Saugatuck has just published the results of a study where it analysed the impact of companies (referred to as "vendors") on open source. Among the findings there are hints about why Microsoft wants authority. It's all about controlling and taming projects through .NET, patents, Windows and formats like OOXML, then having a band of free labourers. That's how it views it. This is not open source; it's just Microsoft's vision of it, which is self serving.
Dat net
I was a little surprised when I stumbled on this page about "Open Source .Net eXchange." It's a mini-conference in London, UK, for .Net developers who are, or are thinking about, using open source.
I agree with Rodrigues’ conclusion that this event is but one small example of instances in which developers can and do have a foot on each side of the open vs. proprietary fence.
Avoid Microsoft led technologies, since these benefit the MS monopolies, since these do not disclose the many other details that would be needed for interop beyond the core shell spec.
[...]
The biggest problem with OOXML was that it didn't leverage even one teensy bit the existing ISO document format, ODF. It threw a ton of existing investments down the drain.
Amazingly, instead of finishing up SVG, OOXML supporters decide to start implementing from scratch a multi-thousand page format that re-invents the SVG wheel and a whole lot of other wheels. Go figure.
“[A] Microsoft supporter hating those who dissent against Microsoft, is like a criminal hating the police for catching him.”"But a Microsoft supporter hating those who dissent against Microsoft, is like a criminal hating the police for catching him. It's nothing more than knee-jerk reciprocation and mindless contradiction. Was the DOJ engaged in a "campaign of hate" when they prosecuted Microsoft for violation of section 2 of the Sherman Act? Well obviously they must have been, since they dared to challenge Micfrosoft's "right" to operate like gangsters. Punishing criminals is obviously wrong, so dissenting against the persistently unethical behaviour of those criminals is therefore purely irrational hatred, naturally.
"When such people are reminded of how Microsoft bribed ISO delegates to support OOXML, and bribed Nigerian education officials to wipe Mandriva from children's laptops, and any one of the thousands of other vile things that Microsoft do as their standard business practise, does it even register in their minds, I wonder, or is it filtered out by their rose-tinted spectacles?
"There can be only one of two possible explanations. Either they believe that all of this documented evidence against Microsoft is a lie (presumably including all the evidence provided by the DOJ; the EU commission; Joe Comes; and countless others in court), or they fully accept the truth of this evidence, but just happen to think it's perfectly acceptable behaviour.
"In other words they are either utterly delusional or evil.
"Take your pick." ⬆
Comments
Charles Oliver
2008-12-20 17:45:56
Shouldn't that be "attempted to bribe". If I remember the MS defence was that they didn't actually get around to bribing anyone, it was agreed in principle but there was a dissenter who wanted Mandriva so the payment was never made.
Roy Schestowitz
2008-12-20 22:01:59
spartan2276
2008-12-24 16:17:35
you know what I realized the more I read those types of articles/News that people do filter it out and they think and truly believe that it is acceptable behavior. You and I and most of the people in the Free software community think that is pure evil, I certainly believe it to be so.
But the funny part about it is that most people will come to this blog read your articles and then call you a nut job or say that is all a conspiracy and that no one should pay attention.
I just don't get it, why are people like this. I mean how much easier can it get, you and everyone else is clearly spelling it out for them but somehow they ignore it. It is truly disgusting to see people reason this way, such lack of education and so much corruption for what money which in the end they won't get to take it with them after they die. What a joke these crooks are and the rest of these idiots who knowingly support them!
jo Shields
2008-12-24 16:41:41
Ironically, demagogues target the stupid. Some are good at it - e.g. Bill O'Reilley or Roy Scheistowitz.
Only the exceptionally moronic would believe "hatred of double standards" means "carte blanche approval of all actions undertaken by Microsoft Corp"