This leads to a proprietary site (they recently abandoned Free software):
The document was made on a proprietary operating system using proprietary software:
Summary: Today (or earlier this week) the Linux Foundation boasts about its "community" (Microsoft and other Linux-hostile corporations it fronts for); it probably doesn't want readers to know that its rejection of both GNU/Linux and "Open Source" is showing (the Foundation is not run by people who support Linux, they're just exploiting the brand)
Garrett was the first person to face sanctions (like muting) in our IRC channels because of his abuse; worse yet, he hijacked other people's names and then locked them out of their own accounts
People creating their own platforms means progress, whereas centralisation (like moving from blogs to social control media) is the opposite of progress
If it was googlebot, it would be possible to argue that you'd at least then get referral traffic from Google Search. With LLMs, all you get is plagiarised.
If people are willing to tolerate standard declines and enshittification (nowadays sold as "pivot to AI" or "replaced by AI" or "AI layoffs") they will pay for it some other way
