EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

05.02.08

What Might Be Behind OpenBSD’s Attack Against Peers

Posted in Antitrust, BSD, FSF, FUD, GNU/Linux, GPL, Microsoft at 1:22 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

“Linux is a cancer that attaches itself in an intellectual property sense to everything it touches.”

Steve Ballmer, Microsoft CEO

Yesterday I attended an inspirational talk from Richard Stallman that contained many familiar bits, a healthy dose of humour and an interesting questions session, which touched on the AGPL, GPLv3 and other currently-debated topics that are more about the present than about the past.

Stallman’s vision is a very scary one to those who have the most to lose. It puts in jeopardy many of those who suppress and exploit the most, but again, this philosophical discussion needn’t be repeated. What’s more concerning are the personal attacks against Stallman, some of which are intended to distract people from his important message and place focus on things like appearance, politics and various forms of disinformation, including deliberate misinterpretation of Stallman’s jokes. We covered some examples of this before and so has Bruce Perens (also see this response from the OSC).

“We all share common goals, but ways of achieving these goals vary somewhat.”In the news digests that we post in this Web site we happen to include announcements and reports about the BSDs because they really ought to be our friends. We all share common goals, but ways of achieving these goals vary somewhat. There is hardly any justification for hostility. So why do we see people fighting?

Theo de Raadt has a good sense of humour and he is very outspoken. He deserves credit for pressuring insidious companies like Intel to open up properly. As you may or may not know, OpenBSD 4.3 has just been released, but Theo is once again taking a shot at Stallman. He did this recently also. Why, Theo, why? Is he once again trying to receive greater publicity by mocking someone whose licence is more widely used?

Several people who are very familiar with BSD seem to suggest that some certain company in north-west America might — just might — be using one rival project against the other. This doesn’t mean there’s a conspiracy or that an agreement exists, but such things can be done more gently with subtle moves such as an invitation for a visit or a meeting with Microsoft-sympathetic figures, poisonous messages ‘injected’ into a mailing list, or anything else that incites hostility and encourages division.

Some people would say that all of this is far-fetched and rather silly. Fine. That’s acceptable. This is only a speculation. However, it would be foolish to ignore some things that we are already aware of, such as this ‘smoking gun’ internal document from Microsoft which served as an antitrust exhibit in Comes vs Microsoft (Iowa). The court exhibit [PDF], whose authenticity has already been confirmed, is available from at least 3 sites which hold a mirror. It’s a very large item to explore, so to quote one fragment of relevance (from Microsoft’s own mouth):

Gathering intelligence on enemy activities is critical to the success of the Slog. We need to know who their allies are and what differences exist between them and their allies (there are always sources of tension between allies), so that we can find ways to split ‘em apart. Reading the trade press, lurking on newsgroups, attending conferences, and (above all) talking to ISVs is essential to gathering this intelligence.

Yes, Microsoft wants to “find ways to split ‘em apart.” Microsoft needs to do some intelligence work to identify “sources of tension between allies.” BSD versus GPL, anyone?

For more context see this overview of "The Slog", along the marketing “road trip” Microsoft refers to as “Jihad” (holy war). It has been seen many times before (even by myself, e.g. in USENET) that one common technique used by Mucnhkins is to divide people who share common goals.

Sometimes, in order to disguise or reduce suspicion, fake accounts and names are created whose character and postings are made solely for the purpose of defending one half of the crowd that supports Free software and attacking the other half of the very same crowd. Elevation of tensions is the purpose. Microsoft makes ‘civil wars’ beyond ‘enemy lines’ [1, 2]. Militaries use similar tactics and some nations go as far as providing physical ammunition for one country to devastate another.

Disclaimer: I like BSD and I use some BSD-licensed software. The purpose of this post is to make friends, not accusations.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

15 Comments

  1. TK said,

    May 2, 2008 at 11:30 am

    Gravatar

    Theo is becoming trifling and childish in his attacks, at least the bits and pieces that I see. Both of them have issues with each other’s license – we get it, now move on and grow up! RMS _seems_ to be taking the high road on it although I haven’t seen all the quotes from him about Theo. Is Theo just more public about throwing mud?

  2. Blaise Alleyne said,

    May 2, 2008 at 2:04 pm

    Gravatar

    I spend a few hours pouring over the OpenBSD misc mailing list this morning, reading the flame war that took place in Dec 07 / Jan 08 (which sparked the song).

    RMS’ failure was to get the BSD crowd emotionally riled up. At which point, they lost all sense of reason. RMS could hav ebeen more clear with his statements, but if you read his posts to the list they are quite rational and quite polite. Theo, on the other hand, dives into expletives and accusations quite quickly, and is more obsessed with name calling than any actual arguments.

    It’s pretty unfortunate…

  3. Roy Schestowitz said,

    May 2, 2008 at 9:02 pm

    Gravatar

    I think the key issue was a statement that RMS made in public about firmware. He has also just told me that he corrected the inaccurate statements about his views. Hopefully Theo can move on and not resent forever. It makes both sides look bad and it doesn’t help.

  4. anonymous said,

    May 3, 2008 at 6:56 am

    Gravatar

    Well covered, but a word of advice: be very, very careful when you address the whole BSD/GPL-axis again.

  5. Dan O'Brian said,

    May 3, 2008 at 9:09 am

    Gravatar

    Seeing as how there has been “friction” between the BSD’s and Linux for at least 10-15 years at this point and, more importantly, how Theo is well known to have an extremely short temper, I seriously doubt that Microsoft is pulling the strings here.

    Why, Theo, why? Is he once again trying to receive greater publicity by mocking someone whose licence is more widely used?

    While reading, this begged the question:

    Why, Roy, why? Is he once again trying to receive greater publicity by mocking someone who is more widely respected in the free software community?

    or maybe this is more relevant:

    Yes, Microsoft wants to “find ways to split ‘em apart.” Microsoft needs to do some intelligence work to identify “sources of tension between allies.” BSD versus GPL, anyone?

    Mono vs whatever, anyone?

    Just like we can’t ignore the possibility that Microsoft is pulling at the strings, we can’t ignore the possibility that you are in their wallet doing their dirty work for them:

    Bad mouth Mono and GNOME in order to destroy those projects for Microsoft. Once those are destroyed, you’ll turn toward KDE and whatever else. And so on and so forth until you’ve trashed all of the larger projects that Microsoft has to compete against.

    This theory actually makes just as much sense as any of yours – it also meshes well with the worldly logic of:

    Those who scream the loudest are often the most guilty

    I don’t know of anyone who screams louder than you about how GNOME and Mono (and Novell, but I don’t care so much about Novell the Company as I do the GNOME and SuSE developers) are in Microsoft’s pocket trying to destroy Free Software.

    Given that your proof is never anything more than speculation by either yourself or some other journalist who is known to have a grudge against Novell or GNOME (e.g. Sam Varghese – who seems to have an infatuation with trying to make Jeff Waugh look bad – 5 page article on how Jeff Waugh isn’t fit to be a leader of GNOME, a position he was ELECTED to by the GNOME community over 1 issue? That’s not journalism, that’s propaganda) and given that your only recurring “positive contributions” to F/LOSS are your success stories posted to comp.os.linux.advocacy (which no one but a handful of trolls actually reads – if they even read your posts) which are mere headline copies and sound bites of articles other journalists have written, my theory offers a far larger source of evidence to back it up.

    Microsoft hired you a few years back and had you start posting these headline/quote snippets to comp.os.linux.advocacy where they knew you’d be able to establish some credibility “advocating linux” while also knowing that you wouldn’t be reaching any non-Linux users, thus you wouldn’t actually be converting anyone over to Linux from Windows. Brilliant strategy imho.

    Then, when Microsoft makes this deal with Novell, one of their biggest threats on the side of F/LOSS (for which they immediately went out and purposely riled up the F/LOSS community in the hopes of getting them to hate Novell – I mean, this wasn’t rocket science – had any of the clueless Novell execs mentioned their Microsoft deal ahead of time to their engineers, they would have discovered that this would anger the community).

    Then, seeing this site was created (and this is assuming that the founder of this site is not in their pockets), immediately saw their opportunity to cash in on the free anti-Novell propaganda and had you begin posting your anti-Novell sentiments in an attempt to split the community and create some infighting (which worked). They also knew that the vast majority of the people who were likely to view this site were Linux users, they began having you start taking anti-Microsoft jibes because that would help you increase your credibility with the more easily riled “Slashdotter” crowd (which are a very vocal and easily swayed emotional group inside the Free Software community) so that you’d be able to tap into them as your unsuspecting minions who you could set loose on Novell, GNOME and Mono.

    Think about it. It makes perfect sense… there’s no easier way for Microsoft to destroy its competition than to get a huge mass of people who are easily manipulated (via emotion) to do your dirty work for you. You get them angry at something your competitor does/did by spinning what they did to be against the mobs ideals and bingo, you have yourself a free army intent on destroying your competition for you.

    And best of all (in Microsoft’s eyes), it is working wonderfully.

  6. Roy Schestowitz said,

    May 3, 2008 at 9:20 am

    Gravatar

    That’s insane to the point of almost being hilarious.

    Has it ever occurred to you that what Novell established with Novell is merely a scheme for banning Free software, at one point or another? There are building blocks in this strategy and one of them is making .NET/XAML/XPS/etc. the ‘standard’ and charging royalties for it. That’s not Free software. That’s just exploitation (using developers as tools) and extortion (charging money for imaginary stuff).

    My opposition to developers whom I criticise is the embrace of .NET when we already have GPL-licensed Java, for example, and the initial implementation of OOXML when ODF is the industry standard that is Free software-compatible. And there are many more examples…

  7. Shane Coyle said,

    May 3, 2008 at 10:44 am

    Gravatar

    Well, I never speak for Roy, but as the ‘site founder’ I can only attest I am in noone’s pocket, I am an employee of my local school district, in a non-technology (nor supervisory) position (and have never been happier since leaving the tech sector – in the best shape of my life, too!).

    I haven’t any direct investment in any of the companies lauded or lambasted here (I am a NYS employee, and therefore my pension perhaps is but I don’t follow it that closely).

    And as far as the idea of cashing in on anti-Novell propoganda – this site makes roughly $1.40 (US) / day in Adsense revenues (very low ad-view numbers compared to visitors because we’re all geeks here and use Adblock and NoScript).

    Honestly, though, this site did pretty much pay for my CD/DVD duplicator, and that allows me to give away more copies of my Live CD than ever before. So, thanks to Novell for that, I suppose.

    I’ve pointed it out before, but Roy makes nothing from BoycottNovell.com (that I know of, anyhow). I have offered him the opportunity in the past to monetize his contributions, and he has consistently declined.

    It’s always been a balance of making sure we pay our bills without over-commercializing the site, and I hope that we strike a happy medium.

    Slightly off-topic, I have stumbled upon an ad server network – adbard.net, that seems to be totally FOSS-related. I just signed up http://www.edu-nix.org, and it seems the network is in early stages, but perhaps we can add a banner to bn.com if things work well, it’s always preferable to promote FOSS.

  8. Natalia said,

    May 4, 2008 at 6:58 am

    Gravatar

    You’re not only stupid, you’ve gone a step further towards being deranged. You should stop breathing or something, it’d make the world a better place.

  9. Roy Schestowitz said,

    May 4, 2008 at 8:11 am

    Gravatar

    Thank you, Natalia, for the polite and constructive remarks. Care to be more specific so that we can resolve this and maybe put to rest speculations?

  10. Mike Milholland said,

    June 17, 2008 at 9:53 pm

    Gravatar

    Keep in mind that Stallman was going on OpenBSDs site to post smack not the other way around. Theo appears to have a temper, but can you blame him?? Stallman is a weasel. The more he messes with GPL the more it moves towards giving up your rights to free software. GPL V3 or whatever number its on sounds like this:

    You can use this software, BUT….

    If somehow you profit on it you will be raped in jail.

    If you know someone who profits on it you will be raped in jail.

    If one your developers looked at some linux code and it gave him and idea and 3 years later he used this idea to make money on it you will be raped in jail

    Who the fuck even put his guy in charge. Why does anyone even listen to a raving moron like Richard Stallman.

    I am pretty sure that freedom means something like no strings attached. GPL does not make me feel like no strings attached. But, you know what does? The BSD based license.

    Free as in air. Not free as in if I do something that Richard Stallman does not like I will be raped in jail.

  11. Roy Schestowitz said,

    June 17, 2008 at 10:14 pm

    Gravatar

    I see a lot of strong words here (“rape”, “jail”), but the argument is not convincing. The “Free” refers to freedom. The developer strives to keep the software free (libre) and spread that freedom. There is nothing that makes freedom and profit contradictory. The GPL(v3) does not forbid making money at all.

  12. Woods said,

    June 17, 2008 at 11:36 pm

    Gravatar

    >I see a lot of strong words here…

    Personally, I just stop listening to people using language like that (Jeffrey Stedfast comes to mind…) That kind of choice of words is just a tad bit too disturbing.

  13. Slated said,

    June 18, 2008 at 12:07 am

    Gravatar

    @Dan O’Brian

    “we can’t ignore the possibility that you are in their wallet doing their dirty work for them”

    Oh for God’s sake grow up.

    What is it exactly that you think Roy has to “gain” through his activities, beyond the exposure of the truth? Ad revenue at $1.40 a day? Puh-lease.

    All Roy is doing is exposing some pretty damned obvious, and well documented, corruption that mostly revolves around Microsoft and their partners.

    Are you one of them, because you seem to expend an awful lot of effort stalking Roy and trying to shut him up?

  14. Slated said,

    June 18, 2008 at 12:14 am

    Gravatar

    @Mike Milholland

    How many times were you raped in jail then?

    Here’s some reading material for you, for the next time it happens:

    [quote]
    Does the GPL allow me to sell copies of the program for money?

    Yes, the GPL allows everyone to do this. The right to sell copies is part of the definition of free software. Except in one special situation, there is no limit on what price you can charge. (The one exception is the required written offer to provide source code that must accompany binary-only release.)
    [/quote]

    http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#DoesTheGPLAllowMoney

    Here’s something else that might help the pain:

    http://www.netdoctor.co.uk/medicines/100002157.html

  15. Roy Schestowitz said,

    June 18, 2008 at 12:19 am

    Gravatar

    The ambiguity in English is truly a shame (the word “free”). People still associate the GPL with currency (or lack thereof) and completely miss the points about control, liability, privacy, education, development, versatility, evolutionary design, integration, customisation, security, etc.

What Else is New


  1. Top Officials in French Government Are Growing Tired of Battistelli's Abuses at the European Patent Office (EPO)

    An automated translation of a recent debate about the EPO in the French government, culminating in intervention by Richard Yung



  2. A US Supreme Court (SCOTUS) Which is Hostile Towards Patent Maximalists May Closely Examine More Patents That Apple Uses Against Android

    A company which often takes pride in designers rather than developers (art, not technical merit) may lose that leverage over the competition if its questionable patents are taken away by the Supremes



  3. As Long as Software Patents Are Granted and Microsoft Equips Trolls With Them, “Azure IP Advantage” is an Attack on Free/Libre Software

    Microsoft is feeding enemies of GNU/Linux and Free/libre Open Source software (FLOSS) in order to sell its 'protection', which it names "IP Advantage" in a rather Orwellian fashion (same naming as back in the Novell days)



  4. Patent Trolls on Their Way Out in the United States and Their Way Into China, No Thanks to the Open Invention Network (OIN)

    An update on patent trolls and the role played by supposed allies of Free/libre software, who in practice do everything to exacerbate the problem rather than resolve it



  5. Insensitivity at the EPO’s Management – Part VIII: When Governed by Criminals, Truth-Tellers Are Cast as Criminals and Criminals as Justice Deliverers

    The bizarre state of affairs at the European Patent Office, where being an honest and transparent person makes one incredibly vulnerable and subjected to constant harassment from the management



  6. The Sickness of the EPO – Part V: Shedding Light on Institutional Abuse Against Ill and/or Disabled Individuals

    The seriousness of the situation at the EPO and a call for action, which requires greater transparency, even if imposed transparency



  7. The EPO's Race to the Bottom in Recruitment and Early Retirements Explained by an Insider

    The European Patent Office under Battistelli is failing to attract -- and certainly failing to retain -- talented examiners



  8. Wouter Pors and Other UPC Boosters Believe That Repeating the Lies Will Potentially Make Them Truths

    The lobbying campaign for UPC, or hopeful lies (sometimes mere rumours) disguised as "news", continues to rely on false perceptions that the UPC is just a matter of time and may actually materialise this year



  9. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) is Utilised in Fixing the US Patent System and the Patent Microcosm Loses Its Mind

    A roundup of PTAB news, ranging from attacks on the legitimacy of PTAB to progress which is made by PTAB, undoing decades of overpatenting



  10. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) and the Federal Circuit (CAFC) Take on Patents Pertaining to Business Methods

    Patents on tasks that can be performed using pen and paper (so-called 'business methods', just like algorithms) and oughtn't be patent-eligible may be the next casualty of the America Invents Act (AIA)



  11. Google's Stewardship of GNU/Linux (Android, Chromebooks and More) in Doubt After Company Resorts to Patent 'First Strikes'

    Google has just turned a little more evil, by essentially using patents as a weapon against the competition (by no means a defensive move)



  12. Links 24/2/2017: Ubuntu 17.04 Beta, OpenBSD Foundation Nets $573,000 in Donations

    Links for the day



  13. IAM, Greased up by the EPO, Continues Lobbying by Shaming Tactics for the UPC, Under the Guise of 'News'

    The shrill and well-paid writers of IAM are still at it, promoting the Unitary Patent (UPC) at every opportunity and every turn



  14. Patent Scope Gone Awry: European Vegetable Patents Office?

    In its misguided race to raise so-called 'production', the EPO lost sight of its original goals and now facilitates patent royalty payments/taxation for naturally-recurring items of nature



  15. Yes, There is Definitely Brain Drain (Experience Deficit) at the European Patent Office and Stakeholders Feel It

    The direction that the European Patent Office has taken under Battistelli undoes many decades (almost half a century) of reputation-building and progress and naturally this repels existing staff, not to mention hampers recruitment efforts



  16. The Sickness of the EPO – Part IV: Cruel Management That Deliberately Attacks the Sick and the Weak

    The dysphoric reality at the European Patent Office, which is becoming like a large cell (with bolted-down windows) where people are controlled by fear and scapegoats are selected to perpetuate this atmosphere of terror and maintain demand (or workload) for the Investigative Stasi



  17. Links 23/2/2017: Qt 5.9 Alpha, First SHA1 Collision

    Links for the day



  18. UPC Roundup: War on the Appeal Boards, British Motion Against the UPC, Fröhlinger Recalled, and Fake News About Spain

    Taking stock of some of the latest attempts to shove the Unitary Patent (UPC) down Europe's throat, courtesy of Team Battistelli and Team UPC



  19. The Sickness of the EPO – Part III: Invalidity and Suicides

    An explanation of what drives a lot of EPO veterans to depression and sometimes even suicide



  20. The Appeal Board (PTAB) and Federal Circuit (CAFC) Maintain Good Pace of Patent Elimination Where Scope Was Exceeded

    The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) continues to accept about 4 out of 5 decisions of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) and the US Supreme Court (SCOTUS) refuses to intervene



  21. Software Patents Are Ebbing Away, But the “Swamp” Fights Back and Hijacks the Word “Fix”

    The club of patent maximalists, or those who profit from excess prosecution and legal chaos, isn't liking what has happened in the United States and it wants everything reversed



  22. Report From Yesterday's Debate About the European Patent Office (EPO) at the Bavarian Landtag

    A report of the EPO debate which took place at the Bavarian Landtag yesterday (21/2/2017)



  23. Links 22/2/2017: Wine-Staging 2.2, Nautilus 3.24

    Links for the day



  24. French Politician Richard Yung Tells the Government About Abuses at the European Patent Office (EPO)

    The subject of EPO scandals has once again landed in French politics, just a couple of months since it last happened



  25. The Sickness of the EPO – Part II: Background Information and Insights

    With a privatised, in-house (sometimes outsourced and for-profit) force for surveillance, policing, justice, public relations and now medical assessment (mere vassals or marionettes of the management) the EPO serves to show that it has become indistinguishable from North Korea, where the Supreme Leader gets to control every single aspect (absolutely no separation of powers)



  26. EPO Cartoon/Caricature by KrewinkelKrijst

    A new rendition by Dutch cartoonist and illustrator KrewinkelKrijst



  27. Inverting Narratives: IAM 'Magazine' Paints Massive Patent Bully Microsoft (Preying on the Weak) as a Defender of the Powerless

    Selective coverage and deliberate misinterpretation of Microsoft's tactics (patent settlement under threat, disguised as "pre-installation of some of the US company’s software products") as seen in IAM almost every week these days



  28. The Sickness of the EPO – Part I: Motivation for New Series of Articles

    An introduction or prelude to a long series of upcoming posts, whose purpose is to show governance by coercion, pressure, retribution and tribalism rather than professional relationship between human beings at the European Patent Office (EPO)



  29. Insensitivity at the EPO’s Management – Part VII: EPO Hypocrisy on Cancer and Lack of Feedback to and From ECPC

    The European Cancer Patient Coalition (ECPC), which calls itself "the largest European cancer patients' umbrella organisation," fails to fulfill its duties, says a source of ours, and the EPO makes things even worse



  30. Links 21/2/2017: KDE Plasma 5.9.2 in Chakra GNU/Linux, pfSense 2.3.3

    Links for the day


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts