of six hours (maximum ten hours) and the minimum working week at 35 hours (maximum 48 hours). The abolition of accrual of flexi-hours would remove any possibility for staff to deviate from this framework. In addition, flexi-hours accrual is very simple to administrate and gives visibility and predictability for management, while helping staff to manage their work-life balance.

The New Normal staff survey results show that 82% of staff want flexibility in working times and 73% are interested in the removal of core-hours. We understand that, for the Human Resources Department, both are linked. In order to meet both ends, we propose to abolish accrual of flexi-hours only on days of teleworking and to change the purpose of core-hours to define them as a preferred timeslot for joint meetings, thus also for strengthening the “sense of belonging”.

Our proposal: Article 15(1): “All provisions of the Guidelines on arrangements for working hours concerning the accrual of flexi-hours on days of teleworking and the establishment of core time are suspended by the Circular. Core-time as set out in the Guidelines on arrangements for working hours should be the preferred timeslot for the purpose of Article 7(1)(b) and Article 8(1)(d).

2. Fast joint conflict resolution panel

Argument: The Circular does not define clear procedures and steps for negative decisions on teleworking, and the criteria remain vague. Teleworking has a significant impact on personal and family planning which cannot be reconciled with long delays incurred by the management review and internal appeal systems, let alone the AT-ILO as the ultimate end of any dispute.

We understand that the administration is currently reluctant to set up a fast joint conflict resolution panel.

In order to move forward, we propose that this topic be revisited at the time of the review. We also understand that in the meantime the staff and Office will try to solve arising conflicts expeditiously, using the existing internal means of redress.

Our proposal: An addition in Article 16(1): “The review shall involve the monitoring of cases of conflict arising from the implementation of the Circular and an evaluation of the suitability of the existing means of redress on this topic.“

3. Health & Safety

We are still waiting for the opinion of the COHSEC with respect to Health & Safety matters on the document.

We are looking forward to a fruitful discussion in the GCC. We would appreciate receiving an amended text reflecting our proposals above and would of course agree to waive our right to the deadline for submission to the GCC.

Yours sincerely,

Alain Dumont Chairman of the Central Staff Committee


The short story is, there is an ongoing inquiry (survey) about how staff feels after more than a year working from home, at least part of the time. Expect more of this in light of the Austrian news.

As we've seen many times before, ILO-AT (or AT-ILO, same thing) is clearly too slow to react to abuses against staff, especially a new modality of abuse (off-site labour). Working from home isn't as simple as it sounds. It's not like being "on holiday"; there are health implications, lack of access to various facilities that are expected in an organised and centralised workplace, and no access to supportive supervisors (yes, some do exist and a good supervisor can provide help and comfort, not fear).

Recent Techrights' Posts

Autumn Has Come
Autumn should be exciting in all sorts of ways; it'll also mark our anniversary
IBM Has Taken Control of GNOME
Don't expect a successor to be found any time soon
 
Links 01/09/2025: Fresh Backlash Against Slop and "Norway’s Electricity Crisis is About to Hit Britain"
Links for the day
Writing and Coding Isn't Always Enough
Last year we had to assume a role we didn't have before: litigants
Links 01/09/2025: Catching Up (Mostly via Deutsche Welle), "Windows TCO" Effect in UK
Links for the day
Gemini Links 01/09/2025: Linguistic Barriers and "Web 1.0 Hosting"
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Sunday, August 31, 2025
IRC logs for Sunday, August 31, 2025
The UEFI 9/11 - Part IV - External Interference
They all seem to be playing a role in crushing Software Freedom and self-determination for users
Links 31/08/2025: Baggage Claim Scams, an Insurrectionist’s War on Culture, and a Sudden Robotics Hype
Links for the day
Gemini Links 31/08/2025: Reviewing Netsurf and Slightly Less Historic Ada Design
Links for the day
Links 31/08/2025: Google Gmail Data Breach and LF Puff Pieces for Pay
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Saturday, August 30, 2025
IRC logs for Saturday, August 30, 2025
This is What Google News Has Become
Moments ago
The Slopfarm WebProNews Has Turned Google News Into a Laughing Stock Full of Plagiarism by Slop
If Google News dies of neglect, that's one thing. It's starting to seem like active neglect by Google is a form of participation.
Do What is Moral, as What's Legal Isn't Always Moral
Do what's objectively moral, no matter the costs and the risks
Slopwatch: Google News Assisting Plagiarism and Anti-Linux FUD, Serial Slopper Rips Off Linux-Centric Journalists
This makes the Web a much worse place and lessens the incentive to do journalism
Links 30/08/2025: NVIDIA Fakes Results to Hide a Bubble Already in Implosion Phase, Data Breaches Galore, Important Win for Workers' Union in Canada
Links for the day
Representing and Speaking for Animals
If I ever choose to take this matter to tribunal with animals-centric NGOs on my side, it'll get some press coverage for sure
The UEFI 9/11 - Part II - Campaign of Censorship and Defamation Against Critics
In dictatorships, humour serves an important role. It's tragic.
In Kazakhstan, Yandex Estimated to be 20 Times Bigger Than Microsoft
Bing is measured as down this month
Shutterstock Not Enough? The Register MS Uses Slop Images in Articles (Seemingly More and More Over Time)
Cost-saving trajectory amid office shutdown?
Gemini Links 30/08/2025: Games, PostmarketOS, and Slop
Links for the day
Links 30/08/2025: Imgur Uproar and Many Ukraine Updates (Mediazona Reports Over 200,000 Russians Died for Putin)
Links for the day
How Not to Build Software
code forges that need a Web browser perhaps fill some 'niche' demand
GAFAM and "MATA"
The use of dark humour there hopefully helps illuminate what a lot of "modern" technology became like and how it interacts with human civilisation (to what ends and whose gain)
Birds Are Not "Pests and Vermin", Privacy is Not a Crime, and GNU/Linux is Not 'Hacking Platform'
I could not help but think of Free software analogies
The Sites Should Be Very Fast Again
That issue is now resolved
Flying in 2025
worse than ever before
Activists, Including Technical Activists, Need Not Pursue Affirmation
Techrights doesn't play or participate in a "popularity contest"
The UEFI 9/11 - Part III - Chaos is Scheduled to Happen Second Thursday of September (No Matter What the Microsofters Tell You)
The clock is ticking
Downplaying the Impact of "UEFI 9/11" is a Losing Strategy
we won't publish much whilst on holiday
Government Sites Should Run Free Software
Not proprietary bloatware with buzzwords
LLM Slopfarms Take No Breaks
When people run sites by bots they don't need to worry about "breaks"
GNOME Having a Meltdown Again
Thanks and farewell to Steven Deobald
Gemini Links 30/08/2025: Low Tech and Hunchbin 1.0.6
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Friday, August 29, 2025
IRC logs for Friday, August 29, 2025