Bonum Certa Men Certa

IBM/Red Hat Promoting Microsoft Surveillance and Proprietary Software Instead of Freedom-Centric, Self-Hosted, Privacy-Respecting, and 'Real' GNU/Linux Servers

Video download link | md5sum 200351d9ae015457f5966b0ee418dac9 IBM Outsourcing to Microsoft Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Works 4.0



Summary: IBM is not interested in Free software and under IBM the company formerly known as Red Hat does not have a positive vision (a lot of the technical staff has already left)

THIS morning's Microsoft puff piece in a Red Hat-controlled site is just one of many examples of the company's lack of edge. It's promoting mainframe era thinking, where Microsoft instead of IBM is in control of everything.



Red Hat shilling Microsoft proprietary software and surveillance isn't a new thing, but I've decided to respond in a video today because Red Hat has become a useless company...

Yesterday Lennart Poettering pretended systemd was modular and permitted choice (this is false, everything is interconnected and is designed to work as a monolith) and it seems like IBM -- now together with Microsoft -- promotes vendor lock-in, i.e. the very opposite of freedom. "Azure cloud is a large, changing ecosystem," says the site, "and still relatively new in the context of the company's long history."

GeminispaceNo, it's very old and it is failing. It started 14 years ago and now there are layoffs. There's no compelling reasons for IBM to even bother with it...

As noted above in the video -- that's Falkon and a Gemini client (Lagrange) -- part of the problem is that Red Hat keeps recruiting from Microsoft, even for management positions. We gave an example a couple of months ago. What's more, there is cross-pollination in the patent department (e.g. Marshall Phelps) and in yesterday's article as shown in Gemini (the image on the right shows the ongoing expansion of Geminispace; we're investing an increasing amount of time in it) we showed that IBM can be just as big a bully as Microsoft when it comes to software patents.

Historically IBM has been on our side. But don't assume that's still the case. IBM is mostly trying to privatise the whole thing and to IBM the "community" is just unpaid slaves. Don't help these executives, who do not even themselves use GNU/Linux.

Recent Techrights' Posts

Links 01/11/2025: Microsoft Distributes Malware Again, Radio Free Asia Shut Down by Dictator
Links for the day
 
Links 01/11/2025: Microsoft Azure Goes Offline Again
Links for the day
November is Here, Anniversary Party This Coming Friday
Expect this site to return to its normal publication pace either by tomorrow or Monday
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Friday, October 31, 2025
IRC logs for Friday, October 31, 2025
Gemini Links 01/11/2025: Synergetic Disinformation and Software Maintenance
Links for the day
IRC Proceedings: Thursday, October 30, 2025
IRC logs for Thursday, October 30, 2025
IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, October 29, 2025
IRC logs for Wednesday, October 29, 2025
Slopwatch: Brian Fagioli, Google News, and Other LLM Slopfarms
Why does Google News keep promoting these fake articles?
Links 29/10/2025: Amazon Kept "Data Center Water Use Secret", "Abuse of Power" Against Media
Links for the day
Gemini Links 29/10/2025: "My Hardware Specs" and "Goodbye Debian…"
Links for the day
EPO Cocainegate: Feedback and Clarifications
Part III will come out soon
Links 29/10/2025: "US Military Is Destroying the Planet Beyond Imagination" and Boat Strikes Deemed Unlawful
Links for the day
Quality Comes First (Techrights Search)
It's generally working already, but we wish to polish it some more
Techrights Party Countdown
Late next week we'll be holding a party near our home