EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

10.29.08

Does Microsoft Try to Conquer ODF to Sell Microsoft Office?

Posted in Africa, Free/Libre Software, Microsoft, Office Suites, Open XML, OpenDocument at 9:15 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Protests in Norway (OOXML)

NO matter one’s point of view, it’s clear that ODF is not going away. It has already become a national standard in several nations, whereas OOXML is typically shunned due to binary Office formats, (X)HTML, and PDF. ODF adoption too is increasing.

According to Tectonic, which is based in South Africa, the government there is “more committed to ODF than ever.” It’s worth remembering the tricks that Microsoft and its lobbyists tried to pull there, without success. In fact, South Africa filed a complaint shortly afterwards.

Open standards are critical in ensuring that the South African government both avoids vendor lock-in and promotes democracy. This is according to South Africa’s minister of home affairs, Nosiviwe Mapisa-Nqakula.

In a prepared speech for the opening of the recent Second International ODF conference in Pretoria, Mapisa-Nqakula said that the department of home affairs was “forging ahead to make open standards a priority” to ensure future ability to process and share documents “using formats which have significant impact on the efficiency, interoperability and accessibility of public services”.

Even if a country has strong pro-ODF inclinations, Microsoft wants to virtually force it to pay for Microsoft Office. As we’ve seen before, it may be capable of sending its lobbyists to threaten governments.

“As we’ve seen before, it may be capable of sending its lobbyists to threaten governments.”If Microsoft is able to take ODF into its own hands, which is something it may already be trying to achieve [1, 2, 3, 4, 5], then a pro-standards policy will be less effective than a Free software policy.

Meanwhile, it sure seems like there are appointments of more Microsoft cronies inside ISO. This time it’s Jesper Lund Stocholm [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8]. ISO becomes more of a farce as time goes by if it permits itself to be taken over by Microsoft’s interests.

In another new post from Alex Brown, there seems to be more typical agenda of promoting Microsoft Office for ODF. How ironic is is that the sidebar of the blog also includes a “Quotable” from “Jesper Lund Stocholm.” They are all from the same ‘group’, sharing the same vested interests and seeking to exploit the system for self gain, using it to their advantage.

The most un-enamoring thing of it all is infinite dishonesty from Microsoft, which fought ODF like fire. Now it’s just pretending to be its friend and evangelist, having snuck a proprietary format into ISO, using blackmail, bribes, sabotage, smear campaigns and vote-rigging.

“Freedom is primarily achieved by providing the means for self-reliance. When individuals can provide for their own needs independently, without placing burdens on others, they are more free.”

Terry Hancock

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

15 Comments

  1. Linux said,

    October 29, 2008 at 9:41 am

    Gravatar

    http://www.linuxworld.com.au/index.php/id;424767525;fp;2;fpid;1

    So now companies who have the cash can own the internet !! This system is for the rich, by the rich and of the rich !!

  2. Roy Schestowitz said,

    October 29, 2008 at 9:49 am

    Gravatar

    I think that has always been the case, in general. ISO is no exception and it makes it truly visible by allowing a rich spoiled brat to run it.

  3. pcole said,

    October 29, 2008 at 12:15 pm

    Gravatar

    What is bothersome is, many people are switching to the ODF format and MS has it’s people in SC 34. The fear is that they may be approving MS-only bin-blobs into ODF, thereby corrupting the format to MS’s interests.

  4. Gentoo User said,

    October 29, 2008 at 4:42 pm

    Gravatar

    Um, I wouldn’t be too quick to bemoan the “they’re all in league” angle, considering this twitter guy promotes your site heavily on Slashdot (under god knows how many accounts).

    Note: comment arrived from a witch hunter that does not even use GNU/Linux.

  5. twitter said,

    October 29, 2008 at 4:58 pm

    Gravatar

    I’m sad to say that I link to Wintel press articles more often than Roy.

    You too may be worth quoting. Got anything interesting to say about M$’s move to put ODF under the authority of the OOXML group and M$’s blatant corruption of ISO?

  6. Gentoo User said,

    October 29, 2008 at 5:24 pm

    Gravatar

    Err… I’m not going to get into that with you, since you’re obviously a troll (and badly conceptualized at that), but if by “M$” you mean Microsoft, then no.

    Then again, I probably wouldn’t sensationalize it as much as you require.

    There’s a story on the /. front page right now about Twitter (the service), and half the posts there seem to be jokes about you. I’d take that as a warning sign if I were you…

    Note: comment arrived from a witch hunter that does not even use GNU/Linux.

  7. Roy Schestowitz said,

    October 29, 2008 at 5:43 pm

    Gravatar

    ‘Gentoo User’,

    Please keep personal disputes off this site and don’t try to associate me with other people who just visit the Web site.

    I don’t sensationalise. ISO has gone through quite an ordeal that left is run by many people who operate in the interests of a rich spoiled brat called Microsoft. This is not the first such example.

  8. G. Michaels said,

    October 29, 2008 at 6:23 pm

    Gravatar

    twitter, I would like to congratulate you on adding a former XEmacs developer and long-time Unix advocate to your “Troll Zoo” list, after he dared post this:

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1009565&cid=25537739

    In response to your highly rated flamebait (posted with a sockpuppet, no less):

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1009565&cid=25536083

    You truly are a credit to F/OSS evangelism. And your Perens/Raymond quotes sure lessen the impact of your apparent inability to control your anger and hatred towards anyone who disagrees with you.

    Note: writer of this comment adds absolutely nothing but stalking and personal attacks against readers, as documented here.

  9. Gentoo User said,

    October 29, 2008 at 6:27 pm

    Gravatar

    @schestowitz: The “sensationalist” thing was not directed at you.

    Note: comment arrived from a witch hunter that does not even use GNU/Linux.

  10. Roy Schestowitz said,

    October 29, 2008 at 6:29 pm

    Gravatar

    Either way, if you have a Slashdot confrontation, please refrain from bringing it here.

  11. twitter said,

    December 4, 2008 at 9:42 pm

    Gravatar

    Since you mention it, here’s the troll zoo. It’s fun but it does not have much to do with ODF.

  12. G. Michaels said,

    December 5, 2008 at 12:23 am

    Gravatar

    Funny how you never allowed comments there, nymshifter.

    Note: writer of this comment adds absolutely nothing but stalking and personal attacks against readers, as documented here.

  13. AlexH said,

    December 5, 2008 at 4:23 am

    Gravatar

    @pcole: SC 34 doesn’t have any control over ODF. Fears of ODF being “corrupted” are unfounded.

  14. pcolon said,

    December 5, 2008 at 8:19 am

    Gravatar

    Yes, all fears of MS stacked SC 34 are unfounded. JTC-1 helps the consumer. Ecma, ACTA are good for SMB’s. MS is looking out for our welfare. Comcast is not looking to censor the internet. RIAA/MPAA are looking out for the artist’s interest. Novell is not a turncoat. The Gates foundation is a real charity and do not invest in media outlets and energy revenues; OLPC is a money laundering outfit. ISO is honest.

    click, click, there’s no place like home.

  15. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 5, 2008 at 8:24 am

    Gravatar

    Alex, please don’t try to pass naivety onto other readers. This is not Faux News here.

    Direct link

What Else is New


  1. “US Inventor” is a “Bucket of Deplorables” Not Worthy of Media Coverage

    Jan Wolfe of Reuters treats a fringe group called “US Inventor” as though it's a conservative voice rather than a bunch of patent extremists pretending to be inventors



  2. Team Battistelli's Attacks on the EPO Boards of Appeal Predate the Illegal Sanctions Against a Judge

    A walk back along memory lane reveals that Battistelli has, all along, suppressed and marginalised DG3 members, in order to cement total control over the entire Organisation, not just the Office



  3. PTAB is Safe, the Patent Extremists Just Try to Scandalise It Out of Sheer Desperation

    The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA), which gave powers to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) through inter partes reviews (IPRs), has no imminent threats, not potent ones anyway



  4. Update on the EPO's Crackdown on the Boards of Appeal

    Demand of 35% increases from the boards serves to show that Battistelli now does to the 'independent' judges what he already did to examiners at the Office



  5. The Lobbyists Are Trying to Subvert US Law in Favour of Patent Predators

    Mingorance, Kappos, Underweiser and other lobbyists for the software patents agenda (paid by firms like Microsoft and IBM) keep trying to undo progress, notably the bans on software patents



  6. Patent Trolls Based in East Texas Are Affected Very Critically by TC Heartland

    The latest situation in Texas (United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in particular), which according to new analyses is the target of legal scrutiny for the 'loopholes' it provided to patent trolls in search of easy legal battles



  7. Alice Remains a Strong Precedential Decision and the Media Has Turned Against Software Patents

    The momentum against the scourge of software patents and the desperation among patent 'professionals' (people who don't create/develop/invent) is growing



  8. Harm Still Caused by Granted Software Patents

    A roundup of recent (past week's) announcements, including legal actions, contingent upon software patents in an age when software patents bear no real legitimacy



  9. Links 18/11/2017: Raspberry Digital Signage 10, New Nano

    Links for the day



  10. 23,000 Posts

    23,000 blog posts milestone reached in 11 years



  11. BlackBerry Cannot Sell Phones and Apple Looks Like the Next BlackBerry (a Pile of Patents)

    The lifecycle of mobile giants seems to typically end in patent shakedown, as Apple loses its business to Android just like Nokia and BlackBerry lost it to Apple



  12. EFF and CCIA Use Docket Navigator and Lex Machina to Identify 'Stupid Patents' (Usually Software Patents That Are Not Valid)

    In spite of threats and lawsuits from bogus 'inventors' whom they criticise, EFF staff continues the battle against patents that should never have been granted at all



  13. The Australian Productivity Commission Shows the Correct Approach to Setting Patent Laws and Scope

    Australia views patents on software as undesirable and acts accordingly, making nobody angry except a bunch of law firms that profited from litigation and patent maximalism



  14. EPO 'Business' From the United States Has Nosedived and UPC is on Its Death Throes

    Benoît Battistelli and Elodie Bergot further accelerate the ultimate demise of the EPO (getting rid of experienced and thus 'expensive' staff), for which there is no replacement because there is a monopoly (which means Europe will suffer severely)



  15. Links 17/11/2017: KDE Applications 17.12, Akademy 2018 Plans

    Links for the day



  16. Today's EPO and Team UPC Do Not Work for Europe But Actively Work Against Europe

    The tough reality that some Europeans actively work to undermine science and technology in Europe because they personally profit from it and how this relates to the Unitary Patent (UPC), which is still aggressively lobbied for, sometimes by bribing/manipulating the media, academia, and public servants



  17. Links 16/11/2017: WordPress 4.9 and GhostBSD 11.1 Released

    Links for the day



  18. The Staff Union of the EPO (SUEPO) is Rightly Upset If Not Shocked at What Battistelli and Bergot Are Doing to the Office

    The EPO's dictatorial management is destroying everything that's left (of value) at the Office while corrupting academia and censoring discussion by threatening those who publish comments (gagging its own staff even when that staff posts anonymously)



  19. EPO Continues to Disobey the Law on Software Patents in Europe

    Using the same old euphemisms, e.g. "computer-implemented inventions" (or "CII"), the EPO continues to grant patents which are clearly and strictly out of scope



  20. Links 16/11/2017: Tails 3.3, Deepin 15.5 Beta

    Links for the day



  21. Benoît Battistelli and Elodie Bergot Have Just Ensured That EPO Will Get Even More Corrupt

    Revolving door-type tactics will become more widespread at the EPO now that the management (Battistelli and his cronies) hires for low cost rather than skills/quality and minimises staff retention; this is yet another reason to dread anything like the UPC, which prioritises litigation over examination



  22. Australia is Banning Software Patents and Shelston IP is Complaining as Usual

    The Australian Productivity Commission, which defies copyright and patent bullies, is finally having policies put in place that better serve the interests of Australians, but the legal 'industry' is unhappy (as expected)



  23. Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Defended by Technology Giants, by Small Companies, by US Congress and by Judges, So Why Does USPTO Make It Less Accessible?

    In spite of the popularity of PTAB and the growing need/demand for it, the US patent system is apparently determined to help it discriminate against poor petitioners (who probably need PTAB the most)



  24. Declines in Patent Quality at the EPO and 'Independent' Judges Can No Longer Say a Thing

    The EPO's troubling race to the bottom (of patent quality) concerns the staff examiners and the judges, but they cannot speak about it without facing rather severe consequences



  25. The EPO is Now Corrupting Academia, Wasting Stakeholders' Money Lying to Stakeholders About the Unitary Patent (UPC)

    The Unified Patent Court/Unitary Patent (UPC) is a dying project and the EPO, seeing that it is going nowhere fast, has resorted to new tactics and these tactics cost a lot of money (at the expense of those who are being lied to)



  26. Links 15/11/2017: Fedora 27 Released, Linux Mint Has New Betas

    Links for the day



  27. Patents Roundup: Packet Intelligence, B.E. Technology, Violin, and Square

    The latest stories and warnings about software patents in the United States



  28. Decline of Skills Level of Staff Like Examiners and Impartiality (Independence) of Judges at the EPO Should Cause Concern, Alarm

    Access to justice is severely compromised at the EPO as staff is led to rely on deficient tools for determining novelty while judges are kept out of the way or ill-chosen for an agenda other than justice



  29. Links 14/11/2017: GNU/Linux at Samsung, Firefox 57 Quantum

    Links for the day



  30. Microsoft: Sheltering Oneself From Patent Litigation While Passing Patents for Trolls to Attack GNU/Linux

    Another closer look at Provenance Asset Holdings and what exactly it is (connection to AST, part of the cartel Microsoft subsidises to shield itself)


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts