EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

10.09.10

Massive Implosion at Microsoft: Another Business Unit Dies

Posted in Microsoft at 6:46 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Sunken ship

Summary: Massive, which Microsoft spent a lot of money buying, is finally being buried

THE list of Microsoft’s deprecated services, dead products, and discarded divisions grows at a fast rate and it is not deniable that Microsoft suffers a lot right now. Maybe its investors didn’t quite get the memo because Microsoft spends a lot of money making promises and showing/alluding to vapourware. The truth is, the core of the company is stagnating and Microsoft just cannot find good ways to evolve.

The next wave of destruction within Microsoft is Massive, which previously suffered layoffs.

Microsoft Nick has covered this:

Despite saying in May that the effectiveness of in-game advertisements blew away expectations, Microsoft reportedly is shuttering its Massive video-game advertising unit four years after acquiring it.

Here’s more:

An online report suggests Microsoft’s in-game advertising unit, Massive, will be shut down before the end of the month.

Ad industry trade publication Adweek cites “sources close to the company” and “insiders at Microsoft” in reporting that Massive General Manager J.J. Richards has been seeking new employment with other unit members reportedly being reassigned throughout the company.

The report suggests that Microsoft had been shopping around a Massive buyout in the past few months, reportedly seeking a high six-figure or low seven-figure sale to rival ad network Double Fusion.

At this rather alarming shrinking rate, all that may remain of Microsoft is Windows and Office, which are sold only because of inertia and somewhat unlawful exclusion (bundling, formats, and so on).

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

8 Comments

  1. The Mad Hatter said,

    October 9, 2010 at 9:12 pm

    Gravatar

    I estimated that Microsoft would be in Chapter 11 within five years, about a year ago. I’m beginning to wonder if maybe it may occur faster.

  2. TemporalBeing said,

    October 11, 2010 at 1:15 pm

    Gravatar

    There are several key points in the life of a company all of which determine how long a company will last.

    1) The Founding – will the company survive the first 7 years.
    2) Growth – will the company recognize it needs to grow and do so in a balanaced way.

    The above are the most well known. Most start-ups do not make it past #1. Those that do struggle with #2 – either they try not to grow at all, or they try to grow too fast. If no growth (e.g. employees, etc.) then they will lose their customers as they won’t be able to meet demand. If too much growth then they overstretch themselves and lose customers because they are stretched too thin.

    If a company survives those two things then there is still a major challenge to overcome – the departure of the founders, which could happen any time even during those initial stages, though it usually ends up being a disaster for the company at those points. This is what Microsoft is struggling with. Since its founding Microsoft has had BillyG and co at the helm. Now everyone is retiring or moving on and the next generation must take over; yet Ballmer is still around trying to keep BillyG’s mentality – the old way – working. If Ballmer were cast aside, Microsoft might survive, though not likely – but it would have a better chance.

    However, Microsoft’s next biggest problem is that its too dependent on its two cash cows – Windows and Office – and the rest of the company requires the extra cash from those two in order to even have a semblance of profit. And the Window+Office franchises are in trouble with WinPhone7 losing out to Android and iOS in the embedded space (since Microsoft can’t envision anything other than their Windows Desktop), Windows Server losing to Linux, and Windows Desktop and Office facing battles due to ODF, security pressures, and people realizing there is a world other than the mediocre Microsoft out there.

    5 years may be a bit extreme, but either Microsoft will be a very small shadow of what it is today or it will be completely extinct between 10-20 years, though I guess I should say 8-18 years since I’ve been saying that for about 2-3 years now.

    There’s a reason Microsoft fought so vehemently to keep OOXML as the standard – without it no one needs Windows, or Microsoft.

  3. The Mad Hatter said,

    October 11, 2010 at 4:03 pm

    Gravatar

    TemporalBeing,

    You aren’t considering the network effect. When you consider it, four years is about right. But there are certain signs that it may happen quicker.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Speaking from what I see when I read the news, what’s important is that Microsoft is heading down. From Mini-Microsoft:

    Wow, what got in the corporate water for this week? Coming off the glow of last week’s Company Meeting Koolaid we first got hit by the Goldman Sachs downgrade hang-over, then, to channel Mr. Ballmer, “Boom-Boom-Boom!”

    * Health care changes on the way.
    * Live Labs gets shut down.
    * Technical Fellow Gary Flake, one of Microsoft few-TED stars, resigns.
    * Technical Fellow Brad Lovering leaves.
    * A glassdor.com survey that shows a lowly 50% approval rating for Mr. Ballmer.
    * IEB gets re-orged.
    * Massive gets shuttered (like we were all looking forward to billboard ads while blowing crap up in Xbox).
    * Adobe acquisition rumors.
    * Matt Rosoff leaves Directions on Microsoft.

    All this right on the eve of Windows Phone 7 being launched. Feels like one big… purge.

    I may take a bit of a break from blogging about Microsoft.

    The Mad Hatter Reply:

    That’s why I think that it may be three years rather than four. the company is still profitable, but it’s tearing itself apart internally, and totally unable to compete except in two narrow markets.

    Disaster – film at 11:00!

    TemporalBeing Reply:

    You also forget the inertia. It will take a bit more than 3 or 4 years for the full inertia to die off and for Microsoft to succumb to it. Think about how many places M$ has their fingers in, how many companies are essentially backing them, and how widespread their software is used. That won’t disappear over 3 or 4 years as people still have to find alternatives for big products – like SAP for example – things that run on Windows and have no alternative but are core business software. People will keep their subscriptions around until they get a replacement; but their licenses will dwindle as they cut back to having Microsoft products only where necessary, etc.

    There’s a lot riding on Microsoft, and it’ll take time to unwind.

    Now, I’d be glad to be wrong and see Microsoft drop a lot faster. But from a business point-of-view (as well as an IT rollout point-of-view) I just don’t see it happening.

    For example, even if a major corporation such as Hewlett Packard, IBM, Northrop Grumman, etc decided to make the switch away from Windows today – it would take them 3 or 4 years to complete the switch. Even if everything was in place – meaning all desktop and laptop systems could be switched over without side-effects – it would still take them at least 1 years just to migrate end-users, not to mention any retraining. Now add another 1 or 2 years per major application (e.g. SharePoint, LiveLink, NetMeeting, etc.) and the roll-out goes longer.

    There’s just some simple practicalities that will keep Microsoft around – even if it’s only a shadow of what it is now – for a lot longer than 3 or 4 years.

    The Mad Hatter Reply:

    You are mistaking the need of the customer, with the health of the company. It’s quite possible for Microsoft to die, before their customers have an exit strategy in place. The customers won’t like it, but really considering how badly Microsoft supports them right now, they probably wouldn’t be any better off.

    Oh, and you are also assuming that these large companies are stupid enough that they can’t see what’s coming, and make plans. They aren’t that stupid, and I suspect the changeover will happen so fast that the tech press will go into shock.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    They could aways spin off Windows and/or Office as separate companies.

What Else is New


  1. Links 23/7/2016: Leo Laporte on GNU/Linux, Dolphin Emulator’s Vulkan Completion

    Links for the day



  2. Links 22/7/2016: Wine 1.9.15, KaOS 2016.07 ISO

    Links for the day



  3. Haar Mentioned as Likely Site of Appeal Boards as Their Eradication or Marginalisation Envisioned by UPC Proponent Benoît Battistelli

    Not only the Staff Union of the European Patent Office (SUEPO) is under severe attack and possibly in mortal danger; the increasingly understaffed Boards of Appeal too are coming under attack and may (according to rumours) be sent to Haar, a good distance away from Munich and the airport (half an hour drive), not to mention lack of facilities for visitors from overseas



  4. EPO Attaché Albert Keyack Viewed as Somewhat of a Mole, Reporting From the US Embassy in Brazil Until Shortly Before the Temer Coup

    Public responses to the role played by Albert Keyack on behalf of the United States inside the European [sic] Patent Office



  5. EPO Insiders Explain Why the EPO's Examination Quality Rapidly Declines and Will Get Even Worse Because of Willy Minnoye

    Public comments from anonymous insiders serve to highlight a growing crisis inside the European Patent Office (EPO), where experienced/senior examiners are walking away and leaving an irreplaceable bunch of seats (due to high experience demands)



  6. Patents Roundup: BlackBerry, Huawei, PTAB, GAO, Aggressive Universities With Patents, and Software Patents in Europe

    Various bits and pieces of news regarding patents and their fast-changing nature in the United States nowadays



  7. Glimpse at Patent Systems Across the World: Better Quality Control at the USPTO Post-America Invents Act (2011), Unlike the EPO Post-Battistelli (2010)

    While the EPO reportedly strives to eliminate pendency and appeal windows altogether (rubberstamping being optimal performance as per the yardstick du jour), the USPTO introduces changes that would strengthen the system and shield innovation, not protect the business model of serial litigants



  8. Blockstream Has No Patents, But Pledges Not to Sue Using Patents

    Blockstream says that it comes in peace when it comes to software patents, which triggers speculations about coming Blockchain patent wars



  9. Links 21/7/2016: Ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS, Linux Mint 18 “Sarah” Xfce Beta

    Links for the day



  10. Links 21/7/2016: An Honorary Degree for Alan Cox, Looks Back at DebConf16

    Links for the day



  11. EPO USA: Under Battistelli, the 'European' Patent Office Emulates All the Mistakes of the USPTO

    Conservative Benoît Battistelli is trying to impose on the European Patent Office various truly misguided policies and he viciously attacks anyone or anything that stands in his way, including his formal overseers



  12. Links 19/7/2016: ARM and Opera Buyout

    Links for the day



  13. Large Corporations' Software Patenting Pursuits Carry on in Spite of Patent Trolls That Threaten Small Companies the Most

    With unconvincing excuses such as OIN, large corporations including IBM continue to promote software patents in the United States, even when public officials and USPTO officials work towards ending those



  14. Battistelli Has Implemented De Facto EPO Coup to Remove Oversight, Give Himself Total Power, and Allegedly Give UPC Gifts (Loot) to French Officials

    Benoît Battistelli's agenda at the EPO is anything but beneficial to the EPO and suspicions that Battistelli's overall agenda is transitioning to the UPC to further his goals grow feet



  15. EPO Social [sic] Report is a Big Pile of Lies That Responsible Journalists Must Ignore

    A reminder of where the EPO stands on social issues and why the latest so-called 'social' report is nothing but paid-for propaganda for Battistelli's political ambitions



  16. Links 18/7/2016: Vista 10 a Failure, FreeType 2.7

    Links for the day



  17. Exploiting Perceived Emergencies/Disasters, Suspending the Rule of Law, and Suspending Judges: How Erdoğan is Like Battistelli, Except the Coup

    Pretexts for crackdown on law-abiding people or figureheads who are remote and independent the hallmark not only of Erdoğan but also the EPO's President, Benoit Battistelli



  18. The Impotence of Gene Quinn

    Attacking the enforcer of Alice v CLS because it's doing harm to his source of income, which makes him angry



  19. After the FTI Consulting-EPO Reputation Laundering Deal's Expansion in Germany Süddeutsche Zeitung 'Forgets' That the EPO Even Exists

    Relative apathy if not complete silence regarding the EPO at Süddeutsche Zeitung following reports of FTI Consulting's deal expansion (media positioning in Germany), with hundreds of thousands of Euros (EPO budget) thrown at the controversial task



  20. Benoît Battistelli and Persistratos

    Reminds you of someone?



  21. Whistleblower Protection Desperately Needed at the European Patent Office

    EPO scandals are not publicly accessible or known to many people and not many such scandals are known at all because people are afraid of Battistelli's Fabius Maximus strategies



  22. Microsoft and Its Patent Minions at Nokia Still Have Patent Stacking Ambitions Against Android/Linux OEMs

    Weaponisation of European companies for the sake of artificial elevation of prices (patent taxes) a growing issue for Free/Open Source software (FOSS) and those behind it are circulating money among themselves not for betterment of products but for the crippling of FOSS contenders



  23. [ES] ¿Que si la EPO Bajo Battistelli Se Arruina Sin Posibilidad de Reparación Como la UPC?

    La última evidencia alrededor del hundimiénto de la reputación de la Epo y su calidad de trabajo, así como la caída del sistema que Battistelli trata forzadamente de imponer (una carrera al fondo)



  24. [ES] La EPO de Battistelli, Quién Quiebra la Ley, Subvierte el Curso de la Justicia y Rechaza Obedecer las Ordenes de la Corte Dice lo Impensable en Medio de los Actos de Terror

    Los terribles ataques hace un dia en Francia están siéndo explotados por el caradura de Benoît Battistelli para comedia negra o un verdaderamente absurda afirmación en la sección de “noticias” de la EPO



  25. [ES] La EPO de Battistelli Continúa Cortejando a Officiales de Países Pequeños y su Propaganda de Beneficiar a las “PYMEs de Aquellos Países”

    El caradura de Benoît Battistelli prosigue desfilando en los países pequeños que tienen delegados al Consejo Administrativo (CA) y los explota para propaganda barata, no sólo para que lo apoyen en las reuniónes del CA



  26. Links 17/7/2016: Lithuanian Police Switches to GNU/Linux, Blockchain on LinuxONE

    Links for the day



  27. This is Why Benoît Battistelli Has 0% Approval Rating Among 'His' Staff at the EPO

    The EPO expresses solidarity regarding (mostly) French people but does so only in English as the real purpose is to manipulate the media and justify the EPO's sheer abuses and unprecedented oppression against staff



  28. Law Professors Try to Put an End to Patent Trolls So Patent Trolls-Funded IAM 'Magazine' Complains

    Many professors suggest a method of stopping patent trolls (restrictions on venue shifting), so patent trolls-funded propaganda sites and think tanks strike back and distract even further, putting forth a wish list or a 'reform' that's designed to give them more money and incredibly protectionist power



  29. The Importance of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) and High-Quality Patents (Not Software Patents)

    Strong patents rather than strong patent enforcement (i.e. ease of legal abuse) help discern the difference between successful economies and self-destructive economies



  30. With 'Friends' Like IBM and Its 'Open' Invention Network We Legitimise Software Patents Rather Than End Them

    Another reminder of where IBM stands on patent policy and what this means to those who rely on IBM for sheltering of Free/Open Source software (FOSS) or small businesses (SMEs) in a post-Alice era


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts