EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

03.30.08

Microsoft’s Latest OOXML Corruptions in Germany, Croatia, Norway

Posted in Europe, Formats, Fraud, ISO, Microsoft, Open XML at 12:51 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

OOXML is fraud

Get a load of Groklaw’s most recent report. Wow. Just wow. Who is Microsoft kidding and is anyone still surprised that multiple investigations are being launched to study the many abuses?

If Microsoft gets this OOXML format “approved”, it will be by irregularities in the voting, it seems. Here’s more on what happened in Germany and a report on what is being called a scandal in Norway. And another odd process in Croatia.

If you can read German, here’s the story on what happened there. For those who can’t, when they went to vote, they were not allowed to vote disapprove, so the choice was to approve or to abstain. It was a tie, 6:6, which means no consensus. So under the rules I’ve read, that would have meant that they should send a vote of Abstain.

But surprise, surprise!! A solution helpful to Microsoft: the representative from DIN decided to cast a vote, which isn’t the process. DIN isn’t supposed to vote, because it’s supposed to advise. But this, they rationalized, was a vote not about whether to accept OOXML on the basis of *technical* issues, but whether to accept the approval suggestion of the technical committee. So DIN voted to accept DIN’s suggestion. Hence Germany ends up in the Approve column. I know. No doubt there will be objections filed.

Norway’s at least as bad. Here’s an article from Norway, and the translation of the title of the article is, “Scandal in Standards Norway. I didn’t write that headline. They did. And here’s why. The article says there should be an investigation of the irregularities there, because while there were only two votes to approve, from Microsoft and a business partner, Statoilhydro, and all the others voted no, 21 votes, they approved anyway. Here’s how they shuffled the deck in Norway. So they put everyone out of the room, and Standards Norway, three people were left in the room, and they usurped the decision and made it their business to decide to approve anyway.

Unbelievable. If it was happening in only one country, you might think it was local difficulties. But when it happens in place after place, one can only conclude that Microsoft, although outnumbered in a fair vote, has sufficient clout behind the scenes to shove this format into the world’s mouth and hold its mouth closed by force until the world is compelled to swallow. Remember that Microsoft memo that surfaced in the Comes v. Microsoft litigation? The one about how to stack a panel discussion at conferences so it would be favorable to Microsoft? The key was to get to be the moderator.

One thing is certain. Unless ISO steps up and fixes this mess, it will lose the world’s respect, and rightly so. Either the rules mean something, or they don’t, but if they don’t standards don’t mean anything either.

Groklaw contains many pointers to back with evidence. Further to this, consider the following set of posts (ordered by precedence).

Germany:

Norway:

Croatia:

There are several more posts and summaries which can be found by following the links or searching the Web site.

Andy Updegrove keeps track of the votes, but regardless of the outcome, antitrust issues, The European Commission and several other factors are likely to stand in the way. We shall see what ‘propaganda’ Microsoft unleashes regardless of ethical/legal breaches, probably using a one-sided press release that surely mentions none of the abuse. We saw that in September, despite the fact they had lost.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

27 Comments

  1. LinuxIsFun said,

    March 30, 2008 at 1:11 am

    Gravatar

    Whats the use of investigations, the crime has already been committed. They will just pay the money and get away with it again.

    There is nothing called Interoperability in Microsoft world.

  2. Roy Schestowitz said,

    March 30, 2008 at 1:14 am

    Gravatar

    This may be true, but the “Microsoft” brand has sunk like no other brand, partly because of incidents such as these.

  3. SubSonica said,

    March 30, 2008 at 4:59 am

    Gravatar

    This is comment sumarises the fundamental roots of the problem and why Microsoft is fighting to death for the ISO approval: They are fighting for survival here, don’t forget it: as described by a commenter in groklaw (remember I always argument that OOXML is one of the two fundamental pillars of Microsoft curresnt strategy to mantain their monopoly lock-in over the whole IT business and environment, the other being software patents, of wich there are plentiful in OOXML:
    http://www.noooxml.org/patents):

    OOXML Vote: Irregularities in Germany & Croatia and a Call for an Investigation of Norway
    Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, March 29 2008 @ 03:08 PM EDT
    They don’t need it to. If they get their standard, and then the EU courts bash

    them down two years later, they don’t care. They’ll pay a $100 million fine
    and go on their merry way, because they’ll have:

    1) Secured Office’s monopoly for another 5 years at least.
    2) Have destroyed the ISO’s credibility and the credibility of standards
    processes everywhere.

    (1) is the obvious money-maker for them: A continuation of the Office
    monopoly means that they can spend several years trying to innovate while
    OpenOffice and the rest spend their time trying to get decent OOXML
    compatibility (which is essentially a lost cause). A few years from now, when
    OpenOffice has that compatibility (to some degree), Office14 or 15 will be
    out.

    (2) is also a major coup for them. If people stop trusting standards bodies,
    then Microsoft wins. Standards break lock-ins, so Microsoft would love to
    damage ISO’s credibility. Doing so also hurts W3C and other standards
    groups by association.

    However, if Microsoft loses and this goes to the normal track, they’ll be in
    trouble, because they’ll have won a lot of ill will, and this’ll be moving along

    that track when the EU catches up with them.

  4. LinuxIsFun said,

    March 30, 2008 at 6:26 am

    Gravatar

    Even google is no better. All their software is closed source (talk, desktop search…)

    All their search algorithms are closed and patented.

    But they are much better than Microsoft. They don’t go about damaging the eco-system like microsoft. Atleast they follow and add to the standards in a better and a responsible way.

    Microsoft wont last too long. They are just a bully.

  5. Roy Schestowitz said,

    March 30, 2008 at 6:32 am

    Gravatar

    SubSonica,

    It’s a very pessimistic view. Microsoft won’t last that long as a dominant company.

  6. Victor Soliz said,

    March 30, 2008 at 6:50 am

    Gravatar

    Bah, this is utter BS, in Norway OOXML won because it got 2 out of 23 votes… and unless there are unannounced surprises, OOXML will get the approval by exactly ONE vote! This means that if any of those latest P countries who suddenly changed their vote to approval didn’t do it OOXML would fail. Thanks Norway standards, fuck you.

    Although Norway is the worst case, I can’t think of a single of the P members that changed their decision to YES to have actually based it on, at the very least, a decent vote. Money can definitely buy you international standards, I am now unable to even think of something money can’t buy…

  7. CoolGuy said,

    March 30, 2008 at 7:14 am

    Gravatar

    I am now unable to even think of something money can’t buy…

    - Life
    - Peaceful sleep
    - Happiness

  8. Roy Schestowitz said,

    March 30, 2008 at 9:53 am

    Gravatar

    Victor, this is not over yet. Microsoft’s aggression will cost it a lot and if you stick around and help us gather evidence, more justice will be served.

    The important news and the good news is that we were able not only to see but also to show just how corrupt this whole process has been. While Murdoch’s Cathedral is unlikely to publish anything about the abuses, it’s not the general public that matters as much as the CIOs, many of whom have become familiar with this debacle and some of whom have sworn to no longer deal with Microsoft. Keep on bringing out truth and trust the regulators who will do their thing. It’s their job. There’s no room for bitterness if it only becomes a distraction and an emotional provocation.

  9. CoolGuy said,

    March 30, 2008 at 10:35 am

    Gravatar

    What does Bill Gates or Microsoft achive by doing all this ??

  10. Roy Schestowitz said,

    March 30, 2008 at 10:38 am

    Gravatar

    The next generation of lockin. Lock-in 2.0. It involves a new seemingly open stack that contains XAML, OOXML, XPS, REST, etc. It also forms the basis for a software patent strategy, its main target being the GPL.

  11. Victor Soliz said,

    March 30, 2008 at 11:24 am

    Gravatar

    Regarding not over yet : http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=504276&cid=22906868

  12. Roy Schestowitz said,

    March 30, 2008 at 11:30 am

    Gravatar

    More promising IMO would be to file an appeal on the grounds of the WTO GPA (Government Procurement Agreement) and/or antitrust considerations, and at the same time file a lawsuit seeking a court order against ISO and IEC that the appeal shall be granted.

    Brilliant, if true (and if it materialises).

  13. CoolGuy said,

    March 30, 2008 at 11:38 am

    Gravatar

    Only thing that m$ has been successful previously is at Windows OS. They were lucky to have no competition in that market.

    That is soon ending with Mac OS and Linux.

  14. CoolGuy said,

    March 30, 2008 at 11:41 am

    Gravatar

    I think Groklaw should take this up !!

  15. Roy Schestowitz said,

    March 30, 2008 at 11:40 am

    Gravatar

    What about Office (Windows integration/bundling being a crucial part of it)?

    “I am convinced we have to use Windows – this is the one thing they don’t have. We have to be competitive with features, but we need something more — Windows integration.”

    Jim Allchin, Microsoft

  16. Roy Schestowitz said,

    March 30, 2008 at 11:42 am

    Gravatar

    Antitrust challenge?

  17. CoolGuy said,

    March 30, 2008 at 11:46 am

    Gravatar

    They are able to such a over price boltware office suite is only because of Windows platform lock they have.

    Remove windows and their entire house of cards falls apart.

  18. Roy Schestowitz said,

    March 30, 2008 at 11:48 am

    Gravatar

    it’s quite the opposite, I think. Remove the Office cash cow (or introduce ODF) and the Windows monopoly falls apart. It’s Office that keeps many people locked in, despite Wine.

  19. CoolGuy said,

    March 30, 2008 at 12:06 pm

    Gravatar

    DirectX also comes into into picture. Gamers cannot switch since most of the games are Windows only. Everything is so tightly integrate…

    I suppose it all starts with Windows and then goes upwards..Windows is the base of all. The core is windows. Bottom to top integration…

    Major monopolies are the ones who own the entire chain…its very hard to compete with them. The ones who are at the bottom of this process…are the real rulers. Think about it…they control everything that builds upon them.

    Intel -> hardware. They own the entire consumer CPU business or most of it.

  20. CoolGuy said,

    March 30, 2008 at 12:22 pm

    Gravatar

    My predictions in 5 years :

    Windows 7 or whatever that comes out after some 5 years is going to suck even more…

    Apple is going to have 50% desktop market share.

    Linux is going to have 30% in desktop and will own most of the server with BSD variants and more than 50% of mobile.

    Windows will be like 20% and going downhill.

  21. Roy Schestowitz said,

    March 30, 2008 at 12:13 pm

    Gravatar

    Intel is very dominant in desktops and laptops with x86, but bear in mind that it account for less than 2% of all the CPUs. ARM has a far larger share.

  22. Roy Schestowitz said,

    March 30, 2008 at 12:30 pm

    Gravatar

    Windows 7 or whatever that comes out after some 5 years is going to suck even more…

    It already looks very grim and I will gladly write a post about this, along with compelling proof if you wish.

    Windows will be like 20% and going downhill.

    The tipping point is Microsoft’s financial problems, but it’s hard to predict where it goes from there. Politics (and by their very nature — corruption) will play a role also. I think that sites like Groklaw and ever-growing bodies like the FSF will play an increasing role in this.

  23. CoolGuy said,

    March 30, 2008 at 12:36 pm

    Gravatar

    I am worried that after RMS the FSF will get sold out like the OSI by the insiders. See how they did it with OOXML and every other thing. Money is a very strong motivating factor.

    People running the FSF will be bought and broken by M$. Its only because of RMS the FSF is working. Without him its hard to see where FSF will go…

  24. Roy Schestowitz said,

    March 30, 2008 at 12:41 pm

    Gravatar

    Have you got any evidence to justify this concern? I know of nobody in the FSF who sympathises with Microsoft. Moglen visited Redmond for the benefit of Samba developers, but he is far, far from being a fan or an apologist, As for Stallman, he can be trusted for good. You can’t fool him.

  25. CoolGuy said,

    March 30, 2008 at 12:51 pm

    Gravatar

    All though there are good people in the OSI/FSF but the bad ones are far more and they will control the direction. The good ones will simply be out numbered.

    See the ISO. Although there are lot of credible people in the ISO they couldn’t do a thing and just kept watching how ISO was mauled by Microsoft right in front of their eyes.

    See how its happening in Gnome also. And how frustrated we are that we cant do a thing about it…same things are going to happen at FSF I guess…

    Check Matt. No one could stop him from inviting M$ to the the OSBC.

    Place a few wrong people in the board and then they take the entire thing down along with them.

  26. Roy Schestowitz said,

    March 30, 2008 at 12:58 pm

    Gravatar

    Well, that rule applies to several companies which immediately come to mind as recent examples: Google, Yahoo, Nokia, Vodafone, XenSource, Novell…

    It’s hard to watch in which direction staff is moving and who is having lunch with whom.

  27. Victor Soliz said,

    March 30, 2008 at 6:18 pm

    Gravatar

    Games don’t matter, I am a PC gamer and all but really, most gamers are console gamers and most PC gamers are casual gamers, the guys depending so hard on the latest PC 3d games are a minority . And they also fall within the teen geek category so they can really deal with WINE.

    The FSF is the FSF I doubt they would sell out. As a matter of fact OSI didn’t either, sure they approved MS’ lame licenses but that comes from MS yet again gaming the system, the OSI was unable to give a good reason not to approve the lame licenses, and this is mostly a problem the “open source” definition got from the start, rather than OSI deciding to sell out.

    At least we later heard from OSI about how MS’ open source and protection is bollocks and their public statement against OOXML.

    -
    MS can buy a lot of people, but think to yourself, has the MS opposition been reduced? Ever since the Novell deal I am noticing that there’s more and more opposition, and for every person MS buys there enter two guys who wouldn’t let MS come out. It is amazing how we currently are full of information about how MS got its votes that it is impossible for MS to escape a negative opinion, just take a look at their brand perception.

What Else is New


  1. Patents on Computer Software and Plants in the United States Indicative of Systemic Error

    The never-ending expansion of patent scope has meant that patent law firms generally got their way at the patent office; can the courts react fast enough (before confidence in patents and/or public support for patents is altogether shattered)?



  2. Yesterday's Misleading News From Team UPC and Its Aspiring Management of the Unified Patent Court (UPC)

    The Unified Patent Court (UPC) enthusiasts — i.e. those looking to financially gain from it — continue to wrestle with logic, manipulate words and misrepresent the law; yesterday we saw many law firms trying to make it sound as though the UPC is coming to the UK even though this isn’t possible and UPC as a whole is likely already dead



  3. Time for the European Commission to Investigate EPO Corruption Because It May be Partly or Indirectly Connected to EU-IPO, an EU Agency

    The passage of the top role at the EU-IPO from António Campinos to Christian Archambeau would damage confidence in the moral integrity of the European Council; back room deals are alleged to have occurred, implicating corrupt Battistelli



  4. Links 17/7/2018: Catfish 1.4.6 Released, ReactOS 0.4.9, Red Hat's GPL Compliance Group Grows

    Links for the day



  5. Links 16/7/2018: Linux 4.18 RC5, Latte Dock v0.8, Windows Back Doors Resurface

    Links for the day



  6. Alliance for US Startups and Inventors for Jobs (USIJ) Misleads the US Government, Pretending to Speak for Startups While Spreading Lies for the Patent Microcosm

    In the United States, which nowadays strives to raise the patent bar, the House Small Business Committee heard from technology firms but it also heard from some questionable front groups which claim to support "startups" and "jobs" (but in reality support just patents on the face of it)



  7. 'Blockchain', 'Cloud' and Whatever Else Gets Exploited to Work Around 35 U.S.C. § 101 (or the EPC) and Patent Algorithms/Software

    Looking for a quick buck or some low-quality patents (which courts would almost certainly reject), opportunists carry on with their gold rush, aided by buzzwords and hype over pretty meaningless things



  8. PTAB Defended by the EFF, the R Street Institute and CCIA as the Number of Petitions (IPRs) Continues to Grow

    Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) inter partes reviews (IPRs) come to the rescue when patently-bogus patents are used, covering totally abstract concepts (like software patents do); IPRs continue to increase in number and opponents of PTAB, who conveniently cherry-pick Supreme Court (SCOTUS) decisions, can't quite stop that



  9. IAM/Joff Wild May Have Become a de Facto Media Partner of the Patent Troll iPEL

    Invitation to trolls in China, courtesy of the patent trolls' lobby called "IAM"; this shows no signs of stopping and has become rather blatant



  10. Cautionary Tale: ILO Administrative Tribunal Cases (Appeals) 'Intercepted' Under António Campinos

    The ILO Administrative Tribunal (ILO-AT) is advertised by the EPO's management as access to justice, but it's still being undermined quite severely to the detriment of aggrieved staff



  11. Asking the USPTO to Comply With 35 U.S.C. § 101 is Like Asking Pentagon Officials to Pursue Real, Persistent Peace

    Some profit from selling weapons, whereas others profit from patent grants and litigation; what's really needed right now is patent sanity and adherence to the public interest as well as the law itself, e.g. Supreme Court (SCOTUS) decisions



  12. BT and Sonos Are Still Patent Bullies, Seeing Patents as a Backup Plan

    The companies seeking to complement their business (or make up for their demise) using patents are still suing rivals while calling that litigation "research and development" (the same old euphemism)



  13. Jim Skippen, a Longtime Patent Troll, Admits That the Trolling Sector is Collapsing

    Canada's biggest patent troll (WiLAN) bar BlackBerry doesn't seem to be doing too well as its CEO leaves the domain altogether



  14. From East Asia to the Eastern District of Texas: XYZ Printing, Maxell, and X2Y Attenuators

    The patent aggression, which relies on improper litigation venues, harms innocent parties a great deal; only their lawyers benefit from all this mess



  15. Links 14/7/2018: Mesa 18.1.4, Elisa 0.2.1, More on Python's Guido van Rossum

    Links for the day



  16. Number of Oppositions to Grants/Awards of European Patents at the EPO Has Skyrocketed, Based on Internal Data

    The number of challenged patents continues to soar and staff of the EPO (examiners already over-encumbered by far too much work, due to unrealistic targets) would struggle to cope or simply be compelled to not properly deal with oppositions



  17. 'Transaction' Complete: Former EPO Executive From Belgium Takes the Seat of António Campinos at EU-IPO

    Rumours that Belgium made a back room deal with Battistelli may be further substantiated with the just-confirmed appointment of Archambeau



  18. EPO Abuses Against People With Disabilities Followed by Legal Bullying?

    The new President of the EPO is not (at least not yet) obeying court rulings from ILO; The above move seems like an attempt to derail ongoing cases at the ILO’s Administrative Tribunal (ILO-AT), i.e. yet more strong-arming



  19. Weeks Later António Campinos Still in Noncompliance With the Courts (ILO's Tribunal)

    'report card' for the ever-so-intransparent (or nontransparent) new President of the EPO, who does not even bother obeying court rulings



  20. Links 13/7/2018: Kube 0.7.0, Trisquel 8.0 LTS Reviewed

    Links for the day



  21. Constitutionality and CJEU as Barriers, the UPC Agreement (UPCA) is Already Moot in the United Kingdom

    The Unified Patent Court (UPC) isn't going anywhere and the UK merely "explores" what to do about it; for Team UPC, however, this means that the UK "confirms intention to remain in Unitary Patent system after Brexit" (clearly a case of deliberate misinformation)



  22. It's Not About EPO 'Backlog' But About Faking 'Production' by Lowering Standards

    Remarks on the EPO dropping all pretenses of genuine care for patent quality; it's all about speed now, never mind if wrongly-granted patents can cause billions in damages across Europe (a lot of that money flows towards patent law firms)



  23. Links 12/7/2018: GTK+ 4.0 Plans, OpenBSD Gains Wi-Fi “Auto-Join”

    Links for the day



  24. The Anti-35 U.S.C. § 101 Lobby Pushes Old News Into the Headlines in an Effort to Resurrect/Protect Software Patents

    The software patenting proponents (law firms for the most part) are still doing anything they can -- stretching even months into the past -- in an effort to modify the law in defiance of Supreme Court (SCOTUS) rulings



  25. Thomas Massie and Marcy Kaptur Are Promoting the Interests of Patent Trolls and Patent Lawyers While Calling That “Innovation”

    Remarks on the ongoing effort to promote patent trolls’ interests under the guise of “helping small businesses” — a very misleading propaganda pattern that we have been finding in Unified Patent Court (UPC) lobbying at the EPO



  26. Links 12/7/2018: Mesa 18.1.4 RC, Curl 7.61.0

    Links for the day



  27. Texas: When Trade Secret 'Damages' Are Almost 1,000 Times Higher Than Patent 'Damages'

    It's possible to deal with conflicts and disputes using means other than patents; a new trade secret misappropriation case and a new study from Ofer Eldar (Duke Law) and Neel Sukhatme (Georgetown Law) bring examples from Texas



  28. Cellspin Soft Will Likely Need to Pay the Accused Party's Lawyers Too After Frivolous Litigation With Patents Eliminated Under 35 U.S.C. § 101

    Pursuing bogus (questionable) patents and going even further by asserting them in court can be worse than a waste of time and money; it can actually cause the target of assertion to be compensated (legal fees) at the plaintiff’s expense — a critical fact largely ignored by the patent ‘industry’



  29. The Lack of Genuine, Honest Discussion About Patent Quality Means That Under António Campinos Software Patents Will Continue to be Granted, Campinos Strives to Make Them 'Unitary'

    The agenda of the litigation 'industry' is still being served by the existing EPO administration; this is a problem because not only do they grant patents on just about anything but they also attempt to broaden litigation jurisdiction



  30. Links 11/7/2018: Xen 4.11, Ubuntu Infographics, Lockbox and Notes

    Links for the day


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts