12.12.11

Gemini version available ♊︎

The Age of Speaking Out Against the Patent System

Posted in Law, Patents at 9:25 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

[written in 05/12/2011]

Courthouse

Summary: A few more examples of notable figures that grew tired of the patent system as it stands, especially in the United States

EARLY in the month Russia Today interviewed Richard Stallman. We saw some very good answers from Stallman, even to seemingly hostile questions.

One article which was written around the time of the interview concentrated on Stallman’s take on patents. To quote: “Muktware: Do you think USA is becoming hostile to innovation and competition as the companies like Apple and Microsoft are gaming the system?

“RMS: I have to point out that innovation is not my highest value. Human rights are my highest values. So I don’t to get into the dialogue that treats innovation as a primary goal.

“With software patents the US has become a dangerous place for software development, including innovative software development, because when a program is innovative, that means it has some new ideas in it. But it also has lots of well-known ideas in it. A large program combines thousands of ideas. So if you have some new ideas and you want to use them, in order to use them you have to combine them with a lot of other ideas that are well-known. And if you are not allowed to do that because those other ideas are patented, you can’t use your new idea.”

Stallman might be described as eccentric by some, but what about business people like Mark Shuttleworth? Well, he too holds a similar opinion on the US patent system, as noted here before. One article which was written about it says that the whole patent system is a sham, according to Shuttleworth. And for those who cry foul and say that patents are only disliked by ‘freeriders’, let us remember who Shuttleworth is:

Mark Shuttleworth is probably best known for three things. Selling the certificate authority Thawte Consulting to VeriSign for about $575 million in 1999; using some of that money to become the second self-funded space tourist; and using some more of it to found and sustain the Ubuntu version of GNU/Linux.

So here we have a rich businessman detesting patent. Even Bezos recently attested to a similar experience. The trend is telling.

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

Decor ᶃ Gemini Space

Below is a Web proxy. We recommend getting a Gemini client/browser.

Black/white/grey bullet button This post is also available in Gemini over at this address (requires a Gemini client/browser to open).

Decor ✐ Cross-references

Black/white/grey bullet button Pages that cross-reference this one, if any exist, are listed below or will be listed below over time.

Decor ▢ Respond and Discuss

Black/white/grey bullet button If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

9 Comments

  1. Michael said,

    December 13, 2011 at 12:36 am

    Gravatar

    Stallman, as is his norm, made a complete fool of himself and made it harder for true supporters of open source software. Here is the interview:

    Question:
    —–
    How does free software promote personal freedom?
    —–

    Stallman:
    ——
    Free software literally gives you freedom in the area of
    computing.
    ——

    Well, this is true to some extent – you should be free to select to use it or not. But then the loony goes on to talk about how it is a human right to use the software he approves of, as if you are going against human rights to use software *he* does not approve of. Completely idiotic.

    Stallman then makes it clear that his view of what software he approves is a “political” decision – not one based on intrinsic qualities of the software. As many who frequent this site and COLA know, and Stallman makes clear, “free” software is not about making people productive or making software as good as it can be, it is about politics and philosophy.

    Question:
    —–
    If free software is suddenly enforced on the world wouldn’t
    it cause a massive cash outflow from related industries and
    whole organizations.
    —–

    Stallman:
    —–
    Who cares?
    —–

    This is an easy question to answer! The people you want to convince to follow your whacked out cult! But Stallman goes on:
    —–
    What good is a so-called industry that is creating tools to
    subjugate people. I won’t use the non-free software at all.
    I dedicate my effort to getting away from it. So if they
    stopped making it that would be great. I wish they would. I
    hope for the day when they won’t make non-free software any
    more.
    —–

    This is where Stallman could have made it clear he supports *real* freedom and believes people should be able to make – and use – either software he approves of or not… that he would like to see the software he approves of gain in popularity and how he thinks that if people make this *choice* this would be a benefit.

    Instead he does not say a word against the idea of having his ideas “enforced on the world” and then talks about his own preferences and actions and how he wishes the world would comply. Who cares if he dedicates his effort to using software that is developed as he sees fit, comes with a blue theme, or does not have the letter “B” in its name? He can do whatever he wants. He can be free. By why push his desires on others.

    And his BS about how restricting choice somehow increases freedom is just absurd double-talk. When open source software serves me best, I use it. I am free to do so and I do. When closed source software serves me best I use that… assuming it is worth the price (if there is one… it can be free). Stallman misuses the term “free” and makes things up about how people would be more free if only they would restrict their choices as he does.

    Utterly insane. He is a miserable spokesperson for any movement.

    And then he completely contradicts himself:

    Stallman:
    —–
    What would I do to convince companies to use free software?
    I hope they will for their sake.
    —–

    For their sake? What? Just before this he was saying he did not care about their profitability. He cannot keep his story straight for 10 minutes!

    Then he makes another completely outrageous comment about using proprietary software and using illegal copies:
    —–
    An unauthorized copy is almost as nasty as an authorized copy. … If they pay the developer than makes it worse.
    —–

    What! Not only is he against people using software he does not approve of, but it is worse to follow reasonable morality than to not! It is *worse*, says Stallman, to be honest than to lie (at least in this area).

    Stallman is completely devoid of any sense of reasonable morality. And his cult followers worship this immorality. Just sickness.

    He insists people are evil for exercising their own freedom. And it takes away your freedom to exercise your freedom and make choices he does not like. Insanity. And many of the COLA herd follow this whacked out “leader”.

    At least in this interview he did not eat from his foot nor speak about his views of kids and sexuality. Still, what a repulsive man and immoral man Stallman is! The more I listen to his whacked out, cult-like babblings the more insane I realize he is.

    And the more against the open source movement I realize he and his followers are.

    phel Reply:

    Stallman consider commercial software immoral. From that pov it makes complete sense to claim that paying for a license is bad. The only companies which would have a problem in Stallman’s world are parasitic mega software-centric companies which the world would do much better without.

    Michael Reply:

    Stallman encourages using software in a dishonest and illegal way… this is not moral no matter how you try to twist it.

    phel Reply:

    _If_ commercial software is considered immoral, paying for it is no better than buying drugs or stolen goods.

    Michael Reply:

    So? Really… I do not see the point. Nobody is suggesting you should be required to pay for it. Don’t pay.

    But don’t be dishonest and immoral and use what you do not pay for (unless permitted, of course!)

    This is not complex. Stallman is advocating dishonesty and immoral behavior. He need not do this – he could just advocate using software he approves of and not that which he does not approve… and he can pick any criteria he wants. I am fine with that. If Stallman tomorrow suddenly declared all software with a green icon evil, his herd would follow him on that. No problems with me! Just don’t then say you should use such software without paying for it (outside of its license requirements).

    Got it?

    twitter Reply:

    I can’t wait till you get the bill for your posts here, Michael. I’ve got a portfolio of trolling patents. I won’t tell you what they cover, but paying up now will save you a lot of time and money.

    Michael Reply:

    Interesting how you have now admitted you and your group of cult-folks get paid to post your nonsense… but you have me confused with someone else if you think I will ever pay you a dime for your BS. Sure, you amuse me, but it is not like you are worth a cent.

    twitter Reply:

    I’m sorry, that was a joke. I was pretending to be Bill Gates or one of his flunkies.

    Michael Reply:

    Why would Bill Gates want people to pay him for posting here? No… you made it clear that your cult is paid to post here. Which is not surprising… after all, who would post the type of nonsense you do for free?

    :)

DecorWhat Else is New


  1. [Meme] EPO: Pursuing an Eastern and Western District of Europe (for Patent Trolls and Software Patents)

    With the EPO so flagrantly lying and paying for misinformation maybe we should expect Benoît Battistelli and António Campinos to have delusions of grandeur… such as presiding over the Eastern and Western District of Europe, just like Mr. Gilstrap and Mr. Albright (political appointment by Donald Trump, ushering in “the swamp”)



  2. Gemini at 2,000: 86% of Capsules Use Self-Signed Certificate, Just Like the Techrights Web Site (WWW)

    As shown in the charts above (updated an hour ago), the relative share of ‘Linux’ Foundation (LE/LF; same thing, same office) in the capsules’ certificates has decreased over time; more and more (in terms of proportion) capsules choose to sign their own certificate/s; the concept of ‘fake security’ (centralisation and consolidation) should be rejected universally because it leaves nobody safe except plutocrats



  3. [Meme] UPC: Many Lies as Headlines, Almost Exclusively in Publishers Sponsored by EPO and Team UPC to Produce Fake News (Lobbying Through Misinformation)

    Lest we forget that EPO dictators, like Pinky and the Brainless Benoît Battistelli and António Campinos, have long littered the EPO's official Web site as well as publishers not directly connected to the EPO (but funded by it) with disinformation about the UPC



  4. EPO as the 'Ministry of Truth' of Team UPC and Special Interests

    The 'Ministry of Truth' of the patent world is turning the EPO's Web site into a propaganda mill, a misinformation farm, and a laughing stock with stock photography



  5. Microsoft 'Delighted' by Windows 11 (Vista 11) Usage, Which is Only 1% Three Months After Official Launch and Six Months After Release Online

    Microsoft boosters such as Bogdan Popa and Mark Hachman work overtime on distraction from the failure Vista 11 has been (the share of Windows continues to fall relative to other platforms)



  6. Links 27/1/2022: Preinstalled GNU/Linux (Ubuntu) and Arch Linux-Powered Steam Deck 30 Days Away

    Links for the day



  7. Don't Fall for Microsoft's Spin That Says Everything is Not Secure and Cannot be Secured

    Microsoft keeps promoting the utterly false concept that everything is not secure and there's nothing that can be done about it (hence, might as well stay with Windows, whose insecurity is even intentional)



  8. At Long Last: 2,000 Known Gemini Capsules!

    The corporate media, looking to appease its major sponsors (such as Web/advertising giants), won't tell you that Gemini Protocol is rising very rapidly; its userbase and the tools available for users are rapidly improving while more and more groups, institutions and individuals set up their own capsule (equivalent of a Web site)



  9. Links 26/1/2022: Gamebuntu 1.0, PiGear Nano, and Much More

    Links for the day



  10. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, January 25, 2022

    IRC logs for Tuesday, January 25, 2022



  11. Links 26/1/2022: No ARM for Nvidia, End of EasyArch, and WordPress 5.9 is Out

    Links for the day



  12. Why the Unified Patent Court (UPC) is Still Just a Fantasy and the UPC's Fake News Mill Merely Discredits the Whole Patent 'Profession'

    Patents and science used to be connected; but now that the patent litigation 'sector' is hijacking patent offices (and even courts in places like Texas) it's trying to shove a Unified Patent Court (UPC) down the EU's throat under the disingenuous cover of "community" or "unity"



  13. Links 25/1/2022: Vulkan 1.3 Released, Kiwi TCMS 11.0, and antiX 19.5

    Links for the day



  14. Gemini Milestones and Growth (Almost 2,000 Known Gemini Servers Now, 39,000 Pages in Ours)

    The diaspora to Gemini Protocol or the transition to alternative 'webs' is underway; a linearly growing curve suggests that inertia/momentum is still there and we reap the benefits of early adoption of Gemini



  15. [Meme] Get Ready for Unified Patent Court (UPC) to be Taken to Court

    The Unified Patent Court (UPC) and Unitary Patent system that’s crafted to empower EPO thugs isn’t legal and isn’t constitutional either; even a thousand fake news 'articles' (deliberate misinformation or disinformation) cannot change the simple facts because CJEU isn’t “trial by media”



  16. The EPO Needs High-Calibre Examiners, Not Politicians Who Pretend to Understand Patents and Science

    Examiners are meant to obstruct fake patents or reject meritless patent applications; why is it that working conditions deteriorate for those who are intellectually equipped to do the job?



  17. Free Software is Greener

    Software Freedom is the only way to properly tackle environmental perils through reuse and recycling; the mainstream media never talks about it because it wants people to "consume" more and more products



  18. Links 25/1/2022: Git 2.35 and New openSUSE Hardware

    Links for the day



  19. IRC Proceedings: Monday, January 24, 2022

    IRC logs for Monday, January 24, 2022



  20. Links 25/1/2022: GPL Settlement With Patrick McHardy, Godot 4.0 Alpha 1, and DXVK 1.9.4 Released

    Links for the day



  21. Proprietary Software is Pollution

    "My daughter asked me about why are we throwing away some bits of technology," Dr. Andy Farnell says. "This is my attempt to put into words for "ordinary" people what I tried to explain to a 6 year old."



  22. Microsoft GitHub Exposé — Part XV — Cover-Up and Defamation

    Defamation of one’s victims might be another offence to add to the long list of offences committed by Microsoft’s Chief Architect of GitHub Copilot, Balabhadra (Alex) Graveley; attempting to discredit the police report is a new low and can get Mr. Graveley even deeper in trouble (Microsoft protecting him only makes matters worse)



  23. [Meme] Alexander Ramsay and Team UPC Inciting Politicians to Break the Law and Violate Constitutions, Based on Misinformation, Fake News, and Deliberate Lies Wrapped up as 'Studies'

    The EPO‘s law-breaking leadership (Benoît Battistelli, António Campinos and their corrupt cronies), helped by liars who don't enjoy diplomatic immunity, are cooperating to undermine courts across the EU, in effect replacing them with EPO puppets who are patent maximalists (Europe’s equivalents of James Rodney Gilstrap and Alan D Albright, a Donald Trump appointee, in the Eastern and Western Districts of Texas, respectively)



  24. Has the Administrative Council Belatedly Realised What Its Job in the European Patent Organisation Really Is?

    The "Mafia" which took over the EPO (the EPO's own workers call it "Mafia") isn't getting its way with a proposal, so it's preventing the states from even voting on it!



  25. [Meme] Team UPC is Celebrating a Pyrrhic Victory

    Pyrrhic victory best describes what's happening at the moment (it’s a lobbying tactic, faking/staging things to help false prophecies be fulfilled, based on hopes and wishes alone), for faking something without bothering to explain the legal basis is going to lead to further escalations and complaints (already impending)



  26. Links 24/1/2022: Scribus 1.5.8 and LXLE Reviewed

    Links for the day



  27. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, January 23, 2022

    IRC logs for Sunday, January 23, 2022



  28. [Meme] Team UPC Congratulating Itself

    The barrage of fake news and misinformation about the UPC deliberately leaves out all the obvious and very important facts; even the EPO‘s António Campinos and Breton (Benoît Battistelli‘s buddy) participated in the lying



  29. Links 24/1/2022: pgBadger 11.7 Released, Catch-up With Patents

    Links for the day



  30. The Demonisation and Stereotyping of Coders Not Working for Big Corporations (or 'The System')

    The war on encrypted communication (or secure communications) carries on despite a lack of evidence that encryption stands in the way of crime investigations (most criminals use none of it)


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts