11.27.08
Happy Thanksgiving
Richard Stallman at the launch of GPLv3
If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.
Pages that cross-reference this one
40 Comments
What Else is New
Links - MSNokia Passes Blame, Bill Gates pushes GMOs, Open Access news
Links 7/2/2012: Firefox 11 Enters Beta, Canonical Disappoints KDE
Links for the day
IRC Proceedings: February 6th, 2012
IRC logs for February 6th, 2012
IRC Proceedings: February 5th, 2012
IRC logs for February 5th, 2012
Links 6/2/2012: PCLinuxOS 2012.02 and Mint KDE Reviews
Links for the day
Bill Gates Indoctrinates Youth in the United States and India, Critics Speak Out
Backlash against the Gates Crusade to brainwash the young minds all around the world
Bill Gates Uses Symbolic 'Donation' to Force Taxpayers to Pay Microsoft (of Which He Holds Shares)
The Gates Foundation goes lobbying for Microsoft again, this time in Vietnam
Monopoly as Innovation?
Challenging the old misconception that patents are beneficial to anything but few multinationals and their patent lawyers
Links 5/2/2012: Lenovo in India, Netrunner 4.1 is Out
Links for the day
IRC Proceedings: February 4th, 2012
IRC logs for February 4th, 2012
OpenStack, Microsoft, Junk Patents, Microsoft Copyrights, and Oracle Copyrights
Another look at the OpenStack situation, why Microsoft should not be allowed to enter, and more about patent and copyright complications
Apple, Which Started Patent Wars, Gets What It Deserves
Apple products get banned (for the time being) after Apple decided to attack Linux-supporting competitors and then received some blowback
Unitary Patent and the Emergence of More Junk Patents
The rise of the junk patents and what we are taught about them by the news, including some news about the unitary patent in Europe
Backlash Against Bill Gates' Lobbying for Patented Life
GMO, a robbery of the right of reproduction (and a potential health hazard), is promoted by Bill Gates for profit, whereupon critics strike back
IRC Proceedings: February 3rd, 2012
IRC logs for February 3rd, 2012
Links 4/2/2012: Ubuntu 12.04 Alpha 2 Preview, ACTA Backlash in Europe
Links for the day
A Glimpse at Executives Who Left the Sinking Novell Ship
A roundup of news about former Novell staff and where that staff is moving these days
Novell Makes New Software for Microsoft Windows and Office
PR spin from Novell and money-grabbing moves that promote proprietary software rather than Free/Open Source software
Links 3/2/2012: BT Vision Goes for Linux, Linux 3.3 With Android
Links for the day
Debt in Attachmate
The company that bought Novell has a poor outlook, financial issues, and little signs of expansion/renaissance
Longtime SUSE Executive Holger Dyroff Moves on, SUSE in a Bad State
Key people continue to leave SUSE and the distribution is left without a compelling sales pitch
Groklaw Update on Android Patent Cases and Response to FUD From Microsoft Lobbyists
A few updates of greater importance where the Linux situation is discussed in the context of Android and Novell
IRC Proceedings: February 2nd, 2012
IRC logs for February 2nd, 2012
Links 2/2/2012: DEFT Linux 7, Mozilla Firefox 10
Links for the day
IRC Proceedings: February 1st, 2012
IRC logs for February 1st, 2012
IRC Proceedings: January 31st, 2012
IRC logs for January 31st, 2012
IRC Proceedings: January 30th, 2012
IRC logs for January 30th, 2012
Bill Gates is Hijacking Open Source While Attacking It Using Lobbyists, Patents, and Patent Trolls
Response to reputation laundering from Wired Magazine, the latest nonsense from Microsoft's lobbyist Florian Müller, an update on Microsoft's trolling against Android, and a little more of Apple's
The Gates Foundation is Still Hijacking the Voice of the Poor and Effectively Runs Paid Advertisements Inside 'News'
Money still the vehicle by which opinions get heard, so Bill Gates exploits this for fame, power, and profit
Bill Gates and Rupert Murdoch Liaise to Take Over Minds of Children
The latest dangerous hijack of education systems and the role played by creepy plutocrats with control over the press
Needs Sunlight said,
November 27, 2008 at 11:03 am
I’m particularly thankful for all the effort towards software freedom that has been made by the Gnu project.
As far as utilities go, I’m really glad about Gnu tar. The other tars have been catching up, but it led the way.
AlexH said,
November 27, 2008 at 12:30 pm
@Needs: because it’s an acronym, you should usually write “GNU” not “Gnu”.
Roy Schestowitz said,
November 27, 2008 at 12:32 pm
AFAIK, both are acceptable in actual use. The UNIX way doesn’t encourage capitalisation, either.
AlexH said,
November 27, 2008 at 12:47 pm
No, they’re not. You won’t see anyone in the project refer to it that way.
Roy Schestowitz said,
November 27, 2008 at 12:53 pm
Journalists sometimes do.
AlexH said,
November 27, 2008 at 12:57 pm
That doesn’t really make it correct
Roy Schestowitz said,
November 27, 2008 at 1:00 pm
Of course not. Becta ain’t correct either.
AlexH said,
November 27, 2008 at 1:06 pm
Actually, “Becta” is correct, it’s no longer an acronym. Ditto Ecma.
GNU remains an acronym, hence it should not be studly-capped.
Roy Schestowitz said,
November 27, 2008 at 1:10 pm
Tell USENET/Google as well.
http://groups.google.com/groups/dir?sel=usenet%3Dgnu
AlexH said,
November 27, 2008 at 1:16 pm
As far as I can see, all the descriptions there are correct, and anyway I’m not going around hunting for people mis-writing “GNU”.
It was just a friendly hint to someone who appears to support the project; I don’t get why you’re trying to defend writing it incorrectly.
Roy Schestowitz said,
November 27, 2008 at 1:17 pm
Naa… I just see an overly pedantic Microsoft apologist nitpicking the comment of a regular reader.
AlexH said,
November 27, 2008 at 1:24 pm
It doesn’t really surprise me that you’re resorting to insults again now that you’ve lost the argument that you picked in the first place.
“Needs Sunlight” was trying to give just credit to the GNU Project, and I’m just showing him how we usually write the project name. It’s pretty poor show that you’re attempting to confuse the matter with nonsense.
Roy Schestowitz said,
November 27, 2008 at 1:31 pm
Again… the point is the nitpicking. Almost everything revolves around it.
AlexH said,
November 27, 2008 at 1:32 pm
No, it’s not nitpicking, it’s just a helpful nudge. I assumed he would want to know because he wants to credit GNU. I would do the same if he’s written “Redhat” or something.
You’re the one making a big thing out of this by spouting inaccuracies.
Roy Schestowitz said,
November 27, 2008 at 1:37 pm
I don’t bother correcting people who write “Redhat” or “Linux” in reference to an operating system. Most people I know would simply not bother.
Again… the point is your nitpicking. It’s part of a pattern.
AlexH said,
November 27, 2008 at 1:49 pm
Correcting “Linux” referring to an operating system isn’t “nit picking“, Roy.
If you don’t want to bother, that’s up to you. Please stop disrupting those of us who do.
Roy Schestowitz said,
November 27, 2008 at 1:54 pm
Are you AlexH or just a forger? Either way, this is getting funny.
AlexH said,
November 27, 2008 at 2:01 pm
Whatever, Roy. Saying “GNU/Linux” is important. If you cannot comprehend why, then I have no idea what you think you’re doing.
pcolon said,
November 27, 2008 at 2:17 pm
Today is a day when we attribute as thanksgiving. A short time in which we stop or rear from our normal daily activities, to reflect and focus on things to be thankful for.
Like “Needs Sunlight”, I also am thankful for the efforts of GNU/FOSS and the altruistic efforts of all contributors to the cause of freedom of choice & expression.
Goblin said,
November 27, 2008 at 5:48 pm
How do you do it Roy?
How do you manage getting these people to post on your blog? I would love AlexH (or should that be ALEXh or alexH or AlExH) to post on mine.
If he is a shiller, it shows how desperate MS posters are getting. If he’s not then it is even worse (Ive seen some petty points being made but that takes the biscuit)
Please AlexH would you consider coming over to my site?
Michael said,
November 27, 2008 at 7:25 pm
Ahh, nice friendly banter to lighten my morning coffee. Can’t you just “feel the love”? Do you guys want a private room?
*chuckle*
And after getting angry at SA’s attorneys general for being a complete dick head, I only come over here to get all my angriness-at-something out in one go this morning.
Roy Schestowitz said,
November 27, 2008 at 7:30 pm
Can you elaborate on that?
RyanT said,
November 28, 2008 at 5:54 am
How do you do it Goblin, posting completely irrelevant remarks and insults about someone who has been right more than wrong?
Roy Schestowitz said,
November 28, 2008 at 6:26 am
Alex side-steps all the big questions and instead addresses pet peeves or minor inaccuracies.
AlexH said,
November 28, 2008 at 7:27 am
@Roy: that’s completely untrue. E.g., “Mono has patent problems” – that meme/FUD gets repeated here on a regular basis, and I help show people how it’s wrong.
What happens is that you, and others, attempt to defend the FUD by saying things like “Oh, you’re supporting software patents!”, or “MS have been nasty before so Mono must have problems”. When I point out that your facts are wrong, you call it “nit-picking” because I don’t take on your conclusions.
The problem is that your conclusions don’t follow from the facts.
Roy Schestowitz said,
November 28, 2008 at 7:53 am
I was referring to things like neglecting Microsoft’s pattern of behaviour. Jeff Waugh has the same type of problem and so does Miguel de Icaza.
AlexH said,
November 28, 2008 at 8:05 am
No, I don’t neglect it, I accept it without question.
I’m not willing to use it as justification to attack e.g. Mono, though. Mono’s future cannot be controlled by Microsoft; it is free software.
Roy Schestowitz said,
November 28, 2008 at 8:09 am
It mimics Microsoft, just as the name “mono” (monkey) suggests. Therefore it is controlled by Microsoft, not to mention Microsoft’s close partner, Novell (copyrights holder).
AlexH said,
November 28, 2008 at 8:26 am
You’ve been given plenty of examples of Mono technologies that are not present in .net before, including Simd, Posix, Cecil, Gnome#, and a host of other APIs.
Yes, it is byte-code compatible with .net and comes with the same basic library. Yes, there are higher level libraries which are also MS compatible. But no, it’s not ‘controlled by Microsoft’.
Roy Schestowitz said,
November 28, 2008 at 8:29 am
Believing this is akin to believing that Iraq is an independent country.
Ian said,
November 28, 2008 at 5:21 pm
It mimics Microsoft, just as the name “mono” (monkey) suggests. Therefore it is controlled by Microsoft, not to mention Microsoft’s close partner, Novell (copyrights holder).
So does Samba.
Roy Schestowitz said,
November 28, 2008 at 5:25 pm
Yes, but that’s a flawed comparison.
Ian said,
November 28, 2008 at 5:39 pm
You said Mono mimics Microsoft(.net). I’m saying Samba mimics CIFS. I don’t see what’s flawed. It’s not a bash on Samba, it just is what it is. Samba reacts to what Microsoft does with their CIFS protocols, not the other way around.
That article mentions patents, which neither you nor I mention in the two previous posts.
Roy Schestowitz said,
November 28, 2008 at 6:04 pm
Samba treats existing protocols. Mono and Novell encourage development using Microsoft APIs (‘protocols’).
AlexH said,
November 28, 2008 at 7:10 pm
Mono doesn’t include solely MS “APIs / protocols”. So that argument obviously doesn’t work.
As empirical evidence, try running Tomboy on Windows without installed the free software APIs.
Roy Schestowitz said,
November 28, 2008 at 7:41 pm
Let me state my point more clearly as I seem to be miscomprehended. Mono is used to create content the ‘Microsoft way’. Samba merely treats things in existence, much like wine.
AlexH said,
November 28, 2008 at 7:46 pm
@Roy: except that’s not true either. E.g., Samba’s BDC support is nothing like MS’ version.
Roy Schestowitz said,
November 28, 2008 at 7:53 pm
Yes, the dissimilarities are not perfect.
AlexH said,
November 28, 2008 at 7:54 pm
Including that Mono can be used to develop stuff not in the “Microsoft way”, unless Microsoft adopted Gtk+ / Qt while I wasn’t looking.
Roy Schestowitz said,
November 28, 2008 at 7:58 pm
In practice, inside Novell in particular, Mono is routinely used for C#/Gtk development.