EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

01.07.18

China’s Self-Destructive Patent Policy Will Replace Assembly Lines of Products With Assembly Lines of Low-Quality Patents and Lawsuits

Posted in Asia, Patents at 5:52 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Recent: No, China Isn’t Most Innovative, It’s Just Granting a Lot of Low-Quality Patents

China's trolls

Summary: China’s vision, as put forth by Xi Jinping (the General Secretary of the Communist Party of China and paramount leader of China), includes an unprecedented number of patents of notoriously low quality, missing the whole point of patents and neglecting to properly account for economic theories behind patents

THE Chinese patent system is a disgrace like nowhere else. SIPO is a production line or an assembly line of applications, matching perhaps the stereotypes or stigma associated with the country’s manufacturing industry. We wrote a great deal about the short-sightedness of this approach; it’ll jeopardise China’s economic leadership, except in the litigation space, which can in turn deter/discourage companies from operating there. It’s already happening; the writings are on the wall (data points).

“We wrote a great deal about the short-sightedness of this approach; it’ll jeopardise China’s economic leadership, except in the litigation space, which can in turn deter/discourage companies from operating there.”A few days ago (3rd of January 2018) we saw this new article by Hui Wang and Xu Li from Chofn Intellectual Property. Will China be wise enough to put an end to patents on GUI designs? China, as things stand at the moment, is probably the only large country that openly and broadly permits software patents. It became even more lenient on the matter several months ago (further revisions to the guidelines). Is code becoming patentable and if so, why would companies not shift all software development to India (where such patents are banned)? Does China really want this? Patents in China have gone so awfully out of control that some people pursue patents on GUIs. What benefit would workarounds have except confusing users (inconsistent interfaces)?

The parallel universe which is the patent trolls’ lobby loves China. It’s the new ‘darling’. For those who make a living out of litigation China is looking more and more like a paradise or greener pastures. Here’s one of them writing that “China invention patent applications reached nearly 1.4 million in 2017 – 14% year-on-year increase…”

“The parallel universe which is the patent trolls’ lobby loves China.”A worker of a patent troll wrote: “A massive number indeed. Let’s keep the “their quality is poor” rhetoric down…they will get better, faster with these kinds of numbers. The world should be on notice.”

To these people (trolls and their friends at IAM) all these patents are potential profit. At whose expense? Non-trolls. China’s patent bubble is going out of control. It spins out of reason. The Chinese press says this:

China made 1.38 million invention patent applications in 2017, a 14.2 percent increase year on year, an intellectual property official said here Thursday.

Of the total applications, 744,000 patents have been handled and concluded, said Shen Changyu, head of the State Intellectual Property Office, told a meeting attended by intellectual property officials from across the country.

To put things in perspective, 744,000 patents being handled in one single year is probably more than the rest of the world combined. How good an assessment can this possibly be? Does WIPO even care as long as it can boast “growth”? How many Mandarin-speaking examiners even properly assess patents from other countries in the process (at the very least in order to investigate prior art)? They probably just don’t care because this gold rush, which Xi actively encourages, is all about quantity, not about quality.

“To put things in perspective, 744,000 patents being handled in one single year is probably more than the rest of the world combined.”“Story also notes Shen Changyu, head of the State Intellectual Property Office, has urged strengthening of IP protection in China,” Managing IP wrote some days ago. They just try to impress the world with numbers, just like Battistelli. The quality does not seem to matter. Patent scope doesn’t matter either. Without speaking Mandarin it’s hard to scrutinise individual patents and considering weak protections for free speech in China do not expect a Mandarin equivalent of “Stupid Patent of the Month”.

Karry Lai, writing from Hong Kong for Managing IP, had this to say: (the headline states “China tipped for doubling in NPE [read: trolls] patent suits in 2018″)

Non-practicing entities [read: trolls] are looking to take advantage of China’s courts, with some predicting at least a doubling of NPE patent cases in 2018. But a number of factors act as deterrents in China, meaning plaintiffs need to know how to play the game

Misguided patent policy in China has made it the ‘new Texas’ — world’s emergent capital of patent trolls. NPE is just a euphemism and Managing IP is on their side. Why is China doing this to its otherwise blooming industry? Local firms already complain about trolls. They cause a lot of trouble for locals. We wrote several articles about that. They’re called not only “trolls” but also “cockroaches” and worse words. Chinese businessmen and businesswomen gradually come to grips with this relatively new menace.

“They’re called not only “trolls” but also “cockroaches” and worse words.”In some circles, China is nowadays becoming better known for patent litigation than for production/manufacturing (a shot in the foot, except for lawyers). Here’s what IAM wrote some days ago
:

The biggest contrast is in the damages sought. Baidu is asking the Beijing court for around $7.6 million plus legal costs, in addition to an order halting JingChi’s use of any misappropriated technology. This is not a small sum for China, where a recent World Trademark Review article pointed out that the norm in trade secrets cases is statutory damages amounting to less than Rmb 1 million ($154,000). But it pales in comparison with the amount that Waymo could be expected to recoup if it convinces a jury that Uber’s Ottomoto and Otto Trucking divisions were built on stolen technology. Given what’s at stake in China’s autonomous driving market, $7.6 million may not provide much of a deterrent to companies seeking to gain a technical edge and attract investment.

How many small firms can even shell out amounts like $7.6 million? Not many. What is China hoping to accomplish with such a transition to litigation (soaring at alarming rates in Beijing)?

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. Links 22/9/2019: KMyMoney 5.0.7, Lennart's Latest Plan

    Links for the day



  2. Summits of Open Bear Traps: The Open Core Summit and Other 'Open' Events That Actually Attack Software Freedom

    Conferences that call themselves "open" something are sometimes nothing but an attack on openness (not to mention freedom) and promotion of FUD about Free/Open Source software (FOSS); there's an ample set of examples to that effect



  3. Openwashing Report: 'Open Source' Without Any or Most of the Benefits

    The cheapening of the term "Open Source" continues; sooner or later everything out there will be called "open" irrespective of what it really is



  4. Patent Extremism is Not Normal and Not an Innocent Mindset

    Reflection upon the sad state of the European patent system and how media turns a blind eye to it; worldwide, in general, the discussion about patents is being warped by the litigation giants, whose sole goal is to maximise the number of lawsuits/shakedowns (personal gain)



  5. Links 22/9/2019: LLVM 9.0.0 and FreeBSD 12.1 Beta

    Links for the day



  6. Links 21/9/2019: Plasma 5.17 Beta in Kubuntu, Cockpit 203

    Links for the day



  7. IBM Cannot Become a True Friend of Free Software Because of Its Current Patent Policy

    IBM needs to quit bullying people/companies with software patents; that would help towards appeasement of IBM critics and sceptics



  8. When Patent 'Professionals' Sound Like Children Who Learned to Parrot Some Intentionally-Misleading Buzzwords, Myths and Lies

    With buzzwords like "AI" and misleading terms like "IP" the litigation zealots are trying to convince themselves (and the public) that software is a physical thing and a "property" which needs "protecting" from "theft"; it doesn't seem to bother these people that copyright law already covers software<



  9. The European Parliament Needs to Become More Outspoken About EPO Abuses

    There are few encouraging signs in Europe right now because the EPO's disregard for patent law (striving to just grant as many patents as possible) earned it much-needed backlash from the European Parliament



  10. Links 19/9/2019: German Federal Ministry of the Interior Wants FOSS, Top Snaps Named

    Links for the day



  11. Buying the Voices of 'Linux' People to Repeat Microsoft's Talking Points While Removing Our Icons and Leaders (Calling Them Sexist)

    The dirty games leveraged by several companies including Microsoft target charismatic people who are essential for morale and leadership; these tactics aren't particularly novel



  12. When the EPO Sees Itself as Above European Law, Grants Patents in Defiance of the EPC (Its Founding Document) and Violates Staff's Labour Rights/Protections (International Law)

    The absurd state of affairs at the EPO has reached the point where laws at every level are being violated and even judges are being threatened or vainly ignored; the EU is belatedly trying to tackle these issues, which have actually cost its credibility a great deal and threaten the perception of Rule of Law at multiple levels



  13. Links 19/9/2019: Samba 4.11.0 and Kubernetes 1.16

    Links for the day



  14. Update on Koch v EPO: Internal Appeals Committee (IAC) Composition Still Likely Illegal

    An important EPO case, concerning a dismissed staff representative, shows what ILO-AT and the EPO's Internal Appeals Committee boil down to



  15. Links 18/9/2019: Fedora Linux 31 Beta, PCLinuxOS 2019.09 Update

    Links for the day



  16. Links 17/9/2019: CentOS 7.7 and Funtoo Linux 1.4 Released

    Links for the day



  17. EPO is Not European

    Internationalists and patent trolls are those who stand to benefit from the 'globalisation' of low-quality and law-breaking patents such as patents on algorithms, nature and life itself; the EPO isn't equipped to serve its original goals anymore



  18. The EPO's Central Staff Committee and SUEPO (Staff Union) Respond to “Fascist Bills” Supported by EPO President António Campinos

    Raw material pertaining to the latest Campinos "scandal"; what Campinos said, what the Central Staff Committee (CSC) said, and what SUEPO said



  19. Storm Brewing in the European Patent Office After a Hot Summer

    Things aren't rosy in EPOnia (to say the least); in fact, things have been getting a lot worse lately, but the public wouldn't know judging by what media tells the public (almost nothing)



  20. Why I Once Called for Richard Stallman to Step Down

    Guest post from the developer who recently authored "Getting Stallman Wrong Means Getting The 21st Century Wrong"



  21. As Richard Stallman Resigns Let's Consider Why GNU/Linux Without Stallman and Torvalds Would be a Victory to Microsoft

    Stallman has been ejected after a lot of intentionally misleading press coverage; this is a dark day for Software Freedom



  22. Links 16/9/2019: GNU Linux-libre 5.3, GNU World Order 13×38, Vista 10 Breaks Itself Again

    Links for the day



  23. Links 16/9/2019: Qt Quick on Vulkan, Metal, and Direct3D; BlackWeb 1.2 Reviewed

    Links for the day



  24. Richard Stallman's Controversial Views Are Nothing New and They Distract From Bill Gates' Vastly Worse Role

    It's easier to attack Richard Stallman (RMS) using politics (than using his views on software) and media focus on Stallman's personal views on sexuality bears some resemblance to the push against Linus Torvalds, which leans largely on the false perception that he is sexist, rude and intolerant



  25. Links 16/9/2019: Linux 5.3, EasyOS Releases, Media Backlash Against RMS

    Links for the day



  26. Openwashing Report on Open Networking Foundation (ONF): When Open Source Means Collaboration Among Giant Spying Companies

    Massive telecommunications oligopolies (telecoms) are being described as ethical and responsible by means of openwashing; they even have their own front groups for that obscene mischaracterisation and ONF is one of those



  27. 'Open Source' You Cannot Run Without Renting or 'Licensing' Windows From Microsoft

    When so-called ‘open source’ programs strictly require Vista 10 (or similar) to run, how open are they really and does that not redefine the nature of Open Source while betraying everything Free/libre software stands for?



  28. All About Control: Microsoft is Not Open Source But an Open Source Censor/Spy and GitHub/LinkedIn/Skype Are Its Proprietary Censorship/Surveillance Tools

    All the big companies which Microsoft bought in recent years are proprietary software and all of the company’s big products remain proprietary software; all that “Open Source” is to Microsoft is “something to control and censor“



  29. The Sad State of GNU/Linux News Sites

    The ‘media coup’ of corporate giants (that claim to be 'friends') means that history of GNU/Linux is being distorted and lied about; it also explains prevalent lies such as "Microsoft loves Linux" and denial of GNU/Free software



  30. EPO President Along With Bristows, Managing IP and Other Team UPC Boosters Are Lobbying for Software Patents in Clear and Direct Violation of the EPC

    A calm interpretation of the latest wave of lobbying from litigation professionals, i.e. people who profit when there are lots of patent disputes and even expensive lawsuits which may be totally frivolous (for example, based upon fake patents that aren't EPC-compliant)


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts