EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

01.28.18

An Uphill Battle for Software Patents in the United States, Except When Catchphrases and Buzzwords Are Used

Posted in America, Patents at 1:51 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

20 Buzzwords you have to know in Artificial Intelligence
Reference: 20 Buzzwords you have to know in Artificial Intelligence

Summary: Barring or excepting misuse of buzzwords such as Artificial Intelligence, software patents have become incredibly hard to assert in the United States, albeit they’re possible to sneak past examiners and then license without any legal challenge

THIS summer, i.e. several months from now, Alice will turn four. The USPTO is still granting some software patents (that ought to have stopped), but the courts as well as PTAB barely tolerate any of that.

“The USPTO is still granting some software patents (that ought to have stopped), but the courts as well as PTAB barely tolerate any of that.”Watchtroll is still overtly promoting software patents, even in a so-called ‘webiner’. It’s like a front group. But worry not, they’re not getting their way.

One way remains to get software patents past examiners and sometimes judges too. It boils down to semantics; they just try to make software patents sound like something they’re not. They use all sorts of catchphrases and buzzwords — many of which we have named here before. That includes, more recently, artificial intelligence (AI).

“They use all sorts of catchphrases and buzzwords — many of which we have named here before. That includes, more recently, artificial intelligence (AI).”It has been particularly hard to overlook or ignore the “AI” buzzword (and media hype) this month. Everywhere one looks in the news — not just science news — it’s “AI”, “AI”, “AI”… it’s not even a new concept.

Wayne Ramsay, Chief Strategy Officer at Exigent, wrote about “AI” some days ago in relation to law firms. It’s time for law firms which neither understand “AI” nor care about “AI” to just say “AI” all the time:

Instead, alternative providers have taken a multifaceted approach to innovation: still applying the FTE billable hour model while slowly shifting to the faster, better quality, fixed-fee model enabled by Artificial Intelligence. [AI]

“We previously hypothesised and showed evidence for “AI” as a buzzword of choice for software patents, along with “machine learning” (ML) and other related terms.”All this hype about artificial intelligence has even reached IAM some days ago (“Patent search: the evolution from manual to artificial intelligence”), not to mention Lexology (“Artificial Intelligence: All Our Patent Are Belong to You 3.0″). This nearly sickening media hype around “Artificial Intelligence” (especially over the past month) is mystifying. Who is pushing this? The concept is many decades old. Why is it all of a sudden like the “next best thing”? We previously hypothesised and showed evidence for “AI” as a buzzword of choice for software patents, along with “machine learning” (ML) and other related terms. A lot of examiners might not be familiar with these concepts, which can make any old idea sound more novel/innovative. I actually implemented “AI” more than 15 years ago when I wrote game engines and wrote papers about machine learning about 15 years ago when working on my Ph.D. Even back then those things weren’t particularly cutting-edge. It’s statistics. It’s mathematics.

We kindly ask examiners as well as other readers not to be misled by buzzwords. They’re like fashion.

“We kindly ask examiners as well as other readers not to be misled by buzzwords. They’re like fashion.”Why does the US still grant some software patents on what’s clearly not eligible under Alice? A few days ago I saw this new press release about 4 newly-granted patents on computer vision (my research discipline). Do they really not know that it’s just mathematics (matrices)?

How about Walmart applying for a 3D image patent for online grocery? This too was in the news some days ago and again it’s computer vision, i.e. software/geometry. Stop granting monopolies on maths…

“As it’s a blanket/bulk licence, they might be paying for patents that aren’t even eligible.”To name one last example, Aterica licenses mMed patents [1, 2] on a “hardware and software platform,” which we assume means that some of these patents simply cover software. As it’s a blanket/bulk licence, they might be paying for patents that aren’t even eligible. This kind of bundling of decent patents with dubious ones has become so common. It’s one way to drive up the price of licensing or litigation (for instance, suing or threatening to sue a company with 100 patents, only a handful of which are decent). Patent maximalism is quite a disease and it’s antithetical to the theory of incentive.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. USPTO and EPO Both Slammed for Abandoning Patent Quality and Violating the Law/Caselaw in Order to Grant Illegitimate Patents on Life/Nature and Mathematics

    Mr. Iancu, the ‘American Battistelli’ (appointed owing to nepotism), mirrors the ‘Battistelli operandi’, which boils down to treating judges like they’re stooges and justices like an ignorable nuisance — all this in the name of litigation profits, which necessitate constant wars over illegitimate patents (it is expensive to prove their illegitimacy)



  2. IRC Proceedings: January 27th, 2019 – March 24th, 2019

    Many IRC logs



  3. IRC Proceedings: December 2nd, 2018 – January 26th, 2019

    Many IRC logs



  4. Links 21/4/2019: SuperTuxKart's 1.0 Release, Sam Hartman Is Debian’s Newest Project Leader (DPL)

    Links for the day



  5. The EPO's Use of Phrases Like “High-Quality Patent Services” Means They Know High-Quality European Patents Are 'Bygones'

    The EPO does a really poor job hiding the fact that its last remaining objective is to grant as many European Patents as possible (and as fast as possible), conveniently conflating quality with pace



  6. A Reader's Suggestion: Directions for Techrights

    Guest post by figosdev



  7. Links 20/4/2019: Weblate 3.6 and Pop!_OS 19.04

    Links for the day



  8. The Likes of Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys (CIPA), Team Campinos and Team UPC Don't Represent Europe But Hurt Europe

    The abject disinterest in patent quality and patent validity (as judged by courts) threatens Europe but not to the detriment of those who are in the 'business' of suing and printing lots of worthless patents



  9. The Linux Foundation Needs to Change Course Before GNU/Linux (as a Free Operating System) is Dead

    The issues associated with the Linux Foundation are not entirely new; but Linux now incorporates so many restrictions and contains so many binary blobs that one begins to wonder what "Linux" even means



  10. Largest Patent Offices Try to Leave Courts in a State of Disarray to Enable the Granting of Fake Patents in the US and Europe

    Like a monarchy that effectively runs all branches of government the management of the EPO is trying to work around the judiciary; the same is increasingly happening (or at least attempted) in the United States



  11. Links 19/4/2019: PyPy 7.1.1, LabPlot 2.6, Kipi Plugins 5.9.1 Released

    Links for the day



  12. Links 18/4/2019: Ubuntu and Derivatives Have Releases, digiKam 6.1.0, OpenSSH 8.0 and LibreOffice 6.2.3

    Links for the day



  13. Freedom is Not a Business and Those Who Make 'Business' by Giving it Away Deserve Naming

    Free software is being parceled and sold to private monopolisers; those who facilitate the process enrich themselves and pose a growing threat to freedom in general — a subject we intend to tackle in the near future



  14. Concluding the Linux Foundation (LF) “Putting the CON in Conference!” (Part 3)

    Conferences constructed or put together based on payments rather than merit pose a risk to the freedom of free software; we conclude our series about events set up by the largest of culprits, which profits from this erosion of freedom



  15. “Mention the War” (of Microsoft Against GNU/Linux)

    The GNU/Linux desktop (or laptops) seems to be languishing or deteriorating, making way for proprietary takeover in the form of Vista 10 and Chrome OS and “web apps” (surveillance); nobody seems too bothered — certainly not the Linux Foundation — by the fact that GNU/Linux itself is being relegated or demoted to a mere “app” on these surveillance platforms (WSL, Croûton and so on)



  16. The European Patent Office Does Not Care About the Law, Today's Management Constantly Attempts to Bypass the Law

    Many EPs (European Patents) are actually "IPs" (invalid patents); the EPO doesn't seem to care and it is again paying for corrupt scholars to toe the party line



  17. The US Supreme Court (SCOTUS) Once Again Pours Cold Water on Patent Maximalists

    Any hopes of a rebound or turnaround have just been shattered because a bizarre attack on the appeal process (misusing tribal immunity) fell on deaf ears and software patents definitely don't interest the highest court, which already deemed them invalid half a decade ago



  18. Links 17/4/2019: Qt 5.12.3 Released, Ola Bini Arrested (Political Stunts)

    Links for the day



  19. Links 16/4/2019: CentOS Turns 15, Qt Creator 4.9.0 Released

    Links for the day



  20. GNU/Linux is Being Eaten Alive by Large Corporations With Their Agenda

    A sort of corporate takeover, or moneyed interests at the expense of our freedom, can be seen as a 'soft coup' whose eventual outcome would involve all or most servers in 'the cloud' (surveillance with patent tax as part of the rental fees) and almost no laptops/desktops which aren't remotely controlled (and limit what's run on them, using something like UEFI 'secure boot')



  21. Reader's Claim That Rules Similar to the Code of Conduct (CoC) Were 'Imposed' on LibrePlanet and the FSF

    Restrictions on speech are said to have been spread and reached some of the most liberal circles, according to a credible veteran who opposes illiberal censorship



  22. Corporate Media Will Never Cover the EPO's Violations of the Law With Respect to Patent Scope

    The greed-driven gold rush for patents has resulted in a large pool of European Patents that have no legitimacy and are nowadays associated with low legal certainty; the media isn't interested in covering such a monumental disaster that poses a threat to the whole of Europe



  23. A Linux Foundation Run by People Who Reject Linux is Like a Children's Charity Whose Management Dislikes Children

    We remain concerned about the lack of commitment that the Linux Foundation has for Linux; much of the Linux Foundation's Board, for example, comes from hostile companies



  24. Links 15/4/2019: Linux 5.1 RC5 and SolydXK Reviewed

    Links for the day



  25. Links 14/4/2019: Blender 2.80 Release Plan and Ducktype 1.0

    Links for the day



  26. 'Poor' (Multi-Millionaire) Novell CEO, Who Colluded With Steve Ballmer Against GNU/Linux, is Trying to Censor Techrights

    Novell’s last CEO, a former IBMer who just like IBM decided to leverage software patents against the competition (threatening loads of companies using "platoons of patent lawyers"), has decided that siccing lawyers at us would be a good idea



  27. Guest Post: The Linux Foundation (LF) is “Putting the CON in Conference!” (Part 2)

    Calls for papers (CfP) and who gets to assess what's presented or what's not presented is a lesser-explored aspect, especially in this age when large corporate sponsors get to indirectly run entire 'community' events



  28. Patent Maximalists Are Enabling Injustices and Frauds

    It's time to come to grips with the simple fact that extreme patent lenience causes society to suffer and is mostly beneficial to bad actors; for the patent profession to maintain a level of credibility and legitimacy it must reject the deplorable, condemnable zealots



  29. Further Decreasing Focus on Software Patents in the United States as They Barely Exist in Valid Form Anymore

    No headway made after almost 4 months of Iancu-led stunts; software patents remain largely dead and buried, so we’re moving on to other topics



  30. Links 13/4/2019: Wine 4.6 and Emacs 26.2 Released

    Links for the day


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts