75e8b5cba1a4f1fd173acf6816ed2391
IBM Attacking Its Own Community
Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Works 4.0
THE "Big Blue" IBM decided to buy Red Hat, thinking it would buy itself a future this way. Less than half a decade later we mostly see IBM dismantling some of the biggest assets, including a community of willing volunteers (working without pay).
“They are burning a serious bridge with the developer community.”
--AnonymousAs one reader put it, the point should be that the agenda is about control; that's what RMS manifesto was about too: control. If IBM does not respect users' control, or even access to the source code, there will be trouble. To quote the reader: "IBM is in trouble because there were still a lot of people using/working on Fedora. They are burning a serious bridge with the developer community. Once they get settled in (e.g. in Devuan or Debian), there is no going back to IBM. That will in turn bite RHEL hard."
"Will we see a GNU/Linux revolution wherein people flock (back) to community-controlled (or user-centric) distros?"The video above discusses some of the latest posts and takes note that (while the video was being recorded) in IRC Ryan had announced his latest article. It seems like a lot of Fedora (or EPEL) packages are being orphaned this week. Fedora is basically collapsing and this will also impact RHEL along with its various clones. Will we see a GNU/Linux revolution wherein people flock (back) to community-controlled (or user-centric) distros? ⬆