Bonum Certa Men Certa

The SLAPPs From Microsofters Distract From Serious Copyright Infringement by Microsoft and Apparent Business Crimes

posted by Roy Schestowitz on May 16, 2025,
updated May 16, 2025

Aside from other issues, such as strangling women

oh good lord, New York? Thanks for the evidence that I've been part of the conspiracy for 20 years

Balabhadra (Alex) Graveley, Miguel de Icaza

Balabhadra (Alex) Graveley, Miguel de Icaza at dinner

The SLAPPs from Microsofters prove the Streisand Effect is real (we didn't coin this term, Mike Masnick did). We keep receiving a lot of inquiries about it and last night a very large law firm phoned us about it. They recognise something is very wrong and legal reform is imperative. It meanwhile looks like the law firm facilitating these SLAPPs is collapsing (staff leaving), so maybe it's like another Discreet Law.

As we've said right from the very start, based on the timings in particular it's not too hard to guess what's happening here. There's coordination [1, 2] and it started as soon as we were causing chaos at GitHub, for reasons other than the copyright infringement [1, 2] and strangulation of women - a taboo topic. The core issue is business abuse/crimes (e.g. possibly fraud and embezzlement, as we covered way back in 2021) - most likely the reason GitHub's CEO and his sidekick Miguel de Icaza suddenly 'left'. Months ago their "best friend" engaged in extortion (which legal professionals tell me is illegal) to compel me to remove many pages about it. I declined.

On the issue of copyright infringement (including GPL violations), "Anonymous Coward" (AC) cited and quoted Microsoft as saying: "We have incorporated filters and other technologies that are designed to reduce the likelihood that Copilots return infringing content" (Microsoft pretty much admitted it in its lobbying blog: https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2023/09/07/copilot-copyright-commitment-ai-legal-concerns/ [microsoft.com])

An associate notes, "so the infringement still goes on, it is just hidden better". Or as AC put it: "So before the filters it did infringe, and after the filters they think it'll infringe less but not stop infringing?"

So just to summarise, what these people try to censor isn't just men being arrested for crimes against women but also business crimes and the biggest GPL violations ever (Microsoft might be forced to pay close to 10 billion dollars in the class-action lawsuit).

Slop as "code" is overhyped; it works no better than traditional code reuse or leveraging interfaces (APIs, libraries and so on). Some coding experts explained this. They still do. Unconscious GPL violations via slop don't bear much real potential. As for Microsoft, some challenge the lie that programmers got replaced by automation. There are mass layoffs and many programmers got removed, according to detailed breakdowns. It's not because of "AI" that Microsoft fires so many development staff. It was a smokescreen strategically timed to distract from bad news [1, 2], including soaring debt levels. They're wasting money on falsely-marketed gimmicks, or as an associate puts it, "notice that slop generation sites and data centers are measured in megawatts or gigawatts and not useful metrics related to calculation like PFLOPs or similar. "AI" is about conspicuous consumption of wealth with the goal of not producing anything useful."

Ryan commented on this earlier on. "In my opinion," he said, ""investing" in "AI" just accelerates the decline. Instead of looking for a new business model they just stuff chatbots into things where nobody wanted them. They cost a lot to make, nobody wants them. They should be investing this money prudently into offering better business services. They're not a monopoly with the sort of things Azure is doing, so they need to spend money to make money here. "AI" is crowding this out badly, and while their business customers suffer hours-long outages and security breaches."

More recently, Ryan remarked on the waste of energy, saying: "Reminds me of Dune. That's where I picked up the concept of conspicuous consumption. When I read that when I was about 12 years old. I remember it described the desert planet and how the rich would wash their hands and then throw water on the floor for the servants to gather off the floor with cloths for their own use. But yes, conspicuous consumption is usually even worse than expecting your slaves to gather water off the floor in the middle of a desert. Because rich and upper middle class people are expected to consume, things they don't even want or need, just to make a point that you're too poor to have it. And this consumption doesn't create much of anything. Like Rolex watches, or now I guess, a trip to Disney World."

"If I have a need for something I might pay money for it. If I want something, I might pay money for it, if there's money to spare after the wants. But I don't see myself as excessively greedy or terribly swayed by marketing."

A lot of what Microsoft calls "AI" boils down to false marketing or old (not novel) things being rebranded using new and overly glorified buzzwords.

"Over the past 23 years I've usually been too poor to consider consuming much just for the hell of it," Ryan said. "Thankfully there's still public parks and libraries, for now. It's a holdover from a more civilized age."

Slop is an attack on the Commons, not a contribution to it. Some slop companies accuse of "theft" those who merely use their slop (which it itself copyright-infringing).

As Cory Doctorow put it, "these models are expensive to run. Even if a bankrupt AI company’s model and servers could be acquired for pennies on the dollar, even if the new owners could be shorn of any overhanging legal liability from looming copyright cases, even if the eye-watering salaries commanded by AI engineers collapsed, the electricity bill for each query – to power the servers and their chillers – would still make running these giant models very expensive."

He said that a lot of the current "AI" frenzy was just subsidised by VCs (like Uber was) and recalled the 90s "dotcom bubble", saying: "[...] This created a weird and often wonderful dynamic in the Bay Area, a brief respite between the go-go days of Bubble 1.0 and Bubble 2.0, a time when the cost of living plummeted in the Bay Area, as did the cost of office space, as did the cost of servers. People started making technology because it served a need, or because it delighted them, or both. Technologists briefly operated without the goad of VCs’ growth-at-all-costs spurs."

A lot of what Microsoft calls "AI" is just plagiarism disguised as "fair use" and copyright experts who oppose this from within the US administration get sacked because "AI" grifters like Scam Altman sponsored the President and inauguration bash.

This is the sort of thing Microsoft wants to distract people from.

At the end of the day we'll seek compensation for the SLAPPs, even if the perpetrators hide in a different continent (in some cabin or dad's home, where they got arrested). One of them will have to book a flight and come here later this year [1, 2] to defend himself in the High Court. His broke lawyers may not be available anymore (the money from Microsoft salaries wasn't enough; the rot has become visible) and they might not even have a licence anymore. Months ago it was dealt a blow after it had fronted for an allegedly pro-Hamas (he denies this) person flinging SLAPPs at newspapers via "Godwin Busuttil instructed by Brett Wilson LLP" (yet again, it was possible to strike out the claim, so this mostly backfired). To quote: "Against this background, I grant the defendant's application to strike out the claim." Godwin Busuttil is a colleague of the "Junior" who both Microsofters chose, not to mention they picked the same lawyer whose notoriety predates the SLAPPs against us. He appears to be leaving.

Also targeted by the same law firm [1, 2, 3] was a person who had exposed tax abuses: (Dan Neidle received SLAPPs from the same lawyer who months later did the same to both my wife and to myself)

At the first SDT trial, held in December 2024, Ashley Hurst, Head of Client Strategy at Osborne Clarke LLP, was found guilty of improperly stifling public scrutiny in relation to correspondence he sent to tax lawyer Dan Neidle when acting for ex-minister Nadhim Zahawi. Hurst’s breach of the SRA’s Code of Conduct and Principles resulted in a fine of £50,000, plus the requirement to cover the SRA’s legal costs. However, the SDT concluded that the case was not a SLAPP because “there was no attempt to prevent scrutiny of Mr Zahawi’s tax affairs per se.”

They like to accuse people who state facts of spreading "conspiracy theories"; they use the same insulting terms in their SLAPP campaigns. It is not only demeaning but also very unprofessional. Those are attempts to discredit claims (or people or whole publications) based on fictional associations or imaginary rings rather than the underlying facts.

It's just one example among many of rich (and/or corrupt, with ill-gotten wealth) people trying to silence vocal/effective/prominent critics using SLAPPs. It doesn't typically work, but it ends up costing a lot of money (which is perhaps the real intention). We'll need to fix this by illuminating the growing need for reform. British media depends on this reform. The SLAPP-chaining in our case [1, 2, 3] is a clear violation, according to prominent and renowned media lawyers. This cannot possibly end well. Two judges ("Masters") have already independently given favourable (to us) Orders. They're not blind to injustice and Microsoft money isn't on their lap, even if their computer systems and data is on Microsoft's lap.

It's not about saying wrong things, it's about saying things that 'embarrass' powerful people. Or their companies, which their wealth is tied to. For instance, for my recent articles about IBM/Red Hat I seem to have enraged IBM's rapidly-eroding PR team and have attracted trolls/AstroTurfers. They're infesting online forums (centralised censorship hubs), trying to 'deplatform' any discussion of the real issues, typically the ad hominem way [1, 2].

But "that's mostly good," an associate opines, "maybe it is useful to keep pounding the drum about how they used to know how to make money, specifically through FOSS (Linux) investments. Their ideological maneuvers against FOSS in favor of IBM's own competitor, Microsoft, only hurts IBM's own ability to make money."

This week Red Hat's site is selling Microsoft. A decade ago Red Hat was selling secure boot for Microsoft, implanting it inside Linux, the kernel. IBM's Red Hat then tried to shut the lid. The people who do this now SLAPP my wife, who merely reported to the wider public the vile abuse (racist and much worse harassment) she had received.

Red Hat works for IBM. It does not work for "the community" (and hasn't for years; they're exceedingly selfish and patronising, they sell another UNIX). It's like another Novell, whose last CEO came from IBM and tried to SLAPP me. It's not that I published anything wrong, Mr. Hovsepian just alleges that it's "old" and thus should be removed (based on age; it's just reputation laundering, or begging to be 'forgotten'). It's no secret that today's search engines are polluted by LLM "summaries", slopfarms and SEO spam (marketing, not information, which games algorithms to go further up the ranks/SERPs). It's important for us to maintain reputable and accurate information even about old events. This week we test an impending search feature/facility for articles as old as 2006. We do not intend to rely on companies like Google for indexing and serving/presenting old pages of ours.

Other Recent Techrights' Posts

Our Three Lawsuits Against Microsofters Are About to Become a Lot More Relevant to GNU/Linux
The Master will easily understand why Garrett has been attacking me since 2012
Slop Is Not Intelligence and It Does Not Enhance Productivity
Like voice dictation, which cannot tell the difference between "sheet" and "shit"
 
Links 23/07/2025: Slop Patents Tackled, Slop Copyright Misuses Tackled by Politicians
Links for the day
Links 23/07/2025: Retreating From Transparency on Jeffrey Epstein, We No Longer Have Press Freedom
Links for the day
Gemini Links 23/07/2025: Piano and Food
Links for the day
New and Old
On Ageism in Tech
EPO Crimes Are Spreading to the British Court System
Society is now paying the price for failing to tackle crimes at the EPO
It's Time to Dump SharePoint and Here's What to Use Instead
Nextcloud, ownCloud, Bookstack, MediaWiki, and MediaGoblin
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, July 22, 2025
IRC logs for Tuesday, July 22, 2025
Brett Wilson LLP Has Gone Silent
Sometimes silence says more than nothing at all
Slopwatch: LinuxSecurity, Planet Ubuntu, and LinuxTechLab
some slopfarms show no remorse and they don't value their reputation at all
Links 23/07/2025: Book Bans, Storms, and Kangaroo Court for Patents Commits More Unlawful Acts of Overreach
Links for the day
Gemini Links 22/07/2025: Thinkpad and Pinephone
Links for the day
Links 22/07/2025: "Blog Restart" and Microsoft Clobbered by “ToolShell"
Links for the day
Global Warming and Global GAFAM Energy-Wasting
Burn more money (borrowed, loans), then hope the waste will somehow translate into profit?
No Compliance With the European Patent Convention (EPC) at the European Patent Office (EPO)
It's about preventing competition against this autocracy
Blue-Collar Trolls vs White-Collar Trolls
Examples of white-collar trolls
Apple Vision Pro Failed So Badly That Its Sales Are About 2,000 Times Smaller Than iPhone Sales
What's left for Apple to offer other than hype?
To Millions of People "Year of the Linux Desktop" Was Some Time in the 1990s (Bootable GNU/Linux as a Complete Operating System is Over 33 in Age)
In some sense, "year of the Linux desktop" was 33 years ago
Make No Assumptions (or Demands) About the Screen Resolution Used by Other People
There are usability aspects, aside from accessibility aspects
Why Wayland (and XWayland) Won't Solve the Key Problem It Proclaims to be Tackling (the Same Is True for Rust)
The problem isn't Wayland per se but the false promises and efforts to force everybody to move to it whilst insulting or demonising everyone who won't play along
They Don't Tell Us that 'Digitalisation' (Now Sold as "Hey Hi") Just Means Customers Become Unpaid Staff and Are Made Accountable
People are being conditioned to associate technology with something undesirable, at times even unbearable
Diplomatic Immunity Should Not Exist for Anybody
The EPO in its current form gradually 'normalises' the end of European democracy
Brett Wilson LLP Stopped Sending Me Papers When I Showed It had Sent Me Over 5 Kilograms of Legal Papers
A week ago we lodged our third lawsuit
Microsoft Mass Layoffs and Shutdowns Became the New Normal at Microsoft
Microsoft mass layoffs became a topic of everyday media coverage since May
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Has Layoffs and Microsoft Gaming/Entertainment Division Has an Uncertain Future
it's good to see all those horrible things crashing and burning
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Monday, July 21, 2025
IRC logs for Monday, July 21, 2025
FSF "Raised Almost $139,000 During This Summer Campaign"
"Thank you for making a stand against dystopia!"
Gemini Links 22/07/2025: VPS Exploited and Fear of View
Links for the day
LLM Bots vs Techrights
Slows things down a bit
New Publication Sheds Lights on Abuse of Workers at the European Patent Office (EPO)
Put in simple terms, they're killing the Office, harming remaining staff, try to hire rubber-stampers
Links 21/07/2025: Hardware, Health, and Imperialism
Links for the day
Gemini Links 21/07/2025: "When Buying Isn't Owning" and "CMS Special Edition"
Links for the day
Links 21/07/2025: Indie Web and Toxic Politics
Links for the day
[Meme] Microsoft Lawyers Throwing Stones in Glass Houses
threatened me with bankruptcy
Google "AI Overview" is Not AI and Not Overview
do not be misled; what Google does isn't smart, it's just ripping off the sites it already crawled for as long as 27 years
Making the Case to Dump Microsoft and GAFAM for National and Digital Sovereignty
"Sovereignty is difficult"
The Tactics of the Opposition (Microsoft Lunduke): Associate With K00ks, Throw in Vaccines to Muddy the Water
Who stands to gain from this?
Europe's Second-Largest Institution (EPO) and Largest Patent Monopoly Office Needs More Transparency, Not Less Transparency
In the EPO, what good are elections when one candidate literally bribes all the voters?
How Not to Report News About Microsoft
This pattern of misreporting is so widespread that it's hard to believe it's not intentional
Computer Science is Under Attack, They Want Everyone to be a Consumer
If people can no longer acquire Computer Science education and real Computer Science experience, they will not know how to control their own digital destiny or emancipate the very same universities that now control the syllabus and instead of teaching Computer Science encourage the outsourcing of systems
The Best Tools Are the Simplest Tools
There's a hidden message here about the merits of sticking with X
Ofcom Online Safety Group Speaks of Protecting Women Online, Will Brett Wilson LLP Ever Listen?
They've essentially became like the Taliban's "burka police"
Social Control Media Relies on Advertisers, So It'll Always Be Hostile Towards Free Software
Sales, sales, sales
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Sunday, July 20, 2025
IRC logs for Sunday, July 20, 2025
Fragmentation of Data
Life is too short to "hoard" data
In Defence of "Spinning Rust"
Just because something is "old" (or older) doesn't mean it ought to become extinct
Using Free Software to Prepare Legal Documents
LibreOffice is openly complaining about OOXML as an obstacle
Tech and Technology Are Not the Same Anymore
"Are you into tech, Sir?"
Our Articles About SLAPPs Receive Recognition and Interest
This week we shall continue writing about the 3 lawsuits we filed