Bonum Certa Men Certa

EPO Directors Would be Wise to Rebel Against Team Campinos While They Still Have the Job

Everybody demoted and disempowered except Team Campinos (below)

Team Campinos



Summary: As the EPO continues its bold journey towards dictatorship (where presidencies are passed between friends and 'circles' are former colleagues or close confidants) Techrights urges those who have power to speak out -- e.g. EPO judges and Directors -- to do something before it's too late

THE European Patent Office's (EPO) Presidency, Team Campinos/Battistelli (more or less the same people, same views, similar policies and identical nationality) is expanding with friends and family (some of the above are spouses and grossly under-qualified). Meanwhile, as a direct result of this institutional corruption, everybody else suffers.



A decade and a half ago I merely protested against software patents in Europe; I was a Computer Science graduate at the time and was working on software (computer vision) towards a doctorate degree. Even back then I argued with some professors about software patents, which they insisted were possible to obtain in the UK (contrary to the EPC). The EPO no longer cares what the EPC says; it grants patents on algorithms based on semantic nonsense like "technical effect" and buzzwords like "AI" (hey hi). It's also granting patents on life/nature in defiance of Parliament (as if the EPO is positioned above the EU itself and decides European policies behind closed doors, based on autocrats and their friends, recruited based on connections/nepotism). This utterly sick situation severely harms Europe's competitiveness. Even the US is already leaving software patents behind (USPTO grapples with 35 U.S.C. ۤ 101).

As recently as yesterday Kluwer Patent Blog, a major patent maximalist, published yet another article about European Patents that perish. Litigation by American giants, using European Patents, turns out to be abusive, thuggish, frivolous. What do their lawsuits target? Generics, i.e. life savers. And "the District Court decided there was no infringement, not even by equivalence." Here's more:

Pemetrexed, yet again: last Wednesday the District Court of The Hague decided on Eli Lilly’s claim that Fresenius infringed its ‘pemetrexed disodium’ patent with a generic product that does not contain pemetrexed disodium. Going against the current, and after a deep diver in the prosecution file, the District Court decided there was no infringement, not even by equivalence.

The basic facts of the widespread Pemetrexed litigation will be well-known to most readers by now. Eli Lilly’s patent (EP 1 313 508) has a Swiss form claim relating to the “use of pemetrexed disodium” in combination with vitamin B12 for inhibiting tumor growth. Different generic companies do not use pemetrexed disodium in their product, but another form of pemetrexed (e.g. pemetrexed diacid, as in Fresenius’ product). Do these generic products fall within the scope of Lilly’s ‘pemetrexed disodium’ claim?

That question was put before numerous European patent judges over the past years.


This attack on a generic product is one of many; the UPC would only exacerbate things (if anything like it ever became a reality, which we doubt). There are lives at stake here. Yes, people would die if these generics were removed from the market and producers of such generic medicine already lose a lot of money in these failed court battles; intimidating and weakening them with weak 'cases' is perhaps the goal as Eli Lilly has very deep pockets, unlike theirs. This isn't about justice; it's bullying.

EPO managers with consciousness ought to do something about it. Attending protests, which will probably come soon, is one option. Leaking material to us is another. Following our latest EPO leak one reader noted, "what a coincidence BIT also means Bureau International du Travail, in other words ILO. You may want to see the scrubbed names [and] therefore here [is] a complete version..."

ILO might receive some appeals from them one day (e.g. if they get laid off* without actually committing any offense).

"I need to carefully think if (or when) these names become relevant," I responded to this reader. "Their subordinates might not like them, but they can form an alliance of convenience against the bad direction the Office has taken. Many would be former examiners."

I've compared the names listed at the top (Team Campinos) to the ones below; spectacularly there's no overlap, so in other words the people who are in effect being cautioned (or pushed one foot out the door) are those not in the 'circle' of Campinos. Coincidence? It's hard not to compare this to Donald Trump's self-assimilation tactics in the White House. Here's the full letter:

New BIT organisation and staff changes

02.05.2019

Implementation of new BIT organisation - several changes of PDs and Directors

Dear colleagues,

The new Business IT organisation came into life on 1 May 2019. BIT comes with a very different structure, a new leadership team and a very ambitious plan, as reflected in the draft SP2023 that you may have had the opportunity to browse. A leadership team, however, is only the tip of the iceberg: a fully functional BIT requires everyone's contribution and engagement. As we said at the beginning of the year, we will leave nobody behind on this journey.

With the implementation of the new BIT organisation as of 1 May, we would like to inform you about the following staff changes:

Under the direct responsibility of PD 4.6 Diego Eguidazu Alonso (CIO):

Mr Alain Lambert as Principal Advisor; Mr John Selkirk as Director IT Operations; Ms Catherine Eder as Director ad personam in charge of Change Management.

Under the direct responsibility of PD 4.5 Angel Aledo Lopez (CTO):

Mr John Bambridge as Principal Advisor; Mr Jean-Marc Janyszek as Director IT Architecture; Mr Yvan de la Fuente as Director IT Patent Granting Process; Mr Domenico Golzio as Director ad personam.

In the Directorate IT Operations (D 4.6.3):

Mr Michel Fombellida Lopez as Director ad personam in the Dept End User Computing (Dept 4.6.3.4); Mr Ian Wood as Director ad personam in the Dept Change and Release Management (Dept 4.6.3.2).

In the Directorate IT Search and Patent Granting Process (D 4.5.3):

Mr Miguel Albrecht as Director in charge of his current directorate (Dept 4.5.3.8); Mr Aloïse Fuchs as Director ad personam in the Dept Business Partners (Dept 4 .5.3.1); Mr Sytse De Jonge as Director ad personam in the Dept Business Partners; Mr Salvatore Chiarizia as Director ad personam in the Dept Business Partners; Mr Auke Hoekstra as Director ad personam in the Dept Patent Grant Products (Dept 4 .5.3.6); Mr Graham Day as Director ad personam in the Dept Patent Grant Products.

In the Directorate IT Architecture (D 4.5.1):

Mr Marc Guilleaume as Director ad personam in the Dept Business Analysis (Dept 4.5.1.1); Mr Giovanni Calamida as Director ad personam in the Dept Business Analysis.

In the Directorate IT Cooperation (D 4.5.2):

Mr Robert Gemmell as Director ad personam in the Dept National Patent Offices Business Partners (Dept 4.5.2.1); Mr Yves Grandjean as Director ad personam in the Dept National Patent Offices Business Partners; Mr Paul Schwander as Director ad personam in the Dept National Patent Offices Business Partners.

In the Directorate Corporate IT (D 4.6.1):

Mr Christian Baetzner as Director ad personam in the Dept Document and Content Management (Dept 4.6.1.3); Mr Giuseppe Falco as Director ad personam in the Dept SAP Centre of Excellence (Dept 4.6.1.1).

In the Directorate IT Planning (D 4.6.2):

Mr Lodewijk De Kock as Director ad personam in the Dept Risk Management (Dept 4.6.2.2); Mr Christophe Lintz as Director ad personam in the Dept IT Budgeting and Controlling (Dept 4.6.2.5).

The ad interim for the Director IT Cooperation (D 4.5.2) will be covered by the Chief Technology Officer until further notice.

The Chief Information Officer will ensure the ad interim function for the Director IT Planning (D 4.6.2) and the Director Corporate IT (D 4.6.1) until further notice.

We would like to thank all of our colleagues mentioned above for having accepted these new challenges and wish them all the best in their new functions.

Nellie Simon Vice-President DG 4

Steve Rowan Vice-President DG 1

Back

02.05.19 | Author: Nellie Simon - Vice-President DG 4, Steve Rowan - Vice-President DG 1



The above people are in effect being demoted; in Zagreb we saw Battistelli's 'bulldog' using similar tactics. He had assigned/relocated people whom he did not like to imaginary/temporary/volatile positions with questionable job titles before rendering them obsolete (making the redundancy seem impersonal). Battistelli later used the same tactics to drive out people inside the EPO (people who opposed him). Recall Lionel Baranes and others. Remember how Battistelli rigged the presidency's succession process against Cuno Tarfusser. The EPO of the past decade or so makes Europe look just about as corrupt as China or Russia (which are notorious for similar things). ____ * The "hoax" financial study (the CSC called it that) suggests they plan major cuts -- and ones that aren't needed. They even hire lawyers in preparation for something to that effect. It certainly looks like the EPO is nowadays preparing to lay off staff, maybe even sympathetic (to examiners' gripes) Directors.

Recent Techrights' Posts

The Myth of an Aging (or Dying) GNU/Linux Leadership
Self-fulfilling prophecies as a tactic?
There's Nothing "Funny" About Attacking Free Speech and Software Freedom
persistent focus on the principal issues is very important
GNU/Linux Adoption in Africa, a Passageway Towards Freedom From Neo-Colonialism
Digi(tal)-Colonialism and/or Techolonialism are a thing. Can Africa flee the trap?
 
Shooting the Messenger Using Bribes and Secrecy Bonds
We seem to live in a world where accountability for the rich and well-connected barely exists anymore
Links 06/12/2023: Many More December Layoffs
Links for the day
IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, December 05, 2023
IRC logs for Tuesday, December 05, 2023
PipeWire 1.0: Linux audio comes of age
Once upon a time, serious audio users like musicians and audio engineers had real trouble with Linux
This is How 'Linux' Foundation Presents Linux to the World
Right now it even picks Windows over Linux in some cases
Links 05/12/2023: Microsoft's Chatbot as Health Hazard
Links for the day
Professor Eben Moglen Explained How Software Patent Threats Had Changed Around 2014 (Alice Case) and What Would Happen Till 2025
clip aged reasonably well
CNN Contributes to Demolition of the Open Web
Reprinted with permission from Ryan Farmer
Eben Moglen on Encryption and Anonymity
The alternate net we need, and how we can build it ourselves
Yet More Microsofters Inside the Board of Mozilla (Which Has Just Outsourced Firefox Development to Microsoft's Proprietary Prison)
Do you want a browser controlled (and spied on) by such a company?
IRC Proceedings: Monday, December 04, 2023
IRC logs for Monday, December 04, 2023
GNU/Linux Now Exceeds 3.6% Market Share on Desktops/Laptops, According to statCounter
things have changed for Windows in China
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news
Links 05/12/2023: Debt Brake in Germany and Layoffs at Condé Nast (Reddit, Wired, Ars Technica and More)
Links for the day
[Meme] Social Control Media Giants Shaping Debates on BSDs and GNU/Linux
listening to random people in Social Control Media
Reddit (Condé Nast), Which Has Another Round of Layoffs This Month, Incited People Against GNU/Linux Users (Divide and Rule, It's 2003 All Over Again!)
Does somebody (perhaps a third party) fan the flames?
Who Will Hold the Open Source Initiative (OSI) Accountable for Taking Bribes From Microsoft and Selling Out to Enable/Endorse Massive Copyright Infringement?
it does Microsoft advocacy
Using Gemini to Moan About Linux and Spread .NET
Toxic, acidic post in Gemini
Web Monopolist, Google, 'Pulls a Microsoft' by Hijacking/Overriding the Name of Competitor and Alternative to the Web
Gulag 'hijacking' 'Gemini'
Links 04/12/2023: Mass Layoffs at Spotify (Debt, Losses, Bubble) Once Again
Links for the day
ChatGPT Hype/Vapourware (and 'Bing') Has Failed, Google Maintains Dominance in Search
a growing mountain of debt and crises
[Meme] Every Real Paralegal Knows This
how copyright law works
Forging IRC Logs and Impersonating Professors: the Lengths to Which Anti-Free Software Militants Would Go
Impersonating people in IRC, too
IRC Proceedings: Sunday, December 03, 2023
IRC logs for Sunday, December 03, 2023
GNU/Linux Popularity Surging, So Why Did MakeUseOf Quit Covering It About 10 Days Ago?
It's particularly sad because some of the best articles about GNU/Linux came from that site, both technical articles and advocacy-centric pieces
Links 04/12/2023: COVID-19 Data Misused Again, Anti-Consumerism Activism
Links for the day