EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

03.30.08

Microsoft’s Latest OOXML Corruptions in Germany, Croatia, Norway

Posted in Europe, Formats, Fraud, ISO, Microsoft, Open XML at 12:51 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

OOXML is fraud

Get a load of Groklaw’s most recent report. Wow. Just wow. Who is Microsoft kidding and is anyone still surprised that multiple investigations are being launched to study the many abuses?

If Microsoft gets this OOXML format “approved”, it will be by irregularities in the voting, it seems. Here’s more on what happened in Germany and a report on what is being called a scandal in Norway. And another odd process in Croatia.

If you can read German, here’s the story on what happened there. For those who can’t, when they went to vote, they were not allowed to vote disapprove, so the choice was to approve or to abstain. It was a tie, 6:6, which means no consensus. So under the rules I’ve read, that would have meant that they should send a vote of Abstain.

But surprise, surprise!! A solution helpful to Microsoft: the representative from DIN decided to cast a vote, which isn’t the process. DIN isn’t supposed to vote, because it’s supposed to advise. But this, they rationalized, was a vote not about whether to accept OOXML on the basis of *technical* issues, but whether to accept the approval suggestion of the technical committee. So DIN voted to accept DIN’s suggestion. Hence Germany ends up in the Approve column. I know. No doubt there will be objections filed.

Norway’s at least as bad. Here’s an article from Norway, and the translation of the title of the article is, “Scandal in Standards Norway. I didn’t write that headline. They did. And here’s why. The article says there should be an investigation of the irregularities there, because while there were only two votes to approve, from Microsoft and a business partner, Statoilhydro, and all the others voted no, 21 votes, they approved anyway. Here’s how they shuffled the deck in Norway. So they put everyone out of the room, and Standards Norway, three people were left in the room, and they usurped the decision and made it their business to decide to approve anyway.

Unbelievable. If it was happening in only one country, you might think it was local difficulties. But when it happens in place after place, one can only conclude that Microsoft, although outnumbered in a fair vote, has sufficient clout behind the scenes to shove this format into the world’s mouth and hold its mouth closed by force until the world is compelled to swallow. Remember that Microsoft memo that surfaced in the Comes v. Microsoft litigation? The one about how to stack a panel discussion at conferences so it would be favorable to Microsoft? The key was to get to be the moderator.

One thing is certain. Unless ISO steps up and fixes this mess, it will lose the world’s respect, and rightly so. Either the rules mean something, or they don’t, but if they don’t standards don’t mean anything either.

Groklaw contains many pointers to back with evidence. Further to this, consider the following set of posts (ordered by precedence).

Germany:

Norway:

Croatia:

There are several more posts and summaries which can be found by following the links or searching the Web site.

Andy Updegrove keeps track of the votes, but regardless of the outcome, antitrust issues, The European Commission and several other factors are likely to stand in the way. We shall see what ‘propaganda’ Microsoft unleashes regardless of ethical/legal breaches, probably using a one-sided press release that surely mentions none of the abuse. We saw that in September, despite the fact they had lost.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

27 Comments

  1. LinuxIsFun said,

    March 30, 2008 at 1:11 am

    Gravatar

    Whats the use of investigations, the crime has already been committed. They will just pay the money and get away with it again.

    There is nothing called Interoperability in Microsoft world.

  2. Roy Schestowitz said,

    March 30, 2008 at 1:14 am

    Gravatar

    This may be true, but the “Microsoft” brand has sunk like no other brand, partly because of incidents such as these.

  3. SubSonica said,

    March 30, 2008 at 4:59 am

    Gravatar

    This is comment sumarises the fundamental roots of the problem and why Microsoft is fighting to death for the ISO approval: They are fighting for survival here, don’t forget it: as described by a commenter in groklaw (remember I always argument that OOXML is one of the two fundamental pillars of Microsoft curresnt strategy to mantain their monopoly lock-in over the whole IT business and environment, the other being software patents, of wich there are plentiful in OOXML:
    http://www.noooxml.org/patents):

    OOXML Vote: Irregularities in Germany & Croatia and a Call for an Investigation of Norway
    Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, March 29 2008 @ 03:08 PM EDT
    They don’t need it to. If they get their standard, and then the EU courts bash

    them down two years later, they don’t care. They’ll pay a $100 million fine
    and go on their merry way, because they’ll have:

    1) Secured Office’s monopoly for another 5 years at least.
    2) Have destroyed the ISO’s credibility and the credibility of standards
    processes everywhere.

    (1) is the obvious money-maker for them: A continuation of the Office
    monopoly means that they can spend several years trying to innovate while
    OpenOffice and the rest spend their time trying to get decent OOXML
    compatibility (which is essentially a lost cause). A few years from now, when
    OpenOffice has that compatibility (to some degree), Office14 or 15 will be
    out.

    (2) is also a major coup for them. If people stop trusting standards bodies,
    then Microsoft wins. Standards break lock-ins, so Microsoft would love to
    damage ISO’s credibility. Doing so also hurts W3C and other standards
    groups by association.

    However, if Microsoft loses and this goes to the normal track, they’ll be in
    trouble, because they’ll have won a lot of ill will, and this’ll be moving along

    that track when the EU catches up with them.

  4. LinuxIsFun said,

    March 30, 2008 at 6:26 am

    Gravatar

    Even google is no better. All their software is closed source (talk, desktop search…)

    All their search algorithms are closed and patented.

    But they are much better than Microsoft. They don’t go about damaging the eco-system like microsoft. Atleast they follow and add to the standards in a better and a responsible way.

    Microsoft wont last too long. They are just a bully.

  5. Roy Schestowitz said,

    March 30, 2008 at 6:32 am

    Gravatar

    SubSonica,

    It’s a very pessimistic view. Microsoft won’t last that long as a dominant company.

  6. Victor Soliz said,

    March 30, 2008 at 6:50 am

    Gravatar

    Bah, this is utter BS, in Norway OOXML won because it got 2 out of 23 votes… and unless there are unannounced surprises, OOXML will get the approval by exactly ONE vote! This means that if any of those latest P countries who suddenly changed their vote to approval didn’t do it OOXML would fail. Thanks Norway standards, fuck you.

    Although Norway is the worst case, I can’t think of a single of the P members that changed their decision to YES to have actually based it on, at the very least, a decent vote. Money can definitely buy you international standards, I am now unable to even think of something money can’t buy…

  7. CoolGuy said,

    March 30, 2008 at 7:14 am

    Gravatar

    I am now unable to even think of something money can’t buy…

    - Life
    - Peaceful sleep
    - Happiness

  8. Roy Schestowitz said,

    March 30, 2008 at 9:53 am

    Gravatar

    Victor, this is not over yet. Microsoft’s aggression will cost it a lot and if you stick around and help us gather evidence, more justice will be served.

    The important news and the good news is that we were able not only to see but also to show just how corrupt this whole process has been. While Murdoch’s Cathedral is unlikely to publish anything about the abuses, it’s not the general public that matters as much as the CIOs, many of whom have become familiar with this debacle and some of whom have sworn to no longer deal with Microsoft. Keep on bringing out truth and trust the regulators who will do their thing. It’s their job. There’s no room for bitterness if it only becomes a distraction and an emotional provocation.

  9. CoolGuy said,

    March 30, 2008 at 10:35 am

    Gravatar

    What does Bill Gates or Microsoft achive by doing all this ??

  10. Roy Schestowitz said,

    March 30, 2008 at 10:38 am

    Gravatar

    The next generation of lockin. Lock-in 2.0. It involves a new seemingly open stack that contains XAML, OOXML, XPS, REST, etc. It also forms the basis for a software patent strategy, its main target being the GPL.

  11. Victor Soliz said,

    March 30, 2008 at 11:24 am

    Gravatar

    Regarding not over yet : http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=504276&cid=22906868

  12. Roy Schestowitz said,

    March 30, 2008 at 11:30 am

    Gravatar

    More promising IMO would be to file an appeal on the grounds of the WTO GPA (Government Procurement Agreement) and/or antitrust considerations, and at the same time file a lawsuit seeking a court order against ISO and IEC that the appeal shall be granted.

    Brilliant, if true (and if it materialises).

  13. CoolGuy said,

    March 30, 2008 at 11:38 am

    Gravatar

    Only thing that m$ has been successful previously is at Windows OS. They were lucky to have no competition in that market.

    That is soon ending with Mac OS and Linux.

  14. CoolGuy said,

    March 30, 2008 at 11:41 am

    Gravatar

    I think Groklaw should take this up !!

  15. Roy Schestowitz said,

    March 30, 2008 at 11:40 am

    Gravatar

    What about Office (Windows integration/bundling being a crucial part of it)?

    “I am convinced we have to use Windows – this is the one thing they don’t have. We have to be competitive with features, but we need something more — Windows integration.”

    Jim Allchin, Microsoft

  16. Roy Schestowitz said,

    March 30, 2008 at 11:42 am

    Gravatar

    Antitrust challenge?

  17. CoolGuy said,

    March 30, 2008 at 11:46 am

    Gravatar

    They are able to such a over price boltware office suite is only because of Windows platform lock they have.

    Remove windows and their entire house of cards falls apart.

  18. Roy Schestowitz said,

    March 30, 2008 at 11:48 am

    Gravatar

    it’s quite the opposite, I think. Remove the Office cash cow (or introduce ODF) and the Windows monopoly falls apart. It’s Office that keeps many people locked in, despite Wine.

  19. CoolGuy said,

    March 30, 2008 at 12:06 pm

    Gravatar

    DirectX also comes into into picture. Gamers cannot switch since most of the games are Windows only. Everything is so tightly integrate…

    I suppose it all starts with Windows and then goes upwards..Windows is the base of all. The core is windows. Bottom to top integration…

    Major monopolies are the ones who own the entire chain…its very hard to compete with them. The ones who are at the bottom of this process…are the real rulers. Think about it…they control everything that builds upon them.

    Intel -> hardware. They own the entire consumer CPU business or most of it.

  20. CoolGuy said,

    March 30, 2008 at 12:22 pm

    Gravatar

    My predictions in 5 years :

    Windows 7 or whatever that comes out after some 5 years is going to suck even more…

    Apple is going to have 50% desktop market share.

    Linux is going to have 30% in desktop and will own most of the server with BSD variants and more than 50% of mobile.

    Windows will be like 20% and going downhill.

  21. Roy Schestowitz said,

    March 30, 2008 at 12:13 pm

    Gravatar

    Intel is very dominant in desktops and laptops with x86, but bear in mind that it account for less than 2% of all the CPUs. ARM has a far larger share.

  22. Roy Schestowitz said,

    March 30, 2008 at 12:30 pm

    Gravatar

    Windows 7 or whatever that comes out after some 5 years is going to suck even more…

    It already looks very grim and I will gladly write a post about this, along with compelling proof if you wish.

    Windows will be like 20% and going downhill.

    The tipping point is Microsoft’s financial problems, but it’s hard to predict where it goes from there. Politics (and by their very nature — corruption) will play a role also. I think that sites like Groklaw and ever-growing bodies like the FSF will play an increasing role in this.

  23. CoolGuy said,

    March 30, 2008 at 12:36 pm

    Gravatar

    I am worried that after RMS the FSF will get sold out like the OSI by the insiders. See how they did it with OOXML and every other thing. Money is a very strong motivating factor.

    People running the FSF will be bought and broken by M$. Its only because of RMS the FSF is working. Without him its hard to see where FSF will go…

  24. Roy Schestowitz said,

    March 30, 2008 at 12:41 pm

    Gravatar

    Have you got any evidence to justify this concern? I know of nobody in the FSF who sympathises with Microsoft. Moglen visited Redmond for the benefit of Samba developers, but he is far, far from being a fan or an apologist, As for Stallman, he can be trusted for good. You can’t fool him.

  25. CoolGuy said,

    March 30, 2008 at 12:51 pm

    Gravatar

    All though there are good people in the OSI/FSF but the bad ones are far more and they will control the direction. The good ones will simply be out numbered.

    See the ISO. Although there are lot of credible people in the ISO they couldn’t do a thing and just kept watching how ISO was mauled by Microsoft right in front of their eyes.

    See how its happening in Gnome also. And how frustrated we are that we cant do a thing about it…same things are going to happen at FSF I guess…

    Check Matt. No one could stop him from inviting M$ to the the OSBC.

    Place a few wrong people in the board and then they take the entire thing down along with them.

  26. Roy Schestowitz said,

    March 30, 2008 at 12:58 pm

    Gravatar

    Well, that rule applies to several companies which immediately come to mind as recent examples: Google, Yahoo, Nokia, Vodafone, XenSource, Novell…

    It’s hard to watch in which direction staff is moving and who is having lunch with whom.

  27. Victor Soliz said,

    March 30, 2008 at 6:18 pm

    Gravatar

    Games don’t matter, I am a PC gamer and all but really, most gamers are console gamers and most PC gamers are casual gamers, the guys depending so hard on the latest PC 3d games are a minority . And they also fall within the teen geek category so they can really deal with WINE.

    The FSF is the FSF I doubt they would sell out. As a matter of fact OSI didn’t either, sure they approved MS’ lame licenses but that comes from MS yet again gaming the system, the OSI was unable to give a good reason not to approve the lame licenses, and this is mostly a problem the “open source” definition got from the start, rather than OSI deciding to sell out.

    At least we later heard from OSI about how MS’ open source and protection is bollocks and their public statement against OOXML.

    -
    MS can buy a lot of people, but think to yourself, has the MS opposition been reduced? Ever since the Novell deal I am noticing that there’s more and more opposition, and for every person MS buys there enter two guys who wouldn’t let MS come out. It is amazing how we currently are full of information about how MS got its votes that it is impossible for MS to escape a negative opinion, just take a look at their brand perception.

What Else is New


  1. Links 29/9/2016: Russia Moving to FOSS, New Nmap and PostgreSQL Releases

    Links for the day



  2. Team UPC is Interjecting Itself Into the Media Ahead of Tomorrow's Lobbying Push Against the European Council and Against European Interests

    A quick look at the growing bulk of UPC lobbying (by the legal firms which stand to benefit from it) ahead of tomorrow's European Council meeting which is expected to discuss a unitary patent system



  3. IP Kat is Lobbying Heavily for the UPC, Courtesy of Team UPC

    When does an IP (or patent) blog become little more than an aggregation of interest groups and self-serving patent law firms, whose agenda overlaps that of Team Battistelli?



  4. Leaked: Conclusions of the Secretive EPO Board 28 Meeting (8th of September 2016)

    The agenda and outcome of the secretive meeting of the Board of the Administrative Council of the EPO



  5. Letter From the Dutch Institute of Patent Attorneys (Nederlandse Orde van Octrooigemachtigden) to the Administrative Council of the EPO

    The Netherlands Institute of Patent Attorneys, a group representing a large number of Dutch patent practitioners, is against Benoît Battistelli and his horrible behaviour at the European Patent Office (EPO)



  6. EPO's Board 28 Notes Battistelli's “Three Current Investigations/Disciplinary Proceedings Involving SUEPO Members in The Hague."

    The attack on SUEPO (EPO staff representatives) at The Hague appears to have been silently expanded to a third person, showing an obvious increase in Battistelli's attacks on truth-tellers



  7. Links 28/9/2016: Alpine Linux 3.4.4, Endless OS 3.0

    Links for the day



  8. Cementing Autocracy: The European Patent Office Against Democracy, Against Media, and Against the Rule of Law

    The European Patent Office (EPO) actively undermines democracy in Europe, it undermines the freedom of the press (by paying it for puff pieces), and it undermines the rule of law by giving one single tyrant total power in Eponia and immunity from outside Eponia (even when he breaks his own rules)



  9. Links 28/9/2016: New Red Hat Offices, Fedora 25 'Frozen'

    Links for the day



  10. Team Battistelli Intensifies the Attack on the Boards of Appeal Again

    The lawless state of the EPO, where the rule of law is basically reducible to Battistelli's ego and insecurities, is again demonstrated with an escalation and perhaps another fake 'trial' in the making (after guilt repeatedly fails to be established)



  11. After the EPO Paid the Financial Times to Produce Propaganda the Newspaper Continues to Produce UPC Puff Pieces, Just Ahead of EU Council Meeting

    How the media, including the Financial Times, has been used (and even paid!) by the EPO in exchange for self-serving (to the EPO) messages and articles



  12. Beware the Patent Law Firms Insinuating That Software Patents Are Back Because of McRO

    By repeatedly claiming (and then generalising) that CAFC accepted a software patent the patent microcosm (meta-industry) hopes to convince us that we should continue to pursue software patents in the US, i.e. pay them a lot more money for something of little/no value



  13. The US Supreme Court Might Soon Tighten Patent Scope in the United States Even Further, the USPTO Produces Patent Maximalism Propaganda

    A struggle brewing between the patent 'industry' (profiting from irrational saturation) and the highest US court, as well as the Government Accountability Office (GAO)



  14. Patent Trolling a Growing Problem in East Asia (Software Patents Also), Whereas in the US the Problem Goes Away Along With Software Patents

    A look at two contrasting stories, one in Asia where patent litigation and hype are on the rise (same in Europe due to the EPO) and another in the US where a lot of patents face growing uncertainty and a high invalidation rate



  15. The EPO's Continued Push for Software Patents, Marginalisation of Appeals (Reassessment), and Deviation From the EPC

    A roundup of new developments at the EPO, where things further exacerbate and patent quality continues its downward spiral



  16. The Battistelli Effect: “We Will be Gradually Forced to File Our Patent Applications Outside the EPO in the Interests of Our Clients”

    While the EPO dusts off old files and grants in haste without quality control (won't be sustainable for more than a couple more years) the applicants are moving away as trust in the EPO erodes rapidly and profoundly



  17. Links 27/9/2016: Lenovo Layoffs, OPNFV Third Software Release

    Links for the day



  18. The Moral Depravity of the European Patent Office Under Battistelli

    The European Patent Office (EPO) comes under heavy criticism from its very own employees, who also seem to recognise that lobbying for the UPC is a very bad idea which discredits the European Patent Organisation



  19. Links 26/9/2016: Linux 4.8 RC8, SuperTux 0.5

    Links for the day



  20. What Insiders Are Saying About the Sad State of the European Patent Office (EPO)

    Anonymous claims made by people who are intimately familiar with the European Patent Office (from the inside) shed light on how bad things have become



  21. The EPO Does Not Want Skilled (and 'Expensive') Staff, Layoffs a Growing Concern

    A somewhat pessimistic look (albeit increasingly realistic look) at the European Patent Office, where unions are under fire for raising legitimate concerns about the direction taken by the management since a largely French team was put in charge



  22. Patents Roundup: Accenture Software Patents, Patent Troll Against Apple, Willful Infringements, and Apple Against a Software Patent

    A quick look at various new articles of interest (about software patents) and what can be deduced from them, especially now that software patents are the primary barrier to Free/Libre Open Source software adoption



  23. Software Patents Propped Up by Patent Law Firms That Are Lying, Further Assisted by Rogue Elements Like David Kappos and Randall Rader (Revolving Doors)

    The sheer dishonesty of the patent microcosm (seeking to bring back software patents by misleading the public) and those who are helping this microcosm change the system from the inside, owing to intimate connections from their dubious days inside government



  24. Links 25/9/2016: Linux 4.7.5, 4.4.22; LXQt 0.11

    Links for the day



  25. Patent Quality and Patent Scope the Unspeakable Taboo at the EPO, as Both Are Guillotined by Benoît Battistelli for the Sake of Money

    The gradual destruction of the European Patent Office (EPO), which was once unanimously regarded as the world's best, by a neo-liberal autocrat from France, Benoît Battistelli



  26. Bristows LLP's Hatred/Disdain of UK/EU Democracy Demonstrated; Says “Not Only Will the Pressure for UK Ratification of the UPC Agreement Continue, But a Decision is Wanted Within Weeks.”

    Without even consulting the British public or the European public (both of whom would be severely harmed by the UPC), the flag bearers of the UPC continue to bamboozle and then pressure politicians, public servants and nontechnical representatives



  27. Released Late on a Friday, EPO Social 'Study' (Battistelli-Commissioned Propaganda) Attempts to Blame Staff for Everything

    The longstanding propaganda campaign (framing staff as happy or framing unhappy staff as a disgruntled minority) is out and the timing of the release is suspicious to say the least



  28. Links 23/9/2016: Latest Microsoft and Lenovo Spin (Now in ‘Damage Control’ Mode)

    Links for the day



  29. White Male-Dominated EPO Management Sinks to New Lows, Again

    Benoît Battistelli continues to make the EPO look like Europe's biggest laughing stock by attempting to tackle issues with corny photo ops rather than real change (like SUEPO recognition, diverse hiring, improved patent quality, and cessation of sheer abuses)



  30. Journalism 102: Do Not Become Like 'Managing IP' or IAM 'Magazine' (the Megaphones of the EPO’s Management)

    Another look at convergence between media and the EPO, which is spending virtually millions of Euros literally buying the media and ensuring that the EPO's abuses are scarcely covered (if ever mentioned at all)


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts