05.14.08

Novell Starts Buying Its Own Stock (Sign of Weakness)

Posted in Finance, Microsoft, Novell at 3:57 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

If the investors go away, then someone needs to fill the void

Novell has just earned itself a very low position (48th) in the “most influential tech vendors” ladder, which seems very gut feeling-driven. Almost on the very same day came this press release from Novell:

Novell, Inc. (Nasdaq: NOVL) today announced that its Board of Directors has authorized the repurchase of up to $100 million of the Company’s outstanding shares of common stock.

Associated Press (at Forbes) had this to add about the buyback program:

There is no fixed expiration date for the program.

Ron Hovsepian smilesIt was almost a year ago that Ron Hovsepian told Reuters about the possibility of buybacks, or at least responded to a question about it. We wrote about Novell buybacks in [1, 2] and some more related posts include [1, 2, 3, 4, 5].

We also discussed Novell’s massaging of its financial figures, which may be similar to Microsoft’s [1, 2, 3]. Novell expects layoffs, not just off-shoring that Bill Gates promotes. Both companies share a similar dilemma which is tied to legacy. Microsoft is by all means on a similar boat, with buybacks that left it without so much cash in the bank (far less than ever before).

Novell's Google Trends chart
Google Trends: search volume for “Novell”

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

This post is also available in Gemini over at:

gemini://gemini.techrights.org/2008/05/14/novell-buybacks-start/

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

12 Comments

  1. Niklas (sic!) Koswinkle said,

    May 14, 2008 at 4:27 am

    Gravatar

    If you want to see a sign of weakness, you don’t have to look any further than this blog: It’s hilarious the read to your little, un-enlightened ‘analyses’ of the stock value of Novell. Firstly, it is very obvious that you have no idea what you are talking about. But that’s not the funny bit. The funny bit is that you seem so desperate to see a correlation between a business-decision, that you think of as immoral, and the economic well-being of the actors who made that decision.

    Aren’t you educated enough to understand that the latter hasn’t got anything to do with the former? Are you really expecting a financial backlash due to a politically incorrect decision?

    You don’t know anything about the real word; but we already knew that…

    For the record: Novell is doing much better than Sun which you – in spite of evidence to the contrary – tout as defender of freedom.

    Note: comment has been flagged for arriving from a possible incarnation of a known (eet), pseudonymous, forever-nymshifting, abusive Internet troll that posts from open proxies and relays around the world.

  2. Paulo said,

    May 14, 2008 at 6:45 am

    Gravatar

    This post is a total joke. I have been to this site a few times and after reading this post, you clearly have no idea what you are talking about. Before posting any ridiculous comments on share buybacks, perhaps you should sharpen your business skills just a ‘wee’ bit.

  3. ZiggyFish said,

    May 14, 2008 at 11:40 pm

    Gravatar

    if you look at novels history, you will see that Novel have been going down hill since the start of the Microsoft – Novel deal

  4. Roy Schestowitz said,

    May 14, 2008 at 11:46 pm

    Gravatar

    It would have been the same without Microsoft, I suppose, but the problem is that with Microsoft’s help Novell is hurting IBM, Sun, Red Hat and others for a variety of reasons. Many of those companies promote Free software.

  5. Niklas (sic!) Koswinkle said,

    May 15, 2008 at 3:49 am

    Gravatar

    I realize that you didn’t bother to search for anthing else than ‘Novell’.

    Try ‘Sun Java’. Yep, it’s going downwards.

    Now for the funny part: Search ‘Red Hat’. Wow. That’s a sharp decline.

    What does this tell us? Are all values in the world rapidly falling? No, it’s only Google Trends which exaggerates the developments. Google Trends is NOT a serious source of information. Tell me you haven’t even realized that they don’t indicate any units on the y-axis? Yeah, that’s right; you can’t tell whether it indicates cents or millions…

    Note: comment has been flagged for arriving from a possible incarnation of a known (eet), pseudonymous, forever-nymshifting, abusive Internet troll that posts from open proxies and relays around the world.

  6. ZiggyFish said,

    May 15, 2008 at 4:29 am

    Gravatar

    Show me the graph from a ‘serious source of information’

  7. Niklas (sic!) Koswinkle said,

    May 15, 2008 at 4:35 am

    Gravatar

    Perhaps there is none? Is that my mistake? It is no ME who is desperately searching for bad news about Novell.

    One thing is for sure: Google Trends is NO source for reliable info on stocks.

    Note: comment has been flagged for arriving from a possible incarnation of a known (eet), pseudonymous, forever-nymshifting, abusive Internet troll that posts from open proxies and relays around the world.

  8. Shane Coyle said,

    May 15, 2008 at 4:49 am

    Gravatar

    Well, here is a comment/quote I had once posted regarding the general idea of stock buybacks – anyone familiar with my articles may recall, I am finance-impaired as well:

    A bit about buybacks for those of us who are finance-impaired (me):

    Buy-backs are intended to give investors increased confidence. The logic goes something like this: if a company buys back its own stock, the share price should go up – first, there are fewer shares outstanding after the buy-back so each share represents a greater portion of the company’s total equity, and second, with fewer shares outstanding the company’s earnings per share and book value per share figures should look more attractive, which might have a positive effect on the stock. A buy-back is also said to counteract the dilutive nature of employee share incentive schemes. But buy-backs do not always result in the share price going up. For one thing, the company has had to spend some of its cash reserves – which really belong to the shareholders anyway. While the buy-back seems to counteract the dilutive effect of employee stock options, all companies are really doing is transferring the problem: the dilutive effect of the employee share incentive schemes is now directly visible on its balance sheet where that huge pot of cash used to be. But just as importantly, by definition buying back stock means that the company feels there is no better way of using that cash reserve than ploughing it into the stock markets to buy its own shares – it does not feel that investing that cash in additional personnel, assets, intellectual property, or even other businesses would be a better use of that money. For some, it could be seen as the last desperate measure of a management team which has run out of inspiration.

    FWIW

  9. ZiggyFish said,

    May 15, 2008 at 5:12 am

    Gravatar

    Niklas (sic!) Koswinkle:

    your the one that is ‘desperately searching’ to prove Roy wrong. And you haven’t found any evidence to prove him wrong.

  10. Roy Schestowitz said,

    May 15, 2008 at 5:25 am

    Gravatar

    I have a follow-up post on this buyback story coming shortly. By the way, in order to demonstrate Novell success (or lack thereof) as a function of time one can consider # of employees. Guess what? it’s going down. Another criterion could be market cap. Even executives/CEOs shuffle.

  11. Niklas (sic!) Koswinkle said,

    May 15, 2008 at 5:53 am

    Gravatar

    Ziggy, it is Roy who has to prove HIS outrageous theories, not me.

    Note: comment has been flagged for arriving from a possible incarnation of a known (eet), pseudonymous, forever-nymshifting, abusive Internet troll that posts from open proxies and relays around the world.

  12. ZiggyFish said,

    May 15, 2008 at 6:00 am

    Gravatar

    Niklas (sic!) Koswinkle:

    I would agree with you if you had something back up your position. All I’ve heard from you is either FUD for personal attacks.

What Else is New


  1. OpenSUSE Hates Your Freedom, But It Loves the Proprietary Software Reseller That Is the True 'Master' of OpenSUSE

    OpenSUSE is inclusive of Microsoft and other companies that attack human rights and [cref 141916 enable nationalists]; but apparently what bothers OpenSUSE very, very much is the people who started the operating system SUSE is selling



  2. Links 12/4/2021: Lagrange 1.3.2, Linux 5.12 RC7

    Links for the day



  3. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, April 11, 2021

    IRC logs for Sunday, April 11, 2021



  4. EPOLeaks on Misleading the Bundestag -- Part 14: The Notorious Revolving Door

    The Benoît Battistelli-António Campinos shuffle left some people in the EPO’s upper management better off; they’re being rewarded for complicity, so there’s no incentive to do the right thing but to do the wrong thing



  5. Links 11/4/2021: GnuPG 2.3.0, Linux 5.13 Additions

    Links for the day



  6. All EPO Articles Are Available Over Gemini Protocol

    For lighter and more privacy-preserving access to Techrights use the Gemini capsule instead of the Web site



  7. Judge and JURI

    The Committee on Legal Affairs, a.k.a JURI, meets the EPO tomorrow (in 24 hours); will abuses by António Campinos and Benoît Battistelli be brought up?



  8. EPOLeaks on Misleading the Bundestag -- Part 13: The Failed Promise of a “Good Governance” Guru…

    Before becoming an absent-minded Vice-President of António Campinos Christoph Ernst was posing as the very opposite of what he would become



  9. Gemini Gateways for IPFS

    The World Wide Web is fine for a lot of things, but for controversial publications and publications that invoke the 'wrath' of corporations/states/plutocracy we must look beyond the traditional protocols, choosing decentralised means and self-hosted means of publication (instead or at the very least in conjunction)



  10. Challenging Times for EPO Management

    A discussion of the status quo at Europe's second-largest (but scarcely-understood) institution, subjected to a JURI hearing tomorrow afternoon



  11. “The Fighters of Freedom”

    Some anime fans have made this video about recent events



  12. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, April 10, 2021

    IRC logs for Saturday, April 10, 2021



  13. [Meme] Bundestagate Series Spoiler

    The chain of command/s at the EPO typically leads to major tragedy



  14. Breaking News: Campinos to Appear Before the Legals Affairs Committee of the European Parliament on Monday 12 April

    "Some MEPs have been briefed about ongoing governance deficits at the EPO, in particular the lack of GDPR compliance and the sell-out of "digital sovereignty" to Microsoft, but it remains to be seen whether or not they will dare to bring these issues up during the hearing."



  15. Pro-FSF Petition (“An Open Letter in Support of Richard Matthew Stallman Being Reinstated by the Free Software Foundation”) Tops 6,200 Signatures

    Monopolies and their media, along with their NGOs, have spoken and incited based on falsehoods; people now respond so the hate letter has a real crisis



  16. Links 10/4/2021: osbuild 28, KDE Frameworks 5.81.0

    Links for the day



  17. EPOLeaks on Misleading the Bundestag -- Part 12: A Worthy Successor to His Mentor?

    We examine the role of Christoph Ernst in EPO management, both in the Benoît Battistelli era and the António Campinos era (plenty to hide)



  18. USPTO for Monopolies, Keeping GNU/Linux in the Dark

    Growing evidence of gross discrimination against GNU/Linux (or Free software, even BSD/UNIX) users at the USPTO is too hard to ignore; some people out there challenge the Office over this travesty



  19. Accessibility and Availability First

    To make Techrights more widely accessible and more difficult to block/censor we've been making further changes, including self-hosting where possible



  20. Self-Hosting Videos With Free Formats and Animated Previews, Watermarks/Logos and Translucency

    We examine the power of video editing with ffmpeg, chained with command-line scripting and HTML5 features



  21. Links 10/4/2021: Linux on M1, Wine 6.6, ClamAV 0.103.2

    Links for the day



  22. Lunduke: On Mob Justice in the Tech Industry

    A new video from the former Microsofter who fears the phenomenon that’s adopted by companies like IBM



  23. IRC Proceedings: Friday, April 09, 2021

    IRC logs for Friday, April 09, 2021



  24. EPOLeaks on Misleading the Bundestag — Appendix (Benoît Battistelli's Vichy Syndrome): Georges Henri Léon Battistelli and Charles Robert Battistelli

    Local copies with evidence of or something concrete about Benoît Battistelli’s connection to unsavoury — and by today’s standards outright fascistic — politics



  25. IBM Doubles Down on Masters Being an Acceptable Word in the Context of Technology

    3 days after this post which disproves IBM's stance or shows its double standards it once again says “Masters” in its official blog (won’t that offend and alienate some people as they insist?)



  26. Hate Letter Against Richard Matthew Stallman (RMS) Backfired So Spectacularly That Signers Asked to Revoke Their Own Signatures and the List Was Then Frozen Permanently (Updated)

    "An open letter in support of Richard Matthew Stallman being reinstated by the Free Software Foundation" tops 6,100 signatures (graph generated just moments ago)



  27. EPOLeaks on Misleading the Bundestag -- Part 11: The BMJV's Tweedledee: Dr Christoph Ernst

    The right-hand man of António Campinos plays a role similar to that of Herr Lutz before him



  28. Links 9/4/2021: Tanglet 1.6.0 and HPVM 1.0

    Links for the day



  29. The Libel Against Richard Stallman Did Not Age Well

    Almost 2 years down the line libel about the founder of the FSF remains online, uncorrected (in sites funded by Microsoft and IBM)



  30. The Letter in Support of the FSF and Richard Stallman is Backed by the International Community, Not American Monopolies and Nationalistic Elements

    Free software is for everybody to use, internationally, it is not the asset of a bunch of current and old monopolists (connected to the US military) that also control the media; the nature of the signatures says that out loud


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts