Bonum Certa Men Certa

The Committee on Patent Law (PLC) Informed About Overlooked Issues “Which Might Have a Bearing on the Validity of EPO Patents.”

A space suit
The 'suits' who run Europe's second-largest institution hate science and law; all they understand is money and power



Summary: In a publication circulated or prepared last week the Central Staff Committee (CSC) of the EPO explains a situation never explored in so-called 'media' (the very little that's left of it)

LATELY we've covered the lies from IAM and the severe patent quality (hence invalidity) issues at the EPO, as explained by the EPO's very own patent examiners.



Benoît Battistelli and António Campinos have been pampering Joff Wild and his fellow PR operatives (advertising company disguised as "news" site). So the public isn't supposed to know what's really going on and the Administrative Council will likely just pat itself on the back/shoulder, based on poor-quality misinformation in very large quantities.

"Who does the EPO actually work for?"In a newly-circulated communication, the CSC (elected staff representation basically) shares an item on "interferences in competencies of Divisions" (targeting the Committee on Patent Law or PLC). In its own words:

The Committee on Patent Law (PLC) shall advise the Administrative Council inter alia on any legal matters concerning a revision of the European Patent Convention (EPC) and on matters concerning the harmonisation of national law in the Contracting States relating to the implementation of the EPC. The 53rd meeting of this Council body took place on 24 November 2021. The Staff Committee informed the PLC about possible consequences arising from Judgment No. 4417 issued by the Administrative Tribunal of the International Labour Organization.

The Tribunal held that decisions taken by the President with respect to the law and/or procedures applicable to patent applications are not appealable by affected examiners. In the underlying case, the competent Examining Division apparently had taken the decision to refuse a patent application. The director, however, ordered the entrusted Examiner of the Division to issue a communication under Article 94(3) EPC. The Tribunal did not examine whether said order was lawful but simply declined jurisdiction because it allegedly concerned a decision with respect to patent procedures.

Examiners can thus not approach the Tribunal about potentially unlawful interferences in their competencies as members of Divisions. Nor can they appeal before the Boards of Appeal. In conclusion, examiners have no means of legal redress against potentially unlawful orders given by someone from management outside a Division to one or all of its members.

Therefore, one may also question whether decisions in examination and opposition proceedings are always taken by the competent body as foreseen in the EPC. As this affects not only the work of examiners but possibly national invalidity proceedings as well, the Staff Committee referred in its intervention in detail to the possible legal gap and the associated potential of violations of the law. The electronic tools currently used in examination and opposition proceedings make the situation even worse, since for example authentication of communications and decisions hardly meet the standards usually foreseen in Europe. Furthermore, the tools do not guarantee the confidentiality of the debate within a Division.


Here is the accompanying document about an intervention dated a fortnight ago:



53rd PLC, 24.11.2021

Manuscript for the intervention of the Staff Representation under point any other business

Staff representation has the duty to make the PLC aware of a possible legal gap affecting examiners carrying out their duties as members of examining and opposition Divisions and which might have a bearing on the validity of EPO patents.

In a recent Judgment of the Administrative Tribunal of the ILO, Judgement No. 4417, the Tribunal held that decisions taken by the President with respect to the law and/or procedures applicable to patent applications are not appealable by affected examiners as they do not adversely affect staff members.

This is particularly remarkable since Judgment No. 4417 relates to a case, where the competent examining Division apparently had taken the decision to refuse a patent application. However, the director ordered the entrusted Examiner of the Division to issue a communication under Article 94(3) EPC instead, which eventually has been sent to the applicant.

The Staff Representation takes the view that such interferences in the Examining Divisions’ decisions amounts to a violation of several Articles of the EPC, inter alia Articles 15, 18, 94 and 97 EPC and, since the communication under Article 94(3) EPC presumably was sent for the examining Division and with the entrusted Examiner’s seal, also Rule 113(1) EPC.

Concerning the use of the Divisions’ seal the EPO Boards of Appeal decision J 16/17 may be cited wherein the Board found that Rule 113(1) EPC, according to which decisions from the European Patent Office must be signed by and state the name of the employee responsible, is not just a mere formality but an essential procedural step in the decision-taking process since the name and the signature serve to identify the decision's authors and express that they unconditionally assume responsibility for its content. This is to prevent arbitrariness and abuse and to ensure that the competent body has taken the decision. The Boards of Appeal furthermore ruled that any violation of the requirement pursuant to Rule 113(1) EPC amounts to a substantial procedural violation and renders the decision erroneous.

Unfortunately the Administrative Tribunal did not examine at all whether the order of the director was lawful but, as already mentioned, simply declined jurisdiction as it allegedly concerned a decision with respect to patent procedures.

On the other hand the Boards of Appeal are not competent to examine such cases, too.

As a result it appears that neither the Tribunal nor the Boards of Appeal can be called by examiners in such cases to examine whether unlawful interferences have taken place or unlawful orders have been given to Divisions’ members.

In conclusion examiners have no means of legal redress against unlawful orders given by somebody from management outside the examining or opposition Division to one or all of a Division’s members concerning patent procedures. Moreover, examiners even have to accept that their signature is misused and that the public as well as the patent applicants can be misled about the decisions’ authors.

It is noted, that the case dealt with in Judgment No. 4417 is not the only case of interferences with Divisions’ responsibilities and orders to Divisions, which Staff Representation is aware of.

With the electronic tools nowadays used in the examination and opposition proceedings the situation has become even worse since it is questionable whether the minimum standards usually foreseen in Europe for electronic authentication and signature are met.

It can therefore at present not be ensured that decisions in examination and opposition proceedings are always taken by the competent body. This not only affects the working conditions of the examiners but might also have a bearing in national invalidity proceedings.

In order to close the legal gap outlined here and to protect the Organisation’s far reaching immunity from national law, Staff Representation urges the Patent Law Committee

- to review the situation, - to ensure that the patent applicants and the public are transparently informed about the examination and opposition proceedings, in particular about all persons involved in each step of the patent granting procedure, as well as about all internal instructions and influences on the Divisions’ decisions, - and to ensure that there is independent jurisdiction available for examiners if they consider an interference with the responsibilities of the Divisions or a specific order to members of a Division being unlawful.


Tribunals at the EPO have long failed to function, but media controlled by patent litigation firms won't speak about it because their business depends on perpetuating the status quo instead of correcting injustices. Moreover, "the tools do not guarantee the confidentiality of the debate within a Division," the CSC says. Yes, well... confidentiality issues go much futher; Microsoft and the US government see everything, including data and interactions between Asia and Europe. Instead of tackling the issue, the Administrative Council worked hard to cover this up a few months ago (in summer and again again in autumn). Who does the EPO actually work for?

Recent Techrights' Posts

Richard Stallman About to Give More Talks in Europe, Some Confirmed Already
In Göteborg
Justice for Wildlife
animals cannot speak to humans who hate animals
GNU Was Right 42+ Years Ago
Since then the abusive, user-hostile technology has spread like mushrooms
Almost Half of the FSFE's Money (the Fake 'FSF', Misusing the Brand) Comes From Vodafone
That money always comes with strings, even if they're invisible to most of us
 
Links 30/09/2025: Death Sentences, Internet Censorship, and Internet Shutdowns
Links for the day
Gemini Links 30/09/2025: Social Control Media and ROOPHLOCH
Links for the day
Links 30/09/2025: CERN in "Have I Been Pwned" and More Windows TCO Blunders
Links for the day
Microsoft Canonical is Selling Mass Surveillance and Back Doors as "Security for Ubuntu"
If you are looking for a GNU/Linux distro to use, just remember that Microsoft has Ubuntu in the bag
Cowboys Gonna Be Cowboys (on the Internet, They're Not a New Problem)
Boys will be boys
Cowboys of the "Left" and Cowboys of the "Right"
Don't believe the lie that this is some "leftist" thing
When Codes of Conduct Serve to Protect Criminals From Much-Deserved Scrutiny
CoCs are typically unfit for purpose because enforcement lacks context and suitable understanding of the full background (the "full story")
It Took the Open Source Initiative (OSI) 4+ Years to Address the 'Data Breach' or Data Protection Violation Reported to the California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA) in March 2025
We may never know the dialogue or its nature
Even Microsoft's Biggest Boosters (and Media Operatives) Are Turning Against Microsoft
Expect many more layoffs before the fake "results" next month
Old Isn't Always Inadequate
How many gadgets manufactured today (in 2025) will still work in 2075?
The Monkey Business of Rust People
Compatibility won't matter
Microsoft Lunduke Spreads Deliberate Lies to Incite Online Mobs
Has he lost his reading comprehension skills?
Our 19th Birthday (in Just Over 5 Weeks From Now)
We meanwhile have ongoing, solid plans to cover patent-related issues when the FSF turns 40
British GNU/Linux Distro FydeOS Tops DistroWatch
That seems like a decent site and decent effort to keep an eye on
We'll Soon Have 75,000 GemText Pages
avoid many perils of today's Web
Google Used Free Software to Build a Monopoly. Now Google Kicks Free Software to the Curb
The "G" in "Google" does not stand for GNU. It never did. It's just another greedy company.
Gemini Links 30/09/2025: Retro Hardware, Federated Fragmentation, and Nex Server Written in C
Links for the day
4 More Days Till "4 decades, 4 freedoms, 4 all users"
We are now just 4 days away from the rare anniversary
Two Months After Merging to Hide GitHub Losses Microsoft is Doing It Again (This Time Windows)
Merging those two together is not a sign of strength but a tightening of budget
Speculations About the Next Large Wave of IBM/Red Hat Layoffs
the mass layoffs are likely to happen on week 3 or 4 in October
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Monday, September 29, 2025
IRC logs for Monday, September 29, 2025
Links 29/09/2025: Opposition to Surveillance Giant Google and Conflicts Worldwide (Moldova Sides With EU)
Links for the day
Why the EPO Never Managed to Silence Us (After Over a Decade of Trying)
Firms like Mishcon de Reya and Brett Wilson LLP contribute to a bad stigma, staining the entire occupation
Links 29/09/2025: Datacenter Fires and "Too Much Internet Use Is Changing Teenage Brains"
Links for the day
Almost a Couple of Years After Microsoft Hijacked the Name 'Sudo' (to Describe Unrelated Windows Stuff) Microsoft Canonical Breaks Sudo in Ubuntu
These are vandals in "goodwill" or "security" clothing
Does the Good Law Project (GLP) Know the Director of Brett Wilson LLP Deems It OK to Endorse Violent Actions Against Trans People?
We were miffed to see this morning's report
Names Are Not Unique IDs and the UK Government's "Digital ID System" Would be a Nightmare
Digital surveillance, "apps", and worse (all the time)
What is Roy and Rianne's Righteously Royalty-free RSS Reader?
A news reader that uses OPML files and parses RSS feeds
The Free Software Foundation (FSF) Turns 40 in 5 Days
We should be talking about software freedom, not "Open Source"
It Feels Like Brett Wilson LLP Has Just Tacitly Admitted That It Defamed Me
It arguably admitted many other things by refusing to deny or address them (altogether)
Stefano Maffulli's Front Page Mentions "AI" 11 Times
They're more focused on slop (plagiarism) than sharing or Software Freedom
CMS Rot
With "modern" (bloated) content management systems (CMSs) there is a long chain of dependencies
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Sunday, September 28, 2025
IRC logs for Sunday, September 28, 2025
Slopwatch: Fake Articles About Linux 6.17 and Microsoft Meddling in Linux Development
today's Slopwatch is short because the picks are from Sunday
Gemini Links 29/09/2025: The Labor Wars and Retro
Links for the day
Links 28/09/2025: Windows TCO, Security Breaches, and Deutsche Bahn Woes
Links for the day
Datacentres Aren't Reliable for Backups
bad practices cause immeasurable levels of permanent data losses each and every day
Links 28/09/2025: Science, Censorship, and Security Incidents/Advisories
Links for the day
Gemini Links 28/09/2025: Golem and Cybertrucks
Links for the day
Links 28/09/2025: Moldova Elections, LLM Slop Failing Again to Accomplish Anything
Links for the day
Links 28/09/2025: Slop Does More Harm, Newly Released Epstein Estate Documents
Links for the day
Links 28/09/2025: Fentanylware (TikTok) 'Going Private' (the Dictator's Media Allies) and UK Mirror Lays Off More Journalists
Links for the day
A Year Ago, Only a Few Weeks After We Countersued the 'Hulk Hogan of UEFI', Our Webhost Came Under Attack
At the end of September 2024 our webhost received several threats
If Only Someone Warned Us About This...
Ubuntu is committing suicide with Rusty code
The Register - Kissing the hand that feeds it
hired to manage the publication several people connected to Microsoft, including the new Editor in Chief
The Myths of "Linux" and of "Intelligence"
As noted this morning
People Remembered GNU's Birthday (Which Helps Remind People It All Started in 1983, Not 1991)
Have the FSF and GNU earned the respect they deserve?
Slopwatch: Ponzi Schemes Promoted by Media Companies, Linux Journal Turning Its 30-Year Reputation to Dust, and Serial Slopper Brian Fagioli Plagiarising, As Usual
This bubble will end up very badly
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Saturday, September 27, 2025
IRC logs for Saturday, September 27, 2025